Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
25
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.7.1
Dataset results
25 results for “ovariole number”
Fig. 53 in Eggs, Ovariole Numbers, and Modes of Parasitism of Cleptoparasitic Bees, with Emphasis on Neotropical Species (Hymenoptera: Apoidea)
Fig. 53. Eggs of some cleptoparasitic bees from some of my recent publications, all reproduced in the same scale to illustrate the often complex shape of those that are hidden in open cells (above horizontal line) and the simple elongate shapes of those that are introduced into closed cells (below horizontal line). The size difference between the oocytes in these two categories is noteworthy, but is best analyzed in terms of oocyte length compared with body size of the female, i.e., the egg index; see Analyses and Results, subsection Size of Mature Oocytes.
Figs. 43, 44 in Eggs, Ovariole Numbers, and Modes of Parasitism of Cleptoparasitic Bees, with Emphasis on Neotropical Species (Hymenoptera: Apoidea)
Figs. 43, 44. SEM micrographs of mature oocyte of Ericrocis lata. 43. Anterior end with micropylar area barely visible just below follicular debris; note smooth, platelike, polygonal patterning on outcurved (upper) surface and nodular patterning on incurved surface. 44. Midbody, showing platelike surface on outcurved surface changing to nodular patterning on incurved surface, lateral view.
Figs. 30, 31 in Eggs, Ovariole Numbers, and Modes of Parasitism of Cleptoparasitic Bees, with Emphasis on Neotropical Species (Hymenoptera: Apoidea)
Figs. 30, 31. SEM micrographs of mature oocyte of Rhathymus bicolor. 30. Micropylar area. 31. Polygonal pattern just below micropyle on incurved side.
Fig. 29 in Eggs, Ovariole Numbers, and Modes of Parasitism of Cleptoparasitic Bees, with Emphasis on Neotropical Species (Hymenoptera: Apoidea)
Fig. 29. Diagrams of mature oocytes of (from top to bottom) Rhathymus bicolor, Rhathymus species A, and Epiclopus gayi, lateral views, anterior ends to the left. Scale line (= 1.0 mm) refers to all figures.
Figs. 16–19 in Eggs, Ovariole Numbers, and Modes of Parasitism of Cleptoparasitic Bees, with Emphasis on Neotropical Species (Hymenoptera: Apoidea)
Figs. 16–19. SEM micrographs of operculum of mature oocyte of Leiopodus abnormis. 16. Late stage, anterodorsal view. 17. Closeup of micropyle; note opercular rim causing micropyle to be recessed. 18. Early stage mature oocyte, with tubercles starting to be deposited, rim thin, and micropyle exposed (except for follicular debris appearing to divide it) anterodorsal view. 19. Intermediatestage mature oocyte, with tubercles partly developed and micropyle becoming recessed by rim, posterodorsal view.
Figs. 13–15 in Eggs, Ovariole Numbers, and Modes of Parasitism of Cleptoparasitic Bees, with Emphasis on Neotropical Species (Hymenoptera: Apoidea)
Figs. 13–15. SEM micrographs of mature oocyte of Melectoides triseriatus, anterior end toward left. 13. Entire oocyte, dorsal view. 14. Closeup of micropylar area as outlined by rectangle in fig. 13. 15. Entire oocyte, lateral view.
Figs. 58–61 in Eggs, Ovariole Numbers, and Modes of Parasitism of Cleptoparasitic Bees, with Emphasis on Neotropical Species (Hymenoptera: Apoidea)
Figs. 58–61. SEM micrographs of mature oocyte of Coelioxys novomexicana. 58. Entire oocyte, ventral view; anterior end toward the left. 59. Anterior end, frontal view. 60. Closeup of micropylar area; absence of strongly raised polygonal boundaries below unexplained but possibly due to dissection damage. 61. Closeup of micropyle.
Fig. 10 in Eggs, Ovariole Numbers, and Modes of Parasitism of Cleptoparasitic Bees, with Emphasis on Neotropical Species (Hymenoptera: Apoidea)
Fig. 10. Diagrams of mature oocytes of Isepeolus luctuosus (above) and Melectoides triseriatus (below), anterior ends toward left. Scale line refers to both.
Figs. 11, 12 in Eggs, Ovariole Numbers, and Modes of Parasitism of Cleptoparasitic Bees, with Emphasis on Neotropical Species (Hymenoptera: Apoidea)
Figs. 11, 12. SEM micrographs of anterior end of mature oocyte of Isepeolus luctuosus. 11. Dorsal view; note polygonal pattern of eclosion line anterior to micropyle. 12. Closeup of micropyle.
Figs. 1–4 in Eggs, Ovariole Numbers, and Modes of Parasitism of Cleptoparasitic Bees, with Emphasis on Neotropical Species (Hymenoptera: Apoidea)
Figs. 1–4. SEM micrographs of mature oocytes of Kelita toroi. 1. Entire oocyte, lateral view, anterior end toward left; apparent longitudinal ridge along top an artifact presumably created by criticalpoint drying. 2. Closeup of micropylar process outlined by rectangle in fig. 1. 3. Entire oocyte, dorsal view. 4. Closeup of micropylar process outlined by rectangle in fig. 3.
Figs. 25–28 in Eggs, Ovariole Numbers, and Modes of Parasitism of Cleptoparasitic Bees, with Emphasis on Neotropical Species (Hymenoptera: Apoidea)
Figs. 25–28. SEM micrographs of mature oocyte of Leiopodus trochantericus. 25. Entire latestage oocyte (except for posterior tip), dorsolateral view; note uneven dorsal chorion behind operculum. 26. Posterior part of earlystage oocyte, dorsolateral view, with dorsal chorion nearly smooth and strong polygonal pattern at posterior end. 27. Intermediatestage mature oocyte, nearly dorsal view, with dorsal chorion becoming uneven. 28. Closeup of micropylar area identified by rectangle in fig. 27.
Fig. 9 in Eggs, Ovariole Numbers, and Modes of Parasitism of Cleptoparasitic Bees, with Emphasis on Neotropical Species (Hymenoptera: Apoidea)
Fig. 9. Macrophotograph of egg of Isepeolus luctuosus attached to cellophanelike lining of host cell. Egg presumably killed by first instar of another individual.
Figs. 37–42 in Eggs, Ovariole Numbers, and Modes of Parasitism of Cleptoparasitic Bees, with Emphasis on Neotropical Species (Hymenoptera: Apoidea)
Figs. 37–42. SEM micrographs of mature oocyte of Epiclopus gayi. 37. Anterior end. 38. Closeup of micropylar area defined by rectangle in fig. 37. 39. Midbody, showing smooth, platelike polygons defined by incised borders on outcurved (upper) surface and nodular patterning of incurved surface, lateral view. 40. Closeup of outcurved surface in rectangle in fig. 39. 41. Closeup of nodular surface at midbody. 42. Closeup of nodular surface near posterior end.
Figs. 32–36 in Eggs, Ovariole Numbers, and Modes of Parasitism of Cleptoparasitic Bees, with Emphasis on Neotropical Species (Hymenoptera: Apoidea)
Figs. 32–36. SEM micrographs of mature oocyte of Rhathymus species A. 32. Entire oocyte, incurved surface. 33. Closeup of micropylar area identified by rectangle in fig. 32. 34. Anterior end of oocyte of another specimen showing small elevation at anterior pole. 35. Closeup of rectangle in fig. 34, showing micropyle just above elevation. 36. Chorionic patterning at midbody.
Fig. 51 in Eggs, Ovariole Numbers, and Modes of Parasitism of Cleptoparasitic Bees, with Emphasis on Neotropical Species (Hymenoptera: Apoidea)
Fig. 51. SEM micrograph of anterior end of mature oocyte of Exaerete smaragdina showing multipored micropylar cluster and polygons with raised borders radiating from it.
Figs. 20–24 in Eggs, Ovariole Numbers, and Modes of Parasitism of Cleptoparasitic Bees, with Emphasis on Neotropical Species (Hymenoptera: Apoidea)
Figs. 20–24. SEM micrographs of mature oocyte of Leiopodus lacertinus. 20. Entire oocyte, lateral view. 21. Closeup of hooked ventral chorion projections in rectangle in fig. 20. 22. Anterior end of oocyte, dorsolateral view, showing smooth operculum and position of micropyle, of presumed latestage mature oocyte. 23. Micropyle of presumed latestage oocyte with most pores closed by debris, frontal view. 24. Anterior end of oocyte, dorsolateral view, showing polygonal pattern suggesting that this is an earlystage mature oocyte.
Fig. 52 in Eggs, Ovariole Numbers, and Modes of Parasitism of Cleptoparasitic Bees, with Emphasis on Neotropical Species (Hymenoptera: Apoidea)
Fig. 52. Comparison frequency distributions for oocyte size (egg index) of cleptoparasitic bees that secrete their eggs in open host cells (dark outline), of those that introduce their eggs into cells that have already been sealed by the host (hatched), and of noneusocial, nonparasitic bees (gray). For further details, see text.
Figs. 45–50 in Eggs, Ovariole Numbers, and Modes of Parasitism of Cleptoparasitic Bees, with Emphasis on Neotropical Species (Hymenoptera: Apoidea)
Figs. 45–50. SEM micrographs of mature oocyte of Mesoplia rufipes. 45. Anterior end, frontal view. 46. Closeup of micropylar area showing plumelike sculpturing below micropyle. 47. Closeup of micropyle; note some pores filled with follicular debris. 48. Posterior end of oocyte, lateral view. 49. Closeup of chorion toward posterior end. 50. Closeup of chorion near anterior end showing incised, polygonal pattern with one or two nodules per polygon.
Fig. 57 in Eggs, Ovariole Numbers, and Modes of Parasitism of Cleptoparasitic Bees, with Emphasis on Neotropical Species (Hymenoptera: Apoidea)
Fig. 57. Diagrams of mature oocyte of Coelioxys novomexicana, lateral and dorsal/ventral views, respectively; anterior ends toward the left; position of micropyle as noted.
Fig. 54 in Eggs, Ovariole Numbers, and Modes of Parasitism of Cleptoparasitic Bees, with Emphasis on Neotropical Species (Hymenoptera: Apoidea)
Fig. 54. Cladogram showing bee phylogeny upon which has been plotted the cleptoparasitic taxa that oviposit into nest cells that have not yet been closed by the host female (O) and the cleptoparasitic taxa that oviposit in nest cells that had been closed by the host female (•). Genera of cleptoparasites appear beneath the higher taxon to which they belong. If no generic name is listed beneath a cleptoparasitic taxon, all included genera are assumed to be cleptoparasitic with the same mode of parasitism. For discussion, see text. Cladogram modified from Engel (2001) and Michener (2000).
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.