Updated for 2026

ToxTrac Alternatives
Best Behavioral Tracking Software 2026

An objective, feature-by-feature comparison to help you choose the right behavioral tracking platform for your lab.

ConductVision

Conduct Science
100

Feature Score

  • 30+ fps tracking
  • 11 body points
  • 13+ species
  • 12 study modules
  • 15+ maze paradigms
VS

ToxTrac

Open Source
29

Feature Score

  • 15–30 fps tracking
  • Custom body points
  • 3 species
  • 2 study modules
  • 2 maze paradigms

Behavioral Research Needs Are Evolving

In 2026, behavioral neuroscience demands more than simple centroid tracking. Modern experiments require higher frame rates, markerless pose estimation, multi-animal tracking, and AI-driven precision — capabilities that legacy platforms were never designed to deliver.

ToxTrac by Open Source has served the research community since 2018, but researchers increasingly report limitations in speed, flexibility, and analytical depth. Here's how the current landscape compares.

Feature-by-Feature Comparison

FeatureConductVisionRecommendedToxTrac
Tracking
Tracking MethodAI Markerless (Pose Estimation)Contour-based
Frame Rate30+ fps15–30 fps
Body Points Tracked11None
Pose Estimation✓✗
Real-time Tracking✓✗
3D Tracking✓✗
Analysis
Multi-animal TrackingUnlimitedUp to ~10
Social Interaction✓✗
Zone Analysis✓✓
Batch Processing✓✗
Cloud Processing✓✗
Usability
Coding Required✓✓
Species Supported13+3
Study Type Modules122
Maze Compatibility15+2
Trial Available✓✗
#1

ConductVision (by Conduct Science)

The Most Advanced AI-Powered Behavioral Tracking Platform

  • AI-powered markerless tracking with 11-point pose estimation
  • 30+ fps frame rate for high-speed behavioral capture
  • Multi-species support across 13+ species out of the box
  • 12+ study type modules covering social, maze, locomotor, and more
  • Batch video processing for high-throughput experiments
  • No coding or machine learning expertise required
  • Compatible with 15+ standard behavioral paradigms
  • IR and visible light camera support
  • Real-time tracking with live visualization
  • Cloud processing for resource-intensive analyses
Species: Mouse, Rat, Zebrafish, Drosophila, C. elegans, Non-human Primates, Birds, Dogs, Cats, Cattle, Pigs, Insects, Aquatic Invertebrates
Study Types: Social Interaction, Maze Navigation, Locomotor Activity, Multi-species, Anxiety & Fear, Memory & Learning, Grooming & Stereotypy, Gait Analysis, Sleep/Wake, Feeding & Drinking, Pain Assessment, Seizure Detection
Maze Paradigms: Open Field, Elevated Plus Maze, Morris Water Maze, Barnes Maze, T-Maze, Y-Maze, Radial Arm Maze, Fear Conditioning, Forced Swim, Tail Suspension, Light/Dark Box, Social Interaction Chamber, Novel Object Recognition, Rotarod, Beam Walk
Output Formats: CSV, Excel, JSON, PDF Reports, Video Overlay
Camera Support: IR (Infrared), Visible Light, USB, GigE, Depth Cameras
Pricing: Competitive — Per-seat, annual or perpetual
Support: 24/7 email + live chat + dedicated onboarding

Best for: Any lab seeking AI-powered, scalable behavioral tracking without coding requirements — from single-animal maze studies to multi-species social interaction research.

Explore ConductVision
#2

ToxTrac (by Open Source)

Free Lightweight Tool for Simple Locomotion

Strengths

  • Completely free and open-source
  • Lightweight — runs on modest hardware
  • Simple interface for basic locomotion tracking
  • Good for zebrafish/drosophila locomotion assays

Limitations

  • Contour-based only — no posture or body-part detection
  • No social interaction analysis
  • No aquatic-specific paradigms beyond basic locomotion
  • Limited to simple experimental setups
  • Project appears unmaintained since 2020
  • No dedicated support — community-only
  • Cannot handle complex backgrounds or occluded animals
  • No built-in statistical or behavioral reporting
Species: Zebrafish, Drosophila, Small aquatic organisms
Study Types: Locomotor Activity, Toxicology screening
Pricing: Free
Support: GitHub issues only

Best for: Students or tight-budget labs running basic zebrafish locomotion screens

Other Behavioral Tracking Alternatives

#3

ANY-maze

Stoelting Co.

Reliable but Becoming Outpaced

6–8 fpsCustom body ptsMid-range (~$3,000–$6,000)
Full Comparison →
#4

EthoVision XT

Noldus Information Technology

Powerful but High Complexity and Cost

25–30 fps3 body ptsPremium ($10,000–$25,000+)
Full Comparison →
#5

DeepLabCut

Mathis Lab (Open Source)

Powerful Pose Estimation with High Barriers to Entry

15–120 (GPU dependent) fpsCustom (user-defined) body ptsFree (but requires GPU hardware + engineering time)
Full Comparison →
#6

SMART 3.0

Panlab / Harvard Bioscience

Legacy Platform with Limited Modern Capabilities

25 fps1 body ptsMid-range (~$4,000–$8,000)
Full Comparison →
#7

Bonsai

NeuroGEARS (Open Source)

Flexible Visual Programming but Steep Integration Curve

Hardware dependent fpsCustom body ptsFree
Full Comparison →

ConductVision — A True Step Forward in 2026

With 11-point AI pose estimation, 30++ fps tracking, 13+ species support, and 12 analysis modules, ConductVision delivers the precision, versatility, and simplicity that modern behavioral research demands — no coding required.

Learn More About ConductVisionRequest a Demo

References

  1. ConductVision — conductscience.com/conductvision
  2. ToxTrac — toxtrac.com
  3. Mathis, A., et al. (2018). DeepLabCut: markerless pose estimation. Nature Neuroscience, 21, 1281–1289.

Built for scientists. Trusted by researchers. Powered by Conduct Science.