Social Dominance Tube Test

Overview

The social dominance tube test is a widely used assay for determining hierarchical rank among cage-mate rodents by exploiting competitive behavior in a narrow transparent tube that permits only single-file passage. Two mice are placed at opposite ends of a tube (typically 30 cm long, 3.5 cm inner diameter for mice) and released simultaneously. Because the tube is too narrow for the animals to pass each other, one mouse must retreat by walking backward, and the mouse that forces the other to withdraw is designated the winner of that bout. The test is completed in a round-robin fashion across all unique dyadic pairings within a cage, generating a complete dominance matrix from which individual rank can be computed.

The primary outcome is the win percentage for each animal across all pairings, which reliably maps onto stable social hierarchies validated by other measures such as barbering patterns, urine marking, and resource competition assays. Additional metrics include retreat latency (time from meeting in the tube to the loser beginning backward movement), the number of push-back events where the eventual loser momentarily advances before ultimately retreating, and total bout duration. The tube test is sensitive to manipulations of medial prefrontal cortex function, as optogenetic activation of mPFC pyramidal neurons in subordinate mice can acutely reverse dominance outcomes, demonstrating the neural specificity of this behavioral readout.

ConductMaze provides a dedicated tube test module that uses lateral-view camera tracking to monitor both animals from introduction through resolution of each bout. The system automatically detects the moment the two mice meet inside the tube, identifies forward versus backward locomotion for each individual using directional body-axis analysis, and logs the retreat event as the decisive outcome. Automated round-robin scheduling generates the optimal pairing order for each cage, computes Elo ratings or David scores from the resulting win-loss matrix, and produces hierarchy stability metrics across repeated testing sessions.

Trial Flow

start

Tube Preparation

Clean tube with 70% ethanol; verify inner diameter is appropriate for species and no obstructions exist

input

Dyad Selection

Select the next cage-mate pair according to round-robin schedule; one enters from each end

input

Simultaneous Release

Release both mice into the tube simultaneously from holding chambers at opposite ends

process

Approach Phase

Both mice walk forward through the tube until they meet and make physical contact

process

Contest Phase

Mice engage in pushing contest; monitor for forward advances and backward retreats

decision

Winner Determination

The mouse that forces the opponent to retreat completely out of the tube end is declared the winner

output

Result Logging

Record winner, loser, bout duration, retreat latency, and push-back events for the dyad

end

Matrix Computation

After all pairings complete, compute dominance rankings using David scores or Elo ratings

Parameters

ParameterTypeDefaultDescription
Tube Lengthdistance30.0Total length of the transparent tube in centimeters
Tube Inner Diameterdistance3.5Inner diameter of the tube in centimeters (3.5 cm for mice, 6.0 cm for rats)
Maximum Bout Durationduration120Maximum allowed bout time before trial is declared a draw in seconds
Cage Sizeinteger4Number of cage-mates to be tested in the round-robin
Trials Per Dyadinteger3Number of repeated bouts per unique pair for reliability
Inter-Bout Intervalduration300Minimum rest period between consecutive bouts for the same animal in seconds
Side CounterbalanceenumalternatingStrategy for assigning tube entry side across repeated trials
Ranking Algorithmenumdavid-scoreHierarchy computation method: david-score, elo-rating, or win-percentage

Metrics

MetricUnitDescription
Win Percentage%Percentage of bouts won across all dyadic pairings
Dominance RankordinalHierarchical rank within cage derived from the win-loss matrix (1 = most dominant)
David ScorescoreNormalized dominance score accounting for opponent strength
Bout DurationsecondsMean time from tube meeting to retreat completion per bout
Retreat LatencysecondsTime from initial contact to the start of backward movement by the loser
Push-Back EventscountNumber of momentary forward advances by the eventual loser during the contest
Hierarchy LinearityindexLandau linearity index (h-prime) for the cage dominance matrix (0-1 scale)

Sample Data

SubjectGenotypeWin %David ScoreRankMean Bout Duration (s)Push-BacksRetreat Latency (s)

Representative data for illustration purposes. Actual values will vary by species, strain, and experimental conditions.

Applications

  • 1
    Social hierarchy mappingdetermining stable dominance ranks within cage groups for stratified experimental assignment
  • 2
    Prefrontal cortex functionassessing mPFC lesions, optogenetic manipulations, and chemogenetic silencing on social dominance
  • 3
    Chronic stress effectsmeasuring hierarchy shifts following chronic social defeat or unpredictable stress paradigms
  • 4
    Pharmacological modulationevaluating serotonergic and dopaminergic compounds that alter competitive social behavior

Ready to Automate Your Behavioral Protocols?

Contact us for a demo and pricing information.