Social Dominance Tube Test
Overview
The social dominance tube test is a widely used assay for determining hierarchical rank among cage-mate rodents by exploiting competitive behavior in a narrow transparent tube that permits only single-file passage. Two mice are placed at opposite ends of a tube (typically 30 cm long, 3.5 cm inner diameter for mice) and released simultaneously. Because the tube is too narrow for the animals to pass each other, one mouse must retreat by walking backward, and the mouse that forces the other to withdraw is designated the winner of that bout. The test is completed in a round-robin fashion across all unique dyadic pairings within a cage, generating a complete dominance matrix from which individual rank can be computed.
The primary outcome is the win percentage for each animal across all pairings, which reliably maps onto stable social hierarchies validated by other measures such as barbering patterns, urine marking, and resource competition assays. Additional metrics include retreat latency (time from meeting in the tube to the loser beginning backward movement), the number of push-back events where the eventual loser momentarily advances before ultimately retreating, and total bout duration. The tube test is sensitive to manipulations of medial prefrontal cortex function, as optogenetic activation of mPFC pyramidal neurons in subordinate mice can acutely reverse dominance outcomes, demonstrating the neural specificity of this behavioral readout.
ConductMaze provides a dedicated tube test module that uses lateral-view camera tracking to monitor both animals from introduction through resolution of each bout. The system automatically detects the moment the two mice meet inside the tube, identifies forward versus backward locomotion for each individual using directional body-axis analysis, and logs the retreat event as the decisive outcome. Automated round-robin scheduling generates the optimal pairing order for each cage, computes Elo ratings or David scores from the resulting win-loss matrix, and produces hierarchy stability metrics across repeated testing sessions.
Trial Flow
Tube Preparation
Clean tube with 70% ethanol; verify inner diameter is appropriate for species and no obstructions exist
Dyad Selection
Select the next cage-mate pair according to round-robin schedule; one enters from each end
Simultaneous Release
Release both mice into the tube simultaneously from holding chambers at opposite ends
Approach Phase
Both mice walk forward through the tube until they meet and make physical contact
Contest Phase
Mice engage in pushing contest; monitor for forward advances and backward retreats
Winner Determination
The mouse that forces the opponent to retreat completely out of the tube end is declared the winner
Result Logging
Record winner, loser, bout duration, retreat latency, and push-back events for the dyad
Matrix Computation
After all pairings complete, compute dominance rankings using David scores or Elo ratings
Parameters
| Parameter | Type | Default | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tube Length | distance | 30.0 | Total length of the transparent tube in centimeters |
| Tube Inner Diameter | distance | 3.5 | Inner diameter of the tube in centimeters (3.5 cm for mice, 6.0 cm for rats) |
| Maximum Bout Duration | duration | 120 | Maximum allowed bout time before trial is declared a draw in seconds |
| Cage Size | integer | 4 | Number of cage-mates to be tested in the round-robin |
| Trials Per Dyad | integer | 3 | Number of repeated bouts per unique pair for reliability |
| Inter-Bout Interval | duration | 300 | Minimum rest period between consecutive bouts for the same animal in seconds |
| Side Counterbalance | enum | alternating | Strategy for assigning tube entry side across repeated trials |
| Ranking Algorithm | enum | david-score | Hierarchy computation method: david-score, elo-rating, or win-percentage |
Metrics
| Metric | Unit | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Win Percentage | % | Percentage of bouts won across all dyadic pairings |
| Dominance Rank | ordinal | Hierarchical rank within cage derived from the win-loss matrix (1 = most dominant) |
| David Score | score | Normalized dominance score accounting for opponent strength |
| Bout Duration | seconds | Mean time from tube meeting to retreat completion per bout |
| Retreat Latency | seconds | Time from initial contact to the start of backward movement by the loser |
| Push-Back Events | count | Number of momentary forward advances by the eventual loser during the contest |
| Hierarchy Linearity | index | Landau linearity index (h-prime) for the cage dominance matrix (0-1 scale) |
Sample Data
| Subject | Genotype | Win % | David Score | Rank | Mean Bout Duration (s) | Push-Backs | Retreat Latency (s) |
|---|
Representative data for illustration purposes. Actual values will vary by species, strain, and experimental conditions.
Applications
- 1Social hierarchy mapping — determining stable dominance ranks within cage groups for stratified experimental assignment
- 2Prefrontal cortex function — assessing mPFC lesions, optogenetic manipulations, and chemogenetic silencing on social dominance
- 3Chronic stress effects — measuring hierarchy shifts following chronic social defeat or unpredictable stress paradigms
- 4Pharmacological modulation — evaluating serotonergic and dopaminergic compounds that alter competitive social behavior
Related Protocols
Compatible Products
Ready to Automate Your Behavioral Protocols?
Contact us for a demo and pricing information.