Find research datasets worth reusing

Figure 1 in Exogenous application of bio-stimulant and growth retardant improved the productivity of cotton cultivars under different planting arrangement

Figure 1. Influence of MLE and MC on squares per plant of cotton genotypes cultivated under different planting arrangement in Multan (a) and Shujabad (b).

Figure 2 in Determination of the ursolic and oleanolic acids content with the antioxidant capacity in apple peel extract of various cultivars

Figure 2. HPLC chromatogram of ursolic acid and oleanolic acid: Standards (500 µg/ml) (A), Apple peel methanolic extract for Red Delicious (B), Granny Smith (C) and, Royal Gala (D) cultivars. UA: ursolic acid; OA: oleanolic acid.

Figure 4 in Determination of the ursolic and oleanolic acids content with the antioxidant capacity in apple peel extract of various cultivars

Figure 4. Correlation analysis of the concentration (µg/ml) of ursolic acid (UA) and oleanolic acid (OA) in Red Delicious (A, B); Granny Smith (C, D); and Royal Gala (E, F) with the antioxidant capacity (%) of the various cultivars. A value of r between 0 –1 indicates a strong positive correlation.

Figure 3 in Determination of the ursolic and oleanolic acids content with the antioxidant capacity in apple peel extract of various cultivars

Figure 3. Antioxidant activity of the apple peel extracts from various cultivars. *Significant difference p <0.001.

Fig. 3 in Antixenosis and tolerance to Diabrotica speciosa (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) in common bean cultivars

Fig. 3. Dendrogram based on plant growth parameters recorded in common bean cultivars infested by Diabrotica speciosa larvae. The arrow indicates the Euclidian distance used for group separation.

Fig. 5 in Antixenosis and tolerance to Diabrotica speciosa (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) in common bean cultivars

Fig. 5. Analysis of Pearson's simple linear correlation between reduction percentage of the dry weight of the plant root system and dry weight of the plant aerial part in common bean cultivars infested by Diabrotica speciosa larvae.

Fig. 4 in Antixenosis and tolerance to Diabrotica speciosa (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) in common bean cultivars

Fig. 4. Distribution of plant growth parameters and common bean cultivars following principal component analysis obtained from plants infested by Diabrotica speciosa larvae.

Fig. 2 in Antixenosis and tolerance to Diabrotica speciosa (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) in common bean cultivars

Fig. 2. Feeding preference index of Diabrotica speciosa adults to common bean cultivars in the no-choice test.

Fig. 1 in Antixenosis and tolerance to Diabrotica speciosa (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) in common bean cultivars

Fig. 1. Feeding preference index of Diabrotica speciosa adults to common bean cultivars in the free-choice test.

opencc-by-4.0Mar 2016View details →

Fig. 1 in Use of crape myrtle, Lagerstroemia (Myrtales: Lythraceae), cultivars as a pollen source by native and non-native bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae) in Quincy, Florida

Fig. 1. Cultivar positions in crape myrtle experimental block. Each small circle is 1 crape myrtle. Each quadrat has 4 crape myrtle plants of the same cultivar. Legend for cultivar abbreviations: Apalach = 'Apalachee', Bwhite = 'Byers Wonderful White', Cbeau = 'Carolina Beauty', Natch = 'Natchez', and Tuske = 'Tuskegee'.

opencc-by-4.0Jun 2016View details →

Fig. 1 in Incidence of Spodoptera litura (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) and its feeding potential on various citrus (Sapindales: Rutaceae) cultivars in the Sargodha Region of Pakistan

Fig. 1. Food consumption and performance of Spodoptera litura 3rd instars on 4 citrus cultivars: (A) leaf area consumption (cm2); (B) relative growth rate (RGR); (C) relative consumption rate (RCR); (D) leaf weight consumed (mg); (E) larval weight (mg); (F) weight of feces produced (mg); (G) efficiency of conversion of ingested food (ECI).

opencc-by-4.0Jun 2017View details →

Fig. 2 in Antibiosis in soybean cultivars to Heliothis virescens (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)

Fig. 2. Principal component analysis plot showing the distribution of different soybean cultivars fed to Heliothis virescens in Urutaí, Goiás, Brazil.

opencc-by-4.0Mar 2017View details →

Fig. 1 in First report of economic injury to tomato due to Zeugodacus tau (Diptera: Tephritidae): relative abundance and effects of cultivar and season on injury

Fig. 1. Seasonal pattern of Zeugodacus tau male adults (mean ± SE) captured by Cue-lure-based traps in tomato in (a) season 1, and (b) season 2.

opencc-by-4.0Jun 2017View details →

Fig. 1 in Antibiosis in soybean cultivars to Heliothis virescens (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)

Fig. 1. Dendrogram based on the biological parameters of Heliothis virescens larvae fed different soybean cultivars in Urutaí, Goiás, Brazil. The hierarchical cluster analysis was performed using Ward's method with Euclidean distances as the measure of dissimilarity. The arrow indicates the distance used to separate the groups.

opencc-by-4.0Sep 2017View details →

Fig. 1 in Field survey of Asian citrus psyllid (Hemiptera: Liviidae) infestations associated with six cultivars of Poncirus trifoliata (Rutaceae)

Fig. 1. Comparisons among cultivars of Citrus, citranges, and pure Poncirus trifoliata with respect to infestations of Asian citrus psyllid (ACP) in 5-yr-old trees at a grove in east-central Florida during 2016. a) Percentage of branches with flush suitable for oviposition by Asian citrus psyllid. b) Average infestation densities of immature Asian citrus psyllids (counts of eggs and nymphs combined) per flush shoot. Error bars are standard errors of the mean.

opencc-by-4.0Apr 2015View details →

Fig. 3 in Biology and reproductive capacity of Spodoptera eridania (Cramer) (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae) in different soybean cultivars

Fig. 3. Total number of eggs and larvae of Spodoptera eridania during the oviposition period in cultivars TMG Tabarana, BRS/MT Pintado, FMT Tucunaré and Monsoy 8757.

opencc-by-4.0May 2021View details →

Fig. 2 in Erratum: Biological studies of the Oligonychus litchii (Trombidiformes: Tetranychidae) on four commercial litchi cultivars (Florida Entomologist (2019) 102:2 (418-424) DOI: 10.1653/024.102.0220)

Fig. 2. Age-stage-specific survival rate of O. litchii reared on different litchi cultivars at 25 ± 1 °C, 65 to 80% RH, and a photoperiod of 14:10 h (L:D).

opencc-by-4.0May 2021View details →

Fig. 1 in Erratum: Biological studies of the Oligonychus litchii (Trombidiformes: Tetranychidae) on four commercial litchi cultivars (Florida Entomologist (2019) 102:2 (418-424) DOI: 10.1653/024.102.0220)

Fig. 1. Life stages of Oligonychus litchi: (A) egg; (B) larva; (C) protonymph; (D) deutonymph; (E) adult male; (F) adult female.

opencc-by-4.0May 2021View details →

Fig. 3 in Erratum: Biological studies of the Oligonychus litchii (Trombidiformes: Tetranychidae) on four commercial litchi cultivars (Florida Entomologist (2019) 102:2 (418-424) DOI: 10.1653/024.102.0220)

Fig. 3. Age-specific survival rate (lx), age-specific fecundity (mx) of O. litchii reared on different litchi cultivars at 25 ± 1 °C, 65 to 80% RH, and a photoperiod of 14:10 h (L:D).