Skip to main content
Powered by ShareScore

Find research datasets worth reusing

Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.

14

datasets available to search

ShareScore release 0.9.0

Reset

Dataset results

14 results for “Phylogenetic Incongruence”

Learn how ShareScore rates datasets ↗
dryad36/100

Data from: Quartet-based computations of internode certainty provide robust measures of phylogenetic incongruence

Incongruence, or topological conflict, is prevalent in genome-scale data sets. Internode Certainty (IC) and related measures were recently introduced to explicitly quantify the level of incongruence of a given internal branch among a set of phylogenetic trees and complement regular branch support measures (e.g., bootstrap, posterior probability) that instead assess the statistical confidence of inference. Since most phylogenomic studies contain data partitions (e.g., genes) with missing taxa and IC scores stem from the frequencies of bipartitions (or splits) on a set of trees, IC score calculation typically requires adjusting the frequencies of bipartitions from these partial gene trees. However, when the proportion of missing taxa is high, the scores yielded by current approaches that adjust bipartition frequencies in partial gene trees differ substantially from each other and tend to be overestimates. To overcome these issues, we developed three new IC measures based on the frequencies of quartets, which naturally apply to both complete and partial trees. Comparison of our new quartet-based measures to previous bipartition-based measures on simulated data shows that: 1) on complete data sets, both quartet-based and bipartition-based measures yield very similar IC scores; 2) IC scores of quartet-based measures on a given data set with and without missing taxa are more similar than the scores of bipartition-based measures; and 3) quartet-based measures are more robust to the absence of phylogenetic signal and errors in phylogenetic inference than bipartition-based measures. Additionally, the analysis of an empirical mammalian phylogenomic data set using our quartet-based measures reveals the presence of substantial levels of incongruence for numerous internal branches. An efficient open-source implementation of these quartet-based measures is freely available in the program QuartetScores (https://github.com/lutteropp/QuartetScores).

opencc-zeroSep 2019View details →
dryad36/100

Quartet-based computations of internode certainty provide robust measures of phylogenetic incongruence

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicDec 2019View details →
zenodo32/100

Figure 7 in Root causes of phylogenetic incongruence observed within basal sauropodomorph interrelationships

Figure 7. Phylogenetic trees obtained after new analyses were performed. They are based on a compilation of data sets and three scorings by different authors. Out-groups are indicated in grey. The shared part, not shared previously, is shaded in grey. A, strict consensus tree of the four most-parsimonious trees found using the scoring in Upchurch et al. (2007a) (tree length, TL: 1078 steps). The matrix includes 469 characters. B, strict consensus tree of the six most-parsimonious trees found using the scoring in Yates et al. (2010) (TL: 1118 steps). The matrix includes 450 characters. C, strict consensus tree of the three most-parsimonious trees found using the scoring in Pol et al. (2011) (TL: 996 steps). The matrix includes 450 characters.

opennotspecifiedJun 2015View details →
zenodo32/100

Figure 6 in Root causes of phylogenetic incongruence observed within basal sauropodomorph interrelationships

Figure 6. Adams consensus trees (except for Yates et al., 2010) found after a reduction of the taxonomic scope (21 ingroups). Out-groups are not represented. A, Adams consensus tree of the 252 most-parsimonious trees obtained running the data set from Upchurch et al. (2007a) (tree length, TL: 680 steps). B, most-parsimonious tree obtained running the data set from Yates et al. (2010) (TL: 896 steps). C, Adams consensus tree of the 88 most-parsimonious trees obtained running the data set of Pol et al. (2011) (TL: 546 steps). D, strict consensus of trees A, B, and C. Branches in grey illustrate the common parts in the three analyses.

opennotspecifiedJun 2015View details →
zenodo32/100

Figure 5 in Root causes of phylogenetic incongruence observed within basal sauropodomorph interrelationships

Figure 5. Strict consensus trees (except for Yates et al., 2010) found after a reduction of the taxonomic scope (21 ingroups). Out-groups are not represented. A, strict consensus tree of the 252 most-parsimonious trees obtained running the data set from Upchurch et al. (2007a) (tree length, TL: 680 steps). B, most-parsimonious tree obtained running the data set from Yates et al. (2010) (TL: 896 steps). C, strict consensus tree of the 88 most-parsimonious trees obtained running the data set from Pol et al. (2011) (TL: 546 steps). D, strict consensus of the trees A, B, and C. Branches in grey indicate areas in common among the three analyses.

opennotspecifiedJun 2015View details →
zenodo32/100

Figure 1 in Root causes of phylogenetic incongruence observed within basal sauropodomorph interrelationships

Figure 1. Original phylogenetic tree and character distribution map from the analysis presented by Upchurch et al. (2007a). A, strict consensus tree, where Blikanasaurus was removed a posteriori. Out-group taxa branches are in grey; in-group taxa branches are in black. B, character distribution map where the x-axis represents the percentage of total characters in each major subdivision (e.g. cranial, axial, and appendicular), and the y-axis represents the percentage of characters within a region (for instance skull roof, braincase, etc., in the cranial region). The percentage written in the rectangle formed by each minor subdivision represents its contribution to the total number of characters.

opennotspecifiedJun 2015View details →
zenodo32/100

Figure 2 in Root causes of phylogenetic incongruence observed within basal sauropodomorph interrelationships

Figure 2. Original phylogenetic tree and character distribution map from the analysis presented by Yates et al. (2010). A, strict consensus tree, where authors removed Blikanasaurus, Camelotia, and Isanosaurus a priori. Out-group taxa branches are in grey; in-group taxa branches are in black; Plateosaurus e, Plateosaurus engelhardti; Plateosaurus g, Plateosaurus gracilis. B, character distribution map where the x-axis represents the percentage of total characters in each major subdivision (e.g. cranial, axial, and appendicular), and the y-axis represents the percentage of characters within a region (for instance skull roof, braincase, etc., in the cranial region). The percentage written in the rectangle formed by each minor subdivision represents its contribution to the total number of characters.

opennotspecifiedJun 2015View details →
zenodo32/100

Figure 3 in Root causes of phylogenetic incongruence observed within basal sauropodomorph interrelationships

Figure 3. Original phylogenetic tree and character distribution map from the analysis presented by Pol et al. (2011). A, strict consensus tree, where Jingshanosaurus, Blikanasaurus, Camelotia, and Ferganasaurus were removed a posteriori. Out-group taxa branches are in grey; in-group taxa branches are in black; Azendhosaurus m, Azendhosaurus madagascar; Azendhosaurus l, Azendhosaurus laroussi. B, character distribution map, where the x-axis represents the percentage of total characters in each major subdivision (e.g. cranial, axial, and appendicular), and the y-axis represents the percentage of characters within a region (for instance skull roof, braincase, etc., in the cranial region). The percentage written in the rectangle formed by each minor subdivision represents its contribution to the total number of characters.

opennotspecifiedJun 2015View details →
dryad32/100

Data from: Phylogenetics of New World ‘justicioids’ (Justicieae: Acanthaceae): major lineages, morphological patterns and widespread incongruence with classification

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicMar 2019View details →
dryad28/100

Data from: Data decisiveness, data quality, and incongruence in phylogenetic analysis: an example from the monocotyledons using mitochondrial atp A sequences

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicMar 2008View details →
dryad28/100

Data from: Deep phylogenetic incongruence in the angiosperm clade Rosidae

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicNov 2014View details →
dryad28/100

Data from: Taxon Influence Index: assessing taxon-induced incongruities in phylogenetic inference

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicDec 2011View details →
dryad24/100

Data from: Congruence versus phylogenetic accuracy: revisiting the incongruence length difference test

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicJul 2018View details →
zenodo20/100

Figure 4 in Root causes of phylogenetic incongruence observed within basal sauropodomorph interrelationships

Figure 4. Pie charts illustrating different features of the characters shared by at least two of the three analyses: P, Pol et al. (2011); U, Upchurch et al. (2007a); Y, Yates et al. (2010). A, distribution of the characters common to the three analyses or shared by two matrices. B, location of the characters. C, character types. D, complexity of characters in Yates et al. (2010) and Pol et al. (2011).

opennotspecifiedJun 2015View details →

ScienceDex guides

Understand access before you commit

These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.

Compare curated datasets

Allen Brain Atlas

Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.

allen-brain-atlas
neuroscienceopenDocumentation, web resources, and API references are available online.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)

ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.

abode-home-cage
behavioral-neuroscienceopenThe DataShare record exposes download links for annotations, documentation, license text, and the zipped per-snippet data directory.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

DANDI Archive for NWB datasets

DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.

dandi-nwb
electrophysiologyopenPublished Dandiset metadata and archive endpoints are available through the production DANDI API.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

International Brain Laboratory public data

The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.

ibl
behavioral-neuroscienceopenPublic sessions can be searched and loaded from the IBL public data server through ONE.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record

OpenNeuro

OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.

openneuro
neuroscienceopenPublished datasets are available on demand over the internet.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record

ScienceDex for faculty

Your academic CV and NIH biosketch

Make your CV in your school's format and your NIH biosketch from it, then download both as Word files.