Escape Latency
Time to locate and enter the escape hole
Track escape latency, search strategy, and head direction with automated analysis.
Metrics automatically extracted by ConductVision.
Time to locate and enter the escape hole
Random, serial, or direct path classification
Orientation relative to escape hole during exploration
Total path length per trial
Visits to non-escape holes before first correct entry
Movement speed across the maze surface
Time to first visit to the target hole — spatial memory index
Visits to holes never baited across sessions
Repeat visits to already-checked holes within a trial
Ratio of direct distance to actual distance traveled
Sequence and distribution of hole visits across the platform
Proportion of trial spent in target vs. non-target quadrants
Time from trial start to first movement away from center
Repeated visits to a previously correct hole after reversal
Angle between initial heading and direct path to target hole
Duration and frequency of immobility bouts on the platform
Shift from random to serial to direct search across training days
The Barnes Maze is a dry-land spatial learning and memory test for rodents. Subjects are placed on an elevated circular platform with evenly spaced holes around the perimeter — only one leads to an escape box. The test leverages rodents' natural aversion to bright, open spaces to motivate escape behavior.
ConductVision automatically tracks the animal's position, classifies its search strategy (random, serial, or direct), and measures escape latency across training and probe trials. Heat maps and trajectory plots reveal search strategy evolution over training days.
| Parameter | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|
| Platform Diameter | Diameter of the circular maze platform | 92 cm |
| Number of Holes | Total holes around the platform perimeter | 20 |
| Max Trial Duration | Maximum time allowed per trial before guided placement | 180 s |
| Trials per Day | Number of acquisition trials per session | 4 |
| Training Days | Number of acquisition days before probe trial | 4 |
| Probe Duration | Duration of probe trial with escape box removed | 90 s |
| Aversive Stimuli | Motivation source driving escape behavior | Light + buzzer |
| Target Zone Size | Number of holes defining the target zone (target + adjacent) | 3 holes |
| Light Intensity | Overhead illumination level on the platform | 800 lux |
| Start Chamber Duration | Time animal is held in opaque start cylinder before release | 10 s |
| Nose-Poke Criterion | Definition of a hole visit — head deflection below plane | Head deflection |
Impaired spatial learning — common in Alzheimer's models (APP/PS1, 3xTg) and after hippocampal lesions.
Failure to form or retrieve spatial memory for the target hole location.
Weak spatial memory consolidation — animal does not preferentially search near the trained escape location.
Loss of hippocampal-dependent spatial strategy — may indicate neurodegeneration or drug-induced impairment.
Cognitive inflexibility in reversal tasks — associated with prefrontal cortex dysfunction.
Elevated anxiety or stress response on the open platform — may confound spatial memory assessment.
Related paradigms
Measure anxiety-like behavior through open vs. closed arm exploration.
Gold-standard spatial learning and memory test with automated swim tracking.
Track locomotion, anxiety, and exploration in a novel open arena.
Assess anxiety through light vs. dark compartment preference with IR tracking.
Evaluate working memory and decision-making via spontaneous alternation.
Sensitive ethological readout for anxiety and risk assessment in rodents.
Request a demo or contact our team to discuss how ConductVision can accelerate your research.