← Capabilities

Freezing Detection

Automated freezing quantification with integrated apparatus control

Dual-mode detection — motion threshold and body segmentation — delivers reproducible freezing scores without inter-rater variability.

Freezing Detection
2modes
Detection algorithms
<100ms
Onset resolution
TTL/serial
Apparatus integration
Reproducible
Cross-lab scoring consistency
The problem

Manual freezing scoring is subjective and unreproducible

Freezing — the complete absence of movement except respiration — is the primary dependent variable in fear conditioning, yet most labs still rely on manual scoring. Inter-rater reliability varies, threshold criteria differ between observers, and scoring a single cohort can consume days of trained observer time.

  • Inter-rater variability in freezing threshold introduces systematic differences between scorers
  • Manual scoring of a 30-animal cohort typically requires 8-15 hours of observer time
  • Threshold criteria drift within and across sessions, reducing reproducibility of longitudinal studies
The solution

Automated dual-mode detection with apparatus integration

ConductVision scores freezing using two complementary algorithms — motion threshold detection and body segmentation analysis. Both modes operate at sub-100 ms onset resolution. Integrated TTL and serial control enables automated stimulus delivery (tone, shock, light) synchronized to behavioral recording.

  • Dual detection modes — motion threshold and body segmentation — cross-validated for reliability
  • Sub-100 ms onset resolution captures precise freezing onset and offset timestamps
  • TTL and serial integration enables automated CS/US delivery synchronized to recording
Endpoints

Fear conditioning dependent variables

Freezing duration and percentage per time bin

Freezing duration and percentage per time bin

Total freezing duration and percent time freezing computed for each user-defined time bin (e.g., per CS presentation, per minute, per trial block).

CSV
Bout analysis

Bout analysis

Number of freezing episodes, mean bout duration, and inter-bout interval per time bin. Captures the temporal microstructure of freezing behavior.

CSV
Motion index with event timestamps

Motion index with event timestamps

Continuous motion index time series aligned to CS/US event markers. Enables visualization of freezing dynamics relative to stimulus presentations.

CSV
Applications

Fear learning and anxiety paradigms

Associative learning

Contextual fear conditioning

Quantify freezing to context during acquisition, consolidation testing, and extinction. Automated scoring ensures identical threshold criteria across all sessions and cohorts.

Measures
  • Percent freezing per time bin
  • Freezing onset latency
  • Context discrimination index
Cue-dependent learning

Cued fear conditioning and extinction

Score freezing during CS presentations, inter-trial intervals, and extinction sessions. TTL integration synchronizes tone delivery with behavioral recording.

Measures
  • CS-evoked freezing
  • Extinction rate
  • Spontaneous recovery index
Memory updating

Fear reconsolidation studies

Precise temporal quantification of freezing before and after reconsolidation manipulation. Sub-second resolution captures rapid changes in defensive behavior.

Measures
  • Pre-reactivation freezing
  • Post-manipulation freezing
  • Memory destabilization index
Pharmacological screening

Anxiolytic screening

Dose-dependent modulation of conditioned freezing scored automatically. Consistent threshold eliminates scorer bias in drug efficacy assessment.

Measures
  • Freezing suppression ratio
  • Dose-response curve
  • Fear potentiated startle
Compared to typical systems

How ConductVision differs

FeatureConductVisionTypical systems
Scoring methodAutomated — dual algorithmManual observer or single threshold
Detection modesMotion threshold + body segmentationSingle mode
Apparatus integrationTTL and serial — tone, shock, lightSeparate apparatus controller
Inter-rater reliabilityNot applicable — deterministicVariable — observer dependent
Scoring time per sessionSeconds (automated)15-30 minutes (manual)

Score freezing consistently across your entire cohort

Upload a fear conditioning session and compare automated scoring against your manual annotations.