ShareScore · ConductScience

A free service for shared knowledge

Knowledge people can build on

Research should serve more people.

Shared knowledge is a public good. ShareScore helps people make research easier to understand and use again, so its value can reach beyond the team that created it.

A message from the founder

For Anthem judges

Shuhan He, MD, on why sharing knowledge is a service to the public.

Founder, ConductScience · Emergency physician and researcher

2.36×

odds of later reuse

Per 10-point higher score
Across 154,569 records

Knowledge can help more people when a study is shared clearly and others can use it to ask new questions.
One studyShared clearlyUsed by othersNew questions

01Recognize the work

Sharing knowledge should count.

Science rewards the published paper. The work that makes its underlying information useful to someone else often goes unrecognized. ShareScore gives that care a measure.

Comparison of the h-index paper path and the S-Index reusable-data path.

What gets credit

PapersCitations
h-indexPaper citations

What helps others

Clear informationUseful sharing
S-IndexSharing record

Give people credit for work others can use.

02The barrier

An open file is only the beginning.

When a study's instructions or permissions are missing, someone else has to start by guessing. Clear information lets people check the work and decide whether they can use it.

Shared information becomes useful when people can see how the work was done, where it came from, and whether they can use it.

Shared, but hard to use

final_final_v2.csv

The next researcher is left guessing.

Useful to someone else

Enough information to build on

Ready to inspect
How it was done
Permission to use it
Instructions
Where it came from

03What we built

A free service for a shared benefit.

ConductScience built ShareScore in response to a National Institutes of Health challenge: give people credit for sharing research in ways that others can understand and use.

From sharing knowledge to helping others use it

01 · SHARE

Clear information

Can someone else understand and use this work?

02 · S-Index

Credit for sharing

Who consistently prepares work others can build on?

03 · S-Impact

Use by others

What did later work build on?

04Open rules

Clear rules that anyone can see.

ShareScore asks 25 practical questions about whether shared information is useful to someone else. The rules are public, so anyone can inspect what earns credit.

68 / 100

Example: 17 checks × 4 points

SCare

Stewardship

  1. 01Where was it made?
  2. 02When was it made?
  3. 03Who did what?
  4. 04What is it about?
  5. 05Are ethics clear?
HClear meaning

Harmonization

  1. 06Are methods included?
  2. 07Are people identified?
  3. 08Is the institution clear?
  4. 09Are sources linked?
  5. 10Is the summary useful?
AAccess

Availability and rights

  1. 11Can I get it?
  2. 12Are rights clear?
  3. 13Can I reuse it?
  4. 14Is it available now?
  5. 15Is the format open?
RReady to use

Reusability

  1. 16Is there a guide?
  2. 17Is analysis code included?
  3. 18Is there a file list?
  4. 19Is it organized?
  5. 20Do filenames make sense?
EConnections

Engagement

  1. 21Is the paper linked?
  2. 22Are related data linked?
  3. 23Is funding named?
  4. 24Are versions tracked?
  5. 25Is a field standard used?

05A practical next step

People can see what to improve.

A score should help someone take the next step. ShareScore shows what is missing and explains each result, so clearer sharing becomes something people can work toward.

A public ShareScore page showing a research record, its score, the original source and evidence of later use
  1. 01

    Understand

    See how ready a record is for someone else to use.

  2. 02

    Check

    Follow each result back to public information.

  3. 03

    Improve

    Find the missing details before sharing again.

A real research record, with its score and the information behind it.

06Evidence of public value

Shared knowledge became a starting point.

Better-prepared research was more likely to be used in later work. That is the public purpose: helping knowledge travel beyond the people who first created it.

Reuse means a later research work named the original data as its source.

Higher scores predicted later use across three increasingly strict checks.

2.36×

Odds of later reuse

Per 10-point higher ShareScore · 154,569 records

See how we checked this
Direct source link471 events3.49×
Verified source link114 events2.57×
Strictest test96 events2.36×

07Value over time

The benefit did not stop at one study.

The link with later use held across different kinds of research and through five years of follow-up. Better sharing can give knowledge a longer useful life.

Odds of later use at one, three, and five years, with a separate result accounting for research field.

Odds of later reuse, per 10-point higher ShareScore

Within 1 year

2.37×

Within 3 years

2.35×

Within 5 years

2.43×

Health and medicine
Life and environment
Physics, computing and engineering
People, society and culture

Results accounted for differences between fields.

After accounting for research field

2.72×

08A habit worth recognizing

Better sharing can become a lasting habit.

People with a stronger sharing record went on to share more work that met the standard. Recognizing that care can help useful sharing become a habit.

1,196 researchers who shared again

2.19×

Rate of later work meeting the sharing standard

For twice the earlier S-Index; later work scored SHARE 48 or above.

Earlier sharing recordbaseline
Twice the earlier score2.19×
A separate test in health research

Higher scores were linked to plans to share study information and ways to access it.

Plans to share

26,755 yes responses

1.97×

Ways to get the information

6,659 access routes

2.18×

ClinicalTrials.gov: each 10-point higher SHARE score was linked to roughly twice the odds on both measures.

09Free public access

Free to use, wherever the work began.

Anyone can inspect the same public rules and results. ShareScore brings information from 25 research archives into one place, helping people look beyond their own field or institution.

76.4M
public research records
139K
authors listed
25
research archives
Zenodo repository
OSF repository
Figshare repository
Dryad repository

Counts: ShareScore 0.9.0, September 8, 2026. Map: the published author-location data.

View evidence ↗

10Make sharing easier

Make useful sharing easier for everyone.

The places where people share research shaped scores more than individual researchers did. Clearer forms and better guidance can help every team leave something more useful behind.

Where work was shared explained more differences in scores than who shared it.

What explained differences in scores

Where work is shared60.2%
The individual researcher12.6%

4,518 researchers · 28,085 scored records

11Independent recognition

Recognized for helping knowledge go further.

The National Institutes of Health selected ShareScore as one of three winning approaches to better data sharing. Seven finalist teams included researchers from Harvard, MIT, Yale, and other institutions.

Shuhan He with NIH leaders at the S-Index Innovation Event
ConductScience at the NIH S-Index Innovation Event.
S-Index Challenge participants gathered on stage at NIH
Challenge participants after the live presentations.

NIH presentation · 12:35

See the work presented at NIH.

12A public good

Let shared knowledge do more good.

When others can understand and use research, its value can reach further. ShareScore makes that work visible, gives it credit, and keeps the rules open to everyone.

Knowledge can help more people when a study is shared clearly and others can use it to ask new questions.
One studyShared clearlyUsed by othersNew questions

Figures checked September 18, 2026. Higher scores predicted later use; the study did not test whether ShareScore caused it.