Behavioral Mazes

Activity Cage

SKU ME-5607
$2,990.00
Unit: Each

Automated rodent activity monitoring system with integrated running wheel, capacitive touch screen control, and comprehensive data recording for locomotor and circadian rhythm studies.

Unit: Each

Shipping costs at most $495. Order at this price, and we email the exact cost within one business day, before you pay.

Scientist guidance
Louise Corscadden, PhD, Director of Science

Louise Corscadden, PhD

Director of Science · ConductScience

Ask Louise about Activity Cage fit, setup, configuration, or quote prep.

Key Specifications

Full details →
Gripping Plate Area
20×20 cm, 25x25cm
Maximum Tensile Force
0 – 50 N (5kgf)
Cage Area
1000 cm²
Wheel Diameter Mouse
20 cm
Wheel Diameter Rat
40 cm
Test Time Range
0 – 9000 minutes
Category: Behavioral Mazes

Track rodents with ConductVision

ConductVision is our video-tracking software. Record your sessions on video, and it scores standard rodent tests, such as those listed below.

Examples of tests it scores

To check whether ConductVision scores your protocol in this apparatus, ask in your quote request.

Add ConductVision to your quote

ConductVision

$1,490 per year

A 5-year license is $3,990 in total.

Results export as CSV files.

Ask a question

Have a question? Just ask.

Send it over and we'll email you a personalized answer, with no call or scheduling.

Personalized email reply
Usually within one business day
Helpful answers published here

Prefer to talk it through?

Ask your question

Type it below and we'll email you a personalized answer, with no meeting required.

We'll only use your email to send your answer; broadly useful answers may be published anonymously.

Accessories

Enhance your setup with compatible accessories

Total: $0.00

Frequently Bought Together

Total: $0.00

§ 1

Introduction

The Activity Cage measures spontaneous locomotor activity by counting infrared beam breaks as a rodent moves through an enclosed cage. Automated activity monitoring turns open-field-style locomotion into a continuous, observer-independent record of distance, ambulation, and rearing. 1

The core readouts are total distance, ambulatory counts, rearing or vertical counts, and the distribution of activity between the cage center and walls. Because beam-break monitoring runs unattended, it is widely used to phenotype hyperactivity, sedation, and drug effects, and to track activity across long circadian windows. 1

Novelty and habituation, circadian timing, handling, beam spacing, and whether animals are tested alone or in groups all change activity counts independent of the manipulation. A defensible protocol fixes the session length, controls the time of day, allows for within-session habituation, and reports beam resolution so counts are comparable across studies. 1

§ 2

Methods

2.1 Procedure

Beam-break locomotor monitoring with habituation handling, circadian control, and resolution-aware count scoring.

Pre-test setup

  1. 1.Acclimation and handling: Acclimate animals to the room and to handling so the first session reflects baseline locomotion rather than novelty stress and handling arousal.
  2. 2.Beam calibration: Verify horizontal and, where present, vertical beam alignment and spacing, and confirm the counter distinguishes ambulatory from stereotypic breaks.
  3. 3.Fix the session: Set the session length, light level, and time of day in advance, since activity falls within a session as animals habituate and varies across the circadian cycle.
  4. 4.Define count rules: Pre-define ambulatory versus stereotypic counts and the center-versus-periphery boundary so anxiety-like and locomotor measures are scored consistently.

Trial sequence

  1. 1.Place and start: Place the animal in the cage and start the counter, recording from the first beam break so the within-session habituation curve is captured.
  2. 2.Record ambulation: Log ambulatory counts and total distance from horizontal beam breaks over the fixed session.3
  3. 3.Count rearing: Record vertical beam breaks as rearing counts where a second plane is present, since rearing indexes exploration distinctly from horizontal movement.1
  4. 4.Track center activity: Log activity in the center versus the periphery, since center avoidance is an anxiety-like measure that rides alongside locomotion.2
  5. 5.Clean between subjects: Clean the cage and beam frame between animals to remove odor and urine cues that alter exploration and thigmotaxis.

Critical methodological constraints

  • Novelty and habituation. Activity is highest at the start and falls as the animal habituates. Report the within-session slope rather than a single total, and allow a habituation window where appropriate.2
  • Circadian timing. Rodent activity varies strongly across the light-dark cycle. Fix the time of day across groups, or record across full circadian windows.5
  • Beam resolution. Beam spacing sets the smallest movement that registers. Coarse grids miss fine movements, so resolution must be reported and held constant for comparison.3
  • Stereotypy versus ambulation. Repetitive movement in one location inflates raw counts. Separate ambulatory from stereotypic counts so locomotion is not overstated.

2.2 Measurement & Analysis

Core activity-cage endpoints for locomotion, exploration, and within-session quality control.

Total Distance

Locomotion

Path length reconstructed from sequential beam breaks, the primary index of overall locomotor activity.3

Ambulatory Counts

Horizontal activity

Horizontal beam breaks reflecting whole-body movement, separated from repetitive stereotypic breaks.

Rearing/Vertical Counts

Exploration

Vertical beam breaks indexing rearing and exploratory posture, recorded where a second beam plane is present.1

Center Activity

Anxiety-like confound

Activity in the center versus the periphery, an anxiety-like thigmotaxis measure that accompanies locomotor counts.2

Habituation Slope

Within-session adaptation

Decline in activity across the session as the animal habituates, separating novelty-driven activity from steady-state locomotion.

+ Additional metrics: stereotypic counts, time of day, session length, beam spacing, resting time, and per-session apparatus notes.

2.3 ambulatory fraction (analysis)

A compact fraction of total beam breaks attributable to ambulation rather than stereotypy.

Inline calculator

Type the values your tracker recorded.

Full calculator with 95% CI ->
Ambulatory fraction

70.0%

Formula: ambulatory counts / (ambulatory counts + stereotypic counts) x 100. Interpret with the habituation slope, circadian timing, beam resolution, and center activity because a high fraction can still reflect novelty-driven activity rather than steady-state locomotion. 1

2.4 sample-size planning

Estimate the N per group needed to detect a literature-anchored locomotor effect at the endpoint you plan to report. Override the defaults with your own pilot numbers.

Control vs hyperactive mouse in an activity monitor; representative magnitudes from Tatem et al. (2014) on open-field activity monitoring.3

Cohen's d

1.69

N per group at 80% power

6

Total N

12

With attrition cushion

14

At 70% / 90% power

5 / 8

Methods sentence

Need ANOVA, proportions, paired design, or a power curve? Open in the full Sample-Size Calculator →

Formula: n = 2 · ((zα/2 + zβ) / d)2, where d = |μ₁ − μ₂| / σ. Assumes equal allocation, normality, and homoskedasticity. The attrition cushion inflates total N by 1 / (1 − dropout); confirm with your IACUC.

§ 3

Results

3.1 Sample apparatus output

Representative output from a 30-minute activity-cage session with horizontal and vertical beam planes.

Table 1 · Per-animal Activity Cage scoring output

AnimalGroupDistanceAmbulatoryRearingAmbulatory fraction
AC-001Control44 m6905869.7%
AC-002Control47 m7126271.2%
AC-003Control43 m6755568.9%
AC-004Hyperactive71 m10804078.3%
AC-005Hyperactive74 m11253779.0%
AC-006Hyperactive69 m10424277.6%

Synthetic example for illustration only. Pair distance with the habituation slope, circadian timing, and center activity before interpreting locomotor differences.

§ 4

Discussion

Limitations of the paradigm, methodological caveats, and current directions.

4.1 Common confounds

Variables that can shift Activity Cage results apart from the effect under study.

Novelty/habituation

Activity peaks on first exposure and falls as the animal habituates within and across sessions. Report the habituation slope rather than a single total count.

Circadian timing

Rodent locomotion varies strongly with the light-dark cycle. Fix the time of day across groups or record across full circadian windows.

Handling

Pre-test handling arouses animals and inflates early activity. Standardize handling and transfer so arousal does not differ between groups.

Beam spacing/resolution

Coarse beam grids miss fine movements and undercount distance. Report beam spacing and hold it constant for any cross-study comparison.

Individual vs group testing

Group-tested animals stimulate each other's movement. Whether animals are recorded alone or together must be fixed and reported.

Confound checklist

Tick the confounds your protocol addresses, then export a methods-paragraph blurb you can paste into your manuscript.

Preview exported markdown

4.2 Construct validity caveats

Activity-cage counts are strongest when session length, time of day, beam resolution, and the ambulatory-versus-stereotypic distinction are fixed before testing. A single total count confounds novelty with steady-state locomotion; report the habituation slope and center activity, and confirm locomotor phenotypes with an independent open-field or home-cage measure. 1

4.3 Special considerations

How long should a session be?

Long enough to capture the within-session habituation curve, since a short session can sit entirely in the novelty phase. Fix the length in advance and report the activity slope rather than only a total.

Does beam spacing matter?

Yes. Beam spacing sets the smallest movement that registers, so coarse grids undercount distance and fine movements. Report the resolution and keep it constant across all groups in a study.

Should I separate ambulation from stereotypy?

Yes. Repetitive movement in one place inflates raw counts. Scoring ambulatory and stereotypic breaks separately keeps locomotion from being overstated by stationary repetitive behavior.

4.4 Current directions

Quarterly editorial review of emerging Activity Cage methodology. Q2 2026

Methods

Habituation-slope reporting

Reporting the within-session activity decline rather than a single total separates novelty-driven activity from steady-state locomotion and improves comparability.

Emerging

Long-window home-cage monitoring

Extended beam-break recording across full light-dark cycles captures circadian structure that a short novel-cage session cannot.

Methods

Resolution standardization

Reporting beam spacing and resolution is increasingly expected because count magnitudes are not comparable across grids of different density.

Emerging

Multi-plane activity decomposition

Adding vertical beam planes separates rearing from horizontal ambulation, giving distinct exploration and locomotion readouts from one session.

§ 5

Background references

5 selected methods and validation studies of the Activity Cage, from any lab.

  1. Walsh RN, Cummins RA. The Open-Field Test: a critical review. Psychol Bull. 1976;83(3):482-504. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.83.3.482
  2. Prut L, Belzung C. The open field as a paradigm to measure the effects of drugs on anxiety-like behaviors: a review. Eur J Pharmacol. 2003;463(1-3):3-33. doi:10.1016/s0014-2999(03)01272-x
  3. Tatem KS, Quinn JL, Phadke A, Yu Q, Gordish-Dressman H, Nagaraju K. Behavioral and locomotor measurements using an open field activity monitoring system for skeletal muscle diseases. J Vis Exp. 2014;(91):51785. doi:10.3791/51785
  4. Crawley JN. Behavioral phenotyping of transgenic and knockout mice. Brain Res. 1999;835(1):18-26. doi:10.1016/s0006-8993(98)01258-x
  5. Tang X, Orchard SM, Sanford LD. Home cage activity and behavioral performance in inbred and hybrid mice. Behav Brain Res. 2002;136(2):555-569. doi:10.1016/s0166-4328(02)00228-0
Activity Cage
Activity Cage
$2,990.00
Added to quoteView Quote