Research data · Disease model and test

Elevated plus maze in brain injury research

From 2021 to 2025, 69 animal research papers on brain injury mentioned the elevated plus maze in their title or abstract.

That is 2.0 times the 35 papers of 2011 to 2015. Between the same two periods, the papers on brain injury that mention any of the 90 tests we count grew more slowly, to 1.6 times as many.

69 papers on brain injury from 2021 to 2025 mentioned the elevated plus maze
8% of the papers on brain injury that mention any test mention the elevated plus maze
2% of the papers that mention the elevated plus maze are on brain injury
2.0 times as many papers as in 2011 to 2015

Papers by year

Animal research papers on brain injury that mention the elevated plus maze, by year, 2001 to 2026

The 2026 bar counts papers added to PubMed by November 8, 2026.

  • Papers in a full year
  • 2026 so far
Show the counts for each year
Papers by year
YearPapers
20010
20020
20030
20040
20054
20062
20072
20082
20091
20103
20113
20127
20135
201410
201510
201612
20178
201810
20196
202012
20219
202213
202316
202414
202517
2026 (part year)13

Which species the papers used

Each bar is a share of the 69 papers from 2021 to 2025. A paper can use more than one species, so the shares can add to more than 100%.

Species

Mouse
35 papers 51%
Rat
33 papers 48%
Other animals
2 papers 3%

“Other animals” counts papers that use none of the species this chart names.

Tests mentioned alongside the elevated plus maze

Each bar is one test, with how many of the 69 papers also mention it, and what share that is. Of these papers, 16 (23%) mention no other test.

The 12 tests these papers mention most

20 papers 29%
19 papers 28%
17 papers 25%
13 papers 19%
5 papers 7%
3 papers 4%
3 papers 4%

Which papers count

A paper counts here when it is animal research, mentions the elevated plus maze in its title or abstract, and studies brain injury.

We tell whether a paper studies brain injury from its MeSH terms, the subject headings the National Library of Medicine adds when it indexes a paper. For a paper without MeSH terms, PubTator 3, NCBI's text-mining service, has to find the disease in the title or abstract. A paper can count under more than one disease model. A paper that mentions the test only in its methods is missed, so the count runs low.

The page on brain injury research names the subject headings we count as brain injury. Download the test list for the search terms we used for the elevated plus maze, or the paper list for the PubMed ID of every paper behind these counts. Our main page, Behavioral tests in published research, has the full method and each source's terms of use.

More tests and disease models

Every pairing of a disease model and a test with 30 or more papers from 2021 to 2025 has a page like this one.

The page on the elevated plus maze counts all the papers that mention it, whatever they study. The page on brain injury research ranks the tests by their papers on brain injury.

How to cite

APA

ConductScience. (2026, November 10). Elevated plus maze in brain injury research [Data set]. https://conductscience.com/resources/data/behavioral-tests/models/brain-injury/elevated-plus-maze

BibTeX

@misc{conductscience_brain_injury_elevated_plus_maze_2026,
  author = {{ConductScience}},
  title = {Elevated plus maze in brain injury research},
  year = {2026},
  month = nov,
  url = {https://conductscience.com/resources/data/behavioral-tests/models/brain-injury/elevated-plus-maze},
  note = {Data set, released November 10, 2026},
}

Elevated plus maze apparatus in our store

In the test battery tool, pick every test your study will run and add the apparatus for all of them to one quote.