Shock Zone Entrances
Number of entries into the prohibited sector per trial
Rotating arena paradigm for spatial learning and cognitive coordination.
Metrics automatically extracted by ConductVision.
Number of entries into the prohibited sector per trial
Latency to first shock zone entry indexing spatial memory
Longest continuous period successfully avoiding the zone
Total foot shocks reflecting avoidance failure frequency
Straightness of escape trajectories from the shock zone
Cumulative path length accounting for arena rotation
Dwell time distribution across room-frame quadrants
Duration in the sector diametrically opposite the shock zone
Average shock count per zone incursion
Velocity during shock zone exit compared to baseline
Average positional distance from the shock zone boundary
Directional concentration of position — avoidance strength
Actual vs ideal avoidance trajectory ratio
The Active Place Avoidance test evaluates spatial learning by requiring rodents to avoid a stationary shock zone on a continuously rotating arena. The animal must integrate distal room cues while ignoring misleading local cues, making APA uniquely sensitive to hippocampal and prefrontal cognitive control.
ConductVision automates real-time position tracking on the rotating platform. Adjustable rotation speeds (0-5 RPM) and shock parameters allow researchers to titrate task difficulty for different species and experimental questions.
| Parameter | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|
| Arena Diameter | Circular rotating platform size | 82 cm (rat) / 40 cm (mouse) |
| Rotation Speed | Platform angular velocity | 1 RPM |
| Shock Zone Angle | Angular width of the prohibited sector | 60° |
| Shock Intensity | Foot shock current | 0.5 mA (mouse) / 0.6 mA (rat) |
| Shock Duration | Duration of each shock pulse | 0.5 s |
| Inter-Shock Interval | Minimum time between successive shocks in zone | 1.5 s |
| Trial Duration | Length of each avoidance session | 10 min |
| Training Days | Acquisition training sessions | 3–5 days, 1 trial/day |
| Room Cues | Distal visual landmarks defining shock zone position | 4 high-contrast cues |
| Habituation | Free exploration on stationary arena before training | 5 min |
| Reversal | Shock zone relocated 180° to test cognitive flexibility | Post-acquisition |
Impaired spatial avoidance — failure to form or maintain room-frame spatial map, common in hippocampal dysfunction and schizophrenia models.
Poor avoidance persistence — short maximum avoidance intervals indicate unstable spatial memory or attention lapses.
Failure to escape shock zone promptly — impaired escape learning or disorientation within the prohibited sector.
Disorganized escape trajectories — circuitous escape paths suggest impaired cognitive coordination of arena-frame and room-frame information.
Cognitive inflexibility — perseverative avoidance of the old shock zone after 180° relocation, sensitive to prefrontal dysfunction.
Dispersed positional preference — failure to concentrate position away from the shock zone indicates weak spatial memory.
Related paradigms
Track escape latency, search strategy, and head direction with automated analysis.
Measure anxiety-like behavior through open vs. closed arm exploration.
Gold-standard spatial learning and memory test with automated swim tracking.
Track locomotion, anxiety, and exploration in a novel open arena.
Assess anxiety through light vs. dark compartment preference with IR tracking.
Evaluate working memory and decision-making via spontaneous alternation.
Request a demo or contact our team to discuss how ConductVision can accelerate your research.