← Capabilities

Balance Beam Motor Assessment

Automated motor coordination scoring on the balance beam

Quantify traversal time, foot slips, and motor coordination from standard video — replacing manual stopwatch-and-counter protocols.

Balance Beam Motor Assessment
30fps
Temporal resolution for slip detection
3
Beam widths supported
0
Manual scoring steps
100%
Automated from start to report
The problem

Balance beam scoring depends on observer attention

The balance beam test requires an observer to simultaneously time traversal, count foot slips, and rate overall coordination. Fast foot slips are easy to miss, and subjective rating scales introduce variability across scorers and sessions.

  • Foot slips happen in under 100 ms — faster than reliable human detection during live scoring
  • Subjective 0-4 coordination scales vary across scorers and over long scoring sessions
  • Simultaneous timing and counting creates divided attention that degrades both measures
The solution

Video-based automated beam walk analysis

ConductVision tracks paw position relative to beam edges at 30 fps. Foot slips are detected as paw excursions below the beam surface, traversal time is calculated from beam entry to exit, and overall coordination is scored objectively from kinematic features.

  • Paw tracking at 30 fps catches foot slips that human observers miss
  • Traversal time automatically measured from beam entry to beam exit
  • Objective coordination score derived from speed variability, slip frequency, and pause duration
Endpoints

Balance beam motor measures

Traversal metrics

Traversal metrics

Start-to-end traversal time, average speed, speed variability, and number of pauses per trial.

CSVJSON
Foot slip log

Foot slip log

Each foot slip event with timestamp, paw identity (left/right, fore/hind), and slip magnitude.

CSV
Motor coordination score

Motor coordination score

Composite score integrating traversal speed, slip rate, and pause frequency into a single motor coordination index.

CSV
Applications

Motor function paradigms

Neurodegeneration

Progressive motor decline monitoring

Longitudinal balance beam testing tracks motor decline in ALS, Huntington, and Parkinson models with objective metrics that detect subtle changes before gross impairment.

Measures
  • Slip rate progression
  • Traversal time trend
  • Coordination score decline
Stroke recovery

Post-stroke motor rehabilitation

Beam walk performance after experimental stroke quantifies unilateral motor deficits and recovery trajectory over weeks.

Measures
  • Ipsilateral vs. contralateral slips
  • Recovery curve
  • Speed normalization
Drug screening

Motor side-effect profiling

Beam walk sensitivity to sedation, ataxia, and motor impairment enables dose-response motor safety profiling.

Measures
  • Slip count by dose
  • Speed reduction
  • Coordination score change
Cerebellar function

Cerebellar ataxia phenotyping

Cerebellar mutants show characteristic beam walk deficits — wider beam widths reveal graded impairment.

Measures
  • Performance across beam widths
  • Slip pattern analysis
  • Learning across trials
Compared to typical systems

How ConductVision differs

FeatureConductVisionTypical systems
Foot slip detectionAutomated at 30 fpsManual live count
Traversal timingFrame-accurate start/endManual stopwatch
Coordination scoringObjective kinematic compositeSubjective 0-4 scale
Paw-specific slip dataYes — per-paw identificationTotal slip count only
Batch processingUnlimited sessions overnightOne session per scorer at a time

Objective motor scoring from your existing beam walk videos

Upload beam walk recordings and get automated foot slip counts and coordination scores.