Behavioral Mazes

Open Field Test

$540.00 - $2,890.00

Standard behavioral apparatus for measuring locomotor activity, exploratory behavior, and anxiety-like responses in rodents through analysis of movement patterns and zone preferences.

Size: Mouse
$650.00
Key Specifications
wall_typesopaque or clear
wall_featureeasily detachable for easy cleaning
floor_insertsgrid floor inserts available for video tracking
arena_shapesquare
alternative_sizes27 x 27 cm and 50 x 50 cm sizes mentioned
wall_finishesopaque colors and matte finish available
SKU:ME-3201/ 3202/ 3203/ 3204/ 3205/ 3206
Need Help? Visit our Support CenterKnowledge base, order lookup, and ticket support
Assembly InstructionsStep-by-step guide for this product
Our Staff are PhD Scientists
Get expert guidance on this product
Louise Corscadden, PhD, Neuroscience
Louise Corscadden
PhD, Neuroscience
Schedule a Call Instead

Accessories

Enhance your setup with compatible accessories

Total: $0.00

Frequently Bought Together

Total: $1,240.00

Upgrade Options

Choose your configuration

Validated Open Field Test configurations

Pick the apparatus configuration that matches the cohort, species, and protocol. Species-specific adaptations should be interpreted within their own validation literature.

This productGeneral purpose

Square Open Field Arena

40 x 40 cm mouse or 100 x 100 cm rat formats

Most common configuration for locomotor activity, anxiety-like behavior, habituation, and drug-screen controls.

$1,290

BuyableMouse cohort

Mouse Open Field

Opaque walls, low-glare floor, overhead tracking compatible

Scaled arena for mouse center-periphery behavior and repeated activity monitoring.

$1,090

SpecialtyCircular arena

Circular Open Field

Round wall geometry for lower corner bias

Useful when the study design prioritizes continuous wall-distance analysis over corner-zone endpoints.

$1,390

§ 1

Introduction

The Open Field Test measures spontaneous locomotion and exploration in a novel arena. It is used as a baseline activity assay, an anxiety-like behavior screen based on center avoidance, and a control for interpreting other behavioral tasks. 1

The classic readout is the tradeoff between exploration of the exposed center and thigmotaxis near the walls. Because total distance, immobility, and velocity can shift for non-anxiety reasons, open-field interpretation depends on reporting both affective and locomotor endpoints. 1

Open field is often paired with EPM, light-dark box, rotarod, fear conditioning, or spatial learning assays so researchers can separate general activity from task-specific performance. 1

§ 2

Methods

2.1 Procedure

Single-session or repeated-session arena exploration, typically 5 to 30 minutes.

Pre-test setup

  1. 1.Arena zonesDefine center, wall, corner, and full-arena zones before acquisition. Use the same center-zone dimensions for all animals.
  2. 2.LightingSet and record illumination at the arena center and corners. Keep lighting consistent across groups.
  3. 3.CleaningClean floor and walls between animals, then allow odor and liquid residue to dissipate.
  4. 4.CameraCalibrate the overhead camera to arena boundaries and confirm tracking contrast for the chosen floor and animal color.

Trial sequence

  1. 1.Place subjectPlace the animal in the same start zone for all subjects, commonly the center or one fixed corner.
  2. 2.Record sessionRecord a fixed session duration. Five to ten minutes captures anxiety-like center avoidance; longer sessions support habituation curves.1
  3. 3.Return animalReturn the animal to the home cage and log grooming, freezing, jumping, or escape attempts.
  4. 4.Clean arenaClean and dry the full arena before the next subject.
  5. 5.CounterbalanceInterleave groups through the same time window to avoid circadian and order effects.

Critical methodological constraints

  • Activity confound. Center time falls when animals are sedated or hypoactive. Always interpret center ratio alongside distance and velocity.2
  • Lighting sensitivity. Bright light increases wall preference. Report lux levels so center avoidance can be compared across labs.
  • Arena geometry. Square arenas create corners that attract shelter-seeking behavior; circular arenas change the zone structure and should not be pooled with square data.
  • Habituation. Repeated sessions change novelty drive. Analyze habituation separately instead of mixing first-exposure and repeat-exposure data.

2.2 Measurement & Analysis

Core open-field endpoints ConductVision scores from arena trajectories.

Center Time

Anxiety-like behavior

Time in the exposed center zone. Higher center time is usually interpreted as lower anxiety-like avoidance.1

Wall Time

Thigmotaxis

Time spent near the arena wall. Increased wall preference can reflect anxiety-like behavior or low exploration.

Total Distance

Locomotor control

Whole-session path length. Essential for separating anxiety-like changes from hypoactivity or hyperactivity.2

Center Entries

Exploration frequency

Number of center-zone transitions. Useful when center dwell time is skewed by freezing.

Velocity and Immobility

Activity state

Speed and immobility time identify sedation, freezing, or stimulant effects.

+ Additional metrics: corner time, rearing, grooming, path entropy, turn angle, zone transitions, and habituation slope.

2.3 center time ratio (analysis)

A normalized center preference endpoint for comparing animals with different activity levels.

Inline calculator

Type the times your tracker recorded.

Full calculator with 95% CI →
Center ratio

19.3%

Formula: center time / (center time + periphery time) x 100. Interpret with total distance and velocity because low activity can reduce both center entries and center time. 1

§ 3

Results

Aggregate publication data, sample apparatus output, and recent findings from the live PubMed feed.

3.1 Publication trends

PubMed volume and co-occurring methods for locomotion and anxiety-like behavior.

Figure 1 · EPM publications by year (PubMed)

The paradigm has been dominant for 40 years and is still growing.

Live · Weekly

2000201020202026 YTD: 467 papers

Total in PubMed since 1985: 13,953+ papers. Updated 2026-05-04.

Figure 2 · Methods co-occurring with EPM (last 12 months)

Other paradigms most often run alongside EPM in the same paper.

Live

3.2 Sample apparatus output

Representative center-periphery and locomotor endpoints.

Table 1 · Per-animal EPM scoring output

Download sample CSV →
AnimalGroupCenter (s)Periphery (s)Distance (m)Center ratio (%)
OF-001Control6123938.220.3%
OF-002Control5524536.718.3%
OF-003Control6423639.121.3%
OF-004Anxiety-like2427635.48.0%
OF-005Anxiety-like2927134.89.7%
OF-006Anxiety-like2127933.97.0%

Synthetic example for illustration only. Low center ratio should be interpreted with total distance and velocity.

3.3 Recent findings (live PubMed feed)

  • May 2026PMID: 41780614

    Mechanistic insights into the antidepressant effects of the Angelica sinensis and Ligusticum chuanxiong Herb Pair: Involvement of the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway.

    Yang TY, Sun XM, Xiong ZW, et al.. J Ethnopharmacol. 2026 May 23.

    The Angelica sinensis and Ligusticum chuanxiong Herb Pair (DC) serves as a core pairing in Traditional Chinese Medicine for treating blood stasis and blood deficiency syndromes, which are frequently associated with depressive-like symptoms in clinical practice.

  • May 2026PMID: 41825795

    miR-146a-3p drives major depressive disorder pathogenesis via BDNF suppression: a novel diagnostic and therapeutic target.

    Sun K, Qin T, Kang Z. Gene. 2026 May 20.

    Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a debilitating neuropsychiatric condition characterized by persistent low mood, affecting approximately 322 million individuals worldwide. With a staggering 15% mortality rate due to suicide among patients, MDD represents a critical global health challenge.

  • May 2026PMID: 41871823

    Betahistine attenuates vestibular stimulation-induced mitochondrial damage and neuroinflammation in Deiters' neurons.

    Zhuikova NS, Mikheeva IB, Antonova OY, et al.. Neurosci Lett. 2026 May 15.

    Dysfunction of the vestibular nuclei, which can arise from various causes, is a common problem, affecting more than a third of people over 40. Its characteristic symptom is vestibular vertigo. This dysfunction is also associated with neurodegenerative diseases.

  • May 2026PMID: 41825762

    High-frequency rTMS mitigates acute sleep deprivation-induced anxiety-like behaviors and working memory impairments associated with hippocampal transcriptional modulation.

    Sun Y, Rong Z, Maimaitiming D, et al.. Neuroscience. 2026 May 14.

    Acute sleep deprivation is known to impair cognitive function and emotional regulation, yet effective interventions and underlying molecular mechanisms remain unclear.

View all 13953 matching papers on PubMed →

§ 4

Discussion

Limitations of the paradigm, methodological caveats, and current directions.

4.1 Common confounds

Variables that shift Open Field Test results independent of anxiety state.

Sedation and hyperactivity

Distance and velocity can change center time independent of anxiety-like behavior.2

Lighting

Illumination intensity strongly changes center avoidance and must be reported.

Arena cleaning

Residual odor changes exploration and wall preference. Keep cleaning and drying intervals consistent.

Prior handling

Handling, injection, and transport stress can shift center behavior before the session begins.

Repeated exposure

Habituation changes novelty-driven locomotion. First exposure and repeated exposure answer different questions.

4.2 Construct validity caveats

Open field is a broad screen, not a standalone anxiety diagnosis. Center avoidance can reflect anxiety-like behavior, low activity, visual impairment, freezing, or altered novelty seeking. 1 Strong designs pair center endpoints with locomotor controls and, when needed, another anxiety assay such as EPM or light-dark box. 2

4.3 Special considerations

Should I use center time or center entries?

Report both when possible. Center time captures dwell behavior, while entries capture approach frequency and can be less sensitive to one long center visit.

Can open field be repeated?

Yes, but repeated sessions measure habituation and activity adaptation. Do not pool repeat sessions with first-exposure anxiety-like behavior.

Does arena shape matter?

Yes. Square arenas introduce corner zones, while circular arenas emphasize wall distance. Treat shape as a protocol factor.

4.4 Current directions

Quarterly editorial review of emerging Open Field Test methodology. Q2 2026

Rising

Home-cage to open-field transitions

Studies increasingly compare home-cage baseline with novelty-evoked open-field behavior.

Methodological

Zone-free path features

Path entropy, turn angle, and wall-distance distributions supplement center-periphery scoring.

Rising

Disease-model baseline controls

Open field remains a standard control before memory, depression-like, and sensorimotor tasks.

Methodological

Automated behavior states

Pose-based scoring is adding rearing, grooming, freezing, and stretch-attend states to basic zone data.

§ 5

References

6 curated Open Field Test methods and validation papers. Schema-marked as ScholarlyArticle ItemList.

  1. Hall CS. Emotional behavior in the rat. I. Defecation and urination as measures of individual differences in emotionality. J Comp Psychol. 1934;18(3):385-403.
  2. Prut L, Belzung C. The open field as a paradigm to measure the effects of drugs on anxiety-like behaviors: a review. Eur J Pharmacol. 2003;463(1-3):3-33.
  3. Walsh RN, Cummins RA. The Open-Field Test: a critical review. Psychol Bull. 1976;83(3):482-504.
  4. Gould TD, Dao DT, Kovacsics CE. The open field test. Mood and Anxiety Related Phenotypes in Mice. 2009:1-20.
  5. Carola V, D'Olimpio F, Brunamonti E, Mangia F, Renzi P. Evaluation of the elevated plus-maze and open-field tests for the assessment of anxiety-related behaviour in inbred mice. Behav Brain Res. 2002;134(1-2):49-57.
  6. Seibenhener ML, Wooten MC. Use of the Open Field Maze to measure locomotor and anxiety-like behavior in mice. J Vis Exp. 2015;(96):e52434.
Open Field Test
Open Field Test
$540.00
Added to quoteView Quote