Classic Mazes

Y Maze

$1,295.00 - $1,790.00

Three-arm behavioral maze with 120-degree arm angles for assessing spatial working memory and spontaneous alternation in mice and rats.

Size: Rat
$1,790.00
Key Specifications
arm_angle120 degrees
food_well_depth1cm
escape_tube_diameter_mouse4cm
escape_tube_diameter_rat8cm
escape_tubes_quantity3x tubes
stand_height_mouse32cm
SKU:3501/2
Category:Classic Mazes
Need Help? Visit our Support CenterKnowledge base, order lookup, and ticket support
Our Staff are PhD Scientists
Get expert guidance on this product
Louise Corscadden, PhD, Neuroscience
Louise Corscadden
PhD, Neuroscience
Schedule a Call Instead

Accessories

Enhance your setup with compatible accessories

Total: $0.00

Frequently Bought Together

Total: $650.00

Upgrade Options

Compare related apparatuses

Choose the right behavioral assay

Y-Maze variants belong in the product selector. This comparison is for adjacent apparatuses researchers may choose instead when stress, motor burden, or protocol fit changes the interpretation.

Discrete-trial choice comparator

T-Maze

Construct
Rewarded alternation, delayed choice, and rule learning
Best fit
Labs that need reinforced choice trials or delay-controlled working-memory protocols.
Tradeoff
More training and reward control than spontaneous Y-Maze exploration.
Welfare load: LowMotor confound: Low
View apparatus ->
Working/reference memory comparator

Radial Arm Maze

Construct
Repeated arm-choice errors across baited and unbaited arms
Best fit
Separating working-memory and reference-memory errors in food-motivated designs.
Tradeoff
Requires habituation, food motivation, and stricter arm-entry definitions.
Welfare load: LowMotor confound: Low
View apparatus ->
Dry spatial-memory comparator

Barnes Maze

Construct
Place learning, probe memory, and reversal learning
Best fit
Cohorts where a dry-land spatial task is preferable to free alternation.
Tradeoff
Higher protocol burden and aversive motivation than a short Y-Maze screen.
Welfare load: LowMotor confound: Moderate
View apparatus ->
Automated delayed-choice comparator

Operant Delayed Alternation

Construct
Lever or nose-poke alternation with programmed delay and reinforcement schedules
Best fit
Labs needing high-trial-count delayed alternation with precise event logs.
Tradeoff
More training, reward dependence, and chamber-specific response rules than free Y-Maze exploration.
Welfare load: LowMotor confound: Low
View apparatus ->

Section 1

Methods context

The Y-Maze is a three-arm spatial working-memory apparatus that exploits rodents natural tendency to investigate a less recently visited arm. Spontaneous alternation requires no explicit training, making it a rapid screen for hippocampal and prefrontal working-memory function. 1

The same apparatus supports several distinct protocols: spontaneous alternation, forced alternation, novel-arm recognition, and continuous alternation. These should be named explicitly because each protocol has different memory load, training burden, and door-control requirements. 1

Y-Maze outcomes are strongly affected by total activity. A low alternation score is difficult to interpret if the animal makes too few arm entries, so entry count and session duration should be reported with alternation percentage. 1

Section 2

Protocol

2.1 Procedure

Spontaneous alternation: one free-exploration session, usually 5 to 8 minutes.

Pre-test setup

  1. 1.Arm labeling - Label arms A, B, and C. Keep spatial cues fixed around the maze.
  2. 2.Zone definition - Define arm entry thresholds consistently, usually all four paws inside an arm.
  3. 3.Lighting - Use even low-to-moderate illumination to support exploration without excessive avoidance.
  4. 4.Door check - For forced or novel-arm protocols, verify doors open and close silently and fully.

Trial sequence

  1. 1.Place subject - Start the animal in the center zone facing the same arm orientation or a counterbalanced orientation.
  2. 2.Record exploration - Allow free exploration for the defined duration, commonly 5 to 8 minutes for spontaneous alternation.1
  3. 3.Score entries - Count a valid entry only after the full body or all four paws cross the threshold.
  4. 4.Compute triads - Score every overlapping set of three consecutive entries as alternating when all three arms are represented.
  5. 5.Clean maze - Clean arms and center zone between subjects.

Critical methodological constraints

  • Minimum activity. Sessions with very low arm entries should be flagged or excluded by pre-defined criteria because alternation percentage becomes unstable.3
  • Protocol naming. Do not mix spontaneous alternation with forced alternation or novel-arm recognition in analysis tables.
  • Door effects. Door sounds and handling during forced-alternation phases can alter exploration. Keep timing and handling identical across groups.
  • Side bias. Persistent preference for one arm can reduce alternation independent of memory. Report arm occupancy when bias appears.

Method reporting controls

Protocol variant

State spontaneous alternation, forced alternation, novel-arm recognition, or continuous alternation before reporting endpoints.

Entry definition

Report whether entries require full body, four paws, center-point crossing, or software zone threshold.

Minimum-entry rule

Predefine the minimum valid arm-entry count and exclusion rule for low-activity sessions.

Arm bias

Report arm occupancy and repeated-arm returns when one arm dominates exploration.

Door timing

For forced or novel-arm protocols, report sample duration, delay interval, door sequence, and handling during delay.

Cleaning and cue stability

Report cleaning procedure, arm labels, cue map, and whether maze orientation changed between animals.

2.2 Measurement & Analysis

Core Y-Maze metrics ConductVision scores from arm-entry sequences.

Spontaneous Alternation

Working-memory index

Percent of overlapping three-entry sequences that include all three arms.1

Total Arm Entries

Activity control

Total valid arm entries. Low counts make alternation percentage unreliable.3

Arm Dwell Time

Preference and bias

Time in each arm, used to detect side bias or avoidance of a specific arm.

Novel Arm Time

Recognition memory

Time spent in the previously blocked arm during novel-arm recognition protocols.

Center Time

Decision behavior

Time in the center choice zone, often increased when animals hesitate or show low exploration.

+ Additional metrics: alternation by time bin, repeated-arm errors, latency to first arm, arm-entry sequence, velocity, and inactivity.

Metric glossary

Behavior terms used in this assay

Spontaneous alternation

Overlapping three-entry sequences in which all three arms are represented.

alternating triads / total triads
Interpretation
Often used as a rapid spatial working-memory index when entry count is adequate.
Confounds
Low locomotion, arm bias, anxiety-like avoidance, odor cues, and entry-threshold differences.
Arm bias

Disproportionate preference for one arm or repeated returns to the same arm.

Interpretation
Can lower alternation percentage without a primary memory impairment.
Confounds
Lighting gradient, odor residue, arm geometry, cue placement, and side preference.
Minimum entry count

Predefined threshold for enough arm entries to calculate a stable alternation percentage.

Interpretation
Protects against overinterpreting low-activity sessions.
Confounds
Session length, age, strain, sedation, stress, and start handling.

2.3 spontaneous alternation percentage (analysis)

Successful triads divided by all possible triads.

Inline calculator

Type the times your tracker recorded.

Full calculator with 95% CI →
Alternation

69.2%

Formula: alternating triads / (alternating triads + non-alternating triads) x 100. Chance is commonly treated as 50%, but interpretation depends on entry count and arm bias. 1

Section 3

Evidence

Aggregate publication data, sample apparatus output, and recent findings from the live PubMed feed.

3.1 Publication trends

PubMed volume and co-occurring methods for spatial working-memory assays.

Figure 1 · EPM publications by year (PubMed)

The paradigm has been dominant for 40 years and is still growing.

Live · Weekly

2000201020202026 YTD: 38 papers

Total in PubMed since 1985: 1,338+ papers. Updated 2026-05-04.

Figure 2 · Methods co-occurring with EPM (last 12 months)

Other paradigms most often run alongside EPM in the same paper.

Live

3.2 Sample apparatus output

Representative arm-entry sequence summary from spontaneous alternation.

Table 1 - Per-animal scoring output

Download sample CSV ->
AnimalGroupArm entriesAlt triadsErrorsAlternation (%)
YM-001Control3121872.4%
YM-002Control2818869.2%
YM-003Control3322971.0%
YM-004Impaired29121544.4%
YM-005Impaired26101441.7%
YM-006Impaired30131546.4%

Synthetic example for illustration only. Sessions with low arm-entry counts should be flagged before group comparison.

Visual sequence outputs

Y-Maze output should show arm-entry order, dwell balance, and whether one arm or the center zone dominated behavior.

Alternating path

Working-memory pattern

Alternation
72%
Entries
31

Side-biased path

Arm preference confound

Dominant arm
58%
Errors
15

Low-entry path

Activity confound

Entries
7
Center dwell
41%

Interpretation library

3.3 Interpreting Y-Maze result patterns

Y-Maze interpretation depends on protocol variant, total entries, arm bias, and whether the task is free exploration or door-controlled choice.

Strain, species, and cohort effects

Mouse strain background

Exploration rate and alternation baseline differ across strains; use within-strain comparisons and report background.

Read background
Mice versus rats

Arm length, wall height, entry definition, and session length should scale with species and protocol variant.

Read background
Low-activity cohorts

Aged, injured, sedated, or anxious animals can produce too few entries for stable alternation scoring.

Read background
Door-controlled variants

Forced and novel-arm protocols add handling, door timing, delay intervals, and auditory cues as protocol variables.

Read background

Result pattern interpreter

Low alternation + normal entries

Working-memory impairment is more plausible.

Check arm bias, sequence trace, and protocol variant.
Low alternation + low entries

Activity, anxiety, sickness, or sedation confound is likely.

Do not interpret memory without entry-count and locomotor controls.
One arm dominates occupancy

Side bias or local cue issue may drive alternation changes.

Inspect arm dwell and clean/cue records.
High center dwell

Decision hesitation or low exploration may be present.

Report center time and latency to first arm.
Delay-dependent forced-alternation drop

Retention load effect is plausible in door-controlled protocols.

Confirm matched sample phase, delay timing, and door operation.

Common research applications

3.4 Recent findings (live PubMed feed)

  • May 2026PMID: 41806956

    Chemogenetic inhibition of developmentally-born hippocampal neurons but not loss of adult neurogenesis impairs spatial working memory in the rat.

    Ward MD, Snyder JS, Seib DR. Behav Brain Res. 2026 May 28.

    The dentate gyrus (DG) of the hippocampus contains a heterogeneous population of granule cells, being comprised of neurons generated during both development and adulthood.

  • May 2026PMID: 41961641

    Effects of ononin on cognitive and learning-memory functions in mild cognitive impairment.

    Yang L, Zhao W, Zhao J, et al.. Neuroreport. 2026 May 13.

    This study aimed to investigate the potential of ononin in alleviating mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and to determine whether its effects depend on the functional recovery of neurons in the nucleus tractus solitarius (NTS).

  • May 2026PMID: 41707874

    Lactate restores PGC1α and BDNF expression rescuing cognitive impairments in a mouse model for schizophrenia.

    Kambali M, Wang M, Nagarajan R, et al.. Behav Brain Res. 2026 May 8.

    Disruption of metabolic interactions between astrocytes and neurons, in particular of the lactate shuttle, may contribute to neurodevelopmental and psychiatric disorders such as autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and schizophrenia.

View all 1338 matching papers on PubMed →

Section 4

Discussion

Limitations of the paradigm, methodological caveats, and current directions.

4.1 Common confounds

Variables that shift Y-Maze results independent of the target construct.

Low activity

Alternation percentage is unstable when animals make too few entries.3

Arm bias

Preference or avoidance of one arm can reduce alternation independent of working memory.

Protocol mixing

Spontaneous alternation, forced alternation, and novel-arm recognition should be analyzed separately.

Door and delay timing

Forced and novel-arm protocols depend on consistent door timing and retention interval.

Cue instability

Moving external cues changes the spatial frame and can impair recognition performance.

4.2 Construct validity caveats

Y-Maze spontaneous alternation is fast and low stress, but it is sensitive to locomotor activity and exploratory drive. 1 Strong interpretation requires enough entries, balanced arm occupancy, and protocol-specific endpoints rather than alternation percentage alone. 2

4.3 Special considerations

What is the minimum number of entries?

Use a pre-defined threshold appropriate to session length and species. Very low entry counts make the denominator too small for reliable alternation estimates.

Can the same maze run forced alternation?

Yes, if it has removable doors or inserts and the protocol defines sample phase, delay, and choice phase separately.

How does Y-Maze differ from T-Maze?

Y-Maze spontaneous alternation is free exploration, while many T-Maze protocols use discrete forced-choice trials with reward or rule structure.

4.4 Current directions

Quarterly editorial review of emerging Y-Maze methodology. Q2 2026

Rising

Time-binned alternation curves

Extended sessions increasingly report alternation decay over time instead of one whole-session percentage.

Methodological

Entry-threshold standardization

Automated full-body threshold rules are reducing scorer variation in arm-entry calls.

Rising

Rapid disease-model screens

Y-Maze remains a common first-pass working-memory screen in AD, stroke, TBI, and pharmacology batteries.

Methodological

Door-controlled protocols

Automated doors are making forced alternation and novel-arm recognition more reproducible.

Section 5

References

6 curated Y-Maze methods and validation papers. Schema-marked as ScholarlyArticle ItemList.

  1. Hughes RN. The value of spontaneous alternation behavior (SAB) as a test of retention in pharmacological investigations of memory. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2004;28(5):497-505.
  2. Dellu F, Mayo W, Cherkaoui J, Le Moal M, Simon H. A two-trial memory task with automated recording: study in young and aged rats. Brain Res. 1992;588(1):132-139.
  3. Lalonde R. The neurobiological basis of spontaneous alternation. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2002;26(1):91-104.
  4. Dudchenko PA. An overview of the tasks used to test working memory in rodents. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2004;28(7):699-709.
  5. Conrad CD, Galea LA, Kuroda Y, McEwen BS. Chronic stress impairs rat spatial memory on the Y maze, and this effect is blocked by tianeptine pretreatment. Behav Neurosci. 1996;110(6):1321-1334.
  6. Holcomb L, Gordon MN, McGowan E, et al. Accelerated Alzheimer-type phenotype in transgenic mice carrying both mutant amyloid precursor protein and presenilin 1 transgenes. Nat Med. 1998;4(1):97-100.
Y Maze
Y Maze
$1,295.00
Added to quoteView Quote