Research data · Disease model and test

Formalin test in pain conditions research

From 2021 to 2025, 386 animal research papers on pain conditions mentioned the formalin test in their title or abstract.

That is 29% fewer than the 541 papers of 2011 to 2015. Between the same two periods, the papers on pain conditions that mention any of the 90 tests we count rose 10%.

386 papers on pain conditions from 2021 to 2025 mentioned the formalin test
15% of the papers on pain conditions that mention any test mention the formalin test
71% of the papers that mention the formalin test are on pain conditions
29% fewer papers than in 2011 to 2015

Papers by year

Animal research papers on pain conditions that mention the formalin test, by year, 2001 to 2026

The 2026 bar counts papers added to PubMed by November 8, 2026.

  • Papers in a full year
  • 2026 so far
Show the counts for each year
Papers by year
YearPapers
200164
200235
200369
200460
200581
200685
200778
200879
2009103
2010126
2011105
2012109
2013102
2014122
2015103
201694
201790
201869
201981
2020104
202194
202294
202362
202476
202560
2026 (part year)62

Which species the papers used

Each bar is a share of the 386 papers from 2021 to 2025. A paper can use more than one species, so the shares can add to more than 100%.

Species

Mouse
250 papers 65%
Rat
163 papers 42%
Other animals
14 papers 4%
Zebrafish
2 papers 1%

“Other animals” counts papers that use none of the species this chart names.

Tests mentioned alongside the formalin test

Each bar is one test, with how many of the 386 papers also mention it, and what share that is. Of these papers, 182 (47%) mention no other test.

The 12 tests these papers mention most

87 papers 23%
82 papers 21%
49 papers 13%
28 papers 7%
24 papers 6%
21 papers 5%
16 papers 4%
6 papers 2%

Which papers count

A paper counts here when it is animal research, mentions the formalin test in its title or abstract, and studies pain conditions.

We tell whether a paper studies pain conditions from its MeSH terms, the subject headings the National Library of Medicine adds when it indexes a paper. For a paper without MeSH terms, PubTator 3, NCBI's text-mining service, has to find the disease in the title or abstract. A paper can count under more than one disease model. A paper that mentions the test only in its methods is missed, so the count runs low.

The page on pain conditions research names the subject headings we count as pain conditions. Download the test list for the search terms we used for the formalin test, or the paper list for the PubMed ID of every paper behind these counts. Our main page, Behavioral tests in published research, has the full method and each source's terms of use.

More tests and disease models

Every pairing of a disease model and a test with 30 or more papers from 2021 to 2025 has a page like this one.

The page on the formalin test counts all the papers that mention it, whatever they study. The page on pain conditions research ranks the tests by their papers on pain conditions.

How to cite

APA

ConductScience. (2026, November 10). Formalin test in pain conditions research [Data set]. https://conductscience.com/data/behavioral-tests/models/pain/formalin-test

BibTeX

@misc{conductscience_pain_formalin_test_2026,
  author = {{ConductScience}},
  title = {Formalin test in pain conditions research},
  year = {2026},
  month = nov,
  url = {https://conductscience.com/data/behavioral-tests/models/pain/formalin-test},
  note = {Data set, released November 10, 2026},
}