Modified Beam Walking Apparatus Sweiss Et Al. 2016
Integrated apparatus combining beam walking motor assessment with anxiety-like behavior evaluation through addition of a darkened safe box target zone.
Louise Corscadden, PhD
Neuroscience · ConductScience
Ask Louise about Modified Beam Walking Apparatus Sweiss Et Al. 2016 fit, setup, configuration, or quote prep.
Already working with us? Sign in to connect this with My Scientist.
The Modified Beam Walking Apparatus (Sweiss et al. 2016) integrates motor coordination assessment with anxiety-like behavior evaluation in a single testing paradigm. This apparatus extends the traditional beam walking test by incorporating a darkened safe box with a semicircular opening (approximately 15 cm diameter) positioned at one end of the beam. The design mimics the enclosed arms of an elevated plus maze, allowing researchers to simultaneously evaluate motor latency to cross the beam and approach/avoidance behaviors.
The apparatus is particularly valuable for assessing brain injury in rodents where both motor function and anxiety-like behaviors may be impacted. By measuring the time required for subjects to traverse the beam and enter the safe box, researchers can obtain integrated measures of motor coordination, balance, and anxiety-related responses in a single test session.
How It Works
The apparatus operates on the principle of approach-avoidance conflict combined with motor challenge. Subjects are placed at the end of the beam opposite the safe box, creating a motivation to traverse the beam to reach the enclosed, secure environment. The beam crossing requires intact motor coordination, balance, and motor planning, while the presence of the safe box introduces an anxiety-related component that can influence crossing behavior.
The darkened safe box is designed to mimic the enclosed arms of an elevated plus maze, exploiting rodents' natural preference for dark, enclosed spaces over open, elevated areas. The semicircular opening provides easy entry while maintaining the enclosed environment that reduces anxiety. Motor latency to cross the beam reflects both the subject's physical capability to maintain balance and coordination, as well as their motivation to reach the safe zone.
This dual-task design allows differentiation between pure motor deficits and motor impairments complicated by anxiety or fear responses, providing more comprehensive behavioral phenotyping than traditional beam walking tests alone.
Features & Benefits
warranty_length
- 1 YEAR
storage_included
- Yes
assembly_required
- Yes
Behavioral Construct
- Motor coordination
- Balance
- Anxiety-like behavior
- Approach-avoidance conflict
- Motor latency
Automation Level
- manual
Research Domain
- Aging Research
- Anxiety and Depression
- Behavioral Pharmacology
- Motor Function
- Neurodegeneration
- Neuroscience
Species
- Mouse
- Rat
Compatible Tracking Software
- ConductVision
Weight
- 44.09 kg
Dimensions
- L: 48.7 mm
- W: 40.5 mm
- H: 32.4 mm
| Feature | This Product | Typical Alternative | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Behavioral Integration | Combines motor coordination and anxiety-like behavior assessment in single test | Standard beam tests evaluate motor function only | Provides more comprehensive behavioral phenotyping relevant to brain injury models where both motor and emotional systems are affected. |
| Target Motivation | Darkened safe box with semicircular opening creates approach motivation | Traditional beam tests rely on avoidance of open height only | Introduces positive reinforcement element that can reveal differences between motor incapacity and behavioral reluctance. |
| Safe Box Design | 15 cm diameter semicircular opening mimics elevated plus maze enclosed arms | Standard endpoints provide no enclosed refuge area | Exploits natural rodent preferences to create consistent motivation across subjects and test sessions. |
| Species Compatibility | All species design accommodates various rodent models | Many beam tests are species-specific in dimensions | Enables comparative studies across different rodent models within the same laboratory setup. |
This apparatus uniquely integrates motor coordination assessment with anxiety-like behavior evaluation through the addition of a darkened safe box target. The design provides more comprehensive behavioral phenotyping than traditional beam walking tests while maintaining the core motor assessment capabilities.
Practical Tips
Establish baseline crossing latencies for each strain and age group before experimental manipulation.
Why: Natural variation in crossing behavior must be characterized to detect treatment effects accurately.
Clean the safe box interior thoroughly between subjects to remove odor cues that might influence behavior.
Why: Residual scents can create artificial approach or avoidance behaviors unrelated to the experimental variables.
Allow subjects brief habituation to the testing room environment before beginning trials.
Why: Environmental stress can confound both motor performance and anxiety-related measures.
Record both crossing latency and any hesitation or freezing behaviors during beam traversal.
Why: Behavioral observations provide context for interpreting latency measures and identifying anxiety versus motor components.
If subjects refuse to enter the safe box, verify the interior is sufficiently darkened and opening is unobstructed.
Why: The safe box must maintain its enclosed, secure characteristics to motivate approach behavior.
Ensure platform height is appropriate for subject safety while maintaining the elevated challenge.
Why: Excessive height can cause injury from falls while insufficient height reduces the motor challenge component.
Counterbalance testing order across treatment groups to control for potential time-of-day effects.
Why: Circadian rhythms can influence both motor performance and anxiety-like behaviors in rodent models.
Setup Guide
What’s in the Box
- Beam walking platform (typical)
- Crossing beam component (typical)
- Darkened safe box with semicircular opening
- Mounting hardware and assembly components (typical)
- User manual and assembly instructions (typical)
- Storage container components
Warranty
ConductScience provides a 1-year manufacturer warranty covering defects in materials and workmanship, with technical support for setup and operational questions.
Compliance
How does this apparatus differ from standard beam walking tests?
The modified version integrates anxiety-like behavior assessment through addition of a darkened safe box target zone, allowing simultaneous evaluation of motor coordination and approach-avoidance behaviors in a single test paradigm.
What species can be tested with this apparatus?
The apparatus is designed for all rodent species, with the 15 cm diameter safe box opening accommodating various sizes from mice to larger rodent models.
How is motor latency measured and what does it indicate?
Motor latency is the time required for subjects to traverse the beam and enter the safe box, reflecting both motor coordination capabilities and motivation to reach the secure environment.
What assembly is required for setup?
Assembly involves mounting the beam to the support platform and attaching the darkened safe box component, with specific instructions provided for proper alignment and stability.
How does the safe box design influence behavior?
The darkened interior with semicircular opening mimics enclosed maze arms, exploiting rodents' natural preference for enclosed spaces and creating approach motivation that interacts with motor performance.
What storage options are included?
The apparatus includes storage components for efficient laboratory organization, allowing disassembly and compact storage between testing sessions.
How should testing sessions be structured?
Subjects are placed at the beam end opposite the safe box, with timing initiated upon placement and concluded when the subject enters the safe box or after a predetermined maximum trial duration.
Have a question about this product?
Accessories
Enhance your setup with compatible accessories
Frequently Bought Together
Upgrade Options
