Behavioral Mazes

Dry Morris Water Maze

SKU ME-DMWM-M01
$1,490.00
Unit: Each
IncludesStandard Care

The Dry Morris Water Maze is a dry land version of the Morris Water Maze (MWM).

The task is used in the assessment of spatial learning and memory. Much like the Morris Water Maze, the Dry Morris Water Maze is a hidden-goal task that requires the food-deprived

CE Marked
Size SKU ME-DMWM-M01
$1,490.00
Unit: Each
Scientist guidance
Louise Corscadden, PhD, Director of Science

Louise Corscadden, PhD

Director of Science · ConductScience

Ask Louise about Dry Morris Water Maze fit, setup, configuration, or quote prep.

Key Specifications

Full details →
Task Type
Hidden-goal spatial learning and memory assessment
Motivation Method
Food-motivated
Learning Type
Hippocampal-based learning
Subject Requirement
Food-deprived subjects
Species
Mouse, Rat
Compatible Tracking Software
ConductVision
Category: Behavioral Mazes

The Dry Morris Water Maze is a dry land version of the Morris Water Maze (MWM). The task is used in the assessment of spatial learning and memory. Much like the Morris Water Maze, the Dry Morris Water Maze is a hidden-goal task that requires the food-deprived subjects to locate the hidden food rewards. This food-motivated task is less stress-inducing than the conventional MWM which uses the fear of drowning to motivate the subject to find the hidden platform. This task requires the use of hippocampal-based learning to remember and locate the hidden rewards. This ability can be affected by lesions and drugs.

Specifications

Track rodents with ConductVision

ConductVision is our video-tracking software. Record your sessions on video, and it scores standard rodent tests, such as those listed below.

Examples of tests it scores

To check whether ConductVision scores your protocol in this apparatus, ask in your quote request.

Add ConductVision to your quote

ConductVision

$1,490 per year

A 5-year license is $3,990 in total.

Results export as CSV files.

Ask a question

Have a question? Just ask.

Send it over and we'll email you a personalized answer, with no call or scheduling.

Personalized email reply
Usually within one business day
Helpful answers published here

Prefer to talk it through?

Ask your question

Type it below and we'll email you a personalized answer, with no meeting required.

We'll only use your email to send your answer; broadly useful answers may be published anonymously.

Accessories

Enhance your setup with compatible accessories

Total: $0.00

§ 1

Introduction

The Dry Morris Water Maze is a spatial assay built around spatial learning without swim stress, hypothermia, or aquatic motor load. Interpretable data depend on matching the apparatus geometry, subject species, trial structure, and scoring rules to the behavioral construct under study. 1

Dry-land spatial acquisition protocols depend on stable geometry, consistent trial timing, and pre-defined scoring rules. Without those controls, target-zone time can be shifted by motivation, locomotion, light level, odor, cue salience, or handling rather than the intended behavioral construct. 1

This methods section summarizes setup, endpoint definitions, common confounds, sample output, adjacent assays, and reporting details needed to evaluate Dry Morris Water Maze results alongside the product specifications. 1

§ 2

Methods

2.1 Procedure

Dry-land spatial acquisition with standardized setup, trial timing, and endpoint extraction.

Pre-test setup

  1. 1.Define construct: Pre-register whether the study uses Dry Morris Water Maze for spatial behavior, screening, cohort comparison, or apparatus validation.
  2. 2.Calibrate apparatus: Verify dry circular arena with escape or goal location analogs for place learning, visibility, lighting, surface condition, cue placement, and camera field of view before animals enter the room.
  3. 3.Set scoring rules: Define target-zone time, omissions, exclusions, latency cutoffs, and event thresholds before acquisition starts.
  4. 4.Control carryover: Use consistent cleaning, handling, acclimation, and inter-trial timing so odor, stress, and fatigue do not become hidden treatment variables.

Trial sequence

  1. 1.Start trial: Place the subject at the protocol-defined start location and begin synchronized video or event logging.
  2. 2.Record behavior: Capture target-zone time, path order, latency, dwell time, and relevant zone or arm events throughout the trial.1
  3. 3.Apply endpoint rules: Score only committed entries or events that meet the pre-defined body-position and timing criteria.
  4. 4.End and reset: Stop at the maximum duration, completion criterion, or humane endpoint, then clean and reset the apparatus.
  5. 5.Export QC: Review tracking loss, outlier latency, immobility, omissions, and apparatus notes before group-level analysis.

Critical methodological constraints

  • Odor trails. Document odor trails because it can shift target-zone time independent of the intended construct.
  • Motivation. Keep motivation stable across cohorts and sessions.
  • Room cues. Audit room cues before interpreting group differences.
  • Locomotor activity. Report locomotor activity when it changes engagement, exploration, or measurable trial completion.
  • Surface preference. Flag surface preference during QA because it often explains apparent assay failure.2

2.2 Measurement & Analysis

Core Dry Morris Water Maze endpoints for behavioral interpretation and apparatus quality control.

Target-zone time

Spatial memory proxy

Target-zone time is the primary endpoint for this page and should be paired with latency and quality-control flags.1

Goal latency

Latency and initiation

Goal latency helps distinguish task performance from motivation, freezing, fatigue, or handling effects.

Path efficiency

Spatial or zone strategy

Path efficiency captures how the subject solved the task, not only whether it reached the endpoint.

Search errors

Engagement control

Search errors identifies omissions, low exploration, sensor dropouts, or species-specific non-response.

Cue instability

Quality-control flag

Cue instability should be reviewed before exporting final group summaries.

+ Additional metrics: trial duration, zone dwell, event count, path efficiency, tracking confidence, exclusions, and session-level notes.

2.3 target-zone time ratio (analysis)

A compact percentage summary for Dry Morris Water Maze output.

Inline calculator

Type the values your tracker recorded.

Full calculator with 95% CI ->
Target-zone time ratio

32.0%

Formula: target-zone time / (target-zone time + other-zone time) x 100. Interpret with latency, engagement, and confound checks before making construct-level claims. 1

§ 3

Results

3.1 Sample apparatus output

Representative Dry Morris Water Maze output for methods review and endpoint interpretation.

Table 1 · Per-animal Dry Morris Water Maze scoring output

AnimalGroupTarget-zone timeGoal latencyPath efficiencySummary
DMW-001Control101 s18 s0.7233.7%
DMW-002Control94 s21 s0.6831.3%
DMW-003Impaired58 s42 s0.4119.3%
DMW-004Impaired62 s39 s0.4420.7%

Synthetic example for illustration only.

§ 4

Discussion

Limitations of the paradigm, methodological caveats, and current directions.

4.1 Common confounds

Variables that can shift Dry Morris Water Maze results apart from the effect under study.

Odor trails

Odor trails can change apparent Dry Morris Water Maze performance without reflecting the intended behavioral construct.

Motivation

Motivation can change apparent Dry Morris Water Maze performance without reflecting the intended behavioral construct.

Room cues

Room cues can change apparent Dry Morris Water Maze performance without reflecting the intended behavioral construct.

Locomotor activity

Locomotor activity can change apparent Dry Morris Water Maze performance without reflecting the intended behavioral construct.

Surface preference

Surface preference can change apparent Dry Morris Water Maze performance without reflecting the intended behavioral construct.

4.2 Construct validity caveats

Dry Morris Water Maze is strongest when endpoint definitions, apparatus settings, and exclusion rules are specified before testing. Treat a single summary metric as a screening signal, then confirm interpretation with latency, engagement, comparator assays, and quality-control review. 1

4.3 Special considerations

When should I choose Dry Morris Water Maze?

Choose Dry Morris Water Maze when the research question matches spatial learning without swim stress, hypothermia, or aquatic motor load. and the lab can control odor trails, motivation, and trial timing.

What setup variables should be specified before testing?

Specify species, cohort size, apparatus dimensions, lighting, tracking method, automation level, cleaning workflow, endpoint definitions, and exclusion criteria before data collection begins.

What makes the data interpretable?

Interpretation is strongest when the apparatus configuration, trial timing, scoring thresholds, confound controls, and comparator assays are documented together with the primary endpoint.

4.4 Current directions

Quarterly editorial review of emerging Dry Morris Water Maze methodology. Q2 2026

Methods

Endpoint standardization

Define target-zone time, latency, exclusions, and engagement flags before comparing cohorts.

Emerging

Automated scoring

Camera and event-log workflows can reduce observer burden and improve consistency when zone definitions and event thresholds are validated.

Methods

Comparator batteries

Dry Morris Water Maze should link to adjacent maze, motor, or motivation assays when interpretation depends on controls.

Emerging

Integrated method reporting

Apparatus dimensions, protocol fit, tracking compatibility, and endpoint definitions should be reported together so results are easier to reproduce.

§ 5

Background references

10 selected methods and validation studies of the Dry Morris Water Maze, from any lab.

  1. Dudchenko PA. An overview of the tasks used to test working memory in rodents. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2004;28(7):699-709. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2004.09.002
  2. Shoji H, et al. Comprehensive behavioral test battery for mice. Curr Protoc Mouse Biol. 2012;2:153-187. Find source
  3. Vorhees CV, Williams MT. Assessing spatial learning and memory in rodents. ILAR J. 2014;55(2):310-332. Find source
  4. Lalonde R. The neurobiological basis of spontaneous alternation. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2002;26(1):91-104. doi:10.1016/S0149-7634(01)00041-0
  5. Walf AA, Frye CA. The use of the elevated plus maze as an assay of anxiety-related behavior in rodents. Nat Protoc. 2007;2(2):322-328. doi:10.1038/nprot.2007.44
  6. Pellow S, Chopin P, File SE, Briley M. Validation of open:closed arm entries in an elevated plus-maze as a measure of anxiety in the rat. J Neurosci Methods. 1985;14(3):149-167. doi:10.1016/0165-0270(85)90031-7
  7. Crawley JN, Goodwin FK. Preliminary report of a simple animal behavior model for the anxiolytic effects of benzodiazepines. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1980;13(2):167-170. doi:10.1016/0091-3057(80)90067-2
  8. File SE, Wardill AG. Validity of head-dipping as a measure of exploration in a modified hole-board. Psychopharmacologia. 1975;44(1):53-59. Find source
  9. Walsh RN, Cummins RA. The Open-Field Test: a critical review. Psychol Bull. 1976;83(3):482-504. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.83.3.482
  10. Brown RE, Corey SC, Moore AK. Differences in measures of exploration and fear in MHC-congenic C57BL/6J and B6-H-2K mice. Behav Genet. 1999;29(4):263-271. Find source
Dry Morris Water Maze
Dry Morris Water Maze
$1,490.00
Added to quoteView Quote