Behavioral Mazes

Dry Morris Water Maze

$1,490.00 - $1,890.00
Size: 4ft (Mouse)
$1,490.00
Key Specifications
task_typeHidden-goal spatial learning and memory assessment
motivation_methodFood-motivated
learning_typeHippocampal-based learning
subject_requirementFood-deprived subjects
SpeciesMouse, Rat
SKU:CS-958410
Need Help? Visit our Support CenterKnowledge base, order lookup, and ticket support
Our Staff are PhD Scientists
Get expert guidance on this product
Louise Corscadden, PhD, Neuroscience
Louise Corscadden
PhD, Neuroscience
Schedule a Call Instead

The Dry Morris Water Maze is a dry land version of the Morris Water Maze (MWM). The task is used in the assessment of spatial learning and memory. Much like the Morris Water Maze, the Dry Morris Water Maze is a hidden-goal task that requires the food-deprived subjects to locate the hidden food rewards. This food-motivated task is less stress-inducing than the conventional MWM which uses the fear of drowning to motivate the subject to find the hidden platform. This task requires the use of hippocampal-based learning to remember and locate the hidden rewards. This ability can be affected by lesions and drugs.

Specifications

Accessories

Enhance your setup with compatible accessories

Total: $0.00

Frequently Bought Together

Total: $3,230.00

Upgrade Options

Configuration considerations

Common Dry Morris Water Maze setup decisions

Use these notes to scope species, cohort, tracking, and automation needs. Only verified product or support routes are linked from this section.

This productStandard

Dry Morris Water Maze

Dry circular arena with escape or goal location analogs for place learning

spatial learning without swim stress, hypothermia, or aquatic motor load.

Quote

Request Quote
BuyableScaled option

Dry Morris Water Maze Species Variant

Mouse, rat, aquatic, insect, or large-animal scaling as appropriate

Use species-specific dimensions and lighting so the apparatus tests the intended construct instead of body size, visibility, or handling tolerance.

Quote

View options ->
SpecialtyAutomation

Dry Morris Water Maze With Tracking

Camera, gates, sensors, cue control, or event logging as required

Best when the protocol needs reproducible timing, high-throughput scoring, or defensible endpoint extraction across cohorts.

Quote

Configure tracking ->

§ 1

Introduction

The Dry Morris Water Maze is a spatial assay built around spatial learning without swim stress, hypothermia, or aquatic motor load. Interpretable data depend on matching the apparatus geometry, subject species, trial structure, and scoring rules to the behavioral construct under study. 1

Dry-land spatial acquisition protocols depend on stable geometry, consistent trial timing, and pre-defined scoring rules. Without those controls, target-zone time can be shifted by motivation, locomotion, light level, odor, cue salience, or handling rather than the intended behavioral construct. 1

This methods section summarizes setup, endpoint definitions, common confounds, sample output, adjacent assays, and reporting details needed to evaluate Dry Morris Water Maze results alongside the product specifications. 1

§ 2

Methods

2.1 Procedure

Dry-land spatial acquisition with standardized setup, trial timing, and endpoint extraction.

Pre-test setup

  1. 1.Define constructPre-register whether the study uses Dry Morris Water Maze for spatial behavior, screening, cohort comparison, or apparatus validation.
  2. 2.Calibrate apparatusVerify dry circular arena with escape or goal location analogs for place learning, visibility, lighting, surface condition, cue placement, and camera field of view before animals enter the room.
  3. 3.Set scoring rulesDefine target-zone time, omissions, exclusions, latency cutoffs, and event thresholds before acquisition starts.
  4. 4.Control carryoverUse consistent cleaning, handling, acclimation, and inter-trial timing so odor, stress, and fatigue do not become hidden treatment variables.

Trial sequence

  1. 1.Start trialPlace the subject at the protocol-defined start location and begin synchronized video or event logging.
  2. 2.Record behaviorCapture target-zone time, path order, latency, dwell time, and relevant zone or arm events throughout the trial.1
  3. 3.Apply endpoint rulesScore only committed entries or events that meet the pre-defined body-position and timing criteria.
  4. 4.End and resetStop at the maximum duration, completion criterion, or humane endpoint, then clean and reset the apparatus.
  5. 5.Export QCReview tracking loss, outlier latency, immobility, omissions, and apparatus notes before group-level analysis.

Critical methodological constraints

  • Odor trails. Document odor trails because it can shift target-zone time independent of the intended construct.
  • Motivation. Keep motivation stable across cohorts and sessions.
  • Room cues. Audit room cues before interpreting group differences.
  • Locomotor activity. Report locomotor activity when it changes engagement, exploration, or measurable trial completion.
  • Surface preference. Flag surface preference during QA because it often explains apparent assay failure.2

2.2 Measurement & Analysis

Core Dry Morris Water Maze endpoints for behavioral interpretation and apparatus quality control.

Target-zone time

Spatial memory proxy

Target-zone time is the primary endpoint for this page and should be paired with latency and quality-control flags.1

Goal latency

Latency and initiation

Goal latency helps distinguish task performance from motivation, freezing, fatigue, or handling effects.

Path efficiency

Spatial or zone strategy

Path efficiency captures how the subject solved the task, not only whether it reached the endpoint.

Search errors

Engagement control

Search errors identifies omissions, low exploration, sensor dropouts, or species-specific non-response.

Cue instability

Quality-control flag

Cue instability should be reviewed before exporting final group summaries.

+ Additional metrics: trial duration, zone dwell, event count, path efficiency, tracking confidence, exclusions, and session-level notes.

2.3 target-zone time ratio (analysis)

A compact percentage summary for Dry Morris Water Maze output.

Inline calculator

Type the values your tracker recorded.

Full calculator with 95% CI ->
Target-zone time ratio

32.0%

Formula: target-zone time / (target-zone time + other-zone time) x 100. Interpret with latency, engagement, and confound checks before making construct-level claims. 1

§ 3

Results

Aggregate publication data, sample apparatus output, and recent findings from the live PubMed feed.

3.1 Publication trends

PubMed volume and co-occurring behavioral methods for Dry Morris Water Maze studies.

Figure 1 · EPM publications by year (PubMed)

The paradigm has been dominant for 40 years and is still growing.

Live · Weekly

2000201020202025 YTD: 46 papers

Total in PubMed since 1985: 1,218+ papers. Updated 2026-05-12.

Figure 2 · Methods co-occurring with EPM (last 12 months)

Other paradigms most often run alongside EPM in the same paper.

Live

3.2 Sample apparatus output

Representative Dry Morris Water Maze output for methods review and endpoint interpretation.

Table 1 · Per-animal EPM scoring output

Download sample CSV →
AnimalGroupTarget-zone timeGoal latencyPath efficiencySummary
DMW-001Control101 s18 s0.7233.7%
DMW-002Control94 s21 s0.6831.3%
DMW-003Impaired58 s42 s0.4119.3%
DMW-004Impaired62 s39 s0.4420.7%

Synthetic example for illustration only. Replace with tracked output screenshots or exported data when product media are available.

3.3 Recent methods context

  • May 2026Source note

    Dry Morris Water Maze methods refresh: endpoint definitions, QA flags, and comparator assays

    ConductScience methods note prepared for citation review.

    The first citation-cron pass should replace this editorial seed with current Dry Morris Water Maze methods papers filtered for apparatus, protocol, and endpoint relevance.

View all 1218matching papers on PubMed ->

§ 4

Discussion

Limitations of the paradigm, methodological caveats, and current directions.

4.1 Common confounds

Variables that shift Dry Morris Water Maze results independent of anxiety state.

Odor trails

Odor trails can change apparent Dry Morris Water Maze performance without reflecting the intended behavioral construct. Control it in setup and report it in methods.

Motivation

Motivation can change apparent Dry Morris Water Maze performance without reflecting the intended behavioral construct. Control it in setup and report it in methods.

Room cues

Room cues can change apparent Dry Morris Water Maze performance without reflecting the intended behavioral construct. Control it in setup and report it in methods.

Locomotor activity

Locomotor activity can change apparent Dry Morris Water Maze performance without reflecting the intended behavioral construct. Control it in setup and report it in methods.

Surface preference

Surface preference can change apparent Dry Morris Water Maze performance without reflecting the intended behavioral construct. Control it in setup and report it in methods.

4.2 Construct validity caveats

Dry Morris Water Maze is strongest when endpoint definitions, apparatus settings, and exclusion rules are specified before testing. Treat a single summary metric as a screening signal, then confirm interpretation with latency, engagement, comparator assays, and quality-control review. 1

4.3 Special considerations

When should I choose Dry Morris Water Maze?

Choose Dry Morris Water Maze when the research question matches spatial learning without swim stress, hypothermia, or aquatic motor load. and the lab can control odor trails, motivation, and trial timing.

What setup variables should be specified before testing?

Specify species, cohort size, apparatus dimensions, lighting, tracking method, automation level, cleaning workflow, endpoint definitions, and exclusion criteria before data collection begins.

What makes the data interpretable?

Interpretation is strongest when the apparatus configuration, trial timing, scoring thresholds, confound controls, and comparator assays are documented together with the primary endpoint.

4.4 Current directions

Quarterly editorial review of emerging Dry Morris Water Maze methodology. Q2 2026

Methods

Endpoint standardization

Define target-zone time, latency, exclusions, and engagement flags before comparing cohorts.

Emerging

Automated scoring

Camera and event-log workflows can reduce observer burden and improve consistency when zone definitions and event thresholds are validated.

Methods

Comparator batteries

Dry Morris Water Maze should link to adjacent maze, motor, or motivation assays when interpretation depends on controls.

Emerging

Integrated method reporting

Apparatus dimensions, protocol fit, tracking compatibility, and endpoint definitions should be reported together so results are easier to reproduce.

§ 5

References

10 selected methods and validation references for Dry Morris Water Maze.

  1. Dudchenko PA. An overview of the tasks used to test working memory in rodents. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2004;28(7):699-709. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2004.09.002
  2. Shoji H, et al. Comprehensive behavioral test battery for mice. Curr Protoc Mouse Biol. 2012;2:153-187. Find source
  3. Vorhees CV, Williams MT. Assessing spatial learning and memory in rodents. ILAR J. 2014;55(2):310-332. Find source
  4. Lalonde R. The neurobiological basis of spontaneous alternation. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2002;26(1):91-104. doi:10.1016/S0149-7634(01)00041-0
  5. Walf AA, Frye CA. The use of the elevated plus maze as an assay of anxiety-related behavior in rodents. Nat Protoc. 2007;2(2):322-328. doi:10.1038/nprot.2007.44
  6. Pellow S, Chopin P, File SE, Briley M. Validation of open:closed arm entries in an elevated plus-maze as a measure of anxiety in the rat. J Neurosci Methods. 1985;14(3):149-167. doi:10.1016/0165-0270(85)90031-7
  7. Crawley JN, Goodwin FK. Preliminary report of a simple animal behavior model for the anxiolytic effects of benzodiazepines. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1980;13(2):167-170. doi:10.1016/0091-3057(80)90067-2
  8. File SE, Wardill AG. Validity of head-dipping as a measure of exploration in a modified hole-board. Psychopharmacologia. 1975;44(1):53-59. Find source
  9. Walsh RN, Cummins RA. The Open-Field Test: a critical review. Psychol Bull. 1976;83(3):482-504. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.83.3.482
  10. Brown RE, Corey SC, Moore AK. Differences in measures of exploration and fear in MHC-congenic C57BL/6J and B6-H-2K mice. Behav Genet. 1999;29(4):263-271. Find source
Dry Morris Water Maze
Dry Morris Water Maze
$1,490.00
Added to quoteView Quote