CFA Inflammatory PainPharmacological
Background: C57BL/6J or CD-1
Pain OnsetWithin 4–6 hours
Pain DurationChronic (2–4 weeks)
Central SensitizationDevelops by 24–48 hours
Test Window1–14 days post-injection
Intraplantar injection of CFA (heat-killed Mycobacterium tuberculosis in mineral oil) into the hindpaw produces localized inflammation, edema, and sustained mechanical and thermal hypersensitivity. The model engages both peripheral sensitization (prostaglandins, cytokines, NGF) and central sensitization (spinal dorsal horn wind-up). Paw swelling provides a macroscopic inflammation biomarker concurrent with pain behavior.
Ideal for: Evaluating anti-inflammatory analgesics and NSAIDs; studying the transition from acute to chronic pain; investigating peripheral and central sensitization mechanisms.
Stein C, Millan MJ, Herz A. (1988). Unilateral inflammation of the hindpaw in rats as a model of prolonged noxious stimulation: alterations in behavior and nociceptive thresholds. Pharmacol Biochem Behav, 31(2), 455-451. PMID: 3244721
CFA Inflammatory Pain Behavioral Battery
Open Field Test
Locomotor activity assessment reveals pain-induced reductions in total distance, rearing, and center zone exploration. Provides a non-evoked measure of ongoing pain affecting spontaneous behavior.
View Open Field Test→Elevated Plus Maze
Assesses anxiety-like behavior associated with chronic inflammatory pain. CFA-injected mice show increased closed arm time, reflecting pain-related anxiety comorbidity.
View Elevated Plus Maze→Grip Strength Test
Quantifies musculoskeletal pain-related weakness via forelimb peak force. CFA-induced inflammation reduces grip strength, providing a functional pain readout.
View Grip Strength Test→Rotarod
Motor coordination and balance assessment. CFA hindpaw inflammation impairs rotarod performance due to weight-bearing pain and guarding behavior.
View Rotarod Test→Forced Swim Test
Evaluates depressive-like behavior as a pain comorbidity. Chronic CFA pain increases immobility time, modeling the affective dimension of persistent pain.
View Forced Swim Test→SNI (Spared Nerve Injury)Surgical
Background: C57BL/6J or Sprague-Dawley (rat)
Pain OnsetWithin 24 hours post-surgery
Pain DurationChronic (months)
Central SensitizationRobust, persistent
Test Window3–28 days post-surgery
Two of three terminal branches of the sciatic nerve (tibial and common peroneal) are ligated and transected, leaving the sural nerve intact. This produces robust, long-lasting mechanical allodynia and cold hypersensitivity in the sural nerve territory of the lateral hindpaw. The adjacent denervated and intact territories create a sharp boundary for spatial sensitivity mapping. Central sensitization in the spinal dorsal horn develops rapidly and persists for months.
Ideal for: Studying neuropathic pain mechanisms and central sensitization; screening analgesics for nerve injury pain; long-duration studies requiring stable pain phenotype.
Decosterd I, Woolf CJ. (2000). Spared nerve injury: an animal model of persistent peripheral neuropathic pain. Pain, 87(2), 149-158. PMID: 10924808
SNI (Spared Nerve Injury) Behavioral Battery
Open Field Test
Locomotor and exploratory activity assessment. SNI mice show reduced spontaneous activity and increased thigmotaxis reflecting pain-related behavioral depression.
View Open Field Test→Elevated Plus Maze
Anxiety-like behavior assessment. Neuropathic pain from SNI produces sustained anxiety phenotype with reduced open arm exploration beginning 7–14 days post-surgery.
View Elevated Plus Maze→Light-Dark Box
Complementary anxiety measure. SNI mice spend more time in the dark compartment and show fewer light-dark transitions, confirming anxiety comorbidity of neuropathic pain.
View Light-Dark Box→Forced Swim Test
Assesses depressive-like behavior comorbid with chronic neuropathic pain. Increased immobility time in SNI animals reflects the affective burden of persistent pain.
View Forced Swim Test→Grip Strength Test
Hindlimb grip force measurement detects functional motor deficits secondary to nerve injury. SNI reduces ipsilateral grip strength relative to the contralateral paw.
View Grip Strength Test→Formalin TestPharmacological
Background: Any (typically C57BL/6J or CD-1)
Pain OnsetImmediate (seconds)
Pain DurationAcute (60 min)
Central SensitizationPhase 2 (15–60 min)
Test WindowImmediate (single session, 60 min)
Subcutaneous injection of dilute formalin (1–5%) into the hindpaw produces a characteristic biphasic pain response: Phase 1 (0–10 min) reflects direct activation of C-fiber nociceptors, while Phase 2 (15–60 min) involves central sensitization and inflammatory mediator release. The interphase quiescent period (10–15 min) separates peripheral and central mechanisms, allowing pharmacological dissection of pain processing at different levels of the neuraxis.
Ideal for: Rapid analgesic screening distinguishing peripheral vs. central mechanisms; teaching and training in pain research methodology; pharmacological characterization of novel analgesics.
Hunskaar S, Hole K. (1987). The formalin test in mice: dissociation between inflammatory and non-inflammatory pain. Pain, 30(1), 103-114. PMID: 3614974
Formalin Test Behavioral Battery
Open Field Test
The formalin test is often conducted in an open field arena where licking, flinching, and lifting of the injected paw are scored during both phases. Automated video tracking quantifies time spent in pain behaviors.
View Open Field Test→Elevated Plus Maze
Post-formalin anxiety assessment. Animals tested after formalin show increased anxiety-like behavior, demonstrating the acute affective component of chemical nociception.
View Elevated Plus Maze→Light-Dark Box
Complementary anxiety-like behavior assessment following formalin injection. Increased dark zone preference confirms aversive affective state induced by acute pain.
View Light-Dark Box→Novel Object Recognition
Evaluates whether acute pain impairs attention and recognition memory. Formalin-injected mice show reduced discrimination index, indicating pain-related cognitive disruption.
View Novel Object Recognition→Hot Plate TestPharmacological
Background: Any (typically C57BL/6J or CD-1)
Pain OnsetImmediate (seconds)
Pain DurationAcute (removed at response)
Central SensitizationNone (supraspinal reflex)
Test WindowImmediate (single session)
The mouse is placed on a heated surface (typically 52–56 degrees C) and the latency to a nociceptive response (hindpaw licking, jumping, or shaking) is measured. Unlike the tail flick test, hot plate responses involve supraspinal processing, making it sensitive to opioid analgesics and other centrally acting drugs. A cutoff time (typically 30 seconds) prevents tissue damage. The test requires no prior training and generates data within minutes.
Ideal for: Screening centrally acting analgesics including opioids; establishing dose-response curves for acute antinociception; comparing potency of analgesic compounds.
Eddy NB, Leimbach D. (1953). Synthetic analgesics. II. Dithienylbutenyl- and dithienylbutylamines. J Pharmacol Exp Ther, 107(3), 385-393. PMID: 13035677
Hot Plate Test Behavioral Battery
Open Field Test
Baseline locomotor activity and sedation screening. Essential control to confirm that increased hot plate latency from analgesics is not due to motor sedation or impaired locomotion.
View Open Field Test→Rotarod
Motor coordination control for analgesic studies. Opioids and other centrally acting drugs may increase hot plate latency through sedation rather than true antinociception — rotarod rules this out.
View Rotarod Test→Grip Strength Test
Neuromuscular function control measure. Confirms that analgesic-induced changes in nociceptive thresholds are not confounded by muscle relaxation or motor impairment.
View Grip Strength Test→