Textile, polymer & composite

Fiber diameter distribution

Mean diameter, CV%, and D10/D50/D90 for wool, synthetic, and nanofiber, measured from the image.

ModalitiesMicroprojectionOptical microscopySEM
Scanning electron micrograph of a single cotton fiber with a 5-micron scale bar, the kind of view used to measure fiber diameter
19.4 µm
Mean diameter
21.3
CV%
2,400
Fibers measured

Example outputs shown for illustration. Numbers depend on your samples and protocol.

Image: CSIRO, CC BY 3.0 via Wikimedia Commons

Optical microscopy
Wider-field coverage and uniformity screening across many locations quickly.
SEM
Nanometre-scale surface detail and feature geometry.

Results

Each measurement below comes from your own images, tied back to the annotated frame it came from, so results stay comparable across samples, locations, and conditions.

µm or count

Mean diameter

Size and shape measured for every detected object, then summarized across the population.

Mean diameter19.4 µm

Example, not a claimed result

In your report: Per-object table, size distribution, and summary percentiles.

µm or count

CV%

Size and shape measured for every detected object, then summarized across the population.

Illustrative shape

In your report: Per-object table, size distribution, and summary percentiles.

µm or count

D10 / D50 / D90

Size and shape measured for every detected object, then summarized across the population.

Illustrative shape

In your report: Per-object table, size distribution, and summary percentiles.

µm or count

Diameter histogram

Size and shape measured for every detected object, then summarized across the population.

Illustrative shape

In your report: Per-object table, size distribution, and summary percentiles.

µm or count

Per-fiber table

Size and shape measured for every detected object, then summarized across the population.

Fibers measured2,400

Example, not a claimed result

In your report: Per-object table, size distribution, and summary percentiles.

Built around your image set

Use the calibrated images your team already collects, together with the locations you need to compare.

01
Representative images
Provide representative microprojection images with a recorded scale calibration and the regions of interest clearly visible.
02
Image capture details
Record instrument, magnification, pixel scale, preparation method, and the smallest feature the review must resolve.
03
What to compare
State the samples, number of fields, and conditions to compare. A single field of view is not treated as a whole-sample result by itself.

Each report includes

The artifacts your team receives, ready for review and archive.

Annotated image set

Original images with regions of interest, measurement points, masks, and finding overlays.

Measurement table

Location-indexed values, units, distributions, and QC flags in a structured export.

Method record

Calibration evidence, analysis settings, version history, and validation summary.

Confidence in every resultTraceable measurements, reviewed against your agreed reference method.
Traceable scale
The report records the image scale, calibration evidence, and a method-specific expanded measurement uncertainty. It does not use one product-wide accuracy number.
Reference comparison
The configured method is compared with your accepted reference method or reviewed annotations, and reports bias by measurement range and image condition.
Detection performance
Detections are evaluated against reviewed reference regions with precision, recall, and segmentation overlap, separated by the conditions that affect performance.
Repeatability
The locked protocol is rerun on the same inputs and on a defined repeat set. The review records variation from image acquisition, sampling, and analysis separately where possible.

What this result does not establish: Automates the diameter measurement that ASTM D2130 performs by microprojection, and applies to any fiber with a round cross-section. Scale calibration and conformance for acceptance testing remain your lab’s responsibility.

The measurement, today

Microprojection diameter is read off a projected image by hand, a few hundred fibers at a time. It is slow, it drifts between operators, and the distribution tails are the first thing lost.

What it costs

Fiber fineness sets yarn hairiness, handle, and how readily a fabric pills. Wool a micron coarser than specified changes both the price and the product, and it is the tails of the distribution, not the mean, that generate the complaints.

From image to reviewed result

  1. 1

    Image the fibers

    Load microprojection, optical, or SEM images of a prepared fiber snippet slide.

  2. 2

    Calibrate the scale

    Set pixels-per-micron against a stage micrometer or scale bar so diameters report in real microns.

  3. 3

    Segment and measure

    Each fiber is segmented and its diameter measured perpendicular to the fiber axis; crossing fibers and border objects are excluded.

  4. 4

    Read the distribution

    Export mean, standard deviation, CV%, D10/D50/D90, the histogram, and the per-fiber table.

Standards & methods

  • ASTM D2130

Standards-aware workflows. ConductVision supports these methods; it does not assert certified compliance without validation on your images.

Talk to a scientist

Not sure this is the right measurement?

Send a representative image and your measurement goal. A ConductVision scientist will confirm whether this is the right fit, or point you to the closer workflow, before you commit to a quote.

Share your image set
One representative image is enough to start the conversation.
Book a 30-minute review
Walk through the measurement plan and confidence evidence live.

Send a sample image and a measurement goal

We will show the closest ConductVision workflow and flag what needs custom validation for your images.