Conditioned Place Preference Olmstead 1996
SKU CS-958271
$1,830.00
Unit: Each
IncludesStandard Care
Behavioral apparatus for measuring conditioned place preference based on the validated Olmstead 1996 design, used to assess reward and aversion learning in laboratory animals.
CE Marked
Scientist guidance
Louise Corscadden, PhD
Director of Science · ConductScience
Ask Louise about Conditioned Place Preference Olmstead 1996 fit, setup, configuration, or quote prep.
Already working with us? Sign in to connect this with My Scientist.
Papers that mention conditioned place preference
From 2021 to 2025, 1,078 animal research papers mentioned conditioned place preference. The count covers the test on any apparatus, not only this one.
Key Specifications
Full details →- Automation Level
- Manual
- Species
- Mouse, Rat
- Compatible Tracking Software
- ConductVision
- SKU family
- CS-958271
- Shipping box
- 65.0 × 36.0 × 27.0 cm
- Ordering
- Online checkout and quote request available
The Conditioned Place Preference (CPP) apparatus based on the Olmstead 1996 design is a behavioral testing system for assessing reward and aversion learning in laboratory animals. This paradigm measures an animal's preference for environmental contexts previously associated with drug administration, natural rewards, or aversive stimuli through changes in time spent in distinct compartments.
The apparatus enables researchers to quantify the motivational properties of pharmacological agents, study addiction mechanisms, and evaluate therapeutic interventions. The Olmstead design incorporates specific spatial and contextual features that have been validated across multiple species for reliable measurement of place conditioning responses.
How It Works
The conditioned place preference paradigm operates on principles of classical conditioning, where neutral environmental contexts become associated with rewarding or aversive stimuli through repeated pairings. The apparatus typically consists of distinct compartments with different visual, tactile, and spatial cues that serve as conditioned stimuli.
During conditioning phases, animals receive treatments in one compartment while receiving vehicle or no treatment in the opposing compartment. The strength of conditioning is measured by comparing time spent in treatment-associated versus control compartments during preference testing sessions. Changes in compartment preference reflect the formation of associative memories linking environmental contexts with the motivational properties of administered treatments.
The Olmstead design incorporates specific methodological controls including counterbalanced compartment assignments, appropriate conditioning schedules, and standardized testing protocols that minimize confounding variables and enhance reproducibility across laboratories.
Features & Benefits
Olmstead 1996 validated design
Ensures experimental protocols consistent with established literature and facilitates cross-study comparisons
Distinct contextual compartments
Provides clear environmental discrimination for reliable conditioning and reduces ambiguous preference responses
Standardized dimensional specifications
Maintains consistent spatial parameters across experiments and laboratories for reproducible behavioral measurements
Counterbalanced testing protocols
Controls for inherent place preferences and strengthens experimental validity through proper control conditions
Multi-session experimental capability
Enables longitudinal assessment of conditioning acquisition, maintenance, and extinction across time
Species-adaptable configurations
Accommodates different laboratory animal models while maintaining core methodological principles
Quantitative preference measurement
Provides objective behavioral endpoints suitable for statistical analysis and dose-response studies
Research identifiers
These IDs come from the Measurement Method Ontology (MMO) and NCBI Taxonomy. Use them in data records and methods sections.
- Behavioral test
- Conditioned place preference
MMO:0000592 - Species
- Mouse
NCBITaxon:10090 - Rat
NCBITaxon:10116
- Mouse
Behavioral Construct
- Place Preference
- Reward Learning
- Aversion Learning
- Conditioned Response
- Motivational State
Automation Level
- manual
Research Domain
- Addiction Research
- Anxiety and Depression
- Behavioral Pharmacology
- Learning and Memory
- Neurodegeneration
- Neuroscience
Species
- Mouse
- Rat
Compatible Tracking Software
- ConductVision
Shipping weight
- 6.06 lb
Shipping box
- L: 65.0 cm
- W: 36.0 cm
- H: 27.0 cm
| Feature | This Product | Typical Alternative | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Validation | Based on peer-reviewed Olmstead 1996 methodology | Some systems use proprietary designs with limited literature validation | Ensures compatibility with established protocols and facilitates literature comparisons |
| Experimental Flexibility | Accommodates custom tracking and data collection systems | Integrated systems may limit experimental modifications | Allows researchers to adapt methodology to specific experimental requirements |
| Protocol Standardization | Follows established methodological specifications | Custom designs may require additional validation studies | Reduces protocol development time and increases experimental reproducibility |
| Literature Foundation | Supported by extensive CPP research literature | Newer designs may have limited reference studies | Provides established benchmarks for interpreting experimental results |
This apparatus provides the validated Olmstead 1996 methodology for conditioned place preference studies with proven reliability across multiple research applications. The design offers experimental flexibility while maintaining standardized protocols essential for reproducible behavioral research.
Behavioral Pharmacology
Evaluating the rewarding or aversive properties of novel pharmaceutical compounds by measuring changes in compartment preference following drug-context pairings.
Addiction Research
Assessing drug-seeking behavior and craving responses by quantifying preference for environments previously associated with substance administration.
Learning and Memory
Investigating associative learning mechanisms through measurement of context-reward or context-aversion conditioning across training sessions.
Neuroscience
Studying neural circuits underlying reward processing and motivation by correlating place preference behaviors with neurobiological measurements.
Neurodegeneration
Evaluating cognitive and motivational deficits in disease models by measuring changes in place conditioning acquisition and retention.
Anxiety and Depression
Assessing anhedonia and reward sensitivity in depression models through measurement of reduced preference for reward-associated contexts.
Practical Tips
Best Practices
Conduct habituation sessions prior to conditioning to reduce neophobia and establish baseline compartment preferences.
Why: Baseline preferences help distinguish conditioned responses from inherent place biases.
Best Practices
Maintain consistent environmental conditions including lighting, temperature, and ambient noise across all experimental sessions.
Why: Environmental stability prevents confounding variables from affecting place preference measurements.
Data Quality
Record both time spent and activity levels in each compartment to distinguish preference from general locomotor effects.
Why: Some treatments may affect activity without changing preference, requiring separate analysis of these behaviors.
Troubleshooting
If animals show strong baseline compartment preferences, consider extended habituation or apparatus modifications.
Why: Strong baseline biases can mask or confound conditioning effects during preference testing.
Maintenance
Clean apparatus thoroughly between subjects using neutral cleaning solutions to eliminate olfactory cues.
Why: Residual odors from previous subjects can influence compartment preferences and compromise data validity.
Best Practices
Use appropriate counterbalancing schemes to assign treatment-compartment pairings across subjects.
Why: Counterbalancing controls for any inherent apparatus asymmetries or compartment preferences.
Data Quality
Include vehicle control groups receiving saline or vehicle in the same compartment assignment protocol.
Why: Vehicle controls distinguish conditioning effects from procedural artifacts or handling stress.
Setup Guide
Apparatus Assembly
Assemble compartments according to the Olmstead design specifications, ensuring proper alignment of walls, floors, and connecting passages.
Environmental Calibration
Verify distinct contextual cues between compartments including lighting levels, floor textures, and visual patterns as specified in the protocol.
Recording System Setup
Position tracking cameras or sensors to provide complete coverage of all compartments with minimal dead zones for accurate position monitoring.
Habituation Protocol
Conduct habituation sessions allowing animals free access to all compartments to establish baseline preferences and reduce neophobia.
Conditioning Schedule
Implement the conditioning protocol with appropriate counterbalancing of treatment-compartment assignments across subjects.
Testing Procedures
Perform preference tests using standardized session durations and environmental conditions consistent with conditioning phases.
What’s in the Box
- Conditioned place preference apparatus components (typical)
- Assembly hardware and fasteners (typical)
- Protocol documentation and setup guide (typical)
- Compartment identification markers (typical)
Warranty
ConductScience provides standard manufacturer warranty coverage with technical support for proper apparatus setup and protocol implementation.
Compliance
IACUC GuidelinesSupports behavioral research protocols commonly subject to institutional animal care and use committee review and approval.
NIH Guidelines for Research Involving AnimalsUsed in behavioral studies that follow federal guidelines for laboratory animal research and welfare standards.
Q
What are the key design features that distinguish the Olmstead 1996 protocol from other CPP paradigms?
A
The Olmstead design incorporates specific methodological controls including standardized compartment dimensions, validated contextual cue configurations, and established conditioning schedules that have been empirically validated for reproducible preference measurements.
Q
How should compartment assignments be counterbalanced to control for inherent place preferences?
A
Randomly assign equal numbers of subjects to receive treatment in each compartment, ensuring that any pre-existing compartment bias is distributed equally across treatment groups.
Q
What is the recommended conditioning schedule for establishing reliable place preferences?
A
Consult the Olmstead 1996 reference protocol for specific session durations, inter-trial intervals, and number of conditioning trials, as these parameters have been optimized for the experimental design.
Q
How can I assess whether observed preferences represent true conditioning versus baseline compartment bias?
A
Compare preference scores to pre-conditioning baseline measurements and include appropriate vehicle control groups to distinguish conditioned responses from inherent place preferences.
Q
What behavioral measures should be recorded beyond simple time spent in each compartment?
A
Additional measures may include locomotor activity, transition frequency between compartments, and preference coefficient calculations to provide comprehensive behavioral assessment.
Q
How does this apparatus compare to automated CPP systems with integrated tracking?
A
This design provides the validated Olmstead methodology with flexibility for custom tracking solutions, while automated systems offer integrated data collection but may use different spatial configurations.
Have a question about this product?
Track rodents with ConductVision
ConductVision is our video-tracking software. Record your sessions on video, and it scores standard rodent tests, such as those listed below.
Examples of tests it scores
To check whether ConductVision scores your protocol in this apparatus, ask in your quote request.
Ask a question
Have a question? Just ask.
Send it over and we'll email you a personalized answer, with no call or scheduling.
Personalized email reply
Usually within one business day
Helpful answers published here
Prefer to talk it through?
Accessories
Enhance your setup with compatible accessories
Total: $0.00
Frequently Bought Together
Total: $790.00
Conditioned Place Preference Olmstead 1996
$1,830.00
Added to quoteView Quote
