Touchscreen Paired Associates Learning
Overview
The touchscreen paired associates learning (PAL) task requires rodents to learn specific object-location associations and select the correct spatial location for each visual stimulus presented on a touchscreen display. On each trial, two or three stimuli are shown simultaneously, each in a different screen location, but only one stimulus is in its correct paired location. The task is a direct rodent analogue of the CANTAB Paired Associates Learning test used clinically to detect early hippocampal dysfunction in Alzheimer's disease. Performance depends on hippocampal pattern separation and completion, entorhinal-hippocampal spatial processing, and perirhinal object-identity circuits.
The primary dependent variable is the percentage of correct responses, which must exceed chance level (33% for three-choice or 50% for two-choice variants) to demonstrate learning. Errors are classified as stimulus-driven (selecting the wrong location for a given stimulus) or location-driven (responding to a preferred location regardless of stimulus), providing insight into whether deficits reflect associative binding or spatial bias. Correction trials, in which incorrect trials are repeated until a correct response occurs, yield perseverative error counts. Additional metrics include trials to criterion, response latency, reward collection latency, and session completion rate.
ConductMaze manages PAL protocols by rendering stimulus-location configurations on calibrated touchscreen panels and detecting touch responses with spatial precision. The system counterbalances stimulus-location pairings across sessions, applies configurable correction trial logic, and classifies errors by type in real time. Learning curves, error distributions, and latency profiles are exported alongside raw trial-by-trial data. The platform supports flexible stimulus sets and location arrays for parametric difficulty manipulation.
Trial Flow
Trial Initiation
Subject nose-pokes in the magazine to trigger stimulus display on the touchscreen.
Stimulus Display
Present stimuli in their assigned locations; one stimulus is in its correct paired location, others are misplaced.
Touch Response
Subject touches one of the displayed stimuli; evaluate whether the selected stimulus is in its correct location.
Correct Response
Deliver tone and food reward; record response latency and advance to next trial after collection.
Incorrect Response
Illuminate house light as punishment signal; begin timeout period. If correction trials enabled, repeat trial.
Error Classification
Classify error as stimulus-driven or location-driven based on response pattern analysis.
Session End
Terminate session after trial limit or time elapsed; export accuracy, error types, and latencies.
Parameters
| Parameter | Type | Default | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| Number of Stimulus-Location Pairs | integer | 3 | Number of unique object-location associations the subject must learn. |
| Stimuli per Trial | integer | 2 | Number of stimuli displayed simultaneously on each trial. |
| Correction Trials | enum | enabled | Whether incorrect trials repeat until a correct response is made. |
| Criterion | integer | 24 correct in 30 trials | Performance level required to advance to the next stage or complete the task. |
| Maximum Trials per Session | integer | 36 | Maximum number of non-correction trials per session. |
| Session Duration | duration | 60 min | Maximum session length. |
| Timeout Duration | seconds | 5 | House light punishment timeout following an incorrect response. |
| Inter-Trial Interval | seconds | 20 | Delay between reward collection and next trial initiation opportunity. |
Metrics
| Metric | Unit | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Percent Correct | % | Proportion of first-presentation (non-correction) trials answered correctly. |
| Trials to Criterion | count | Total trials required to reach the performance criterion. |
| Stimulus-Driven Errors | count | Errors where the subject selected the wrong location for a given stimulus. |
| Location-Driven Errors | count | Errors where the subject responded to a preferred location regardless of which stimulus was present. |
| Correction Trial Errors | count | Total incorrect responses on correction trial repeats. |
| Response Latency | s | Time from stimulus display to touch response. |
| Reward Collection Latency | s | Time from reward delivery tone to magazine nose-poke. |
Sample Data
| Subject | Group | % Correct | Trials to Criterion | Stim Errors | Location Errors | Response Lat (s) | Collection Lat (s) |
|---|
Representative data for illustration purposes. Actual values will vary by species, strain, and experimental conditions.
Applications
- 1Alzheimer's Disease Early Detection — Model hippocampal-dependent associative memory deficits in transgenic mouse lines using a task directly analogous to clinical CANTAB PAL.
- 2Cholinergic System Evaluation — Assess the impact of cholinergic lesions or pharmacological blockade on object-location binding as a preclinical endpoint for pro-cognitive therapies.
- 3Schizophrenia Cognitive Remediation — Measure relational memory impairments in developmental or pharmacological schizophrenia models and evaluate cognitive remediation strategies.
- 4Hippocampal Subfield Mapping — Combine with selective hippocampal subregion lesions or chemogenetic silencing to dissect contributions of CA1, CA3, and dentate gyrus to paired-associate learning.
Related Protocols
Compatible Products
Ready to Automate Your Behavioral Protocols?
Contact us for a demo and pricing information.