Touchscreen Paired Associates Learning

Overview

The touchscreen paired associates learning (PAL) task requires rodents to learn specific object-location associations and select the correct spatial location for each visual stimulus presented on a touchscreen display. On each trial, two or three stimuli are shown simultaneously, each in a different screen location, but only one stimulus is in its correct paired location. The task is a direct rodent analogue of the CANTAB Paired Associates Learning test used clinically to detect early hippocampal dysfunction in Alzheimer's disease. Performance depends on hippocampal pattern separation and completion, entorhinal-hippocampal spatial processing, and perirhinal object-identity circuits.

The primary dependent variable is the percentage of correct responses, which must exceed chance level (33% for three-choice or 50% for two-choice variants) to demonstrate learning. Errors are classified as stimulus-driven (selecting the wrong location for a given stimulus) or location-driven (responding to a preferred location regardless of stimulus), providing insight into whether deficits reflect associative binding or spatial bias. Correction trials, in which incorrect trials are repeated until a correct response occurs, yield perseverative error counts. Additional metrics include trials to criterion, response latency, reward collection latency, and session completion rate.

ConductMaze manages PAL protocols by rendering stimulus-location configurations on calibrated touchscreen panels and detecting touch responses with spatial precision. The system counterbalances stimulus-location pairings across sessions, applies configurable correction trial logic, and classifies errors by type in real time. Learning curves, error distributions, and latency profiles are exported alongside raw trial-by-trial data. The platform supports flexible stimulus sets and location arrays for parametric difficulty manipulation.

Trial Flow

start

Trial Initiation

Subject nose-pokes in the magazine to trigger stimulus display on the touchscreen.

input

Stimulus Display

Present stimuli in their assigned locations; one stimulus is in its correct paired location, others are misplaced.

decision

Touch Response

Subject touches one of the displayed stimuli; evaluate whether the selected stimulus is in its correct location.

output

Correct Response

Deliver tone and food reward; record response latency and advance to next trial after collection.

process

Incorrect Response

Illuminate house light as punishment signal; begin timeout period. If correction trials enabled, repeat trial.

output

Error Classification

Classify error as stimulus-driven or location-driven based on response pattern analysis.

end

Session End

Terminate session after trial limit or time elapsed; export accuracy, error types, and latencies.

Parameters

ParameterTypeDefaultDescription
Number of Stimulus-Location Pairsinteger3Number of unique object-location associations the subject must learn.
Stimuli per Trialinteger2Number of stimuli displayed simultaneously on each trial.
Correction TrialsenumenabledWhether incorrect trials repeat until a correct response is made.
Criterioninteger24 correct in 30 trialsPerformance level required to advance to the next stage or complete the task.
Maximum Trials per Sessioninteger36Maximum number of non-correction trials per session.
Session Durationduration60 minMaximum session length.
Timeout Durationseconds5House light punishment timeout following an incorrect response.
Inter-Trial Intervalseconds20Delay between reward collection and next trial initiation opportunity.

Metrics

MetricUnitDescription
Percent Correct%Proportion of first-presentation (non-correction) trials answered correctly.
Trials to CriterioncountTotal trials required to reach the performance criterion.
Stimulus-Driven ErrorscountErrors where the subject selected the wrong location for a given stimulus.
Location-Driven ErrorscountErrors where the subject responded to a preferred location regardless of which stimulus was present.
Correction Trial ErrorscountTotal incorrect responses on correction trial repeats.
Response LatencysTime from stimulus display to touch response.
Reward Collection LatencysTime from reward delivery tone to magazine nose-poke.

Sample Data

SubjectGroup% CorrectTrials to CriterionStim ErrorsLocation ErrorsResponse Lat (s)Collection Lat (s)

Representative data for illustration purposes. Actual values will vary by species, strain, and experimental conditions.

Applications

  • 1
    Alzheimer's Disease Early DetectionModel hippocampal-dependent associative memory deficits in transgenic mouse lines using a task directly analogous to clinical CANTAB PAL.
  • 2
    Cholinergic System EvaluationAssess the impact of cholinergic lesions or pharmacological blockade on object-location binding as a preclinical endpoint for pro-cognitive therapies.
  • 3
    Schizophrenia Cognitive RemediationMeasure relational memory impairments in developmental or pharmacological schizophrenia models and evaluate cognitive remediation strategies.
  • 4
    Hippocampal Subfield MappingCombine with selective hippocampal subregion lesions or chemogenetic silencing to dissect contributions of CA1, CA3, and dentate gyrus to paired-associate learning.

Ready to Automate Your Behavioral Protocols?

Contact us for a demo and pricing information.