Textile, polymer & composite

Dimensional stability & skew

Warp and weft shrinkage plus skew, measured from marked-square photographs before and after wash.

ModalitiesFlatbed scanOverhead rigMacro photo
Knitted fabric laid flat with a printed measurement grid and a ruler, the layout used to measure shrinkage and skew before and after washing
-2.1%
Warp
-1.3%
Weft
1.8%
Skew

Example outputs shown for illustration. Numbers depend on your samples and protocol.

Image: Illustrative rendering (AI-generated, gpt-image-2), not a photograph of a specific fabric

Flatbed scan
Flat, evenly-lit capture of sheets, fabrics, and sections.
Macro photo
Whole-part context at the scale a technician actually sees.

Results

Each measurement below comes from your own images, tied back to the annotated frame it came from, so results stay comparable across samples, locations, and conditions.

count or µm

Warp shrinkage %

Visible surface features detected, measured, and located against the reviewed image.

Warp-2.1%
<1µm
1-2µm
2-4µm
>4µm

Example, not a claimed result

In your report: Per-feature list with size, position, and annotated overlays.

count or µm

Weft shrinkage %

Visible surface features detected, measured, and located against the reviewed image.

Weft-1.3%
<1µm
1-2µm
2-4µm
>4µm

Example, not a claimed result

In your report: Per-feature list with size, position, and annotated overlays.

count or µm

Skew / torque %

Visible surface features detected, measured, and located against the reviewed image.

Skew1.8%
<1µm
1-2µm
2-4µm
>4µm

Example, not a claimed result

In your report: Per-feature list with size, position, and annotated overlays.

count or µm

Per-specimen table

Visible surface features detected, measured, and located against the reviewed image.

Illustrative shape
<1µm
1-2µm
2-4µm
>4µm

In your report: Per-feature list with size, position, and annotated overlays.

Built around your image set

Use the calibrated images your team already collects, together with the locations you need to compare.

01
Representative images
Provide representative flatbed scan images with a recorded scale calibration and the regions of interest clearly visible.
02
Image capture details
Record instrument, magnification, pixel scale, preparation method, and the smallest feature the review must resolve.
03
What to compare
State the samples, number of fields, and conditions to compare. A single field of view is not treated as a whole-sample result by itself.

Each report includes

The artifacts your team receives, ready for review and archive.

Annotated image set

Original images with regions of interest, measurement points, masks, and finding overlays.

Measurement table

Location-indexed values, units, distributions, and QC flags in a structured export.

Method record

Calibration evidence, analysis settings, version history, and validation summary.

Confidence in every resultTraceable measurements, reviewed against your agreed reference method.
Traceable scale
The report records the image scale, calibration evidence, and a method-specific expanded measurement uncertainty. It does not use one product-wide accuracy number.
Reference comparison
The configured method is compared with your accepted reference method or reviewed annotations, and reports bias by measurement range and image condition.
Detection performance
Detections are evaluated against reviewed reference regions with precision, recall, and segmentation overlap, separated by the conditions that affect performance.
Repeatability
The locked protocol is rerun on the same inputs and on a defined repeat set. The review records variation from image acquisition, sampling, and analysis separately where possible.

What this result does not establish: Measures the marked reference distances from images. The wash, dry, and conditioning procedure stays yours, and results are only comparable when that procedure is held fixed.

The measurement, today

Marked squares are measured by hand with a ruler, one dimension at a time. Readings differ between operators, skew is usually eyeballed, and nothing about the measurement is recorded beyond a number on a sheet.

What it costs

Shrinkage outside tolerance means garments fail their size spec once the customer washes them. It is one of the most common causes of bulk rejection, and it is discovered at the worst possible moment.

From image to reviewed result

  1. 1

    Photograph before

    Image the marked specimen flat, with the reference marks and a scale in frame.

  2. 2

    Wash and dry

    Run your own laundering and conditioning procedure. Nothing about it changes.

  3. 3

    Photograph after

    Re-image the same specimen on the same rig so the two frames are directly comparable.

  4. 4

    Measure the change

    The marks are detected in both frames; warp and weft change and skew are computed and overlaid.

Talk to a scientist

Not sure this is the right measurement?

Send a representative image and your measurement goal. A ConductVision scientist will confirm whether this is the right fit, or point you to the closer workflow, before you commit to a quote.

Share your image set
One representative image is enough to start the conversation.
Book a 30-minute review
Walk through the measurement plan and confidence evidence live.

Send a sample image and a measurement goal

We will show the closest ConductVision workflow and flag what needs custom validation for your images.