Textile, polymer & composite

Foreign fiber contamination

Find polypropylene, coloured, and foreign fibers in the web before they reach the dyehouse.

ModalitiesWeb imagingSliver scanMacro photo
Textile fibers crossing under polarized-light microscopy, each fiber showing distinct birefringence colors that help separate foreign fibers from the base stock
7
Contaminants
0.4 /kg
Rate
0.8 mm
Smallest found

Example outputs shown for illustration. Numbers depend on your samples and protocol.

Image: Ptosky, CC BY-SA 4.0 via Wikimedia Commons

Results

Each measurement below comes from your own images, tied back to the annotated frame it came from, so results stay comparable across samples, locations, and conditions.

µm or count

Contaminant count

Size and shape measured for every detected object, then summarized across the population.

Contaminants7

Example, not a claimed result

In your report: Per-object table, size distribution, and summary percentiles.

per area

Location map

Findings placed in sample coordinates to reveal spatial patterns and local density.

Illustrative shape
Bottom
64%
Corner
71%

In your report: Coordinate-referenced map, regional density, and representative images.

µm or count

Fiber length & width

Size and shape measured for every detected object, then summarized across the population.

Illustrative shape

In your report: Per-object table, size distribution, and summary percentiles.

class

Colour class

Each detected feature assigned to a class using the agreed rule set, shown on the image.

Illustrative shape
<1µm
1-2µm
2-4µm
>4µm

In your report: Per-feature class, counts by class, and annotated overlays.

µm or count

Contamination rate per kg

Size and shape measured for every detected object, then summarized across the population.

Rate0.4 /kg

Example, not a claimed result

In your report: Per-object table, size distribution, and summary percentiles.

Built around your image set

Use the calibrated images your team already collects, together with the locations you need to compare.

01
Representative images
Provide representative web imaging images with a recorded scale calibration and the regions of interest clearly visible.
02
Image capture details
Record instrument, magnification, pixel scale, preparation method, and the smallest feature the review must resolve.
03
What to compare
State the samples, number of fields, and conditions to compare. A single field of view is not treated as a whole-sample result by itself.

Each report includes

The artifacts your team receives, ready for review and archive.

Annotated image set

Original images with regions of interest, measurement points, masks, and finding overlays.

Measurement table

Location-indexed values, units, distributions, and QC flags in a structured export.

Method record

Calibration evidence, analysis settings, version history, and validation summary.

Confidence in every resultTraceable measurements, reviewed against your agreed reference method.
Traceable scale
The report records the image scale, calibration evidence, and a method-specific expanded measurement uncertainty. It does not use one product-wide accuracy number.
Reference comparison
The configured method is compared with your accepted reference method or reviewed annotations, and reports bias by measurement range and image condition.
Detection performance
Detections are evaluated against reviewed reference regions with precision, recall, and segmentation overlap, separated by the conditions that affect performance.
Repeatability
The locked protocol is rerun on the same inputs and on a defined repeat set. The review records variation from image acquisition, sampling, and analysis separately where possible.

What this result does not establish: Detects and locates foreign fibers visible at the imaged surface. It does not identify polymer chemistry; confirm suspect fibers by FTIR or a melt test before rejecting a bale.

The measurement, today

A stray polypropylene thread survives opening, carding, and weaving unseen. It refuses dye, then surfaces as a white streak in a finished piece. Hand inspection of a web catches the obvious ones and misses the short, pale ones.

What it costs

Contamination is usually found after dyeing, when the fabric already carries its full cost. Recycled and blended feedstock raise the odds every season, and a single contaminated lot can push a roll to seconds or scrap.

From image to reviewed result

  1. 1

    Image the web

    Capture the card web, sliver, or bale surface under controlled, even illumination.

  2. 2

    Separate the odd fiber out

    Segmentation flags fibers whose colour or reflectance departs from the base web, down to sub-millimetre fragments.

  3. 3

    Measure and classify

    Each contaminant gets a length, width, and colour class, so pale polypropylene is separated from dark trash.

  4. 4

    Map and rate

    Contaminants are mapped to their position and totalled into a contamination rate per kilogram.

Talk to a scientist

Not sure this is the right measurement?

Send a representative image and your measurement goal. A ConductVision scientist will confirm whether this is the right fit, or point you to the closer workflow, before you commit to a quote.

Share your image set
One representative image is enough to start the conversation.
Book a 30-minute review
Walk through the measurement plan and confidence evidence live.

Send a sample image and a measurement goal

We will show the closest ConductVision workflow and flag what needs custom validation for your images.