Classic Mazes

Y Maze

$1,295.00 - $1,790.00

Three-arm behavioral maze with 120-degree arm angles for assessing spatial working memory and spontaneous alternation in mice and rats.

Size: Rat
$1,790.00
Key Specifications
arm_angle120 degrees
food_well_depth1cm
escape_tube_diameter_mouse4cm
escape_tube_diameter_rat8cm
escape_tubes_quantity3x tubes
stand_height_mouse32cm
SKU:3501/2
Category:Classic Mazes
Need Help? Visit our Support CenterKnowledge base, order lookup, and ticket support
Our Staff are PhD Scientists
Get expert guidance on this product
Louise Corscadden, PhD, Neuroscience
Louise Corscadden
PhD, Neuroscience
Schedule a Call Instead

Accessories

Enhance your setup with compatible accessories

Total: $0.00

Frequently Bought Together

Total: $650.00

Upgrade Options

Choose your configuration

Validated Y-Maze configurations

Pick the apparatus configuration that matches the cohort, species, and protocol. Species-specific adaptations should be interpreted within their own validation literature.

This productMouse standard

Mouse Y-Maze

Three 120-degree arms, removable inserts, overhead tracking compatible

Standard spontaneous alternation and novel-arm recognition apparatus for mice.

$1,190

BuyableRat standard

Rat Y-Maze

Scaled arms for adult rats with optional guillotine doors

Used for spontaneous alternation, forced alternation, and spatial recognition tasks in rats.

$1,390

SpecialtyAutomated

Automated Y-Maze

Door control, sensors, TTL triggers, and software integration

For forced alternation and delayed non-match protocols requiring controlled access to arms.

$2,490

View automated ->

§ 1

Introduction

The Y-Maze is a three-arm spatial working-memory apparatus that exploits rodents natural tendency to investigate a less recently visited arm. Spontaneous alternation requires no explicit training, making it a rapid screen for hippocampal and prefrontal working-memory function. 1

The same apparatus supports several distinct protocols: spontaneous alternation, forced alternation, novel-arm recognition, and continuous alternation. These should be named explicitly because each protocol has different memory load, training burden, and door-control requirements. 1

Y-Maze outcomes are strongly affected by total activity. A low alternation score is difficult to interpret if the animal makes too few arm entries, so entry count and session duration should be reported with alternation percentage. 1

§ 2

Methods

2.1 Procedure

Spontaneous alternation: one free-exploration session, usually 5 to 8 minutes.

Pre-test setup

  1. 1.Arm labelingLabel arms A, B, and C. Keep spatial cues fixed around the maze.
  2. 2.Zone definitionDefine arm entry thresholds consistently, usually all four paws inside an arm.
  3. 3.LightingUse even low-to-moderate illumination to support exploration without excessive avoidance.
  4. 4.Door checkFor forced or novel-arm protocols, verify doors open and close silently and fully.

Trial sequence

  1. 1.Place subjectStart the animal in the center zone facing the same arm orientation or a counterbalanced orientation.
  2. 2.Record explorationAllow free exploration for the defined duration, commonly 5 to 8 minutes for spontaneous alternation.1
  3. 3.Score entriesCount a valid entry only after the full body or all four paws cross the threshold.
  4. 4.Compute triadsScore every overlapping set of three consecutive entries as alternating when all three arms are represented.
  5. 5.Clean mazeClean arms and center zone between subjects.

Critical methodological constraints

  • Minimum activity. Sessions with very low arm entries should be flagged or excluded by pre-defined criteria because alternation percentage becomes unstable.3
  • Protocol naming. Do not mix spontaneous alternation with forced alternation or novel-arm recognition in analysis tables.
  • Door effects. Door sounds and handling during forced-alternation phases can alter exploration. Keep timing and handling identical across groups.
  • Side bias. Persistent preference for one arm can reduce alternation independent of memory. Report arm occupancy when bias appears.

2.2 Measurement & Analysis

Core Y-Maze metrics ConductVision scores from arm-entry sequences.

Spontaneous Alternation

Working-memory index

Percent of overlapping three-entry sequences that include all three arms.1

Total Arm Entries

Activity control

Total valid arm entries. Low counts make alternation percentage unreliable.3

Arm Dwell Time

Preference and bias

Time in each arm, used to detect side bias or avoidance of a specific arm.

Novel Arm Time

Recognition memory

Time spent in the previously blocked arm during novel-arm recognition protocols.

Center Time

Decision behavior

Time in the center choice zone, often increased when animals hesitate or show low exploration.

+ Additional metrics: alternation by time bin, repeated-arm errors, latency to first arm, arm-entry sequence, velocity, and inactivity.

2.3 spontaneous alternation percentage (analysis)

Successful triads divided by all possible triads.

Inline calculator

Type the times your tracker recorded.

Full calculator with 95% CI →
Alternation

69.2%

Formula: alternating triads / (alternating triads + non-alternating triads) x 100. Chance is commonly treated as 50%, but interpretation depends on entry count and arm bias. 1

§ 3

Results

Aggregate publication data, sample apparatus output, and recent findings from the live PubMed feed.

3.1 Publication trends

PubMed volume and co-occurring methods for spatial working-memory assays.

Figure 1 · EPM publications by year (PubMed)

The paradigm has been dominant for 40 years and is still growing.

Live · Weekly

2000201020202026 YTD: 38 papers

Total in PubMed since 1985: 1,338+ papers. Updated 2026-05-04.

Figure 2 · Methods co-occurring with EPM (last 12 months)

Other paradigms most often run alongside EPM in the same paper.

Live

3.2 Sample apparatus output

Representative arm-entry sequence summary from spontaneous alternation.

Table 1 · Per-animal EPM scoring output

Download sample CSV →
AnimalGroupArm entriesAlt triadsErrorsAlternation (%)
YM-001Control3121872.4%
YM-002Control2818869.2%
YM-003Control3322971.0%
YM-004Impaired29121544.4%
YM-005Impaired26101441.7%
YM-006Impaired30131546.4%

Synthetic example for illustration only. Sessions with low arm-entry counts should be flagged before group comparison.

3.3 Recent findings (live PubMed feed)

  • May 2026PMID: 41806956

    Chemogenetic inhibition of developmentally-born hippocampal neurons but not loss of adult neurogenesis impairs spatial working memory in the rat.

    Ward MD, Snyder JS, Seib DR. Behav Brain Res. 2026 May 28.

    The dentate gyrus (DG) of the hippocampus contains a heterogeneous population of granule cells, being comprised of neurons generated during both development and adulthood.

  • May 2026PMID: 41961641

    Effects of ononin on cognitive and learning-memory functions in mild cognitive impairment.

    Yang L, Zhao W, Zhao J, et al.. Neuroreport. 2026 May 13.

    This study aimed to investigate the potential of ononin in alleviating mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and to determine whether its effects depend on the functional recovery of neurons in the nucleus tractus solitarius (NTS).

  • May 2026PMID: 41707874

    Lactate restores PGC1α and BDNF expression rescuing cognitive impairments in a mouse model for schizophrenia.

    Kambali M, Wang M, Nagarajan R, et al.. Behav Brain Res. 2026 May 8.

    Disruption of metabolic interactions between astrocytes and neurons, in particular of the lactate shuttle, may contribute to neurodevelopmental and psychiatric disorders such as autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and schizophrenia.

  • Apr 2026PMID: 41955866

    Synergistic effect of 5-HTreceptor activation and phosphodiesterase type 7 inhibition on object recognition and working memory performances in adult mice.

    Le Ridant DC, Freret T, Boulouard M, et al.. Eur J Pharmacol. 2026 Apr 28.

    Low-dose multitarget pharmacological strategies are viewed as promising approaches for managing cognitive impairment in aging. Here, we assessed the preclinical efficacy of co-modulating the 5-HTreceptor-dependent cAMP pathway to improve memory.

View all 1338 matching papers on PubMed →

§ 4

Discussion

Limitations of the paradigm, methodological caveats, and current directions.

4.1 Common confounds

Variables that shift Y-Maze results independent of anxiety state.

Low activity

Alternation percentage is unstable when animals make too few entries.3

Arm bias

Preference or avoidance of one arm can reduce alternation independent of working memory.

Protocol mixing

Spontaneous alternation, forced alternation, and novel-arm recognition should be analyzed separately.

Door and delay timing

Forced and novel-arm protocols depend on consistent door timing and retention interval.

Cue instability

Moving external cues changes the spatial frame and can impair recognition performance.

4.2 Construct validity caveats

Y-Maze spontaneous alternation is fast and low stress, but it is sensitive to locomotor activity and exploratory drive. 1 Strong interpretation requires enough entries, balanced arm occupancy, and protocol-specific endpoints rather than alternation percentage alone. 2

4.3 Special considerations

What is the minimum number of entries?

Use a pre-defined threshold appropriate to session length and species. Very low entry counts make the denominator too small for reliable alternation estimates.

Can the same maze run forced alternation?

Yes, if it has removable doors or inserts and the protocol defines sample phase, delay, and choice phase separately.

How does Y-Maze differ from T-Maze?

Y-Maze spontaneous alternation is free exploration, while many T-Maze protocols use discrete forced-choice trials with reward or rule structure.

4.4 Current directions

Quarterly editorial review of emerging Y-Maze methodology. Q2 2026

Rising

Time-binned alternation curves

Extended sessions increasingly report alternation decay over time instead of one whole-session percentage.

Methodological

Entry-threshold standardization

Automated full-body threshold rules are reducing scorer variation in arm-entry calls.

Rising

Rapid disease-model screens

Y-Maze remains a common first-pass working-memory screen in AD, stroke, TBI, and pharmacology batteries.

Methodological

Door-controlled protocols

Automated doors are making forced alternation and novel-arm recognition more reproducible.

§ 5

References

6 curated Y-Maze methods and validation papers. Schema-marked as ScholarlyArticle ItemList.

  1. Hughes RN. The value of spontaneous alternation behavior (SAB) as a test of retention in pharmacological investigations of memory. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2004;28(5):497-505.
  2. Dellu F, Mayo W, Cherkaoui J, Le Moal M, Simon H. A two-trial memory task with automated recording: study in young and aged rats. Brain Res. 1992;588(1):132-139.
  3. Lalonde R. The neurobiological basis of spontaneous alternation. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2002;26(1):91-104.
  4. Dudchenko PA. An overview of the tasks used to test working memory in rodents. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2004;28(7):699-709.
  5. Conrad CD, Galea LA, Kuroda Y, McEwen BS. Chronic stress impairs rat spatial memory on the Y maze, and this effect is blocked by tianeptine pretreatment. Behav Neurosci. 1996;110(6):1321-1334.
  6. Holcomb L, Gordon MN, McGowan E, et al. Accelerated Alzheimer-type phenotype in transgenic mice carrying both mutant amyloid precursor protein and presenilin 1 transgenes. Nat Med. 1998;4(1):97-100.
Y Maze
Y Maze
$1,295.00
Added to quoteView Quote