Semiconductor, packaging & electronics

AI hardware thermal-interface & cold-plate inspection

Review thermal-interface coverage, cold-plate channels, surface damage, and visible air-pocket candidates in AI compute hardware.

ModalitiesMacro imagingOptical microscopyThermal imaging
Illustrative cold plate with copper channels and thermal-interface material coverage defects
96.8%
Coverage
2
Gaps
5
Surface findings

Example outputs shown for illustration. Numbers depend on your samples and protocol.

Image: Illustrative rendering (AI-generated, gpt-image-2), not an image of a specific server component

Macro imaging
Whole-part context at the scale a technician actually sees.
Optical microscopy
Wider-field coverage and uniformity screening across many locations quickly.
Thermal imaging
Surface temperature fields across the assembly.

Results

Each measurement below comes from your own images, tied back to the annotated frame it came from, so results stay comparable across samples, locations, and conditions.

% area

Coverage fraction

Segmented area of the feature divided by the eligible area in the two-dimensional image.

Coverage96.8%
<1µm
1-2µm
2-4µm
>4µm

Example, not a claimed result

In your report: Per-field value, size distribution, and the segmentation overlay used.

per area

Uncovered-area map

Findings placed in sample coordinates to reveal spatial patterns and local density.

Illustrative shape
Bottom
64%
Corner
71%

In your report: Coordinate-referenced map, regional density, and representative images.

nm or µm

Air-pocket candidates

Perpendicular distance between the defined boundaries at each accepted measurement point.

Illustrative shape

In your report: Per-point values with median, spread, minimum, maximum, and location.

count or µm

Channel / surface findings

Visible surface features detected, measured, and located against the reviewed image.

Surface findings5
<1µm
1-2µm
2-4µm
>4µm

Example, not a claimed result

In your report: Per-feature list with size, position, and annotated overlays.

Built around your image set

Use the calibrated images your team already collects, together with the locations you need to compare.

01
Representative images
Provide representative macro imaging images with a recorded scale calibration and the regions of interest clearly visible.
02
Image capture details
Record instrument, magnification, pixel scale, preparation method, and the smallest feature the review must resolve.
03
What to compare
State the samples, number of fields, and conditions to compare. A single field of view is not treated as a whole-sample result by itself.

Each report includes

The artifacts your team receives, ready for review and archive.

Annotated image set

Original images with regions of interest, measurement points, masks, and finding overlays.

Measurement table

Location-indexed values, units, distributions, and QC flags in a structured export.

Method record

Calibration evidence, analysis settings, version history, and validation summary.

Confidence in every resultTraceable measurements, reviewed against your agreed reference method.
Traceable scale
The report records the image scale, calibration evidence, and a method-specific expanded measurement uncertainty. It does not use one product-wide accuracy number.
Reference comparison
The configured method is compared with your accepted reference method or reviewed annotations, and reports bias by measurement range and image condition.
Detection performance
Detections are evaluated against reviewed reference regions with precision, recall, and segmentation overlap, separated by the conditions that affect performance.
Repeatability
The locked protocol is rerun on the same inputs and on a defined repeat set. The review records variation from image acquisition, sampling, and analysis separately where possible.

What this result does not establish: Measures visible coverage and surface features in supplied images. Thermal resistance, coolant flow, and hardware release need controlled thermal and reliability validation.

The measurement, today

Thermal interfaces and cold plates are frequently inspected from photographs, teardown images, or one-off technician checks. Coverage defects are hard to compare consistently across assemblies.

What it costs

Coverage gaps, channel damage, and interface irregularities can complicate thermal investigation. Retained image measurements give hardware and reliability teams a common review record.

From image to reviewed result

  1. 1

    Capture the assembly

    Load macro, microscope, or thermal images of the cold plate, interface material, or associated hardware.

  2. 2

    Define the review region

    Register the die-contact, channel, and fastener regions that matter for your assembly.

  3. 3

    Measure visible coverage

    Segment coverage, exposed regions, candidate air pockets, and visible channel or surface anomalies.

  4. 4

    Export the evidence

    Create annotated images and a finding table for build, reliability, or teardown review.

Talk to a scientist

Not sure this is the right measurement?

Send a representative image and your measurement goal. A ConductVision scientist will confirm whether this is the right fit, or point you to the closer workflow, before you commit to a quote.

Share your image set
One representative image is enough to start the conversation.
Book a 30-minute review
Walk through the measurement plan and confidence evidence live.

Send a sample image and a measurement goal

We will show the closest ConductVision workflow and flag what needs custom validation for your images.