Avoidance Responses
Crossings made during the CS, before shock onset — the primary index of successful active avoidance
Two-way active avoidance and step-through passive avoidance in one dual-compartment apparatus.
Metrics automatically extracted by ConductVision.
Crossings made during the CS, before shock onset — the primary index of successful active avoidance
Crossings made after shock onset — the animal terminates the shock but did not avoid it
Time from shock onset to the animal crossing into the safe compartment
Time from CS onset to a crossing, on trials where the shock was avoided
Trials with no crossing within the trial window — neither avoided nor escaped
Spontaneous crossings between trials. Separates genuine learning from general hyperactivity
Passive avoidance retention: time to enter the shock-paired compartment at test
Immobility during the CS. Freezing competes with shuttling and suppresses avoidance
Trials needed to reach a set avoidance rate — the acquisition rate measure
Speed of the shuttle response, separating motivation from motor capacity
Baseline side preference before conditioning, used to correct for it
The shuttle box is a two-compartment chamber with independently controlled shock grids, lights, and speakers. In active avoidance, a conditioned stimulus (tone or light) precedes a foot shock, and the animal learns to cross into the other compartment during the CS to avoid the shock entirely. In passive (inhibitory) avoidance, the animal learns the opposite: to withhold a movement it would naturally make, and retention is read from how long it hesitates before entering the shock-paired side.
Two-way avoidance is deliberately harder to acquire than one-way avoidance, and the reason is diagnostic. The compartment the animal escapes into is the same one it was shocked in on an earlier trial, so the safe side is never unambiguously safe. That conflict pits the learned shuttle response against the rodent's species-specific defense reaction — freezing — which is why an animal can look like a poor learner when it is in fact freezing well. Reading avoidance responses without also reading freezing and inter-trial crossings will misattribute a defensive strategy to a memory deficit.
ConductVision scores crossings, latencies, and freezing frame by frame across both compartments, and separates avoidance from escape by aligning each crossing to CS and shock onset.
| Parameter | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|
| Chamber (mouse) | Exterior dimensions, small configuration | 22 × 22 × 25 cm |
| Chamber (rat) | Exterior dimensions, large configuration | 30 × 30 × 30 cm |
| Grid floor | Removable shock grid, independently controlled per compartment | 20 × 20 cm / 27 × 27 cm |
| Shock current | DC, adjustable in 0.1 mA steps (apparatus range 0.1–4.0 mA) | 0.3–0.6 mA |
| Shock duration | Maximum shock exposure if the animal does not escape | 2–10 s |
| Conditioned stimulus | Tone or light (apparatus range 100–40,000 Hz, 1–150 dB) | Tone, 2–10 kHz at 75–85 dB |
| CS duration | Warning period before shock onset | 5–10 s |
| CS–US interval | Gap between CS onset and shock onset | 5 s |
| Inter-trial interval | Variable, to prevent temporal conditioning | 20–60 s |
| Trials per session | Active avoidance acquisition | 30–100 |
| Sessions | One per day until criterion | 3–5 days |
| Passive avoidance retention | Delay between training and step-through test | 24 h (cutoff 300 s) |
Successful acquisition — the animal is using the CS to predict the shock
Impaired learning, or a sensory/motor deficit. Check shock reactivity and crossing velocity before calling it memory
General hyperactivity, not learning. A drug that raises both avoidance and inter-trial crossings has not improved memory
The defense reaction is outcompeting the shuttle response — a strategy difference, not a deficit
Weaker passive avoidance retention — the classic readout for amnestic agents and lesion models
Dual compartment with two independent shock grids, two audio channels, and visible/IR lighting.
Removable grid floor for aversive conditioning protocols.
Companion apparatus for cued and contextual conditioning.
Automated scoring of crossings, latencies, and freezing across both compartments.
Related paradigms
Precision measurement of associative learning through contextual and cued freezing.
Quantify behavioral despair and escape deficit in depression research models.
Assess inhibitory avoidance memory through step-down latency.
Rotating arena paradigm for spatial learning and cognitive coordination.
Track escape latency, search strategy, and head direction with automated analysis.
Measure anxiety-like behavior through open vs. closed arm exploration.
Request a demo or contact our team to discuss how ConductVision can accelerate your research.