Behavioral Mazes

Burrowing Tube

$749.99

Standardized tube system for quantifying burrowing and tunneling behaviors in laboratory rodents under controlled conditions.

Key Specifications
Automation Level
manual
Species
Gerbil, Hamster, Mouse, Rat
Compatible Tracking Software
ConductVision
SKU:CS-958248
Need Help? Visit our Support CenterKnowledge base, order lookup, and ticket support
Scientist guidance
Louise Corscadden, PhD, Director of Science

Louise Corscadden, PhD

Director of Science · ConductScience

Ask Louise about Burrowing Tube fit, setup, configuration, or quote prep.

The Burrowing Tube provides a standardized environment for studying natural burrowing and tunneling behaviors in laboratory rodents. This apparatus consists of a transparent or translucent tube system that allows researchers to observe and quantify digging behaviors, spatial navigation within confined spaces, and species-specific burrowing patterns under controlled conditions.

The system enables researchers to assess motor coordination, spatial memory, and anxiety-related behaviors as animals navigate through tube networks. The apparatus supports both acute behavioral assessments and chronic studies of burrowing preference, with applications spanning neuroscience research, behavioral pharmacology, and comparative ethology studies.

How It Works

The Burrowing Tube apparatus utilizes the natural burrowing instinct present in most rodent species to assess behavioral and cognitive parameters. Animals are placed at tube entrances and their movement patterns, exploration time, and navigation choices are recorded through direct observation or video tracking systems.

The transparent or translucent construction allows researchers to monitor animal behavior without interference while maintaining the enclosed environment that stimulates natural burrowing responses. Behavioral parameters are quantified through measurement of latency to enter, total time spent burrowing, distance traveled, and preference for specific tube sections or configurations.

Data collection typically involves recording movement trajectories, measuring exploration duration, and analyzing spatial distribution patterns within the tube system to generate quantitative behavioral metrics for statistical analysis.

Features & Benefits

Transparent construction
Enables continuous behavioral observation without disturbing natural burrowing patterns
Modular tube sections
Allows customizable configurations to match specific experimental requirements and species needs
Smooth internal surfaces
Provides consistent movement conditions and reduces variables that could affect behavioral measurements
Easy disassembly design
Facilitates thorough cleaning between subjects to prevent cross-contamination and maintain hygiene standards
Standardized dimensions
Ensures reproducible conditions across experiments and enables comparison with published literature
Durable material construction
Withstands repeated use and cleaning cycles while maintaining structural integrity for long-term studies

Accessories

Enhance your setup with compatible accessories

Total: $0.00

Frequently Bought Together

Total: $6,480.00

Use this apparatus with

The complete Burrowing Test workflow

Track behavior

No exact ConductVision burrowing page is currently published. Substrate displaced is measured by weighing the tube before and after rather than by tracking, so automated burrowing scoring stays a roadmap gap.

Supporting page not yet built

Run protocol

Habituation, tube loading, substrate selection, overnight versus 2-hour timing, and definitions for substrate displaced, burrowing latency, and non-burrowers.

ConductMaze Burrowing Protocol ->

Analyze output

No exact burrowing analysis tool is currently published. Burrowed fraction, latency, and time-course yields are summarized from before-and-after weights rather than a dedicated analyzer; keep this as a roadmap gap.

Supporting page not yet built

Configuration considerations

Common Burrowing Test setup decisions

Use these notes to scope species, cohort, tracking, and automation needs. Only verified product or support routes are linked from this section.

This productStandard tube

Burrowing Test

Open-ended tube with a raised lip and end stopper, loaded with a weighed substrate charge

Standard configuration for measuring burrowing as a spontaneous, welfare-sensitive behavior, reporting the weight of substrate displaced from the tube over a fixed interval.

Quote

Request Quote
BuyableMouse or rat

Species-Scaled Tube

Tube diameter, length, and lip height scaled for mouse or rat

Tube bore, length, and lip height set how readily an animal can displace substrate, so the tube should be scaled to the species and substrate weight.

Quote

View options ->
SpecialtyTime-course

Time-Course Burrowing Set

Matched tubes for paired 2-hour and overnight yields

Best when the question is the time course of burrowing rather than a single endpoint, using paired short and overnight measures to separate initiation from total output.

Quote

Request automation help

§ 1

Introduction

The Burrowing Test measures a spontaneous, species-typical behavior by recording how much substrate a rodent displaces from a loaded tube over a fixed interval. Deacon established burrowing as a sensitive index of behavioral dysfunction and general wellbeing that detects deficits many task-based assays miss. 1

The core readout is the weight of substrate displaced, supported by burrowing latency, time spent burrowing, and the proportion of non-burrowers. Because burrowing is voluntary and unrewarded, a drop in output is an early, low-stress marker of disrupted wellbeing across models of neurodegeneration, infection, and inflammation. 1

Novelty, tube geometry, substrate type and weight, satiety when food substrate is used, and individual-housing condition all change displacement independent of the underlying state. A defensible protocol habituates animals to the tube, fixes the substrate and timing, distinguishes overnight from short yields, and flags non-burrowers as a welfare quality-control category. 1

§ 2

Methods

2.1 Procedure

Loaded-tube burrowing with habituation, fixed substrate and timing, time-course measurement, and non-burrower flagging.

Pre-test setup

  1. 1.HabituationHabituate animals to a loaded tube over prior nights so the test session reflects burrowing motivation rather than novelty of the apparatus.
  2. 2.Tube and substrate setupFix the tube diameter, length, lip height, and substrate type and weight, since each changes how readily substrate is displaced.
  3. 3.Define the timingChoose and fix the measurement window, typically a 2-hour reading and an overnight reading, so initiation and total output are captured separately.
  4. 4.Set welfare flagsPre-define a non-burrower threshold and the conditions under which an animal is flagged, so low output is treated as a welfare signal rather than missing data.

Trial sequence

  1. 1.Weigh and load the tubeRecord the loaded substrate weight and place the tube in the cage with the open end raised on the lip.
  2. 2.Record burrowing latencyNote the latency to the first burrowing bout, indexing how readily the animal initiates the behavior.3
  3. 3.Measure short-interval yieldAt the 2-hour mark, weigh the substrate remaining in the tube and compute the amount displaced.2
  4. 4.Measure overnight yieldRe-weigh after the overnight interval to capture total output, since some animals burrow late and a single early reading underestimates them.
  5. 5.Flag non-burrowersRecord animals that displace little or no substrate as non-burrowers, a welfare category rather than a zero to be averaged away.

Critical methodological constraints

  • Substrate consistency. Substrate type and weight set the baseline displacement. Use the same material and loaded weight across groups so output is comparable.2
  • Tube geometry. Tube diameter, length, and lip height change how easily substrate is pushed out. Hold geometry constant across all animals in a study.1
  • Time-course separation. A single early reading misses late burrowers. Report 2-hour and overnight yields separately to distinguish initiation from total output.2
  • Non-burrower handling. Animals that burrow little are a welfare signal, not noise. Flag non-burrowers as a category rather than folding zeros into a group mean.3

2.2 Measurement & Analysis

Core burrowing endpoints for output, initiation, engagement, and welfare quality control.

Substrate Displaced

Burrowing output

Weight of substrate pushed out of the tube over the interval, the primary index of burrowing behavior and general wellbeing.1

Burrowing Latency

Initiation

Time from tube placement to the first burrowing bout, indexing how readily the animal initiates the behavior.3

Time Spent Burrowing

Engagement

Duration of active burrowing during the interval, separating sustained engagement from a brief initial push.

Overnight vs 2h Yield

Time-course

Comparison of the short-interval and overnight displacement, distinguishing early initiation from total output for late burrowers.2

Non-Burrowers

Welfare QC

Proportion of animals displacing little or no substrate, flagged as a welfare quality-control category rather than averaged into the group.

+ Additional metrics: substrate type and weight, tube geometry, time of day, housing condition, body weight, and per-animal welfare notes.

2.3 burrowed fraction (analysis)

A compact fraction of the loaded substrate that the animal displaced from the tube.

Inline calculator

Type the values your tracker recorded.

Full calculator with 95% CI ->
Burrowed fraction

70.0%

Formula: substrate displaced / (substrate displaced + substrate remaining) x 100. Interpret with substrate type and weight, tube geometry, the 2-hour versus overnight time course, and non-burrower status because a low fraction can reflect a late burrower or an unfamiliar tube rather than impairment. 1

2.4 sample-size planning

Estimate the N per group needed to detect a literature-anchored burrowing effect at the endpoint you plan to report. Override the defaults with your own pilot numbers.

sample-size planning

Estimate the N per group needed to detect a literature-anchored burrowing effect at the endpoint you plan to report. Override the defaults with your own pilot numbers.

Control vs behaviorally impaired rodent over the burrowing interval; representative magnitudes from Deacon (2006) on burrowing as a dysfunction assay.1

Cohen's d

2.11

N per group at 80% power

4

Total N

8

With attrition cushion

9

At 70% / 90% power

3 / 5

Methods sentence

Need ANOVA, proportions, paired design, or a power curve? Open in the full Sample-Size Calculator →

Formula: n = 2 · ((zα/2 + zβ) / d)2, where d = |μ₁ − μ₂| / σ. Assumes equal allocation, normality, and homoskedasticity. The attrition cushion inflates total N by 1 / (1 − dropout); confirm with your IACUC.

§ 3

Results

Aggregate publication data, sample apparatus output, and recent findings from the live PubMed feed.

3.1 Publication trends

PubMed volume and co-occurring behavioral methods for rodent burrowing studies.

Figure 1 · EPM publications by year (PubMed)

The paradigm has been dominant for 40 years and is still growing.

Live · Weekly

2000201020202025 YTD: 66 papers

Total in PubMed since 1985: 1,240+ papers. Updated 2026-06-12.

Figure 2 · Methods co-occurring with EPM (last 12 months)

Other paradigms most often run alongside EPM in the same paper.

Live

3.2 Sample apparatus output

Representative output from a burrowing session with a 2-hour and overnight reading on a 200 g substrate charge.

Table 1 · Per-animal EPM scoring output

Download sample CSV →
AnimalGroupDisplacedLatencyOvernight yieldBurrowed fraction
BW-001Control152 g4 min188 g76.0%
BW-002Control146 g5 min180 g73.0%
BW-003Control150 g3 min184 g75.0%
BW-004Impaired72 g17 min96 g36.0%
BW-005Impaired68 g20 min88 g34.0%
BW-006Impaired70 g18 min92 g35.0%

Synthetic example for illustration only. Pair the displaced weight with substrate consistency, the 2-hour versus overnight time course, and non-burrower status before interpreting a wellbeing difference.

3.3 Recent findings (live PubMed feed)

  • Jun 2026Source note

    Burrowing methods emphasize habituation, fixed substrate, and paired time-course readings.

    Static methods note aligned with Deacon (2006), Deacon (2009), and Jirkof (2014).

    Habituate animals to the loaded tube, hold substrate type and weight constant, and report both a 2-hour and an overnight yield so initiation is separated from total output before interpreting a wellbeing deficit.

    Methods overviewWelfare
  • Jun 2026Source note

    Non-burrowers as a welfare category rather than averaged zeros.

    Static methods note aligned with Jirkof et al. (2013) and Deacon et al. (2001).

    Animals that displace little substrate are a welfare signal. Flag non-burrowers as a defined category, standardize housing and feeding state, and confirm a deficit alongside nest building.

    ConfoundsReproducibility

View all 1240matching papers on PubMed ->

§ 4

Discussion

Limitations of the paradigm, methodological caveats, and current directions.

4.1 Common confounds

Variables that shift Burrowing Test results independent of anxiety state.

Novelty/habituation

An unfamiliar tube suppresses burrowing on first exposure. Habituate animals over prior nights so the test reflects motivation rather than novelty.

Tube size/material/angle

Tube diameter, length, lip height, and material change how easily substrate is displaced. Hold geometry constant across all groups.

Substrate type & weight

Different substrates and loaded weights set different baselines. Use the same material and charge weight so output is comparable across groups.

Satiety (food substrate)

When food pellets are the substrate, hunger drives displacement. Standardize feeding state, or use a non-food substrate to remove the appetite confound.

Individual-housing condition

Housing and social condition affect burrowing motivation. Match housing across groups so the comparison is not confounded by isolation or crowding.

Confound checklist

Tick the confounds your protocol addresses, then export a methods-paragraph blurb you can paste into your manuscript.

Preview exported markdown
## Burrowing Test — methods controls

Confounds controlled in this protocol:

- **Novelty/habituation.** An unfamiliar tube suppresses burrowing on first exposure. Habituate animals over prior nights so the test reflects motivation rather than novelty.
- **Tube size/material/angle.** Tube diameter, length, lip height, and material change how easily substrate is displaced. Hold geometry constant across all groups.
- **Substrate type & weight.** Different substrates and loaded weights set different baselines. Use the same material and charge weight so output is comparable across groups.
- **Satiety (food substrate).** When food pellets are the substrate, hunger drives displacement. Standardize feeding state, or use a non-food substrate to remove the appetite confound.
- **Individual-housing condition.** Housing and social condition affect burrowing motivation. Match housing across groups so the comparison is not confounded by isolation or crowding.

4.2 Construct validity caveats

Burrowing is strongest when habituation, substrate, tube geometry, and timing are fixed before testing. Because output is voluntary and time-dependent, report both a short and an overnight yield, flag non-burrowers as a welfare category, and confirm a wellbeing deficit alongside an independent measure such as nest building. 1

4.3 Special considerations

Should I read at 2 hours or overnight?

Report both. A 2-hour reading captures initiation but misses late burrowers, while an overnight reading captures total output. Reporting them separately distinguishes slow starters from genuinely impaired animals.

How should I handle non-burrowers?

Flag them as a welfare category rather than averaging their zeros into the group. A cluster of non-burrowers is itself a meaningful signal of disrupted wellbeing, not missing data.

Does the substrate choice matter?

Yes. Substrate type and weight set the baseline displacement, and food substrate adds a hunger confound. Use the same material and charge weight across groups, and standardize feeding state if food is used.

4.4 Current directions

Quarterly editorial review of emerging Burrowing Test methodology. Q2 2026

Methods

Time-course reporting

Reporting paired 2-hour and overnight yields rather than a single endpoint separates initiation from total output and reduces misclassification of late burrowers.

Emerging

Burrowing in welfare batteries

Burrowing is increasingly paired with nest building and grimace scoring as a low-stress battery for monitoring general wellbeing during disease models.

Methods

Substrate standardization

Reporting substrate type, charge weight, and tube geometry is increasingly expected because displacement is not comparable across different materials and tubes.

Emerging

Non-burrower flagging

Treating non-burrowers as a defined welfare category rather than averaging their zeros gives a clearer read on disrupted wellbeing within a group.

§ 5

References

5 selected methods and validation references for Burrowing Test.

  1. Deacon RM. Burrowing in rodents: a sensitive method for detecting behavioral dysfunction. Nat Protoc. 2006;1(1):118-121. doi:10.1038/nprot.2006.19
  2. Deacon RM. Burrowing: a sensitive behavioural assay, tested in five species of laboratory rodents. Behav Brain Res. 2009;200(1):128-133. doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2009.01.007
  3. Jirkof P. Burrowing and nest building behavior as indicators of well-being in mice. J Neurosci Methods. 2014;234:139-146. doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2014.02.001
  4. Deacon RM, Raley JM, Perry VH, Rawlins JN. Burrowing into prion disease. Neuroreport. 2001;12(9):2053-2057. doi:10.1097/00001756-200107030-00052
  5. Jirkof P, Leucht K, Cesarovic N, et al. Burrowing is a sensitive behavioural assay for monitoring general wellbeing during dextran sulfate sodium colitis in laboratory mice. Lab Anim. 2013;47(4):274-283. doi:10.1177/0023677213493409
Burrowing Tube
Burrowing Tube
$749.99
Added to quoteView Quote