

Burrowing Tube
Standardized tube system for quantifying burrowing and tunneling behaviors in laboratory rodents under controlled conditions.

Louise Corscadden, PhD
Director of Science · ConductScience
Ask Louise about Burrowing Tube fit, setup, configuration, or quote prep.
Already working with us? Sign in to connect this with My Scientist.
Key Specifications
Full details →- Model fit
- Mouse, Rat, Small Mammal
- SKU family
- CS-958248-01
- Shipping box
- 65.0 × 36.0 × 27.0 cm
- Ordering
- Online checkout and quote request available
- Category
- Behavioral Mazes
- Build notes
- Confirm accessories, station layout, and support needs before purchase
The Burrowing Tube provides a standardized environment for studying natural burrowing and tunneling behaviors in laboratory rodents. This apparatus consists of a transparent or translucent tube system that allows researchers to observe and quantify digging behaviors, spatial navigation within confined spaces, and species-specific burrowing patterns under controlled conditions.
The system enables researchers to assess motor coordination, spatial memory, and anxiety-related behaviors as animals navigate through tube networks. The apparatus supports both acute behavioral assessments and chronic studies of burrowing preference, with applications spanning neuroscience research, behavioral pharmacology, and comparative ethology studies.
How It Works
The Burrowing Tube apparatus utilizes the natural burrowing instinct present in most rodent species to assess behavioral and cognitive parameters. Animals are placed at tube entrances and their movement patterns, exploration time, and navigation choices are recorded through direct observation or video tracking systems.
The transparent or translucent construction allows researchers to monitor animal behavior without interference while maintaining the enclosed environment that stimulates natural burrowing responses. Behavioral parameters are quantified through measurement of latency to enter, total time spent burrowing, distance traveled, and preference for specific tube sections or configurations.
Data collection typically involves recording movement trajectories, measuring exploration duration, and analyzing spatial distribution patterns within the tube system to generate quantitative behavioral metrics for statistical analysis.
Features & Benefits
Research identifiers
These IDs come from NCBI Taxonomy. Use them in data records and methods sections.
- Species
- Mouse
NCBITaxon:10090 - Rat
NCBITaxon:10116
- Mouse
Shipping weight
- 4.41 lb
Shipping box
- L: 65.0 cm
- W: 36.0 cm
- H: 27.0 cm
| Feature | This Product | Typical Alternative | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Construction Material | Consult product datasheet for material specifications | Basic models may use opaque materials limiting observation capabilities | Transparent construction enables continuous behavioral monitoring without environmental disruption |
| Tube Configuration | Modular design allowing custom configurations | Fixed configurations limit experimental flexibility | Adaptable setup accommodates diverse experimental protocols and species requirements |
| Assembly Method | Easy disassembly for cleaning | Permanent assemblies complicate sanitation procedures | Thorough cleaning between subjects prevents cross-contamination and maintains data integrity |
| Size Range | Consult product datasheet for dimensional specifications | Limited size options may not accommodate all species | Appropriate sizing ensures natural movement patterns and behavioral validity |
The Burrowing Tube system provides modular construction and transparent materials for comprehensive behavioral assessment. The design emphasizes ease of cleaning and flexible configuration to support diverse experimental protocols.
Practical Tips
Allow 5-10 minutes habituation time before beginning formal behavioral measurements.
Why: Reduces novelty stress that could confound natural burrowing behavior patterns.
Inspect tube connections regularly for secure fit and replace worn connection hardware promptly.
Why: Loose connections can create gaps that affect animal movement and compromise behavioral measurements.
Record environmental conditions including temperature and lighting for each test session.
Why: Environmental variables can influence burrowing behavior and should be controlled or documented for data interpretation.
Verify tube dimensions periodically using calipers to ensure consistency across experiments.
Why: Dimensional accuracy affects movement patterns and ensures reproducible behavioral measurements.
Check for sharp edges or cracks before each use that could injure animals.
Why: Animal safety is paramount and injuries could introduce confounding variables to behavioral data.
If animals show reluctance to enter tubes, reduce ambient lighting to create more natural burrowing conditions.
Why: Bright lighting can inhibit natural burrowing instincts and reduce experimental validity.
Setup Guide
What’s in the Box
- Burrowing tube sections (typical)
- Connection hardware (typical)
- Assembly instructions (typical)
- Cleaning protocol guide (typical)
Warranty
ConductScience provides a one-year manufacturer warranty covering material defects and construction issues, with technical support for setup and operational questions.
Compliance
What species size ranges are accommodated by the tube dimensions?
Consult product datasheet for specific internal diameter specifications. Standard configurations typically accommodate mice and rats, with tube dimensions selected based on species body size and natural burrowing preferences.
How should the apparatus be cleaned between subjects?
Disassemble tube sections and clean with appropriate disinfectant solution. Allow complete drying before reassembly. Use ethanol-based cleaners that evaporate completely to avoid residual odors affecting behavior.
Can multiple tubes be connected for complex maze configurations?
The modular design allows connection of multiple tube sections to create branched or linear configurations. Connection methods and maximum recommended configurations depend on specific tube design features.
What behavioral parameters are typically measured?
Common measurements include latency to enter tubes, total exploration time, distance traveled, time spent in different sections, and preference indices for tube branches or configurations.
Is the apparatus compatible with video tracking systems?
Transparent construction enables video recording for automated tracking analysis. Lighting conditions and camera positioning should be optimized for the specific tracking software being used.
How does tube diameter affect behavioral measurements?
Tube diameter influences movement speed, turning ability, and stress levels. Diameter should be large enough for comfortable movement while maintaining the confined environment that stimulates natural burrowing responses.
Have a question about this product?
Track rodents with ConductVision
ConductVision is our video-tracking software. Record your sessions on video, and it scores standard rodent tests, such as those listed below.
Examples of tests it scores
To check whether ConductVision scores your protocol in this apparatus, ask in your quote request.
Have a question? Just ask.
Send it over and we'll email you a personalized answer, with no call or scheduling.
Prefer to talk it through?
Accessories
Enhance your setup with compatible accessories
Frequently Bought Together
Creator Insights
About the Creator
Robert M. J. Deacon was a behavioral neuroscientist at the University of Oxford who developed a suite of ethologically grounded assays for mouse models of neurological disease, emphasizing tasks sensitive to early or subtle changes in brain function. In a 2006 Nature Protocols paper he described the burrowing test, which measures a rodent’s spontaneous motivation to displace material from a tube — a behavior reliably suppressed by central nervous system pathology. The test is valued for its simplicity, low cost and sensitivity, and has been widely adopted in models of Alzheimer’s disease, prion disease and other neurodegenerative conditions.
To view Robert M. J. Deacon’s publications, visit PubMed.
Are you Robert M. J. Deacon? to review your photo and bio, and find out how to submit Creator Insights.
ConductScience celebrates method creators: researchers who, through rigorous and often ingenious experiments, develop the tools that reveal how the brain and body work. These are real scientific discoveries that become everyday instruments for the labs that follow.
Foundational paper
- Deacon, R. M. J. (2006). Burrowing in rodents: a sensitive method for detecting behavioral dysfunction. Nature Protocols, 1(1), 118–121. doi:10.1038/nprot.2006.19
Use this apparatus with
The complete Burrowing Test workflow
§ 1
Introduction
The Burrowing Test measures a spontaneous, species-typical behavior by recording how much substrate a rodent displaces from a loaded tube over a fixed interval. Deacon established burrowing as a sensitive index of behavioral dysfunction and general wellbeing that detects deficits many task-based assays miss. 1
The core readout is the weight of substrate displaced, supported by burrowing latency, time spent burrowing, and the proportion of non-burrowers. Because burrowing is voluntary and unrewarded, a drop in output is an early, low-stress marker of disrupted wellbeing across models of neurodegeneration, infection, and inflammation. 1
Novelty, tube geometry, substrate type and weight, satiety when food substrate is used, and individual-housing condition all change displacement independent of the underlying state. A defensible protocol habituates animals to the tube, fixes the substrate and timing, distinguishes overnight from short yields, and flags non-burrowers as a welfare quality-control category. 1
§ 2
Methods
2.1 Procedure
Loaded-tube burrowing with habituation, fixed substrate and timing, time-course measurement, and non-burrower flagging.
Pre-test setup
- 1.Habituation: Habituate animals to a loaded tube over prior nights so the test session reflects burrowing motivation rather than novelty of the apparatus.
- 2.Tube and substrate setup: Fix the tube diameter, length, lip height, and substrate type and weight, since each changes how readily substrate is displaced.
- 3.Define the timing: Choose and fix the measurement window, typically a 2-hour reading and an overnight reading, so initiation and total output are captured separately.
- 4.Set welfare flags: Pre-define a non-burrower threshold and the conditions under which an animal is flagged, so low output is treated as a welfare signal rather than missing data.
Trial sequence
- 1.Weigh and load the tube: Record the loaded substrate weight and place the tube in the cage with the open end raised on the lip.
- 2.Record burrowing latency: Note the latency to the first burrowing bout, indexing how readily the animal initiates the behavior.3
- 3.Measure short-interval yield: At the 2-hour mark, weigh the substrate remaining in the tube and compute the amount displaced.2
- 4.Measure overnight yield: Re-weigh after the overnight interval to capture total output, since some animals burrow late and a single early reading underestimates them.
- 5.Flag non-burrowers: Record animals that displace little or no substrate as non-burrowers, a welfare category rather than a zero to be averaged away.
Critical methodological constraints
- Substrate consistency. Substrate type and weight set the baseline displacement. Use the same material and loaded weight across groups so output is comparable.2
- Tube geometry. Tube diameter, length, and lip height change how easily substrate is pushed out. Hold geometry constant across all animals in a study.1
- Time-course separation. A single early reading misses late burrowers. Report 2-hour and overnight yields separately to distinguish initiation from total output.2
- Non-burrower handling. Animals that burrow little are a welfare signal, not noise. Flag non-burrowers as a category rather than folding zeros into a group mean.3
2.2 Measurement & Analysis
Core burrowing endpoints for output, initiation, engagement, and welfare quality control.
Substrate Displaced
Burrowing output
Burrowing Latency
Initiation
Time Spent Burrowing
Engagement
Overnight vs 2h Yield
Time-course
Non-Burrowers
Welfare QC
+ Additional metrics: substrate type and weight, tube geometry, time of day, housing condition, body weight, and per-animal welfare notes.
2.3 burrowed fraction (analysis)
A compact fraction of the loaded substrate that the animal displaced from the tube.
2.4 sample-size planning
Estimate the N per group needed to detect a literature-anchored burrowing effect at the endpoint you plan to report. Override the defaults with your own pilot numbers.
§ 3
Results
3.1 Sample apparatus output
Representative output from a burrowing session with a 2-hour and overnight reading on a 200 g substrate charge.
§ 4
Discussion
Limitations of the paradigm, methodological caveats, and current directions.
4.1 Common confounds
Variables that can shift Burrowing Test results apart from the effect under study.
Novelty/habituation
An unfamiliar tube suppresses burrowing on first exposure. Habituate animals over prior nights so the test reflects motivation rather than novelty.
Tube size/material/angle
Tube diameter, length, lip height, and material change how easily substrate is displaced. Hold geometry constant across all groups.
Substrate type & weight
Different substrates and loaded weights set different baselines. Use the same material and charge weight so output is comparable across groups.
Satiety (food substrate)
When food pellets are the substrate, hunger drives displacement. Standardize feeding state, or use a non-food substrate to remove the appetite confound.
Individual-housing condition
Housing and social condition affect burrowing motivation. Match housing across groups so the comparison is not confounded by isolation or crowding.
Preview exported markdown
4.2 Construct validity caveats
Burrowing is strongest when habituation, substrate, tube geometry, and timing are fixed before testing. Because output is voluntary and time-dependent, report both a short and an overnight yield, flag non-burrowers as a welfare category, and confirm a wellbeing deficit alongside an independent measure such as nest building. 1
4.3 Special considerations
Should I read at 2 hours or overnight?
Report both. A 2-hour reading captures initiation but misses late burrowers, while an overnight reading captures total output. Reporting them separately distinguishes slow starters from genuinely impaired animals.
How should I handle non-burrowers?
Flag them as a welfare category rather than averaging their zeros into the group. A cluster of non-burrowers is itself a meaningful signal of disrupted wellbeing, not missing data.
Does the substrate choice matter?
Yes. Substrate type and weight set the baseline displacement, and food substrate adds a hunger confound. Use the same material and charge weight across groups, and standardize feeding state if food is used.
4.4 Current directions
Quarterly editorial review of emerging Burrowing Test methodology. Q2 2026
Time-course reporting
Reporting paired 2-hour and overnight yields rather than a single endpoint separates initiation from total output and reduces misclassification of late burrowers.
Burrowing in welfare batteries
Burrowing is increasingly paired with nest building and grimace scoring as a low-stress battery for monitoring general wellbeing during disease models.
Substrate standardization
Reporting substrate type, charge weight, and tube geometry is increasingly expected because displacement is not comparable across different materials and tubes.
Non-burrower flagging
Treating non-burrowers as a defined welfare category rather than averaging their zeros gives a clearer read on disrupted wellbeing within a group.
§ 5
Background references
5 selected methods and validation studies of the Burrowing Test, from any lab.
- Deacon RM. Burrowing in rodents: a sensitive method for detecting behavioral dysfunction. Nat Protoc. 2006;1(1):118-121. doi:10.1038/nprot.2006.19
- Deacon RM. Burrowing: a sensitive behavioural assay, tested in five species of laboratory rodents. Behav Brain Res. 2009;200(1):128-133. doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2009.01.007
- Jirkof P. Burrowing and nest building behavior as indicators of well-being in mice. J Neurosci Methods. 2014;234:139-146. doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2014.02.001
- Deacon RM, Raley JM, Perry VH, Rawlins JN. Burrowing into prion disease. Neuroreport. 2001;12(9):2053-2057. doi:10.1097/00001756-200107030-00052
- Jirkof P, Leucht K, Cesarovic N, et al. Burrowing is a sensitive behavioural assay for monitoring general wellbeing during dextran sulfate sodium colitis in laboratory mice. Lab Anim. 2013;47(4):274-283. doi:10.1177/0023677213493409






