Semiconductor, packaging & electronics

Critical dimension (CD) metrology

Line width, space, and via diameter measured from top-down images, with per-feature tables.

ModalitiesTop-down SEMOptical CD
Top-down SEM of nanoscale silicon reference lines used for critical-dimension metrology
42 nm
Mean CD
2.1 nm
3 sigma
1,850
Features

Example outputs shown for illustration. Numbers depend on your samples and protocol.

Image: NIST, public domain via Wikimedia Commons

Top-down SEM
Plan-view feature geometry and edge placement.
Optical CD
Optical critical-dimension readout at defined sites.

Results

Each measurement below comes from your own images, tied back to the annotated frame it came from, so results stay comparable across samples, locations, and conditions.

µm or count

Line width & space

Size and shape measured for every detected object, then summarized across the population.

Illustrative shape

In your report: Per-object table, size distribution, and summary percentiles.

µm or count

Via / contact diameter

Size and shape measured for every detected object, then summarized across the population.

Illustrative shape

In your report: Per-object table, size distribution, and summary percentiles.

per area

CD uniformity map

Findings placed in sample coordinates to reveal spatial patterns and local density.

Illustrative shape
Bottom
64%
Corner
71%

In your report: Coordinate-referenced map, regional density, and representative images.

per area

Within-die range

Findings placed in sample coordinates to reveal spatial patterns and local density.

Illustrative shape
Bottom
64%
Corner
71%

In your report: Coordinate-referenced map, regional density, and representative images.

per area

Per-feature table

Findings placed in sample coordinates to reveal spatial patterns and local density.

Features1,850
Bottom
64%
Corner
71%

Example, not a claimed result

In your report: Coordinate-referenced map, regional density, and representative images.

Built around your image set

Use the calibrated images your team already collects, together with the locations you need to compare.

01
Representative images
Provide representative top-down sem images with a recorded scale calibration and the regions of interest clearly visible.
02
Image capture details
Record instrument, magnification, pixel scale, preparation method, and the smallest feature the review must resolve.
03
What to compare
State the samples, number of fields, and conditions to compare. A single field of view is not treated as a whole-sample result by itself.

Each report includes

The artifacts your team receives, ready for review and archive.

Annotated image set

Original images with regions of interest, measurement points, masks, and finding overlays.

Measurement table

Location-indexed values, units, distributions, and QC flags in a structured export.

Method record

Calibration evidence, analysis settings, version history, and validation summary.

Confidence in every resultTraceable measurements, reviewed against your agreed reference method.
Traceable scale
The report records the image scale, calibration evidence, and a method-specific expanded measurement uncertainty. It does not use one product-wide accuracy number.
Reference comparison
The configured method is compared with your accepted reference method or reviewed annotations, and reports bias by measurement range and image condition.
Detection performance
Detections are evaluated against reviewed reference regions with precision, recall, and segmentation overlap, separated by the conditions that affect performance.
Repeatability
The locked protocol is rerun on the same inputs and on a defined repeat set. The review records variation from image acquisition, sampling, and analysis separately where possible.

What this result does not establish: Measures critical dimensions from the image you provide at its native resolution. Absolute accuracy is set by your imaging tool and scale calibration, not by this analysis.

The measurement, today

Critical dimensions are read off SEM images against cursors by hand, a handful of features at a time. Throughput is low, and the operator decides where the edge sits.

What it costs

A few nanometres of line-width drift shifts device timing and yield. When CD is measured slowly on a small sample, an excursion is caught late, after the wafers have already moved to the next layer.

From image to reviewed result

  1. 1

    Image the pattern

    Load top-down SEM or optical images of the printed features.

  2. 2

    Calibrate the scale

    Set pixels-per-nanometre from the image magnification so widths report in real units.

  3. 3

    Measure each feature

    Edges are detected and width is measured perpendicular to each line, space, or via.

  4. 4

    Aggregate uniformity

    Per-feature values roll up into within-die range and a CD uniformity map.

Talk to a scientist

Not sure this is the right measurement?

Send a representative image and your measurement goal. A ConductVision scientist will confirm whether this is the right fit, or point you to the closer workflow, before you commit to a quote.

Share your image set
One representative image is enough to start the conversation.
Book a 30-minute review
Walk through the measurement plan and confidence evidence live.

Send a sample image and a measurement goal

We will show the closest ConductVision workflow and flag what needs custom validation for your images.