Semiconductor, packaging & electronics

Semiconductor defect patterns

Classify wafer-map patterns and quantify defect clusters and densities.

ModalitiesWafer mapOptical
Wafer inspection field with die grid and defect pattern clusters
Edge-ring
Pattern
0.9/cm²
Density
11
Clusters

Example outputs shown for illustration. Numbers depend on your samples and protocol.

Wafer map
Findings in wafer coordinates, so spatial signatures stay reviewable.
Optical
Wider-field coverage and screening across many locations quickly.

Results

Each measurement below comes from your own images, tied back to the annotated frame it came from, so results stay comparable across samples, locations, and conditions.

class

Pattern class

Each detected feature assigned to a class using the agreed rule set, shown on the image.

PatternEdge-ring
<1µm
1-2µm
2-4µm
>4µm

Example, not a claimed result

In your report: Per-feature class, counts by class, and annotated overlays.

per area

Cluster map

Findings placed in sample coordinates to reveal spatial patterns and local density.

Clusters11
Bottom
64%
Corner
71%

Example, not a claimed result

In your report: Coordinate-referenced map, regional density, and representative images.

per area

Defect density

Findings placed in sample coordinates to reveal spatial patterns and local density.

Density0.9/cm²
Bottom
64%
Corner
71%

Example, not a claimed result

In your report: Coordinate-referenced map, regional density, and representative images.

per area

Yield proxy

Findings placed in sample coordinates to reveal spatial patterns and local density.

Illustrative shape
Bottom
64%
Corner
71%

In your report: Coordinate-referenced map, regional density, and representative images.

Built around your image set

Use the calibrated images your team already collects, together with the locations you need to compare.

01
Representative images
Provide representative wafer map images with a recorded scale calibration and the regions of interest clearly visible.
02
Image capture details
Record instrument, magnification, pixel scale, preparation method, and the smallest feature the review must resolve.
03
What to compare
State the samples, number of fields, and conditions to compare. A single field of view is not treated as a whole-sample result by itself.

Each report includes

The artifacts your team receives, ready for review and archive.

Annotated image set

Original images with regions of interest, measurement points, masks, and finding overlays.

Measurement table

Location-indexed values, units, distributions, and QC flags in a structured export.

Method record

Calibration evidence, analysis settings, version history, and validation summary.

Confidence in every resultTraceable measurements, reviewed against your agreed reference method.
Traceable scale
The report records the image scale, calibration evidence, and a method-specific expanded measurement uncertainty. It does not use one product-wide accuracy number.
Reference comparison
The configured method is compared with your accepted reference method or reviewed annotations, and reports bias by measurement range and image condition.
Detection performance
Detections are evaluated against reviewed reference regions with precision, recall, and segmentation overlap, separated by the conditions that affect performance.
Repeatability
The locked protocol is rerun on the same inputs and on a defined repeat set. The review records variation from image acquisition, sampling, and analysis separately where possible.

The measurement, today

Wafer-map signatures (rings, scratches, edge clusters) are read by experienced engineers and rarely classified consistently at scale.

From image to reviewed result

  1. 1

    Calibrate the scale

    Set spatial scale from a bar or known dimension. Every downstream number inherits real units.

  2. 2

    Detect & segment

    Segmentation models find the objects and regions of interest: grains, particles, pores, fibers, cells.

  3. 3

    Measure

    Quantify size, count, area fraction, density, and orientation. The metrics your method already defines.

  4. 4

    Review the overlay

    Inspect the result on every field. Adjust thresholds by hand; the change is logged with the output.

  5. 5

    Export & compare

    Publication-ready statistics, plus batch comparison across lots, conditions, and time points.

Talk to a scientist

Not sure this is the right measurement?

Send a representative image and your measurement goal. A ConductVision scientist will confirm whether this is the right fit, or point you to the closer workflow, before you commit to a quote.

Share your image set
One representative image is enough to start the conversation.
Book a 30-minute review
Walk through the measurement plan and confidence evidence live.

Send a sample image and a measurement goal

We will show the closest ConductVision workflow and flag what needs custom validation for your images.