Semiconductor, packaging & electronics

Wafer defect map & binning

Detect, locate, size, and bin defects across a wafer into a spatial map.

ModalitiesWafer scanOptical inspectionSEM review
Processed 150 mm silicon wafer with a grid of dies and ink-marked defective dies
312
Defects
6
Classes
flagged
Edge cluster

Example outputs shown for illustration. Numbers depend on your samples and protocol.

Image: Phiarc, CC BY-SA 4.0 via Wikimedia Commons

Wafer scan
Full-surface capture across the wafer.
Optical inspection
Production-style optical review of the surface under test.
SEM review
Targeted high-magnification review of flagged locations.

Results

Each measurement below comes from your own images, tied back to the annotated frame it came from, so results stay comparable across samples, locations, and conditions.

µm or count

Defect count

Size and shape measured for every detected object, then summarized across the population.

Defects312

Example, not a claimed result

In your report: Per-object table, size distribution, and summary percentiles.

per area

Wafer map

Findings placed in sample coordinates to reveal spatial patterns and local density.

Illustrative shape
Bottom
64%
Corner
71%

In your report: Coordinate-referenced map, regional density, and representative images.

class

Defect class bins

Each detected feature assigned to a class using the agreed rule set, shown on the image.

Illustrative shape
<1µm
1-2µm
2-4µm
>4µm

In your report: Per-feature class, counts by class, and annotated overlays.

µm or count

Size distribution

Size and shape measured for every detected object, then summarized across the population.

Illustrative shape

In your report: Per-object table, size distribution, and summary percentiles.

per area

Cluster / signature flags

Findings placed in sample coordinates to reveal spatial patterns and local density.

Edge clusterflagged
Bottom
64%
Corner
71%

Example, not a claimed result

In your report: Coordinate-referenced map, regional density, and representative images.

Built around your image set

Use the calibrated images your team already collects, together with the locations you need to compare.

01
Representative images
Provide representative wafer scan images with a recorded scale calibration and the regions of interest clearly visible.
02
Image capture details
Record instrument, magnification, pixel scale, preparation method, and the smallest feature the review must resolve.
03
What to compare
State the samples, number of fields, and conditions to compare. A single field of view is not treated as a whole-sample result by itself.

Each report includes

The artifacts your team receives, ready for review and archive.

Annotated image set

Original images with regions of interest, measurement points, masks, and finding overlays.

Measurement table

Location-indexed values, units, distributions, and QC flags in a structured export.

Method record

Calibration evidence, analysis settings, version history, and validation summary.

Confidence in every resultTraceable measurements, reviewed against your agreed reference method.
Traceable scale
The report records the image scale, calibration evidence, and a method-specific expanded measurement uncertainty. It does not use one product-wide accuracy number.
Reference comparison
The configured method is compared with your accepted reference method or reviewed annotations, and reports bias by measurement range and image condition.
Detection performance
Detections are evaluated against reviewed reference regions with precision, recall, and segmentation overlap, separated by the conditions that affect performance.
Repeatability
The locked protocol is rerun on the same inputs and on a defined repeat set. The review records variation from image acquisition, sampling, and analysis separately where possible.

What this result does not establish: Detects and classifies defects visible in the images provided. Killer-versus-nuisance calls depend on your device rules and should be confirmed against electrical test.

The measurement, today

Defects are reviewed one image at a time and tallied on a sheet. Spatial signatures such as edge rings, radial scratches, and cluster hot spots only emerge when someone plots them by hand.

What it costs

The pattern of defects across a wafer points at the tool that caused them. Without a fast map, a drifting chamber keeps printing scrap while review works through a backlog.

From image to reviewed result

  1. 1

    Scan the wafer

    Tile optical or SEM images across the wafer surface.

  2. 2

    Detect and size

    Every defect is segmented, located, and measured.

  3. 3

    Bin by class

    Defects are sorted into classes such as particle, scratch, and pattern defect.

  4. 4

    Map and flag

    Defects are plotted to wafer coordinates and spatial signatures are flagged.

Talk to a scientist

Not sure this is the right measurement?

Send a representative image and your measurement goal. A ConductVision scientist will confirm whether this is the right fit, or point you to the closer workflow, before you commit to a quote.

Share your image set
One representative image is enough to start the conversation.
Book a 30-minute review
Walk through the measurement plan and confidence evidence live.

Send a sample image and a measurement goal

We will show the closest ConductVision workflow and flag what needs custom validation for your images.