Semiconductor, packaging & electronics

Etch profile & high-aspect-ratio metrology

Measure trench width, depth, sidewall angle, bowing, taper, and bottom residue from cross-section images.

ModalitiesCross-section SEMCD-SEMFIB-SEM
Illustrative SEM-style cross-section of high-aspect-ratio semiconductor trenches
2.8 µm
Depth
88.6 deg
Sidewall
46
Features

Example outputs shown for illustration. Numbers depend on your samples and protocol.

Image: Illustrative rendering (AI-generated, gpt-image-2), not an SEM image of a specific device

Cross-section SEM
Nanometre-scale layer thickness and sidewall geometry at defined features.
CD-SEM
Critical-dimension measurement at the sites your recipe defines.
FIB-SEM
Site-specific cross-sections milled exactly where the question is.

Results

Each measurement below comes from your own images, tied back to the annotated frame it came from, so results stay comparable across samples, locations, and conditions.

nm or µm

Trench width & depth

Perpendicular distance between the defined boundaries at each accepted measurement point.

Depth2.8 µm

Example, not a claimed result

In your report: Per-point values with median, spread, minimum, maximum, and location.

per area

Sidewall angle

Findings placed in sample coordinates to reveal spatial patterns and local density.

Sidewall88.6 deg
Bottom
64%
Corner
71%

Example, not a claimed result

In your report: Coordinate-referenced map, regional density, and representative images.

per area

Bowing / taper

Findings placed in sample coordinates to reveal spatial patterns and local density.

Illustrative shape
Bottom
64%
Corner
71%

In your report: Coordinate-referenced map, regional density, and representative images.

per area

Bottom-residue proxy

Findings placed in sample coordinates to reveal spatial patterns and local density.

Illustrative shape
Bottom
64%
Corner
71%

In your report: Coordinate-referenced map, regional density, and representative images.

per area

Per-feature table

Findings placed in sample coordinates to reveal spatial patterns and local density.

Features46
Bottom
64%
Corner
71%

Example, not a claimed result

In your report: Coordinate-referenced map, regional density, and representative images.

Built around your image set

Use the calibrated images your team already collects, together with the locations you need to compare.

01
Representative images
Provide representative cross-section sem images with a recorded scale calibration and the regions of interest clearly visible.
02
Image capture details
Record instrument, magnification, pixel scale, preparation method, and the smallest feature the review must resolve.
03
What to compare
State the samples, number of fields, and conditions to compare. A single field of view is not treated as a whole-sample result by itself.

Each report includes

The artifacts your team receives, ready for review and archive.

Annotated image set

Original images with regions of interest, measurement points, masks, and finding overlays.

Measurement table

Location-indexed values, units, distributions, and QC flags in a structured export.

Method record

Calibration evidence, analysis settings, version history, and validation summary.

Confidence in every resultTraceable measurements, reviewed against your agreed reference method.
Traceable scale
The report records the image scale, calibration evidence, and a method-specific expanded measurement uncertainty. It does not use one product-wide accuracy number.
Reference comparison
The configured method is compared with your accepted reference method or reviewed annotations, and reports bias by measurement range and image condition.
Detection performance
Detections are evaluated against reviewed reference regions with precision, recall, and segmentation overlap, separated by the conditions that affect performance.
Repeatability
The locked protocol is rerun on the same inputs and on a defined repeat set. The review records variation from image acquisition, sampling, and analysis separately where possible.

What this result does not establish: Measures geometry from prepared cross-section images. Cross-section preparation, image scale, charging, and site measurement rules determine absolute accuracy.

The measurement, today

High-aspect-ratio features are reviewed on a small number of manually annotated SEM cross-sections. Edge placement and the choice of measurement location can vary between analysts.

What it costs

A changing etch profile can alter downstream fill, resistance, or device behavior. Structured, image-linked measurements make profile differences visible across conditions.

From image to reviewed result

  1. 1

    Acquire a cross-section

    Load a prepared cross-section SEM, CD-SEM, or FIB-SEM image with a verified scale.

  2. 2

    Identify the profile

    Segment the feature sidewalls, opening, and bottom to establish the measurement geometry.

  3. 3

    Measure each feature

    Calculate configured width, depth, sidewall, taper, and residue measurements at consistent locations.

  4. 4

    Compare conditions

    Export overlays and per-feature tables for recipe, wafer, or lot review.

Talk to a scientist

Not sure this is the right measurement?

Send a representative image and your measurement goal. A ConductVision scientist will confirm whether this is the right fit, or point you to the closer workflow, before you commit to a quote.

Share your image set
One representative image is enough to start the conversation.
Book a 30-minute review
Walk through the measurement plan and confidence evidence live.

Send a sample image and a measurement goal

We will show the closest ConductVision workflow and flag what needs custom validation for your images.