Semiconductor, packaging & electronics

Wafer edge, bow & warp inspection

Locate edge chips and measure image-derived edge geometry before handling, lithography, or packaging.

ModalitiesEdge inspectionOptical profilometryMacro imaging
Illustrative side view of a silicon wafer edge with a small chip for edge and geometry inspection
3
Edge chips
58 µm
Largest chip
14 µm
Bow

Example outputs shown for illustration. Numbers depend on your samples and protocol.

Image: Illustrative rendering (AI-generated, gpt-image-2), not a photograph of a specific wafer

Edge inspection
The wafer edge and exclusion zone, where handling damage starts.
Optical profilometry
Non-contact surface height and step geometry.
Macro imaging
Whole-part context at the scale a technician actually sees.

Results

Each measurement below comes from your own images, tied back to the annotated frame it came from, so results stay comparable across samples, locations, and conditions.

per area

Edge-chip map

Findings placed in sample coordinates to reveal spatial patterns and local density.

Edge chips3
Bottom
64%
Corner
71%

Example, not a claimed result

In your report: Coordinate-referenced map, regional density, and representative images.

nm or µm

Chip length & depth proxy

Perpendicular distance between the defined boundaries at each accepted measurement point.

Largest chip58 µm

Example, not a claimed result

In your report: Per-point values with median, spread, minimum, maximum, and location.

per area

Edge exclusion zone

Findings placed in sample coordinates to reveal spatial patterns and local density.

Illustrative shape
Bottom
64%
Corner
71%

In your report: Coordinate-referenced map, regional density, and representative images.

per area

Bow / warp profile

Findings placed in sample coordinates to reveal spatial patterns and local density.

Bow14 µm
Bottom
64%
Corner
71%

Example, not a claimed result

In your report: Coordinate-referenced map, regional density, and representative images.

Built around your image set

Use the calibrated images your team already collects, together with the locations you need to compare.

01
Representative images
Provide representative edge inspection images with a recorded scale calibration and the regions of interest clearly visible.
02
Image capture details
Record instrument, magnification, pixel scale, preparation method, and the smallest feature the review must resolve.
03
What to compare
State the samples, number of fields, and conditions to compare. A single field of view is not treated as a whole-sample result by itself.

Each report includes

The artifacts your team receives, ready for review and archive.

Annotated image set

Original images with regions of interest, measurement points, masks, and finding overlays.

Measurement table

Location-indexed values, units, distributions, and QC flags in a structured export.

Method record

Calibration evidence, analysis settings, version history, and validation summary.

Confidence in every resultTraceable measurements, reviewed against your agreed reference method.
Traceable scale
The report records the image scale, calibration evidence, and a method-specific expanded measurement uncertainty. It does not use one product-wide accuracy number.
Reference comparison
The configured method is compared with your accepted reference method or reviewed annotations, and reports bias by measurement range and image condition.
Detection performance
Detections are evaluated against reviewed reference regions with precision, recall, and segmentation overlap, separated by the conditions that affect performance.
Repeatability
The locked protocol is rerun on the same inputs and on a defined repeat set. The review records variation from image acquisition, sampling, and analysis separately where possible.

What this result does not establish: Reports geometry from calibrated image or profilometry inputs. Use your qualified tool and site method for any handling, process, or acceptance limit.

The measurement, today

Edge damage and wafer geometry are often logged as separate pass/fail checks. The image evidence is not consistently retained, and a small edge chip can be missed until a handling or coating issue appears.

What it costs

Edge defects can seed breakage, handling failures, and exclusion-zone losses. Geometry trends are more useful when tied back to the actual wafer image and lot.

From image to reviewed result

  1. 1

    Image the edge

    Capture the edge and exclusion zone with your edge-inspection or optical-profilometry system.

  2. 2

    Register the wafer

    Align the edge image set to wafer coordinates so each finding keeps its angular location.

  3. 3

    Measure findings

    Segment chips and visible edge damage, then calculate the configured bow or warp profile from the supplied geometry images.

  4. 4

    Export the record

    Deliver an image-linked defect list and geometry summary for review.

Talk to a scientist

Not sure this is the right measurement?

Send a representative image and your measurement goal. A ConductVision scientist will confirm whether this is the right fit, or point you to the closer workflow, before you commit to a quote.

Share your image set
One representative image is enough to start the conversation.
Book a 30-minute review
Walk through the measurement plan and confidence evidence live.

Send a sample image and a measurement goal

We will show the closest ConductVision workflow and flag what needs custom validation for your images.