Research data · Disease model and test

Radial arm maze in cognitive impairment and dementia research

From 2021 to 2025, 94 animal research papers on cognitive impairment and dementia mentioned the radial arm maze in their title or abstract.

That is 8% fewer than the 102 papers of 2011 to 2015. Between the same two periods, the papers on cognitive impairment and dementia that mention any of the 90 tests we count rose 70%.

94 papers on cognitive impairment and dementia from 2021 to 2025 mentioned the radial arm maze
2% of the papers on cognitive impairment and dementia that mention any test mention the radial arm maze
42% of the papers that mention the radial arm maze are on cognitive impairment and dementia
8% fewer papers than in 2011 to 2015

Papers by year

Animal research papers on cognitive impairment and dementia that mention the radial arm maze, by year, 2001 to 2026

The 2026 bar counts papers added to PubMed by November 8, 2026.

  • Papers in a full year
  • 2026 so far
Show the counts for each year
Papers by year
YearPapers
200118
200216
200319
200428
200519
200617
200728
200834
200929
201022
201125
201222
201317
201420
201518
201631
201730
201832
201929
202021
202120
202219
202321
202417
202517
2026 (part year)14

Which species the papers used

Each bar is a share of the 94 papers from 2021 to 2025. A paper can use more than one species, so the shares can add to more than 100%.

Species

Rat
57 papers 61%
Mouse
37 papers 39%
Other animals
4 papers 4%

“Other animals” counts papers that use none of the species this chart names.

Tests mentioned alongside the radial arm maze

Each bar is one test, with how many of the 94 papers also mention it, and what share that is. Of these papers, 29 (31%) mention no other test.

The 12 tests these papers mention most

19 papers 20%
15 papers 16%
15 papers 16%
6 papers 6%
3 papers 3%
3 papers 3%
3 papers 3%

Which papers count

A paper counts here when it is animal research, mentions the radial arm maze in its title or abstract, and studies cognitive impairment and dementia.

We tell whether a paper studies cognitive impairment and dementia from its MeSH terms, the subject headings the National Library of Medicine adds when it indexes a paper. For a paper without MeSH terms, PubTator 3, NCBI's text-mining service, has to find the disease in the title or abstract. A paper can count under more than one disease model. A paper that mentions the test only in its methods is missed, so the count runs low.

The page on cognitive impairment and dementia research names the subject headings we count as cognitive impairment and dementia. Download the test list for the search terms we used for the radial arm maze, or the paper list for the PubMed ID of every paper behind these counts. Our main page, Behavioral tests in published research, has the full method and each source's terms of use.

More tests and disease models

Every pairing of a disease model and a test with 30 or more papers from 2021 to 2025 has a page like this one.

Papers on other disease models that mention the radial arm maze

The page on the radial arm maze counts all the papers that mention it, whatever they study. The page on cognitive impairment and dementia research ranks the tests by their papers on cognitive impairment and dementia.

How to cite

APA

ConductScience. (2026, November 10). Radial arm maze in cognitive impairment and dementia research [Data set]. https://conductscience.com/data/behavioral-tests/models/cognitive-impairment/radial-arm-maze

BibTeX

@misc{conductscience_cognitive_impairment_radial_arm_maze_2026,
  author = {{ConductScience}},
  title = {Radial arm maze in cognitive impairment and dementia research},
  year = {2026},
  month = nov,
  url = {https://conductscience.com/data/behavioral-tests/models/cognitive-impairment/radial-arm-maze},
  note = {Data set, released November 10, 2026},
}

Radial arm maze apparatus in our store

In the test battery tool, pick every test your study will run and add the apparatus for all of them to one quote.