Research data · Disease model and test

Novel object recognition in depression research

From 2021 to 2025, 134 animal research papers on depression mentioned novel object recognition in their title or abstract.

That is 2.9 times the 47 papers of 2011 to 2015. Between the same two periods, the papers on depression that mention any of the 90 tests we count grew more slowly, to 1.5 times as many.

134 papers on depression from 2021 to 2025 mentioned novel object recognition
5% of the papers on depression that mention any test mention novel object recognition
4% of the papers that mention novel object recognition are on depression
2.9 times as many papers as in 2011 to 2015

Papers by year

Animal research papers on depression that mention novel object recognition, by year, 2001 to 2026

The 2026 bar counts papers added to PubMed by November 8, 2026.

  • Papers in a full year
  • 2026 so far
Show the counts for each year
Papers by year
YearPapers
20010
20020
20032
20040
20051
20061
20073
20085
20093
20104
20115
20128
201312
201410
201512
201621
201731
201826
201928
202025
202125
202225
202325
202431
202528
2026 (part year)44

Which species the papers used

Each bar is a share of the 134 papers from 2021 to 2025. A paper can use more than one species, so the shares can add to more than 100%.

Species

Mouse
78 papers 58%
Rat
54 papers 40%
Other animals
3 papers 2%
Zebrafish
1 paper 1%

“Other animals” counts papers that use none of the species this chart names.

Tests mentioned alongside novel object recognition

Each bar is one test, with how many of the 134 papers also mention it, and what share that is. Of these papers, 15 (11%) mention no other test.

The 12 tests these papers mention most

Which papers count

A paper counts here when it is animal research, mentions novel object recognition in its title or abstract, and studies depression.

We tell whether a paper studies depression from its MeSH terms, the subject headings the National Library of Medicine adds when it indexes a paper. For a paper without MeSH terms, PubTator 3, NCBI's text-mining service, has to find the disease in the title or abstract. A paper can count under more than one disease model. A paper that mentions the test only in its methods is missed, so the count runs low.

The page on depression research names the subject headings we count as depression. Download the test list for the search terms we used for novel object recognition, or the paper list for the PubMed ID of every paper behind these counts. Our main page, Behavioral tests in published research, has the full method and each source's terms of use.

More tests and disease models

Every pairing of a disease model and a test with 30 or more papers from 2021 to 2025 has a page like this one.

The page on novel object recognition counts all the papers that mention it, whatever they study. The page on depression research ranks the tests by their papers on depression.

How to cite

APA

ConductScience. (2026, November 10). Novel object recognition in depression research [Data set]. https://conductscience.com/data/behavioral-tests/models/depression/novel-object-recognition

BibTeX

@misc{conductscience_depression_novel_object_recognition_2026,
  author = {{ConductScience}},
  title = {Novel object recognition in depression research},
  year = {2026},
  month = nov,
  url = {https://conductscience.com/data/behavioral-tests/models/depression/novel-object-recognition},
  note = {Data set, released November 10, 2026},
}

Novel object recognition apparatus in our store

In the test battery tool, pick every test your study will run and add the apparatus for all of them to one quote.