Manual gait analysis apparatus that captures rodent footprint patterns on paper for quantitative assessment of locomotion parameters including stride length and paw placement.
Director of Science · ConductScience
Ask Louise about Gait Test fit, setup, configuration, or quote prep.
Already working with us? Sign in to connect this with My Scientist.
The Gait Test is a specialized apparatus for quantitative locomotion analysis in rodents, designed to capture and analyze footprint patterns during normal gait. The system consists of a narrow runway connected to a housing chamber, with paper lining that records paw impressions using the included blue-black ink. This approach enables detailed assessment of stride length, step width, paw placement patterns, and gait symmetry through direct measurement of ink footprints.
Available in species-specific configurations for mice and rats, the apparatus provides controlled conditions for gait assessment while maintaining natural walking behavior. The housing chamber serves as a familiar start point, encouraging animals to traverse the runway toward the opposite end, generating clear footprint records for subsequent analysis. This manual recording method offers direct visualization of paw contact patterns and enables measurement of multiple gait parameters from a single trial.
The Gait Test operates on the principle of contact recording, where animals traverse a narrow runway while their paws contact ink-treated paper. As the animal walks from the housing chamber across the runway, each paw step creates an ink impression that records the exact location, orientation, and pressure distribution of paw placement. The runway dimensions are optimized for each species to encourage natural walking behavior while constraining lateral movement for consistent data collection.
The recorded footprint patterns provide quantitative data on multiple gait parameters including stride length (distance between successive placements of the same paw), step width (lateral distance between left and right paw placements), and stride frequency. Additional parameters such as paw angle, step overlap, and gait symmetry can be calculated through manual measurement of the ink impressions. The housing chamber design encourages forward movement while reducing stress, as animals naturally move from an enclosed space toward an open area.
| Feature | This Product | Typical Alternative | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Data Recording Method | Direct ink footprint recording on paper | Video recording or electronic sensor plates | Provides permanent physical records that can be re-analyzed and offers detailed paw contact morphology |
| Species Configuration | Dedicated mouse and rat-specific apparatus dimensions | Single adjustable runway systems | Optimized dimensions ensure natural gait patterns specific to each species without compromise |
| Setup Complexity | Simple assembly with manual ink application | Computer systems requiring calibration and software setup | Minimal technical requirements allow rapid deployment and reduced maintenance overhead |
| Data Analysis Approach | Manual measurement or optional digitization | Automated real-time analysis software | Researcher controls measurement methodology and can focus on specific parameters of interest |
| Cost Structure | Single purchase with consumable paper and ink | Higher initial cost with software licensing fees | Lower barrier to entry for laboratories establishing gait analysis capabilities |
This manual gait analysis system offers direct footprint recording with species-optimized dimensions and straightforward operation. The ink-based recording method provides permanent data records while maintaining simplicity and cost-effectiveness for routine locomotion assessment.
| Model | SKU | Listed price | Status | Dimensions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| White | ME-5009-W | $1,990.00 | Available | 90 x 90 x 60 cm |
| Grey | ME-5009-G | $1,990.00 | Available | 90 x 90 x 60 cm |
| Clear | ME-5009-C | $1,990.00 | Available | 90 x 90 x 60 cm |
| Black | ME-5009-B | $1,990.00 | Available | 90 x 90 x 60 cm |
| White | ME-5008-W | $1,890.00 | Available | 60 x 60 x 40 cm |
| Grey | ME-5008-E | $1,890.00 | Available | 60 x 60 x 40 cm |
| Clear | ME-5008-C | $1,890.00 | Available | 60 x 60 x 40 cm |
| Black | ME-5008-B | $1,890.00 | Available | 60 x 60 x 40 cm |
Verify runway dimensions and paper alignment before each session using a ruler to ensure consistent measurement reference points.
Why: Accurate spatial references are essential for reliable stride length and step width calculations.
Clean the runway surface thoroughly between animals using appropriate disinfectant and allow complete drying before applying new paper.
Why: Prevents cross-contamination and ensures proper paper adhesion for clear footprint recording.
Allow animals to acclimate in the housing chamber for 30-60 seconds before opening access to the runway.
Why: Reduces stress-related behavior modifications that could affect natural gait patterns during testing.
Test ink consistency on practice paper before animal testing to ensure optimal footprint clarity and contrast.
Why: Proper ink density is critical for accurate paw contact measurement and subsequent parameter calculations.
If animals hesitate to cross the runway, dim overhead lighting and ensure the exit area is well-lit to encourage forward movement.
Why: Natural exploration behavior drives movement toward brighter areas, improving trial success rates.
Record environmental conditions (temperature, humidity) for each session as these can influence animal behavior and ink drying.
Why: Environmental consistency supports reproducible results and helps identify sources of variability between sessions.
Ensure ink formulation is non-toxic and remove excess ink from animal paws immediately after testing using appropriate cleaning solution.
Why: Prevents ingestion during grooming and maintains animal welfare standards throughout the procedure.
ConductScience provides a one-year manufacturer warranty covering defects in materials and workmanship under normal laboratory use conditions. Technical support is available for setup guidance and measurement methodology questions.
Background reading relevant to this product:
What gait parameters can be measured from the ink footprint records?
Primary parameters include stride length, step width, stride frequency, paw angle, and gait symmetry. Additional measurements such as step overlap, stance width, and individual paw contact area can be derived through manual measurement or digital analysis of the recorded impressions.
How should the ink be applied to ensure clear footprints without affecting behavior?
Apply a thin, even layer using a small brush or foam applicator, focusing on paw pads while avoiding excess ink between toes. The ink should be sufficient for clear impressions but not so heavy that it alters normal walking patterns or causes animals to lift paws excessively.
How many trials are typically needed for reliable gait assessment?
Most protocols use 3-5 successful traversals per animal, with successful trials defined as continuous forward movement without stops, turns, or grooming behaviors. Multiple trials allow for assessment of consistency and calculation of mean values with appropriate statistical power.
Can the recorded footprints be digitized for computer analysis?
Yes, footprint records can be scanned or photographed for digital analysis using image analysis software. This enables automated measurement of multiple parameters and integration with statistical analysis packages for larger datasets.
What factors might influence gait measurement reliability?
Key factors include consistent ink application, animal acclimation time, runway cleanliness between trials, environmental conditions (lighting, noise), and standardized measurement methodology. Proper training and protocol adherence are essential for reproducible results.
How does this compare to automated gait analysis systems?
This manual system provides direct physical records and lower cost compared to automated systems, but requires manual measurement and analysis time. Automated systems offer real-time data and higher throughput, while this apparatus provides permanent records suitable for re-analysis and detailed morphological assessment of individual footprints.
Enhance your setup with compatible accessories
Use this apparatus with
No exact ConductVision gait-analysis page is currently published. Stride length and stance-swing timing are normally captured by a dedicated illuminated runway or paw-print system rather than overhead tracking; keep automated gait kinematics as a roadmap gap.
Supporting page not yet builtRunway setup, walking-speed normalization, paw-print labeling, and definitions for stride length, base of support, stance and swing duration, and regularity index.
ConductMaze Gait Analysis Protocol ->Confirm runway lighting, camera angle, frame rate, and print-contrast conventions before extracting stride length, stance and swing duration, and regularity index from gait video.
Rodent Gait Video Checklist ->Configuration considerations
Use these notes to scope species, cohort, tracking, and automation needs. Only verified product or support routes are linked from this section.
Illuminated glass runway with a high-speed ventral camera and a goal box at the far end
Standard configuration for locomotor kinematics, capturing paw prints and stance-swing timing as the animal walks across an illuminated runway to a goal box.
Quote
Request QuoteRunway width and length scaled for mouse or rat stride length
Runway width and length change the number of full step cycles captured, so the runway geometry should match the stride length and body size of the species being tested.
Quote
View options ->Paper-lined walkway with paw inking for manual stride and base-of-support measurement
Best when a low-cost static record is needed, because inked paw prints on paper give stride length and base of support without an illuminated runway, though without stance-swing timing.
Quote
Request automation help§ 1
The Gait Analysis Test measures locomotor kinematics by recording paw placement, stride length, and the timing of stance and swing as a rodent walks across a runway. Hamers and colleagues automated quantitative gait analysis during overground locomotion in the rat, establishing the runway-based approach widely used today. 1
The core readouts are stride length, base of support, stance and swing duration, and inter-paw coordination summarized as a regularity index. Because these parameters describe how the limbs move and are placed during voluntary walking, gait analysis is sensitive to motor deficits that a single latency or coordination score cannot localize. 1
Walking speed, body size, motivation, runway surface texture, and print contrast all change gait parameters independent of true motor function. A defensible protocol normalizes parameters to walking speed, reports body size, fixes the runway surface and lighting, and uses only steady-state walking segments rather than acceleration or stopping. 1
§ 2
Steady-state runway walking with paw-print extraction, speed-normalized stride and timing parameters, and regularity-index scoring.
Critical methodological constraints
Core gait-analysis endpoints for locomotor kinematics, balance, and quality control.
Stride Length
Locomotor kinematics
Base Of Support
Balance width
Stance Duration
Weight support
Swing Duration
Limb advancement
Regularity Index
Inter-paw coordination
+ Additional metrics: cadence, duty cycle, paw print area, stride width, walking speed, body size, and per-run video notes.
A compact fraction of the step cycle spent in stance, the duty factor of the limb.
Estimate the N per group needed to detect a literature-anchored motor effect at the endpoint you plan to report. Override the defaults with your own pilot numbers.
§ 3
Aggregate publication data, sample apparatus output, and recent findings from the live PubMed feed.
PubMed volume and co-occurring behavioral methods for rodent gait-analysis studies.
Representative output from a steady-state runway walk normalized to a matched walking-speed window.
Gait-analysis methods continue to emphasize walking-speed normalization and steady-state segment selection.
Static methods note aligned with Hamers et al. (2001), Batka et al. (2014), and Vandeputte et al. (2010).
Review gait studies for parameters normalized to walking speed, only steady-state segments analyzed, fixed runway surface and lighting, and reported body size before interpreting stride and timing differences.
Gait analysis as one assay in a motor battery: pair with horizontal ladder, rotarod, and rodent treadmill.
Static methods note aligned with Clarke & Still (1999) and Mendes et al. (2015).
A single stride-length value is a screening signal. Locomotor deficits are most defensible when confirmed with separate spatial and timing endpoints and an independent motor assay scored in the same cohort.
§ 4
Limitations of the paradigm, methodological caveats, and current directions.
Variables that shift Gait Analysis Test results independent of anxiety state.
Stride length, stance, and swing all vary with walking speed. Normalize parameters to speed or compare only within a matched speed window across groups.
Larger animals have longer strides and wider bases of support independent of motor function, so body size must be reported and considered.
A weak goal-box incentive produces hesitant or stop-start walking, which distorts step timing and prevents valid steady-state runs.
Runway surface and traction change step mechanics. The surface must be held constant across groups for parameters to be comparable.
Poor lighting or low print contrast causes missed or merged paw contacts. Fix illumination, frame rate, and surface so contacts are cleanly resolved.
## Gait Analysis Test — methods controls Confounds controlled in this protocol: - **Walking speed (must normalize).** Stride length, stance, and swing all vary with walking speed. Normalize parameters to speed or compare only within a matched speed window across groups. - **Body size.** Larger animals have longer strides and wider bases of support independent of motor function, so body size must be reported and considered. - **Motivation.** A weak goal-box incentive produces hesitant or stop-start walking, which distorts step timing and prevents valid steady-state runs. - **Surface/runway texture.** Runway surface and traction change step mechanics. The surface must be held constant across groups for parameters to be comparable. - **Print/contrast clarity.** Poor lighting or low print contrast causes missed or merged paw contacts. Fix illumination, frame rate, and surface so contacts are cleanly resolved.
Gait analysis is strongest when parameters are normalized to walking speed, only steady-state segments are used, and runway surface and lighting are fixed before testing. Stride length, base of support, and stance-swing timing index different aspects of locomotion; report them separately and confirm motor deficits with an independent assay such as the horizontal ladder or rotarod. 1
Stride length, stance, and swing all change with how fast the animal walks. Without speed normalization or a matched speed window, a speed difference between groups can masquerade as a gait deficit.
Use the horizontal ladder when the question is skilled limb placement on discrete rungs. Gait analysis characterizes the kinematics of continuous overground walking rather than precision placement.
An illuminated runway captures stance and swing timing as well as stride and base of support, while inked paw prints give only the static spatial parameters. Choose based on whether step timing is needed.
Quarterly editorial review of emerging Gait Analysis Test methodology. Q2 2026
Reporting parameters within a matched walking-speed window improves comparability of stride and timing measures between labs and studies.
High-frame-rate runways with automated paw detection improve the consistency of stride, stance, and swing extraction and reduce observer burden.
Reporting stride length, base of support, and stance-swing timing separately is increasingly expected because each captures a distinct aspect of locomotion.
Gait analysis is paired with horizontal ladder, balance beam, and rotarod to separate locomotor kinematics from skilled placement and coordination.
§ 5
5 selected methods and validation references for Gait Analysis Test.
