Observer Freezing
Percentage of the session the observer spends immobile while watching the demonstrator — the primary index of vicarious fear
Observational fear learning and emotional contagion between a demonstrator and an observer.
Metrics automatically extracted by ConductVision.
Percentage of the session the observer spends immobile while watching the demonstrator — the primary index of vicarious fear
Immobility in the shocked animal. Confirms the stimulus actually worked before you interpret the observer
Time the observer spends near the dividing wall — approach toward, or avoidance of, the distressed conspecific
How quickly the observer begins to freeze after the demonstrator is shocked
Number and duration of discrete immobility episodes in the observer
Temporal alignment between observer and demonstrator immobility
Direct interaction when the partition is removed after the session
Grooming directed at the demonstrator — the consolation-like readout
Distance travelled, to confirm that reduced movement is freezing and not sedation
Freezing on re-exposure to the context 24 h later, testing whether the vicarious fear was learned
In observational fear learning, an observer animal watches a conspecific demonstrator receive foot shocks through a transparent partition. The observer receives no shock, yet freezes — acquiring a fear response from someone else's experience. The behavior is used as a rodent model of emotional contagion, the affective component that underlies empathy, and it is sensitive to familiarity: observers typically freeze more when the demonstrator is a cagemate than a stranger.
The assay lives or dies on its controls. The observer can pick up distress through sight, sound, and smell at once, so a result means little without a no-shock demonstrator condition to show the freezing is not simply a reaction to the apparatus, and a demonstrator-freezing measure to show the shock was delivered at all. An observer that fails to freeze while the demonstrator freezes normally has a social transmission deficit; an observer that fails to freeze because the demonstrator never froze is a failed experiment, not a phenotype.
ConductVision scores both chambers at once, so observer and demonstrator freezing, proximity to the partition, and the synchrony between the two animals come out of the same recording.
| Parameter | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|
| Chamber (mouse) | Per-compartment dimensions | 18 × 18 × 25 cm |
| Chamber (rat) | Per-compartment dimensions | 24 × 24 × 30 cm |
| Partition | Transparent divider passing visual, auditory, and olfactory cues | Perforated, transparent |
| Flooring | Stainless steel rod grid on the demonstrator side | Rod floor |
| Habituation | Both animals in their compartments, no stimulus | 5 min/day × 2 days |
| Observation session | Observer watches the demonstrator | 4–10 min |
| Demonstrator shock | Delivered only to the demonstrator | 0.5–1.0 mA, 1–2 s |
| Shock interval | Spacing of shocks during the observation session | Every 10 s |
| Observer shock | The observer is never shocked | None |
| Familiarity | Cagemate or stranger — a strong modulator of observer freezing | Cagemate (report either way) |
| Required control | Demonstrator present, no shock delivered | Run in every cohort |
| Retention test | Context re-exposure without the demonstrator | 24 h, 5 min |
Vicarious fear — the observer acquired a fear response it never directly experienced
Familiarity modulation, the signature that separates social transmission from a generic startle response
A social transmission deficit — the fear was expressed but not received. The core phenotype in autism and social-deficit models
Consolation-like approach rather than avoidance of the distressed animal
No transmission occurred. Check partition cues and demonstrator freezing before interpreting anything else
Two-chamber apparatus with transparent partition and rod flooring, sized for mice or rats.
Delivers and logs the demonstrator shock protocol.
Companion assay for baseline social preference in the same cohort.
Scores observer and demonstrator freezing simultaneously, plus proximity and synchrony.
Related paradigms
Precision measurement of associative learning through contextual and cued freezing.
Quantify social approach, avoidance, and interaction behaviors.
Three-chamber paradigm for social motivation and social novelty preference.
Two-way active avoidance and step-through passive avoidance in one dual-compartment apparatus.
Track escape latency, search strategy, and head direction with automated analysis.
Measure anxiety-like behavior through open vs. closed arm exploration.
Request a demo or contact our team to discuss how ConductVision can accelerate your research.