Anxiety & Depression Tests

Forced Swim Test

SKU ME-3702
In Stock — ships now
$1,190.00
Unit: Each
IncludesStandard Care

Transparent Plexiglas cylinders for forced swim test protocols, measuring antidepressant-like behaviors through immobility time quantification in rodents.

CE MarkedBAA available
Species SKU ME-3702
$1,190.00
Unit: Each
Scientist guidance
Louise Corscadden, PhD, Director of Science

Louise Corscadden, PhD

Director of Science · ConductScience

Ask Louise about Forced Swim Test fit, setup, configuration, or quote prep.

Used in a 2023 paper in the journal International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology

“(S)-Ketamine but Not (R)-Ketamine Shows Acute Effects on Depression-Like Behavior and Sleep-Wake Architecture in Rats”

From the methods
...for 15 minutes (pretest) and 5 minutes (test) in a cylinder with 30-cm diameter and 60-cm height (MazeEngineers, Skokie, IL, USA) filled with 30 cm tap water at a temperature of 24°C ± 1°C.

Maze Engineers, the maker named in the paper, is part of ConductScience.

As of , this is the only study we’ve found that used this product.

Key Specifications

Full details →
Model fit
Large Rat, Mouse, Rat
SKU family
ME-3701/ 3702/ 3703
Sizing
Mouse: Diameter 20 cm · Height 40 cm; Rat: Diameter 25 cm · Height 45 cm; Rat XL: Diameter 30 cm · Height 60 cm
Ordering
Online checkout and quote request available
Category
Anxiety & Depression Tests
Build notes
Plexiglas

The Forced Swim Test apparatus consists of transparent Plexiglas cylinders designed for behavioral assessment of antidepressant-like effects in rodents. Water-filled chambers prevent floor contact and wall climbing, creating a controlled environment where animals exhibit measurable behavioral responses. The test induces learned helplessness by placing subjects in an inescapable aquatic environment, allowing researchers to quantify immobility time as a primary outcome measure.

Available in three configurations to accommodate different species and body weights, the apparatus features odor-resistant acrylic construction for consistent experimental conditions across sessions. The standardized design supports reproducible protocols for antidepressant screening and behavioral despair studies. Assembly is required, with storage solutions included for laboratory space management.

How It Works

The forced swim test operates on the principle of behavioral despair, where animals placed in an inescapable water-filled cylinder initially attempt active escape behaviors (swimming, climbing) before transitioning to passive floating or minimal movements. The water level is calibrated to prevent foot contact with the chamber bottom while the smooth walls prevent climbing escape, creating a standardized stressful environment.

Behavioral scoring focuses on immobility time, defined as minimal movements necessary only to keep the head above water. Active behaviors include swimming (horizontal movements) and climbing (vertical movements directed at walls). The transparent Plexiglas construction allows clear visualization for manual scoring or video analysis systems. Test duration typically ranges from 5-15 minutes, with immobility measurements serving as the primary dependent variable for statistical analysis.

Features & Benefits

Transparent Plexiglas construction
Provides clear visibility for accurate behavioral observation and video analysis without visual obstruction
Species-specific sizing options
Optimized chamber dimensions (20cm, 25cm, 30cm diameter) accommodate different rodent species and body weights effectively
Odor-resistant acrylic material
Maintains consistent experimental conditions by preventing odor accumulation that could influence animal behavior
Water escape prevention design
Controlled water depth and smooth walls create standardized inescapable environment for reliable behavioral assessment
Assembly required configuration
Allows compact shipping and storage while ensuring proper chamber construction for experimental needs
Included storage solutions
Facilitates laboratory space management and equipment organization between experimental sessions
One-year warranty coverage
Provides equipment reliability assurance and technical support for sustained research operations

Add-ons and modifications

Add-onPriceDetails
Drain$150Additional

Add any of these to your quote request.

Score this test with ConductVision

ConductVision is our video-tracking software. Record your sessions on video, and it reports the measures listed below.

What it measures

Add ConductVision to your quote

ConductVision

$1,490 per year

A 5-year license is $3,990 in total.

The same license also scores standard tests such as the open field, the elevated plus maze, the Y-maze and the Morris water maze. Results export as CSV files.

Ask a question

Have a question? Just ask.

Send it over and we'll email you a personalized answer, with no call or scheduling.

Personalized email reply
Usually within one business day
Helpful answers published here

Prefer to talk it through?

Ask your question

Type it below and we'll email you a personalized answer, with no meeting required.

We'll only use your email to send your answer; broadly useful answers may be published anonymously.

Accessories

Enhance your setup with compatible accessories

Total: $0.00

Creator Insights

Roger D. PorsoltCo-developed the forced swim (Porsolt) test (1977)Synthélabo Research, France

About the Creator

Roger D. Porsolt is a French pharmacologist who, at Synthélabo Research in France, co-developed the forced swim test with Michel Le Pichon and Maurice Jalfre, introducing it in a 1977 Nature paper. The test places a rodent in an inescapable water cylinder and scores immobility as a behavioral index of despair, exploiting the finding that antidepressant-treated animals sustain escape behavior longer than controls. Its speed, simplicity and consistent response to antidepressants made it the dominant preclinical screen for antidepressant activity. Porsolt later founded a contract research organization specializing in preclinical behavioral pharmacology.

To view Roger D. Porsolt’s publications, visit PubMed.

Are you Roger D. Porsolt? to review your photo and bio, and find out how to submit Creator Insights.

ConductScience celebrates method creators: researchers who, through rigorous and often ingenious experiments, develop the tools that reveal how the brain and body work. These are real scientific discoveries that become everyday instruments for the labs that follow.

Foundational paper
  1. Porsolt, R. D., Le Pichon, M., & Jalfre, M. (1977). Depression: a new animal model sensitive to antidepressant treatments. Nature, 266(5604), 730–732. doi:10.1038/266730a0

§ 1

Introduction

The Forced Swim Test is a behavioral immobility and stress-coping assay that records how a rodent shifts between active escape behavior and passive immobility when placed in an inescapable water cylinder. Porsolt and colleagues introduced the procedure, and it is historically used to screen for antidepressant-like activity in rodents as research context. 1

The primary readout is immobility time, scored as the period in which the animal makes only the movements needed to keep its head above water. Latency to immobility, climbing time, and swimming time separate the onset and the balance of passive versus active coping across the test session. 1

Water temperature, water depth, pretest and test duration, strain baseline activity, and the immobility-detection threshold all change scored immobility independent of any underlying coping difference. A defensible protocol fixes the water conditions, the session timing, and the scoring threshold, and reports strain so results are comparable across runs. 1

§ 2

Methods

2.1 Procedure

Inescapable-cylinder swim session with immobility, climbing, and swimming scored against a fixed mobility threshold.

Pre-test setup

  1. 1.Acclimation and handling: Habituate animals to the room and to handling so the first session reflects coping behavior rather than novelty or handling stress.
  2. 2.Set water conditions: Fix water temperature and depth before any data are collected, because cooler or shallower water changes immobility independent of coping.
  3. 3.Define session timing: Fix whether a pretest session is used and set the pretest and test durations and the scoring window in advance.
  4. 4.Set the immobility threshold: Define the mobility threshold that separates immobility from active movement, since labs draw this line differently and it shifts the scored immobility.

Trial sequence

  1. 1.Place animal in cylinder: Lower the animal gently into the cylinder facing away from the observer and start the front-view recording and timer.1
  2. 2.Score immobility: Mark immobility when the animal makes only the movements required to keep its head above water, using the pre-defined threshold.4
  3. 3.Score active coping: Separate climbing (vigorous forepaw movement against the wall) from swimming (horizontal movement across the cylinder) as distinct active-coping categories.4
  4. 4.Record latency: Log latency to the first bout of sustained immobility alongside total immobility time.
  5. 5.Recover and clean: Remove the animal, dry and warm it before returning it to the home cage, and refresh the water between subjects to remove odor cues.

Critical methodological constraints

  • Water temperature. Cooler water raises immobility and adds a thermal stressor that is not coping behavior. Fix temperature and report it.2
  • Water depth. Shallow water lets the animal touch or brace against the bottom, deflating immobility. Standardize depth so the cylinder stays inescapable.3
  • Session timing. Pretest and test durations and the scoring window must be held constant, because immobility accumulates over time and is not comparable across different timings.5
  • Immobility threshold. The line between immobility and active movement is a scoring decision. Pre-specify the mobility threshold and apply it consistently across groups.4

2.2 Measurement & Analysis

Core forced-swim endpoints for passive versus active coping and quality control.

Immobility Time

Passive coping

Total time the animal makes only the movements needed to keep its head above water, the primary passive-coping readout.1

Latency To Immobility

Coping onset

Time from placement to the first sustained bout of immobility, indexing how quickly the animal shifts toward passive coping.

Climbing Time

Active coping

Time spent in vigorous forepaw movement against the cylinder wall, scored separately from swimming as an active-coping category.4

Swimming Time

Active coping

Time spent in horizontal movement across the cylinder, the second active-coping category distinguished from climbing.4

Mobility Tracking

Quality control

Continuous mobility trace against the scoring threshold, used to confirm the immobility threshold was applied consistently across subjects.

+ Additional metrics: water temperature, water depth, pretest use, session duration, strain, body weight, and per-cylinder video notes.

2.3 immobility fraction (analysis)

A compact fraction of the scored window the animal spent immobile rather than actively coping.

Inline calculator

Type the values your tracker recorded.

Full calculator with 95% CI ->
Immobility fraction

60.0%

Formula: immobility time / (immobility time + mobility time) x 100. Interpret with water temperature and depth, session timing, strain baseline activity, and the mobility threshold because the same fraction can reflect different scoring choices. 1

2.4 sample-size planning

Estimate the N per group needed to detect a literature-anchored coping effect at the endpoint you plan to report. Override the defaults with your own pilot numbers.

Control vs stressed mouse in a standard cylinder; representative magnitudes from Can et al. (2012) mouse forced swim methods.2

Cohen's d

1.71

N per group at 80% power

6

Total N

12

With attrition cushion

14

At 70% / 90% power

5 / 8

Methods sentence

Need ANOVA, proportions, paired design, or a power curve? Open in the full Sample-Size Calculator →

Formula: n = 2 · ((zα/2 + zβ) / d)2, where d = |μ₁ − μ₂| / σ. Assumes equal allocation, normality, and homoskedasticity. The attrition cushion inflates total N by 1 / (1 − dropout); confirm with your IACUC.

§ 3

Results

3.1 Sample apparatus output

Representative output from a 6-minute test session scored from front-view video against a fixed mobility threshold.

Table 1 · Per-animal Forced Swim Test scoring output

AnimalGroupImmobilityLatencyClimbingImmobility fraction
FST-001Control118 s92 s74 s39.3%
FST-002Control126 s88 s68 s42.0%
FST-003Control110 s96 s79 s36.7%
FST-004Stressed184 s48 s38 s61.3%
FST-005Stressed196 s44 s34 s65.3%
FST-006Stressed178 s52 s41 s59.3%

Synthetic example for illustration only. Pair immobility with water temperature, session timing, and the mobility threshold before interpreting coping differences.

§ 4

Discussion

Limitations of the paradigm, methodological caveats, and current directions.

4.1 Common confounds

Variables that can shift Forced Swim Test results apart from the effect under study.

Water temperature

Cooler water raises immobility and introduces a thermal stressor unrelated to coping. Fix and report temperature.

Water depth

Shallow water lets animals touch or brace against the bottom, deflating immobility.

Pretest & test duration

Immobility accumulates over time, so different pretest and test durations are not comparable. Hold session timing constant.

Strain baseline activity

Strains differ in baseline swimming and immobility. Compare within strain and report it rather than pooling across strains.

Immobility-detection threshold

The line between immobility and active movement is observer- or software-set. A fixed threshold and ideally a blinded scorer reduce variance.

Confound checklist

Tick the confounds your protocol addresses, then export a methods-paragraph blurb you can paste into your manuscript.

Preview exported markdown

4.2 Construct validity caveats

The forced swim test is a research methods model of passive versus active coping in rodents; it is not a clinical measure and clinical interpretation is out of scope. It is strongest when water conditions, session timing, and the mobility threshold are fixed before testing, with climbing and swimming scored separately and confirmed against an independent behavioral assay. 1

4.3 Special considerations

Should I score climbing and swimming separately?

Yes. The modified scoring separates climbing from swimming as distinct active-coping categories, which is more informative than a single mobility count and helps localize where a behavioral shift occurs.

Do I need a pretest session?

Rat protocols often use a pretest day followed by a test day, while many mouse protocols use a single session. Decide in advance, hold it constant across groups, and report which design you used.

How do I keep water conditions from confounding results?

Fix water temperature and depth, refresh water between subjects, and report both. Cooler or shallower water changes immobility independent of any coping difference.

4.4 Current directions

Quarterly editorial review of emerging Forced Swim Test methodology. Q2 2026

Methods

Mobility-threshold standardization

Calibrating the software mobility threshold across rigs improves comparability of immobility time between labs and scoring systems.

Emerging

Automated coping classification

Video-based classifiers that separate immobility, climbing, and swimming reduce observer burden and improve consistency of active-coping categories.

Methods

Water-condition reporting

Reporting water temperature, depth, and session timing is increasingly expected because each shifts scored immobility independent of coping.

Emerging

Multi-assay behavioral batteries

The forced swim test is paired with open-field and elevated-plus-maze measures to separate coping behavior from general locomotion and exploratory activity.

§ 5

Background references

6 selected methods and validation studies of the Forced Swim Test, from any lab.

  1. Porsolt RD, Le Pichon M, Jalfre M. Depression: a new animal model sensitive to antidepressant treatments. Nature. 1977;266(5604):730-732. doi:10.1038/266730a0
  2. Can A, Dao DT, Arad M, Terrillion CE, Piantadosi SC, Gould TD. The mouse forced swim test. J Vis Exp. 2012;(59):e3638. doi:10.3791/3638
  3. Slattery DA, Cryan JF. Using the rat forced swimming test to assess antidepressant-like activity in rodents. Nat Protoc. 2012;7(6):1009-1014. doi:10.1038/nprot.2012.044
  4. Cryan JF, Valentino RJ, Lucki I. Assessing substrates underlying the behavioural effects of antidepressants using the modified rat forced swimming test. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2005;29(4-5):547-569. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2005.03.008
  5. Petit-Demouliere B, Chenu F, Bourin M. Forced swimming test in mice: a review of antidepressant activity. Psychopharmacology. 2005;177(3):245-255. doi:10.1007/s00213-004-2048-7
  6. Yankelevitch-Yahav R, Franko M, Huly A, Doron R. The forced swim test as a model of depressive-like behavior. J Vis Exp. 2015;(97):52587. doi:10.3791/52587
Forced Swim Test
Forced Swim Test
$1,190.00
Added to quoteView Quote