Anxiety & Depression Tests

Zero Maze

$1,890.00 - $2,290.00

Elevated circular behavioral apparatus for anxiety assessment and exploratory behavior testing in mice and rats, featuring non-reflective acrylic construction and easy cleaning protocols.

Color: White
$2,290.00
Key Specifications
wall_height40cm
doors_availableLess than 4
wall_height_modificationAdditional height available
Automation Levelmanual
Dimensions40cm
SpeciesMouse, Rat
SKU:CS-958390
Need Help? Visit our Support CenterKnowledge base, order lookup, and ticket support
Our Staff are PhD Scientists
Get expert guidance on this product
Louise Corscadden, PhD, Neuroscience
Louise Corscadden
PhD, Neuroscience
Schedule a Call Instead

The Zero Maze is a behavioral testing apparatus designed for assessment of anxiety-related behaviors and exploratory activity in rodents. Constructed from non-reflective matted acrylic, this elevated circular platform provides an alternative to the elevated plus maze for measuring thigmotactic behavior and anxiety responses in laboratory animals.

The apparatus features a continuous circular pathway with wall sections creating open and closed areas, allowing researchers to quantify time spent in protected versus exposed zones. Available in mouse and rat configurations with species-appropriate dimensions, the Zero Maze eliminates center square effects present in traditional plus maze designs. The odorless acrylic construction facilitates easy cleaning with 70% ethanol between subjects, supporting standardized behavioral protocols.

How It Works

The Zero Maze operates on the principle of approach-avoidance conflict, where rodents exhibit natural thigmotactic behavior (preference for wall contact) when placed in an elevated, partially exposed environment. The circular design creates alternating open and closed sections, with animals typically spending more time in closed areas that provide wall contact and shelter.

Anxiety levels are quantified by measuring the ratio of time spent in open versus closed sections, along with entries into open areas and overall locomotor activity. The elevated position (40cm height) adds an aversive component that enhances the anxiety-provoking nature of the open sections. Unlike traditional plus maze designs, the continuous circular pathway eliminates the central square, preventing animals from remaining in a neutral zone and forcing choice behaviors between protected and exposed areas.

Features & Benefits

Non-reflective matted acrylic construction
Eliminates visual artifacts and light reflections that could confound behavioral responses or interfere with video tracking systems.
Odorless material composition
Prevents olfactory cues from influencing animal behavior, ensuring consistent baseline conditions across test sessions.
Species-specific sizing
Optimized dimensions for mouse and rat models provide appropriate spatial scaling for natural exploratory behaviors.
40cm wall height
Standardized elevation creates consistent aversive stimulus while preventing animal escape during testing procedures.
Circular continuous pathway
Eliminates center square effects found in plus maze designs, forcing active choice behaviors between open and closed areas.
Easy ethanol cleaning protocol
Rapid decontamination between subjects using standard 70% ethanol maintains hygienic conditions and prevents cross-contamination.
Available color options
Multiple color choices (black, blue, clear, grey, white) allow optimization for video contrast and tracking system compatibility.
Door modification options
Customizable door configurations enable protocol variations and specialized experimental designs requiring controlled access points.

Accessories

Enhance your setup with compatible accessories

Total: $0.00

Frequently Bought Together

Total: $2,730.00

Configuration considerations

Common Zero Maze setup decisions

Use these notes to scope species, cohort, tracking, and automation needs. Only verified product or support routes are linked from this section.

This productStandard

Zero Maze

Elevated circular annulus with alternating open and enclosed quadrants

continuous open-versus-closed exploration without the center-zone ambiguity of plus-maze designs.

Quote

Request Quote
BuyableScaled option

Zero Maze Species Variant

Mouse, rat, aquatic, insect, or large-animal scaling as appropriate

Use species-specific dimensions and lighting so the apparatus tests the intended construct instead of body size, visibility, or handling tolerance.

Quote

View options ->
SpecialtyAutomation

Zero Maze With Tracking

Camera, gates, sensors, cue control, or event logging as required

Best when the protocol needs reproducible timing, high-throughput scoring, or defensible endpoint extraction across cohorts.

Quote

Configure tracking ->

§ 1

Introduction

The Zero Maze is a anxiety assay built around continuous open-versus-closed exploration without the center-zone ambiguity of plus-maze designs. Interpretable data depend on matching the apparatus geometry, subject species, trial structure, and scoring rules to the behavioral construct under study. 1

Anxiety-like exploration protocols depend on stable geometry, consistent trial timing, and pre-defined scoring rules. Without those controls, open-zone time can be shifted by motivation, locomotion, light level, odor, cue salience, or handling rather than the intended behavioral construct. 1

This methods section summarizes setup, endpoint definitions, common confounds, sample output, adjacent assays, and reporting details needed to evaluate Zero Maze results alongside the product specifications. 1

§ 2

Methods

2.1 Procedure

Anxiety-like exploration with standardized setup, trial timing, and endpoint extraction.

Pre-test setup

  1. 1.Define constructPre-register whether the study uses Zero Maze for anxiety behavior, screening, cohort comparison, or apparatus validation.
  2. 2.Calibrate apparatusVerify elevated circular annulus with alternating open and enclosed quadrants, visibility, lighting, surface condition, cue placement, and camera field of view before animals enter the room.
  3. 3.Set scoring rulesDefine open-zone time, omissions, exclusions, latency cutoffs, and event thresholds before acquisition starts.
  4. 4.Control carryoverUse consistent cleaning, handling, acclimation, and inter-trial timing so odor, stress, and fatigue do not become hidden treatment variables.

Trial sequence

  1. 1.Start trialPlace the subject at the protocol-defined start location and begin synchronized video or event logging.
  2. 2.Record behaviorCapture open-zone time, path order, latency, dwell time, and relevant zone or arm events throughout the trial.1
  3. 3.Apply endpoint rulesScore only committed entries or events that meet the pre-defined body-position and timing criteria.
  4. 4.End and resetStop at the maximum duration, completion criterion, or humane endpoint, then clean and reset the apparatus.
  5. 5.Export QCReview tracking loss, outlier latency, immobility, omissions, and apparatus notes before group-level analysis.

Critical methodological constraints

  • Lighting. Document lighting because it can shift open-zone time independent of the intended construct.
  • Height exposure. Keep height exposure stable across cohorts and sessions.
  • Locomotor activity. Audit locomotor activity before interpreting group differences.
  • Edge risk. Report edge risk when it changes engagement, exploration, or measurable trial completion.
  • Center-free geometry. Flag center-free geometry during QA because it often explains apparent assay failure.2

2.2 Measurement & Analysis

Core Zero Maze endpoints for behavioral interpretation and apparatus quality control.

Open-zone time

Anxiety-like exploration

Open-zone time is the primary endpoint for this page and should be paired with latency and quality-control flags.1

Entry latency

Latency and initiation

Entry latency helps distinguish task performance from motivation, freezing, fatigue, or handling effects.

Transition count

Spatial or zone strategy

Transition count captures how the subject solved the task, not only whether it reached the endpoint.

Freezing time

Engagement control

Freezing time identifies omissions, low exploration, sensor dropouts, or species-specific non-response.

Falls or tracking loss

Quality-control flag

Falls or tracking loss should be reviewed before exporting final group summaries.

+ Additional metrics: trial duration, zone dwell, event count, path efficiency, tracking confidence, exclusions, and session-level notes.

2.3 open-zone time ratio (analysis)

A compact percentage summary for Zero Maze output.

Inline calculator

Type the values your tracker recorded.

Full calculator with 95% CI ->
Open-zone time ratio

23.3%

Formula: open-zone time / (open-zone time + closed-zone time) x 100. Interpret with latency, engagement, and confound checks before making construct-level claims. 1

§ 3

Results

Aggregate publication data, sample apparatus output, and recent findings from the live PubMed feed.

3.1 Publication trends

PubMed volume and co-occurring behavioral methods for Zero Maze studies.

Figure 1 · EPM publications by year (PubMed)

The paradigm has been dominant for 40 years and is still growing.

Live · Weekly

2000201020202025 YTD: 27 papers

Total in PubMed since 1985: 714+ papers. Updated 2026-05-12.

Figure 2 · Methods co-occurring with EPM (last 12 months)

Other paradigms most often run alongside EPM in the same paper.

Live

3.2 Sample apparatus output

Representative Zero Maze output for methods review and endpoint interpretation.

Table 1 · Per-animal EPM scoring output

Download sample CSV →
AnimalGroupOpen-zone timeEntry latencyTransition countSummary
ZM-001Control92 s8 s1830.7%
ZM-002Control86 s7 s1628.7%
ZM-003Treatment132 s5 s2444.0%
ZM-004Treatment145 s4 s2748.3%

Synthetic example for illustration only. Replace with tracked output screenshots or exported data when product media are available.

3.3 Recent methods context

  • May 2026Source note

    Zero Maze methods refresh: endpoint definitions, QA flags, and comparator assays

    ConductScience methods note prepared for citation review.

    The first citation-cron pass should replace this editorial seed with current Zero Maze methods papers filtered for apparatus, protocol, and endpoint relevance.

View all 714matching papers on PubMed ->

§ 4

Discussion

Limitations of the paradigm, methodological caveats, and current directions.

4.1 Common confounds

Variables that shift Zero Maze results independent of anxiety state.

Lighting

Lighting can change apparent Zero Maze performance without reflecting the intended behavioral construct. Control it in setup and report it in methods.

Height exposure

Height exposure can change apparent Zero Maze performance without reflecting the intended behavioral construct. Control it in setup and report it in methods.

Locomotor activity

Locomotor activity can change apparent Zero Maze performance without reflecting the intended behavioral construct. Control it in setup and report it in methods.

Edge risk

Edge risk can change apparent Zero Maze performance without reflecting the intended behavioral construct. Control it in setup and report it in methods.

Center-free geometry

Center-free geometry can change apparent Zero Maze performance without reflecting the intended behavioral construct. Control it in setup and report it in methods.

4.2 Construct validity caveats

Zero Maze is strongest when endpoint definitions, apparatus settings, and exclusion rules are specified before testing. Treat a single summary metric as a screening signal, then confirm interpretation with latency, engagement, comparator assays, and quality-control review. 1

4.3 Special considerations

When should I choose Zero Maze?

Choose Zero Maze when the research question matches continuous open-versus-closed exploration without the center-zone ambiguity of plus-maze designs. and the lab can control lighting, height exposure, and trial timing.

What setup variables should be specified before testing?

Specify species, cohort size, apparatus dimensions, lighting, tracking method, automation level, cleaning workflow, endpoint definitions, and exclusion criteria before data collection begins.

What makes the data interpretable?

Interpretation is strongest when the apparatus configuration, trial timing, scoring thresholds, confound controls, and comparator assays are documented together with the primary endpoint.

4.4 Current directions

Quarterly editorial review of emerging Zero Maze methodology. Q2 2026

Methods

Endpoint standardization

Define open-zone time, latency, exclusions, and engagement flags before comparing cohorts.

Emerging

Automated scoring

Camera and event-log workflows can reduce observer burden and improve consistency when zone definitions and event thresholds are validated.

Methods

Comparator batteries

Zero Maze should link to adjacent maze, motor, or motivation assays when interpretation depends on controls.

Emerging

Integrated method reporting

Apparatus dimensions, protocol fit, tracking compatibility, and endpoint definitions should be reported together so results are easier to reproduce.

§ 5

References

10 selected methods and validation references for Zero Maze.

  1. Dudchenko PA. An overview of the tasks used to test working memory in rodents. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2004;28(7):699-709. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2004.09.002
  2. Shoji H, et al. Comprehensive behavioral test battery for mice. Curr Protoc Mouse Biol. 2012;2:153-187. Find source
  3. Vorhees CV, Williams MT. Assessing spatial learning and memory in rodents. ILAR J. 2014;55(2):310-332. Find source
  4. Lalonde R. The neurobiological basis of spontaneous alternation. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2002;26(1):91-104. doi:10.1016/S0149-7634(01)00041-0
  5. Walf AA, Frye CA. The use of the elevated plus maze as an assay of anxiety-related behavior in rodents. Nat Protoc. 2007;2(2):322-328. doi:10.1038/nprot.2007.44
  6. Pellow S, Chopin P, File SE, Briley M. Validation of open:closed arm entries in an elevated plus-maze as a measure of anxiety in the rat. J Neurosci Methods. 1985;14(3):149-167. doi:10.1016/0165-0270(85)90031-7
  7. Crawley JN, Goodwin FK. Preliminary report of a simple animal behavior model for the anxiolytic effects of benzodiazepines. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1980;13(2):167-170. doi:10.1016/0091-3057(80)90067-2
  8. File SE, Wardill AG. Validity of head-dipping as a measure of exploration in a modified hole-board. Psychopharmacologia. 1975;44(1):53-59. Find source
  9. Walsh RN, Cummins RA. The Open-Field Test: a critical review. Psychol Bull. 1976;83(3):482-504. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.83.3.482
  10. Brown RE, Corey SC, Moore AK. Differences in measures of exploration and fear in MHC-congenic C57BL/6J and B6-H-2K mice. Behav Genet. 1999;29(4):263-271. Find source
Zero Maze
Zero Maze
$1,890.00
Added to quoteView Quote