Zero Maze
Elevated circular annulus with alternating open and enclosed quadrants
continuous open-versus-closed exploration without the center-zone ambiguity of plus-maze designs.
Quote
Request Quote
Elevated circular behavioral apparatus for anxiety assessment and exploratory behavior testing in mice and rats, featuring non-reflective acrylic construction and easy cleaning protocols.
| wall_height | 40cm |
| doors_available | Less than 4 |
| wall_height_modification | Additional height available |
| Automation Level | manual |
| Dimensions | 40cm |
| Species | Mouse, Rat |
The Zero Maze is a behavioral testing apparatus designed for assessment of anxiety-related behaviors and exploratory activity in rodents. Constructed from non-reflective matted acrylic, this elevated circular platform provides an alternative to the elevated plus maze for measuring thigmotactic behavior and anxiety responses in laboratory animals.
The apparatus features a continuous circular pathway with wall sections creating open and closed areas, allowing researchers to quantify time spent in protected versus exposed zones. Available in mouse and rat configurations with species-appropriate dimensions, the Zero Maze eliminates center square effects present in traditional plus maze designs. The odorless acrylic construction facilitates easy cleaning with 70% ethanol between subjects, supporting standardized behavioral protocols.
The Zero Maze operates on the principle of approach-avoidance conflict, where rodents exhibit natural thigmotactic behavior (preference for wall contact) when placed in an elevated, partially exposed environment. The circular design creates alternating open and closed sections, with animals typically spending more time in closed areas that provide wall contact and shelter.
Anxiety levels are quantified by measuring the ratio of time spent in open versus closed sections, along with entries into open areas and overall locomotor activity. The elevated position (40cm height) adds an aversive component that enhances the anxiety-provoking nature of the open sections. Unlike traditional plus maze designs, the continuous circular pathway eliminates the central square, preventing animals from remaining in a neutral zone and forcing choice behaviors between protected and exposed areas.
| Feature | This Product | Typical Alternative | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Platform Design | Continuous circular pathway without center square | Plus maze designs often include central neutral zones | Forces active choice behaviors between protected and exposed areas without neutral zone dwelling. |
| Construction Material | Non-reflective matted acrylic | Standard acrylic or plastic materials may have reflective surfaces | Prevents light artifacts and visual disturbances that could confound behavioral responses. |
| Species Configurations | Dedicated mouse and rat sizing with optimized entry dimensions | Single-size designs may not optimize spatial scaling | Species-appropriate dimensions ensure natural exploratory behaviors and consistent anxiety responses. |
| Color Options | Five color choices including black, blue, clear, grey, and white | Limited color options in standard models | Enables optimization for video contrast and tracking system compatibility across different laboratory setups. |
| Customization Options | Door modifications and additional wall height available | Fixed configurations limit protocol flexibility | Allows protocol customization for specialized experimental designs and research requirements. |
| Cleaning Protocol | Easy cleaning with standard 70% ethanol | Some materials require specialized cleaning agents | Simple decontamination procedures maintain consistent baseline conditions between test sessions. |
The Zero Maze offers a continuous circular design that eliminates center square effects while providing species-specific sizing and customization options. The non-reflective matted acrylic construction with multiple color choices optimizes video tracking compatibility and reduces environmental confounds.
Verify platform height at 40cm and ensure level positioning before each testing session.
Why: Consistent elevation maintains the aversive stimulus necessary for anxiety-related behavioral responses.
Inspect acrylic surfaces for scratches or damage that could create visual artifacts during video tracking.
Why: Surface imperfections can interfere with automated behavioral analysis and introduce measurement variability.
Allow 30-60 minutes for animal acclimation to the testing room environment before behavioral assessment.
Why: Adequate acclimation reduces stress-related confounds and improves baseline behavioral consistency.
Position video cameras directly overhead to capture the entire circular pathway without blind spots.
Why: Complete visual coverage ensures accurate tracking of transitions between open and closed sections.
If animals show excessive freezing behavior, reduce ambient lighting or provide longer acclimation periods.
Why: Excessive fear responses can mask subtle anxiety-related behaviors and reduce protocol sensitivity.
Monitor animals continuously during testing to prevent falls and ensure immediate intervention if needed.
Why: The elevated platform requires safety oversight to protect animal welfare during behavioral assessment.
Randomize the starting position within closed sections to prevent position bias effects.
Why: Consistent starting positions can create learned associations that confound natural exploratory patterns.
Store the apparatus in a dust-free environment and cover when not in use to maintain surface clarity.
Why: Clean surfaces are essential for accurate video tracking and consistent visual conditions across test sessions.
ConductScience provides a standard one-year manufacturer warranty covering defects in materials and workmanship, with technical support available for protocol optimization and troubleshooting.
Background reading relevant to this product:
What is the Zero Maze?
The Zero Maze (Elevated Zero Maze) is a circular variation of the Elevated Plus Maze, eliminating the ambiguous center zone. It consists of alternating open and enclosed quadrants arranged on a circular elevated track.
How does the Zero Maze work?
Rodents freely explore the circular track divided into two open and two enclosed quadrants. Time spent in open versus enclosed sections measures anxiety-like behavior, with the circular design removing the center-square scoring ambiguity of the plus maze.
What research applications use the Zero Maze?
The Zero Maze provides an unambiguous measure of anxiety-like behavior for anxiolytic drug screening. Its continuous design eliminates center-dwell artifacts, making it preferred for precise anxiety quantification in pharmacological studies.
Enhance your setup with compatible accessories
Use this apparatus with
Automate open-zone time, latency, zone occupancy, path order, and event timing for Zero Maze studies.
ConductVision Zero Maze ->Stepwise anxiety-like exploration setup, trial timing, exclusion rules, and reporting checkpoints.
ConductMaze Zero Maze Protocol ->Summarize open-zone time, group differences, and quality-control flags before export.
Zero Maze Calculator ->Configuration considerations
Use these notes to scope species, cohort, tracking, and automation needs. Only verified product or support routes are linked from this section.
Elevated circular annulus with alternating open and enclosed quadrants
continuous open-versus-closed exploration without the center-zone ambiguity of plus-maze designs.
Quote
Request QuoteMouse, rat, aquatic, insect, or large-animal scaling as appropriate
Use species-specific dimensions and lighting so the apparatus tests the intended construct instead of body size, visibility, or handling tolerance.
Quote
View options ->Camera, gates, sensors, cue control, or event logging as required
Best when the protocol needs reproducible timing, high-throughput scoring, or defensible endpoint extraction across cohorts.
Quote
Configure tracking ->§ 1
The Zero Maze is a anxiety assay built around continuous open-versus-closed exploration without the center-zone ambiguity of plus-maze designs. Interpretable data depend on matching the apparatus geometry, subject species, trial structure, and scoring rules to the behavioral construct under study. 1
Anxiety-like exploration protocols depend on stable geometry, consistent trial timing, and pre-defined scoring rules. Without those controls, open-zone time can be shifted by motivation, locomotion, light level, odor, cue salience, or handling rather than the intended behavioral construct. 1
This methods section summarizes setup, endpoint definitions, common confounds, sample output, adjacent assays, and reporting details needed to evaluate Zero Maze results alongside the product specifications. 1
§ 2
Anxiety-like exploration with standardized setup, trial timing, and endpoint extraction.
Critical methodological constraints
Core Zero Maze endpoints for behavioral interpretation and apparatus quality control.
Open-zone time
Anxiety-like exploration
Entry latency
Latency and initiation
Transition count
Spatial or zone strategy
Freezing time
Engagement control
Falls or tracking loss
Quality-control flag
+ Additional metrics: trial duration, zone dwell, event count, path efficiency, tracking confidence, exclusions, and session-level notes.
A compact percentage summary for Zero Maze output.
§ 3
Aggregate publication data, sample apparatus output, and recent findings from the live PubMed feed.
PubMed volume and co-occurring behavioral methods for Zero Maze studies.
Representative Zero Maze output for methods review and endpoint interpretation.
Zero Maze methods refresh: endpoint definitions, QA flags, and comparator assays
ConductScience methods note prepared for citation review.
The first citation-cron pass should replace this editorial seed with current Zero Maze methods papers filtered for apparatus, protocol, and endpoint relevance.
§ 4
Limitations of the paradigm, methodological caveats, and current directions.
Variables that shift Zero Maze results independent of anxiety state.
Lighting can change apparent Zero Maze performance without reflecting the intended behavioral construct. Control it in setup and report it in methods.
Height exposure can change apparent Zero Maze performance without reflecting the intended behavioral construct. Control it in setup and report it in methods.
Locomotor activity can change apparent Zero Maze performance without reflecting the intended behavioral construct. Control it in setup and report it in methods.
Edge risk can change apparent Zero Maze performance without reflecting the intended behavioral construct. Control it in setup and report it in methods.
Center-free geometry can change apparent Zero Maze performance without reflecting the intended behavioral construct. Control it in setup and report it in methods.
Zero Maze is strongest when endpoint definitions, apparatus settings, and exclusion rules are specified before testing. Treat a single summary metric as a screening signal, then confirm interpretation with latency, engagement, comparator assays, and quality-control review. 1
Choose Zero Maze when the research question matches continuous open-versus-closed exploration without the center-zone ambiguity of plus-maze designs. and the lab can control lighting, height exposure, and trial timing.
Specify species, cohort size, apparatus dimensions, lighting, tracking method, automation level, cleaning workflow, endpoint definitions, and exclusion criteria before data collection begins.
Interpretation is strongest when the apparatus configuration, trial timing, scoring thresholds, confound controls, and comparator assays are documented together with the primary endpoint.
Quarterly editorial review of emerging Zero Maze methodology. Q2 2026
Define open-zone time, latency, exclusions, and engagement flags before comparing cohorts.
Camera and event-log workflows can reduce observer burden and improve consistency when zone definitions and event thresholds are validated.
Zero Maze should link to adjacent maze, motor, or motivation assays when interpretation depends on controls.
Apparatus dimensions, protocol fit, tracking compatibility, and endpoint definitions should be reported together so results are easier to reproduce.
§ 5
10 selected methods and validation references for Zero Maze.