Search the ConductScience library, jump into focused collections, or browse current research notes and procurement guides from one resource hub.
Compare endpoints, assay families, animal models, controls, and reporting details before you choose a protocol or interpret a result.
Browse the science libraryBrowser-based instruments for data analysis, experiment design, and lab math. No sign-up, no upload.
Search institutions, medical schools, and departments by NIH funding, top PIs, and trends.
Mechanism recommender, budget benchmarks, S10 eligibility, and grant-writing references.
Build a clean, citation-aware academic CV with NIH biosketch and tenure dossier export.
Replicate Science extends the resource library with reproducibility notes, protocol critiques, and experiment-planning essays.
NIH lookup, budget benchmarks, S10 eligibility, mechanism matching, and proposal-writing references.
Protocols, equipment setup guides, assay explainers, and operational references for wet labs.
Procurement guides that compare equipment architecture, specifications, accessories, and workflow fit.
Run the elevated plus maze in mice or rats, with maze sizes, light, handling, session length, open-arm scoring and fixes for the problems that skew results.
Run the open field test in mice, as one short session for anxiety-like behavior or long sessions for activity, with arena size, zones, scoring and cleaning.
Size the pool and platform for mice or rats, train animals to find a hidden platform from room cues, run the probe trial and choose the measures to report.
Set the rod speed, training and trials for the rotarod test in mice, score the latency to fall, and keep the test about coordination instead of endurance.
Set up the room behind every behavior test, with light, sound, smells, handling, timing, cleaning, housing, run order and blinding, and what to report.
Plan the coordinates, keep the field sterile, level the skull in the frame, target from bregma and watch recovery, with drugs and doses from your approved protocol.
Compare planetary, mixer, attritor, and vibratory ball mills by energy, batch size, achievable fineness, and use case to choose the right mill for your sample preparation.
Select jar and ball material by sample hardness and contamination tolerance — agate, zirconia, steel, tungsten carbide, alumina, and PTFE compared for trace and molecular work.
What ball-to-powder ratio means, the typical 10:1 to 20:1 window for mechanical alloying, and how to size your grinding charge by mass for reproducible ball milling.
When wet milling reaches sub-micron sizes, when dry milling is the better call, and how target size, downstream steps, and material-solvent compatibility decide between them.
A laboratory sample-preparation protocol for milling granulated sugar to a fine powder: drying, ball-to-powder ratio, speed, cycle timing, and combustible-dust safety.
Two sizing rules for grinding-ball diameter, why a multi-size weight-percent blend beats a single size, and stainless steel vs zirconia media for planetary ball milling.
