x
[quotes_form]

Time in the Center Arms: The Subtleties of Anxiety and Decision-Making in the Elevated Plus Maze

Quick Guide

Learn More about our Services and how can we help you with your research!

Beyond Open vs. Closed — The Power of the Center Zone

The Elevated Plus Maze (EPM) is a staple in behavioral neuroscience, classically used to measure anxiety in rodents by tracking how much time they spend in the open versus closed arms of a plus-shaped platform elevated above the ground. However, a key region—often overlooked in traditional analyses—is the center zone, where all four arms intersect.

Rodents typically begin EPM trials in this center zone, and each of their decisions to explore an arm—whether open or closed—must pass through it. As such, the time spent in the center is not idle: it reflects crucial behavioral processing, risk assessment, and indecisiveness, especially in subjects experiencing anxiety or emotional conflict.

At Conduct Science, we emphasize comprehensive behavioral profiling. Our Elevated Plus Maze system, combined with ConductVision software, captures center zone metrics with precision. This empowers researchers to move beyond binary interpretations of behavior and towards complex, multidimensional analysis.

What Does Time in the Center Arms Really Tell Us?

The center zone is more than a physical midpoint—it’s a behavioral crossroads. Time in this area reveals important information about:

1. Decision Latency

How long does a rodent hesitate before making a choice? Prolonged center time suggests high anxiety, fear of exploration, or difficulty processing environmental cues.

2. Risk Assessment and Conflict

An anxious animal may poke its head into an open arm but withdraw to the center without fully entering. These partial attempts increase center time and reflect conflict behavior, a hallmark of anxiety.

3. Indecision or Cognitive Impairment

In models of neurodegeneration, such as Alzheimer’s disease, animals often exhibit prolonged center zone occupancy due to impaired working memory or executive function.

4. Exploratory Impulsivity

Conversely, some neurodevelopmental models (e.g., ADHD or hyperactivity-prone strains) may show shorter center durations with rapid darting, indicating impulsivity and reduced inhibitory control.

5. Drug Response

Pharmacological agents—particularly anxiolytics—alter how rodents engage with the center zone. Effective treatments often reduce center hesitation, promoting quicker and more confident arm exploration.

Quantifying Center Behavior: Metric Breakdown

Metric What It Shows Behavioral Implication
Total Time in Center (s)
Overall hesitation and decision latency
High values suggest anxiety, freezing, or indecision
Latency to Exit Center (s)
First decision after placement
Prolonged latency indicates fear or cognitive delay
Number of Center Returns
How often the subject comes back
Frequent returns suggest scanning, doubt, or safety-seeking
Duration per Visit (s)
Average hesitation per episode
Can help distinguish impulsivity from avoidance

Conduct Science EPM Platform: Designed for Detailed Analytics

Our Elevated Plus Maze apparatus supports nuanced center-zone data collection with:

  • Clearly marked center zone for accurate software mapping

  • 30+ FPS real-time tracking via ConductVision or ANY-maze integration

  • Custom zone annotation to define arm boundaries and central regions

  • Cross-compatible for mice and rats, with adjustable dimensions

  • CSV data outputs for total and segmented metrics, compatible with most statistical platforms

Our maze platforms are manufactured for reproducibility and scalability, ideal for both single-lab use and multi-site collaborations.

Experimental Dataset: Center Time as a Marker of Anxiety Response

Researchers used Conduct Science’s Elevated Plus Maze to assess center behavior in control, stress-exposed, and anxiolytic-treated mice.

Group Time in Center (s) Open Arm Time (s) Closed Arm Time (s) Entries to Open Arms
Control
20.3 ± 3.2
128.5 ± 9.4
151.2 ± 11.6
11.2 ± 1.1
Stress-Exposed
43.7 ± 5.6
88.7 ± 7.2
167.6 ± 12.9
7.5 ± 1.4
Anxiolytic-Treated
15.8 ± 2.9
146.9 ± 10.3
137.3 ± 10.4
13.1 ± 1.2

Interpretation: The stress-exposed group exhibited more than double the center time of controls, confirming heightened anxiety and indecision. The anxiolytic treatment significantly reduced center dwell time, indicating restored behavioral confidence and risk tolerance.

Applications Across Research Models

Center zone analysis is particularly valuable in studies involving:

  • Chronic stress and trauma (PTSD models)

  • Aging and neurodegeneration (Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s)

  • Neurodevelopmental disorders (ASD, ADHD)

  • Pharmacological screening (anxiolytics, nootropics, SSRIs)

  • Sex-based behavioral comparisons

In these models, center zone metrics may precede changes in other measures, offering early detection of behavioral alterations.

Practical Considerations for Center Zone Analysis

  • Standardize starting position in the center across trials.
  • Avoid ambient noise or motion that may artificially prolong center hesitation.
  • Use automated scoring to reduce observer bias
  • Combine center time. data with video footage for qualitative validation
  • Consider trial. segmentation (e.g., early vs. late trial phases) to detect behavioral shifts.

Conclusion: The Center Holds Critical Insight

Behavioral science isn’t just about where animals go—but how they decide to get there. Time spent in the center arms of the Elevated Plus Maze captures the micro-decisions, risk evaluations, and emotional hesitations that define anxious or impaired states.

By including center zone metrics in your behavioral toolkit, you open the door to richer insights, more sensitive analysis, and better translational relevance. Conduct Science’s Elevated Plus Maze platform gives you the precision and flexibility to do just that.

Ready to enhance your anxiety research toolkit?

References

  • Pellow, S., Chopin, P., File, S. E., & Briley, M. (1985). Validation of open:closed arm entries in an elevated plus-maze as a measure of anxiety in the rat. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 14(3), 149-167.
  • Carobrez, A. P., & Bertoglio, L. J. (2005). Ethological and temporal analyses of anxiety-like behavior: The elevated plus-maze model 20 years on. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 29(8), 1193-1205.

Written by researchers, for researchers — powered by Conduct Science.

Author:

Louise Corscadden, PhD

Dr Louise Corscadden acts as Conduct Science’s Director of Science and Development and Academic Technology Transfer. Her background is in genetics, microbiology, neuroscience, and climate chemistry.

Related Posts

Female scientist pointing at molecular diagram during lab presentation with text "Call for Papers" for ConductScience.

Get access to top-tier research from scientists publishing today.

50% OFF for new subscribers