x
[quotes_form]

Head Dips in the Elevated Plus Maze: A Critical Measure of Anxiety-Like Behavior in Rodents

Learn More about our Services and how can we help you with your research!

Introduction

In the study of animal behavior, especially when investigating anxiety-like responses, the Elevated Plus Maze (EPM) remains a gold standard. The maze allows for the exploration of rodents’ tendency to avoid open, elevated spaces, and one of the subtle yet informative behavioral measures that researchers rely on in this context is the head dip. This seemingly simple behavior provides a window into the animal’s emotional state and its risk assessment in a novel environment.

This article explores the concept of head dips, their importance in the EPM, and how they can be categorized into two distinct types: protected and unprotected head dips. We will also discuss the physiological and behavioral significance of these behaviors, how to measure them accurately, and their use in various research contexts.

Understanding Head Dips

A head dip occurs when a rodent partially enters one of the arms of the Elevated Plus Maze, but stops short of fully entering. Instead, the animal dips its head into the arm, often peering around or assessing its surroundings, before retreating to the more protected center or closed arms of the maze. This behavior is considered a type of exploratory response that gives us insight into how the rodent perceives its environment—specifically how it manages the inherent anxiety associated with navigating unfamiliar, risky spaces.

The Significance of Head Dips

Head dips are typically classified into two categories: protected and unprotected head dips. The differentiation between these types of dips provides important nuances in understanding the rodent’s behavior and anxiety levels.

  • Protected head dips: These occur when the animal dips its head into one of the closed arms of the maze, which provides a sense of security due to the enclosed walls. The rodent often retreats to this safer zone after dipping its head into the arm. This type of head dip reflects more cautious exploration, likely driven by anxiety or wariness about entering a vulnerable open space.

  • Unprotected head dips: These occur when the animal dips its head into one of the open arms, areas of the maze exposed to environmental threats. Such a behavior suggests a higher level of anxiety, as the rodent is willing to risk exposure while still maintaining a cautious approach. An unprotected head dip may indicate a high level of conflict between the animal’s exploratory drive and its fear of potential danger.

Both types of head dips serve as indicators of how the animal is weighing the risk-reward balance of exploration. The number of head dips, particularly unprotected head dips, is often used as a proxy for anxiety in various experimental paradigms.

The Role of Head Dips in Anxiety Research

Anxiety and the Elevated Plus Maze

In the context of anxiety research, the EPM is a conflict-based test that places animals in a situation where they must balance exploration (a natural behavior) with the avoidance of perceived threats (exposure in open arms). Rodents innately avoid the open arms due to a fear of predation. However, their exploratory nature drives them to venture into these areas, creating a conflict that researchers can use to infer anxiety-like behavior.

Head dips, particularly those made in the unprotected open arms, are indicative of the rodent’s internal conflict between exploration and the fear of vulnerability. The frequency and nature of these head dips can therefore help researchers assess how anxiety impacts behavior in a controlled setting.

 

Head Dips as a Behavioral Measure

Head dips serve as a fine-grained behavioral measure in EPM studies. While time spent in open arms and number of entries provide valuable data about an animal’s general exploration tendency, head dips provide insight into the level of cautiousness or wariness exhibited during exploration.

The occurrence of protected head dips often suggests increased caution, while unprotected head dips are indicative of the animal’s willingness to take risks in the face of anxiety. These behaviors are most useful when analyzed alongside other metrics, such as time spent in open arms or number of entries into open arms, to form a comprehensive assessment of anxiety-like behavior.

Why Categorize Head Dips?

The categorization of head dips into protected and unprotected is critical for several reasons:

  1. Differentiating anxiety levels: The willingness to engage in unprotected head dips (i.e., dipping the head into the open arms) reflects a higher level of anxiety or uncertainty compared to protected head dips, where the animal stays in the safer closed arms.
  2. Understanding exploratory behavior: Animals that engage in more protected head dips are showing a degree of cautiousness, possibly indicating increased anxiety or hesitation in exploring more risky areas. Conversely, animals with a high frequency of unprotected head dips may exhibit a higher tolerance for risk or may be less anxious overall.
  3. Enhancing pharmacological and genetic research: Head dips can provide a more sensitive measure of anxiety when testing anxiolytic (anxiety-reducing) or anxiogenic (anxiety-inducing) drugs. Changes in the ratio of protected vs. unprotected head dips in response to pharmacological treatment are valuable indicators of how the drugs alter the animal’s emotional state and risk perception.
  4. Revealing nuances in animal models: By distinguishing between different types of head dips, researchers can gain more precise data on the effects of various experimental manipulations, be it environmental stress, genetic modification, or drug treatment.

Measuring Head Dips: Guidelines for Researchers

To accurately quantify head dips, researchers must follow certain guidelines to ensure consistency and reliability in their findings:

  1. Standardized scoring: To ensure consistent results, only fully entrained head dips should be recorded. A head dip is considered valid when the animal’s head is fully inside the arm, even if the rest of the body remains outside.
  2. Differentiation of head dip types: Ensure clear distinctions between protected and unprotected head dips. Only those occurring in the open arms should be classified as unprotected.
  3. Total number of head dips: Record both the frequency of head dips and the ratio of protected to unprotected head dips. This ratio can offer valuable information on the animal’s overall anxiety levels and exploration strategy.
  4. Environmental controls: As with other measures in the EPM, environmental factors such as lighting, noise, and handling should be standardized across trials to avoid introducing extraneous variables that may influence behavior.

Applications of Head Dips in Research

The measurement of head dips is applied across a variety of research fields, including:

Pharmacological Studies:

Head dips can be used to assess the effects of anxiolytic (anxiety-reducing) or anxiogenic (anxiety-inducing) drugs. A drug that reduces anxiety might increase the number of unprotected head dips, reflecting the animal’s reduced fear of open spaces.

Genetic Research:

Genetic mutations that affect anxiety can lead to altered head dip patterns. For example, transgenic models with alterations in serotonin or gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) signaling might show different head dip behaviors, providing insights into the molecular basis of anxiety.

Neurobiological Studies:

Neurochemical treatments or brain lesions can be studied through their impact on head dip behavior. For instance, alterations in brain areas like the amygdala, which are involved in fear processing, can manifest as increased or decreased unprotected head dips.

Environmental Studies:

Chronic stress or changes in the animal’s environment (such as maternal separation) may lead to altered head dip behaviors, providing insight into how environmental factors shape anxiety responses.

Limitations of Head Dip Measures

While head dips are an insightful metric, they have some limitations:

  1. Behavioral interpretation: The interpretation of head dip behavior may vary based on individual rodent characteristics or external factors that influence anxiety, such as prior handling or stress.
  2. Habituation: Repeated exposure to the maze could lead to habituation or changes in the animal’s exploratory behavior, which may reduce the reliability of head dip measures over time.
  3. Species-specific variations: Differences between rodent strains or species may affect the frequency and nature of head dips, necessitating careful consideration of these factors when interpreting results.

 

Conclusion

Head dips in the Elevated Plus Maze are more than just a simple behavioral measure. They provide valuable insight into the anxiety-like behaviors of rodents, offering researchers a deeper understanding of the animal’s emotional state and decision-making processes. By categorizing head dips into protected and unprotected, researchers can further refine their understanding of the risk-reward balance that governs exploration in anxious animals.

Whether used in pharmacological, genetic, or environmental research, head dips remain an important and versatile tool for assessing anxiety. By interpreting head dips alongside other behavioral metrics like time spent in open arms and number of entries, scientists can gain a more comprehensive understanding of how anxiety manifests in rodents and how it can be modulated.

References

  • Pellow, S., Chopin, P., File, S. E., & Briley, M. (1985). Validation of open:closed arm entries in an elevated plus-maze as a measure of anxiety in the rat. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 14(3), 149–167.
  • Kalueff, A. V., Wheaton, M., & Murphy, D. L. (2007). What’s wrong with my mouse model? Advances and strategies in animal modeling of anxiety and depression. Behavioral Brain Research, 179(1), 1–18.
  • Francis, D. D., Diorio, J., Liu, D., & Meaney, M. J. (2002). Nongenomic transmission across generations of maternal behavior and stress responses in the rat. Science, 286(5442), 1155–1158.

Author:

Louise Corscadden, PhD

Dr Louise Corscadden acts as Conduct Science’s Director of Science and Development and Academic Technology Transfer. Her background is in genetics, microbiology, neuroscience, and climate chemistry.