x
[quotes_form]

Number of Entries into the Open Arms: A Window into Risk Assessment and Anxiety in the Elevated Plus Maze

Quick Guide

Learn More about our Services and how can we help you with your research!

Introduction: What Do Open Arm Entries Really Tell Us?

In behavioral neuroscience, the Elevated Plus Maze (EPM) stands as a gold-standard assay for quantifying anxiety-related behaviors in rodents. The maze’s cross-shaped structure consists of two open arms and two closed arms elevated above the ground, taking advantage of rodents’ natural aversion to open, elevated spaces. While many focus on metrics like time spent in open arms, another equally valuable yet often under-discussed variable is the Number of Entries into the Open Arms.

At Conduct Science, we emphasize that the act of entering the open arms is not random—it reflects a conscious behavioral decision under internal stress. Every step into the exposed arm represents a tension between fear and curiosity, between aversion and exploration. Thus, measuring the frequency of these entries offers quantitative insight into the animal’s risk-taking behavior, emotional state, and response to pharmacological or genetic interventions.

Scientific Significance: Beyond Just Counting Entries

Rodents typically avoid the open arms due to their anxiogenic properties—lack of walls, height, and exposure. Therefore, the number of entries into these arms is a proxy for:

  • Reduced anxiety

  • Increased exploratory drive

  • Adaptive coping strategy

  • Pharmacological efficacy (e.g., anxiolytics)

  • Behavioral phenotype in transgenic models

Increased entries may suggest anxiolytic effects or habituation to stress, while fewer entries may indicate anxiety, sedation, or cognitive impairment. However, entry frequency must be interpreted within context: Is the total locomotor activity also reduced? Is the animal freezing or hyperactive?

That’s why we recommend combining this measure with:

  • Total distance traveled

  • Time in open vs. closed arms

  • Latency to first open arm entry

These combined metrics offer a composite behavioral profile, far more robust than any standalone readout.

Conduct Science EPM System Features

The Elevated Plus Maze system at Conduct Science is specifically engineered to maximize tracking reliability and experimental control:

  • High-contrast, non-reflective surfaces for clear visual detection

  • Integrated with ConductVision (30+ fps): Markerless, multi-point body tracking

  • Accurate arm definition zones with adjustable parameters

  • Outputs include arm-specific entry counts, timestamps, and trajectory maps

  • Modular configurations for mice and rats

  • IR compatibility for low-light or circadian studies

Our tracking ecosystem enables not only accurate open-arm entries, but automatic classification of full versus partial entries—a critical distinction often missed in manual scoring.

Case Study: Open Arm Entry as a Pharmacological Endpoint

A research team investigating a novel GABA-A receptor modulator used the Conduct Science EPM system to quantify open-arm entries in male BALB/c mice.

Group Open Arm Entries Closed Arm Entries Total Distance (cm) Time in Open Arms (s)
Control (Vehicle)
3.2 ± 1.1
9.8 ± 1.5
342.1 ± 32.4
28.4 ± 5.3
Low Dose (2 mg/kg)
5.7 ± 1.3
10.5 ± 1.2
410.6 ± 25.8
54.9 ± 6.1
High Dose (5 mg/kg)
7.9 ± 1.6
11.1 ± 1.0
455.3 ± 28.6
78.7 ± 8.2

Interpretation:

  • Increased open-arm entries and time in open arms support dose-dependent anxiolytic effect

  • Total distance confirms that increase was not due to hyperactivity alone

  • Consistency across multiple metrics strengthens confidence in behavioral shift

This demonstrates how open-arm entry frequency can serve as a sensitive, early-phase indicator of drug action, even before total time measures reveal changes.

Practical Recommendations for Researchers

To ensure accurate and reproducible open arm entry data:

  1. Use high-frame-rate tracking software like ConductVision to capture short entries
  2. Define entry zones carefully – ensure entries are recorded only when the full body (not just the head) crosses the threshold
  3. Standardize test duration – typically 5-10 minutes for EPM sessions
  4. Control for confounding variables – age, sex, light intensity, and time of day
  5. Pair with video review – Confirm classification accuracy during data validation

When to Prioritize Entry Count Over Time-Based Metrics

Open arm entries may be a more relevant primary measure in:

  • Early-stage anxiety screening for new drugs

  • Studies of exploratory vs. avoidant behavior

  • Behavioral genetics where subtle differences matter

  • Models of impulsivity, stress reactivity, or habituation

  • Longitudinal studies tracking behavior over multiple sessions

Entry frequency can reveal willingness to explore even when the subject is not yet spending extended time in the arm—a critical window into evolving behavioral state.

Conclusion: Open Arm Entries as a Behavioral Gateway

  • Standardize lighting (ensure consistent illumination and glare reduction)
  • Control odor cues (thorough cleaning between trials)
  • Use consistent start zone orientation to reduce variability
  • Include multiple metrics for interpretive accuracy

Ā 

Time in the closed arms is not just a fallback measure—it is a core indicator of anxiety-related avoidance and behavioral inhibition. When properly interpreted, it can help distinguish between adaptive and maladaptive behavioral strategies, particularly in high-throughput screening studies and translational models.

Ready to enhance your anxiety research toolkit?

References

Ā Pellow, S., Chopin, P., File, S. E., & Briley, M. (1985). Validation of open:closed arm entries in an elevated plus-maze as a measure of anxiety in the rat. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 14(3), 149–167.
Carobrez, A. P., & Bertoglio, L. J. (2005). Ethological and temporal analyses of anxiety-like behavior: The elevated plus-maze model 20 years on. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 29(8), 1193–1205.
Rodgers, R. J., & Dalvi, A. (1997). Anxiety, defence and the elevated plus-maze. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 21(6), 801–810.

Written by researchers, for researchers — powered by Conduct Science.

Author:

Louise Corscadden, PhD

Dr Louise Corscadden acts as Conduct Science’s Director of Science and Development and Academic Technology Transfer. Her background is in genetics, microbiology, neuroscience, and climate chemistry.

Related Posts

Female scientist pointing at molecular diagram during lab presentation with text "Call for Papers" for ConductScience.

Get access to top-tier research from scientists publishing today.

50% OFF for new subscribers