Moving Beyond Time and Error
In the Barnes Maze, classic performance measures such as escape latency and number of errors provide a foundational understanding of learning and memory. However, when researchers aim to distinguish search strategy, motor integrity, and behavioral efficiency, one metric stands out: Total Distance Travelled (TDT).
TDT quantifies the entire path a rodent covers from the beginning of a trial until it either escapes or the trial ends. It is a spatial behavior marker that reflects more than just memory—it captures how an animal navigates the maze, providing insight into motivation, motor function, anxiety, and strategic choice. At Conduct Science, we emphasize this metric as a powerful complement to cognitive testing protocols.
What Is Total Distance Travelled?
TDT is measured as the cumulative length of the path (in centimeters or meters) taken by the animal during a Barnes Maze trial. This is recorded using advanced tracking software such as ANY-maze or EthoVision XT, integrated with Conduct Science’s Barnes Maze platform.
TDT is typically influenced by:
- Search strategy (random vs. spatial)
- Motor capability or impairment
- Level of exploratory drive or anxiety
- Cognitive efficiency and attention focus
Why It Matters: Behavioral Insights from Distance Data
1. Search Strategy Differentiation
Rodents that use direct spatial strategies tend to travel shorter distances, often heading straight or nearly directly to the escape hole. In contrast, those employing random or serial strategies travel significantly farther.
When combined with heatmaps and zone visits, TDT allows researchers to map strategy adoption over time—typically decreasing as learning improves (Sunyer et al., 2007).
2. Motor Function Assessment
TDT is particularly useful in studies involving motor degeneration (e.g., Parkinson’s disease models) or injuries that affect movement. An animal with impaired locomotion may show reduced total distance, even if cognitive functions remain intact. Conversely, a hyperactive phenotype may show elevated TDT regardless of memory performance.
3. Cognitive Load and Efficiency
In early training, rodents typically show high TDT values due to exploratory behavior and trial-and-error learning. As learning consolidates, TDT should decline, reflecting less cognitive load and improved spatial certainty. Prolonged high TDT across sessions may signal a failure to form a spatial map, even if the animal eventually finds the escape.
4. Stress and Anxiety Behavior
Anxious animals may move rapidly or hesitantly, affecting distance travelled. For instance, high TDT combined with low investigation time might reflect hypervigilance or escape-driven over-exploration. Conversely, low TDT with freezing behavior may indicate avoidance or fear-induced suppression of exploration.
How Conduct Science Supports High-Fidelity TDT Measurement
Conduct Science’s Barnes Maze systems are fully compatible with major video tracking platforms to ensure reliable and reproducible measurement of TDT. Key features include:
- Non-reflective surfaces to enhance contrast for accurate animal tracking
- Modular design for rats or mice with customizable hole arrangements
- Optimized overhead camera placement to capture uninterrupted trajectories
- Integrated aversive stimuli (e.g., bright light) to motivate goal-directed navigation
When using EthoVision XT or ANY-maze with our platform, researchers can:
- Calculate exact path length in each trial
- Visualize movement paths with colored trajectory lines
- Compare intra-subject and inter-subject path variability
- Correlate distance data with errors, latency, and zone preference
Experimental Relevance
Neurodegenerative Models
Transgenic mouse models of Alzheimer’s disease often show longer distances travelled even when latency is similar to controls. This suggests less efficient navigation due to spatial disorientation (Barnes, 1979).
Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI)
In TBI models, longer or erratic paths are a common behavioral signature. TDT helps detect this pattern, often before major latency differences emerge.
Pharmacological Testing
Drugs affecting arousal, movement, or memory all influence TDT differently. For example:
- Cognitive enhancers may reduce distance over sessions
- Anxiolytics may normalize high-distance, stress-driven over-exploration
- Sedatives or dopamine antagonists may reduce overall movement, lowering TDT regardless of cognition
Aging and Strategy Shifts
Older rodents often shift to serial strategies, leading to increased TDT. Measuring path length across sessions highlights these age-related changes in search style—even if animals eventually learn the escape location.
Interpretation Tips
- Compare TDT with number of errors to assess efficiency: high distance and high errors suggest scattered search.
- Use trajectory mapping to visualize navigation style.
- Normalize TDT across sessions to assess learning rate.
- Correlate with zone entries and quadrant time to triangulate spatial bias.
Conclusion
Total Distance Travelled is more than a movement variable—it is a behavioral signature of learning, efficiency, and strategy in the Barnes Maze. By capturing how animals physically traverse the maze space, TDT reveals cognitive and emotional states that may not be apparent in latency or error counts alone.
With Conduct Science’s Barnes Maze systems, researchers can reliably collect, analyze, and visualize TDT data to enhance the granularity of their behavioral experiments. Whether studying memory decline, neurodevelopmental disorders, or treatment efficacy, TDT provides critical insight into the dynamics of spatial problem-solving.
References
Barnes, C. A. (1979). Memory deficits associated with senescence: A neurophysiological and behavioral study in the rat. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 93(1), 74–104. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0077579
Sunyer, B., Patil, S., Höger, H., & Lubec, G. (2007). Barnes maze, a useful task to assess spatial reference memory in the mice. Nature Protocols, 2(3), 848–858. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2007.115
To learn more about our Barnes Maze solutions, visit https://conductscience.com/barnes-maze
See more of Our Posts
Behavioral Neuroscience

Dark Side Time Percentage: A Standardized Measure of Anxiety in the Light/Dark Box Test

Top 6 Alternatives to DeepLabCut: AI Tracking Without the Complexity (2025 Edition)

Top 5 Alternatives to Zebrabox for Microplate Behavioral Tracking (2025 Edition)

Top 5 Alternatives to SMART 3.0 for Behavioral Tracking (2025 Edition)

Top 5 Alternatives to EthoVision XT for Multi-Species Tracking (2025 Edition)

Top 5 Alternatives to ANY-maze for Behavioral Tracking (2025 Edition)

Distance Traveled in the Light Side: A Refined Measure of Rodent Behavior in the Light/Dark Box Test

Distance Traveled in the Dark Side: Measuring Anxiety and Behavioral Flexibility in the Light/Dark Box Test

Understanding the Open-Arm Time Ratio in the Elevated Plus Maze: A Window into Rodent Anxiety

The Anxiety Index: A Comprehensive Metric for Assessing Anxiety in the Elevated Plus Maze
All Resources
Never miss our posts!
Author:

Louise Corscadden, PhD
Dr Louise Corscadden acts as Conduct Science’s Director of Science and Development and Academic Technology Transfer. Her background is in genetics, microbiology, neuroscience, and climate chemistry.