Behavioral Mazes

Zebrafish Y Maze

$1,090.00

Aquatic Y-shaped maze apparatus for spatial learning and memory assessment in zebrafish, featuring 120-degree arm configuration and optional automated door control systems.

Color: Grey
$1,090.00
Key Specifications
maze_shapeY-shaped aquarium
arm_angle120 degrees
number_of_arms3
arm_functionChoice arms and start arm
floor_designContrasting color to fish
optional_featuresManually operated or automated guillotine doors
SKU:ME-4815
Need Help? Visit our Support CenterKnowledge base, order lookup, and ticket support
Our Staff are PhD Scientists
Get expert guidance on this product
Louise Corscadden, PhD, Neuroscience
Louise Corscadden
PhD, Neuroscience
Schedule a Call Instead

Accessories

Enhance your setup with compatible accessories

Total: $0.00

Configuration considerations

Common Zebrafish Y Maze setup decisions

Use these notes to scope species, cohort, tracking, and automation needs. Only verified product or support routes are linked from this section.

This productStandard

Zebrafish Y Maze

Aquatic Y-shaped maze with start arm and two goal arms

aquatic alternation, novelty preference, arm choice, and simple discrimination in zebrafish.

Quote

Request Quote
BuyableScaled option

Zebrafish Y Maze Species Variant

Mouse, rat, aquatic, insect, or large-animal scaling as appropriate

Use species-specific dimensions and lighting so the apparatus tests the intended construct instead of body size, visibility, or handling tolerance.

Quote

View options ->
SpecialtyAutomation

Zebrafish Y Maze With Tracking

Camera, gates, sensors, cue control, or event logging as required

Best when the protocol needs reproducible timing, high-throughput scoring, or defensible endpoint extraction across cohorts.

Quote

Configure tracking ->

§ 1

Introduction

The Zebrafish Y Maze is a species-specific behavioral assay built around aquatic alternation, novelty preference, arm choice, and simple discrimination in zebrafish. Interpretable data depend on matching the apparatus geometry, subject species, trial structure, and scoring rules to the behavioral construct under study. 1

Aquatic Y-maze protocols depend on stable geometry, consistent trial timing, and pre-defined scoring rules. Without those controls, novel-arm time can be shifted by motivation, locomotion, light level, odor, cue salience, or handling rather than the intended behavioral construct. 1

This methods section summarizes setup, endpoint definitions, common confounds, sample output, adjacent assays, and reporting details needed to evaluate Zebrafish Y Maze results alongside the product specifications. 1

§ 2

Methods

2.1 Procedure

Aquatic Y-maze with standardized setup, trial timing, and endpoint extraction.

Pre-test setup

  1. 1.Define constructPre-register whether the study uses Zebrafish Y Maze for species-specific behavioral behavior, screening, cohort comparison, or apparatus validation.
  2. 2.Calibrate apparatusVerify aquatic y-shaped maze with start arm and two goal arms, visibility, lighting, surface condition, cue placement, and camera field of view before animals enter the room.
  3. 3.Set scoring rulesDefine novel-arm time, omissions, exclusions, latency cutoffs, and event thresholds before acquisition starts.
  4. 4.Control carryoverUse consistent cleaning, handling, acclimation, and inter-trial timing so odor, stress, and fatigue do not become hidden treatment variables.

Trial sequence

  1. 1.Start trialPlace the subject at the protocol-defined start location and begin synchronized video or event logging.
  2. 2.Record behaviorCapture novel-arm time, path order, latency, dwell time, and relevant zone or arm events throughout the trial.1
  3. 3.Apply endpoint rulesScore only committed entries or events that meet the pre-defined body-position and timing criteria.
  4. 4.End and resetStop at the maximum duration, completion criterion, or humane endpoint, then clean and reset the apparatus.
  5. 5.Export QCReview tracking loss, outlier latency, immobility, omissions, and apparatus notes before group-level analysis.

Critical methodological constraints

  • Water quality. Document water quality because it can shift novel-arm time independent of the intended construct.
  • Tank geometry. Keep tank geometry stable across cohorts and sessions.
  • Lighting gradients. Audit lighting gradients before interpreting group differences.
  • Shoaling history. Report shoaling history when it changes engagement, exploration, or measurable trial completion.
  • Handling stress. Flag handling stress during QA because it often explains apparent assay failure.2

2.2 Measurement & Analysis

Core Zebrafish Y Maze endpoints for behavioral interpretation and apparatus quality control.

Novel-arm time

Preference and alternation

Novel-arm time is the primary endpoint for this page and should be paired with latency and quality-control flags.1

Choice latency

Latency and initiation

Choice latency helps distinguish task performance from motivation, freezing, fatigue, or handling effects.

Arm transitions

Spatial or zone strategy

Arm transitions captures how the subject solved the task, not only whether it reached the endpoint.

Freezing time

Engagement control

Freezing time identifies omissions, low exploration, sensor dropouts, or species-specific non-response.

Water or lighting drift

Quality-control flag

Water or lighting drift should be reviewed before exporting final group summaries.

+ Additional metrics: trial duration, zone dwell, event count, path efficiency, tracking confidence, exclusions, and session-level notes.

2.3 novel-arm time ratio (analysis)

A compact percentage summary for Zebrafish Y Maze output.

Inline calculator

Type the values your tracker recorded.

Full calculator with 95% CI ->
Novel-arm time ratio

56.7%

Formula: novel-arm time / (novel-arm time + familiar-arm time) x 100. Interpret with latency, engagement, and confound checks before making construct-level claims. 1

§ 3

Results

Aggregate publication data, sample apparatus output, and recent findings from the live PubMed feed.

3.1 Publication trends

PubMed volume and co-occurring behavioral methods for Zebrafish Y Maze studies.

Figure 1 · EPM publications by year (PubMed)

The paradigm has been dominant for 40 years and is still growing.

Live · Weekly

2000201020202025 YTD: 38 papers

Total in PubMed since 1985: 1,008+ papers. Updated 2026-05-12.

Figure 2 · Methods co-occurring with EPM (last 12 months)

Other paradigms most often run alongside EPM in the same paper.

Live

3.2 Sample apparatus output

Representative Zebrafish Y Maze output for methods review and endpoint interpretation.

Table 1 · Per-animal EPM scoring output

Download sample CSV →
AnimalGroupNovel-arm timeChoice latencyArm transitionsSummary
ZFY-001Control176 s2.8 s2358.7%
ZFY-002Control162 s3.1 s2154.0%
ZFY-003Impaired118 s6.4 s1239.3%
ZFY-004Impaired109 s7.1 s1136.3%

Synthetic example for illustration only. Replace with tracked output screenshots or exported data when product media are available.

3.3 Recent methods context

  • May 2026Source note

    Zebrafish Y Maze methods refresh: endpoint definitions, QA flags, and comparator assays

    ConductScience methods note prepared for citation review.

    The first citation-cron pass should replace this editorial seed with current Zebrafish Y Maze methods papers filtered for apparatus, protocol, and endpoint relevance.

View all 1008matching papers on PubMed ->

§ 4

Discussion

Limitations of the paradigm, methodological caveats, and current directions.

4.1 Common confounds

Variables that shift Zebrafish Y Maze results independent of anxiety state.

Water quality

Water quality can change apparent Zebrafish Y Maze performance without reflecting the intended behavioral construct. Control it in setup and report it in methods.

Tank geometry

Tank geometry can change apparent Zebrafish Y Maze performance without reflecting the intended behavioral construct. Control it in setup and report it in methods.

Lighting gradients

Lighting gradients can change apparent Zebrafish Y Maze performance without reflecting the intended behavioral construct. Control it in setup and report it in methods.

Shoaling history

Shoaling history can change apparent Zebrafish Y Maze performance without reflecting the intended behavioral construct. Control it in setup and report it in methods.

Handling stress

Handling stress can change apparent Zebrafish Y Maze performance without reflecting the intended behavioral construct. Control it in setup and report it in methods.

4.2 Construct validity caveats

Zebrafish Y Maze is strongest when endpoint definitions, apparatus settings, and exclusion rules are specified before testing. Treat a single summary metric as a screening signal, then confirm interpretation with latency, engagement, comparator assays, and quality-control review. 1

4.3 Special considerations

When should I choose Zebrafish Y Maze?

Choose Zebrafish Y Maze when the research question matches aquatic alternation, novelty preference, arm choice, and simple discrimination in zebrafish. and the lab can control water quality, tank geometry, and trial timing.

What setup variables should be specified before testing?

Specify species, cohort size, apparatus dimensions, lighting, tracking method, automation level, cleaning workflow, endpoint definitions, and exclusion criteria before data collection begins.

What makes the data interpretable?

Interpretation is strongest when the apparatus configuration, trial timing, scoring thresholds, confound controls, and comparator assays are documented together with the primary endpoint.

4.4 Current directions

Quarterly editorial review of emerging Zebrafish Y Maze methodology. Q2 2026

Methods

Endpoint standardization

Define novel-arm time, latency, exclusions, and engagement flags before comparing cohorts.

Emerging

Automated scoring

Camera and event-log workflows can reduce observer burden and improve consistency when zone definitions and event thresholds are validated.

Methods

Comparator batteries

Zebrafish Y Maze should link to adjacent maze, motor, or motivation assays when interpretation depends on controls.

Emerging

Integrated method reporting

Apparatus dimensions, protocol fit, tracking compatibility, and endpoint definitions should be reported together so results are easier to reproduce.

§ 5

References

10 selected methods and validation references for Zebrafish Y Maze.

  1. Stewart AM, et al. The light/dark preference test in zebrafish. Nat Protoc. 2011;6(11):1780-1787. Find source
  2. Kalueff AV, et al. Towards a comprehensive catalog of zebrafish behavior. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2013;14(7):476-488. Find source
  3. Levin ED, Cerutti DT. Behavioral neuroscience of zebrafish. Methods Cell Biol. 2009;91:293-310. Find source
  4. Maximino C, et al. Measuring anxiety in zebrafish: a critical review. Behav Brain Res. 2010;214(2):157-171. Find source
  5. Egan RJ, et al. Understanding behavioral and physiological phenotypes of stress and anxiety in zebrafish. Behav Brain Res. 2009;205(1):38-44. doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2009.06.022
  6. Cachat J, et al. Measuring behavioral and endocrine responses to novelty stress in adult zebrafish. Nat Protoc. 2010;5(11):1786-1799. Find source
  7. Cachat J, et al. Three-dimensional neurophenotyping of adult zebrafish behavior. PLoS One. 2011;6(3):e17597. Find source
  8. Blank M, Guerim LD, Cordeiro RF, Vianna MR. A one-trial inhibitory avoidance task to zebrafish: rapid acquisition of an NMDA-dependent long-term memory. Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2009;92(4):529-534. Find source
  9. Sison M, Gerlai R. Associative learning in zebrafish (Danio rerio) in the plus maze. Behav Brain Res. 2010;207(1):99-104. Find source
  10. Parker MO, Brock AJ, Walton RT, Brennan CH. The role of zebrafish (Danio rerio) in dissecting the genetics and neural circuits of executive function. Front Neural Circuits. 2013;7:63. Find source
Zebrafish Y Maze
Zebrafish Y Maze
$1,090.00
Added to quoteView Quote