Behavioral Mazes

Zebrafish Y Maze

SKU ME-4815
$1,090.00
Unit: Each
IncludesStandard Care

Aquatic Y-shaped maze apparatus for spatial learning and memory assessment in zebrafish, featuring 120-degree arm configuration and optional automated door control systems.

CE MarkedBAA available
Color SKU ME-4815
$1,090.00
Unit: Each
Scientist guidance
Louise Corscadden, PhD, Director of Science

Louise Corscadden, PhD

Director of Science · ConductScience

Ask Louise about Zebrafish Y Maze fit, setup, configuration, or quote prep.

Key Specifications

Full details →
Maze Shape
Y-shaped aquarium
Arm Angle
120 degrees
Number of Arms
3
Arm Function
Choice arms and start arm
Floor Design
Contrasting color to fish
Sizing
Zebrafish: 25 cm long, 8 cm wide and 15 cm high
Category: Behavioral Mazes

Score this test with ConductVision

ConductVision is our video-tracking software. Record your sessions on video, and it reports the measures listed below.

What it measures

Add ConductVision to your quote

A 5-year license is $3,990 in total.

The ConductVision license for zebrafish tests. It also scores shoaling, the T-maze, mirror biting and the 5-choice serial reaction time task.

Ask a question

Have a question? Just ask.

Send it over and we'll email you a personalized answer, with no call or scheduling.

Personalized email reply
Usually within one business day
Helpful answers published here

Prefer to talk it through?

Ask your question

Type it below and we'll email you a personalized answer, with no meeting required.

We'll only use your email to send your answer; broadly useful answers may be published anonymously.

Accessories

Enhance your setup with compatible accessories

Total: $0.00

§ 1

Introduction

The Zebrafish Y Maze is a species-specific behavioral assay built around aquatic alternation, novelty preference, arm choice, and simple discrimination in zebrafish. Interpretable data depend on matching the apparatus geometry, subject species, trial structure, and scoring rules to the behavioral construct under study. 1

Aquatic Y-maze protocols depend on stable geometry, consistent trial timing, and pre-defined scoring rules. Without those controls, novel-arm time can be shifted by motivation, locomotion, light level, odor, cue salience, or handling rather than the intended behavioral construct. 1

This methods section summarizes setup, endpoint definitions, common confounds, sample output, adjacent assays, and reporting details needed to evaluate Zebrafish Y Maze results alongside the product specifications. 1

§ 2

Methods

2.1 Procedure

Aquatic Y-maze with standardized setup, trial timing, and endpoint extraction.

Pre-test setup

  1. 1.Define construct: Pre-register whether the study uses Zebrafish Y Maze for species-specific behavioral behavior, screening, cohort comparison, or apparatus validation.
  2. 2.Calibrate apparatus: Verify aquatic y-shaped maze with start arm and two goal arms, visibility, lighting, surface condition, cue placement, and camera field of view before animals enter the room.
  3. 3.Set scoring rules: Define novel-arm time, omissions, exclusions, latency cutoffs, and event thresholds before acquisition starts.
  4. 4.Control carryover: Use consistent cleaning, handling, acclimation, and inter-trial timing so odor, stress, and fatigue do not become hidden treatment variables.

Trial sequence

  1. 1.Start trial: Place the subject at the protocol-defined start location and begin synchronized video or event logging.
  2. 2.Record behavior: Capture novel-arm time, path order, latency, dwell time, and relevant zone or arm events throughout the trial.1
  3. 3.Apply endpoint rules: Score only committed entries or events that meet the pre-defined body-position and timing criteria.
  4. 4.End and reset: Stop at the maximum duration, completion criterion, or humane endpoint, then clean and reset the apparatus.
  5. 5.Export QC: Review tracking loss, outlier latency, immobility, omissions, and apparatus notes before group-level analysis.

Critical methodological constraints

  • Water quality. Document water quality because it can shift novel-arm time independent of the intended construct.
  • Tank geometry. Keep tank geometry stable across cohorts and sessions.
  • Lighting gradients. Audit lighting gradients before interpreting group differences.
  • Shoaling history. Report shoaling history when it changes engagement, exploration, or measurable trial completion.
  • Handling stress. Flag handling stress during QA because it often explains apparent assay failure.2

2.2 Measurement & Analysis

Core Zebrafish Y Maze endpoints for behavioral interpretation and apparatus quality control.

Novel-arm time

Preference and alternation

Novel-arm time is the primary endpoint for this page and should be paired with latency and quality-control flags.1

Choice latency

Latency and initiation

Choice latency helps distinguish task performance from motivation, freezing, fatigue, or handling effects.

Arm transitions

Spatial or zone strategy

Arm transitions captures how the subject solved the task, not only whether it reached the endpoint.

Freezing time

Engagement control

Freezing time identifies omissions, low exploration, sensor dropouts, or species-specific non-response.

Water or lighting drift

Quality-control flag

Water or lighting drift should be reviewed before exporting final group summaries.

+ Additional metrics: trial duration, zone dwell, event count, path efficiency, tracking confidence, exclusions, and session-level notes.

2.3 novel-arm time ratio (analysis)

A compact percentage summary for Zebrafish Y Maze output.

Inline calculator

Type the values your tracker recorded.

Full calculator with 95% CI ->
Novel-arm time ratio

56.7%

Formula: novel-arm time / (novel-arm time + familiar-arm time) x 100. Interpret with latency, engagement, and confound checks before making construct-level claims. 1

§ 3

Results

3.1 Sample apparatus output

Representative Zebrafish Y Maze output for methods review and endpoint interpretation.

Table 1 · Per-animal Zebrafish Y Maze scoring output

AnimalGroupNovel-arm timeChoice latencyArm transitionsSummary
ZFY-001Control176 s2.8 s2358.7%
ZFY-002Control162 s3.1 s2154.0%
ZFY-003Impaired118 s6.4 s1239.3%
ZFY-004Impaired109 s7.1 s1136.3%

Synthetic example for illustration only.

§ 4

Discussion

Limitations of the paradigm, methodological caveats, and current directions.

4.1 Common confounds

Variables that can shift Zebrafish Y Maze results apart from the effect under study.

Water quality

Water quality can change apparent Zebrafish Y Maze performance without reflecting the intended behavioral construct.

Tank geometry

Tank geometry can change apparent Zebrafish Y Maze performance without reflecting the intended behavioral construct.

Lighting gradients

Lighting gradients can change apparent Zebrafish Y Maze performance without reflecting the intended behavioral construct.

Shoaling history

Shoaling history can change apparent Zebrafish Y Maze performance without reflecting the intended behavioral construct.

Handling stress

Handling stress can change apparent Zebrafish Y Maze performance without reflecting the intended behavioral construct.

4.2 Construct validity caveats

Zebrafish Y Maze is strongest when endpoint definitions, apparatus settings, and exclusion rules are specified before testing. Treat a single summary metric as a screening signal, then confirm interpretation with latency, engagement, comparator assays, and quality-control review. 1

4.3 Special considerations

When should I choose Zebrafish Y Maze?

Choose Zebrafish Y Maze when the research question matches aquatic alternation, novelty preference, arm choice, and simple discrimination in zebrafish. and the lab can control water quality, tank geometry, and trial timing.

What setup variables should be specified before testing?

Specify species, cohort size, apparatus dimensions, lighting, tracking method, automation level, cleaning workflow, endpoint definitions, and exclusion criteria before data collection begins.

What makes the data interpretable?

Interpretation is strongest when the apparatus configuration, trial timing, scoring thresholds, confound controls, and comparator assays are documented together with the primary endpoint.

4.4 Current directions

Quarterly editorial review of emerging Zebrafish Y Maze methodology. Q2 2026

Methods

Endpoint standardization

Define novel-arm time, latency, exclusions, and engagement flags before comparing cohorts.

Emerging

Automated scoring

Camera and event-log workflows can reduce observer burden and improve consistency when zone definitions and event thresholds are validated.

Methods

Comparator batteries

Zebrafish Y Maze should link to adjacent maze, motor, or motivation assays when interpretation depends on controls.

Emerging

Integrated method reporting

Apparatus dimensions, protocol fit, tracking compatibility, and endpoint definitions should be reported together so results are easier to reproduce.

§ 5

Background references

10 selected methods and validation studies of the Zebrafish Y Maze, from any lab.

  1. Stewart AM, et al. The light/dark preference test in zebrafish. Nat Protoc. 2011;6(11):1780-1787. Find source
  2. Kalueff AV, et al. Towards a comprehensive catalog of zebrafish behavior. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2013;14(7):476-488. Find source
  3. Levin ED, Cerutti DT. Behavioral neuroscience of zebrafish. Methods Cell Biol. 2009;91:293-310. Find source
  4. Maximino C, et al. Measuring anxiety in zebrafish: a critical review. Behav Brain Res. 2010;214(2):157-171. Find source
  5. Egan RJ, et al. Understanding behavioral and physiological phenotypes of stress and anxiety in zebrafish. Behav Brain Res. 2009;205(1):38-44. doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2009.06.022
  6. Cachat J, et al. Measuring behavioral and endocrine responses to novelty stress in adult zebrafish. Nat Protoc. 2010;5(11):1786-1799. Find source
  7. Cachat J, et al. Three-dimensional neurophenotyping of adult zebrafish behavior. PLoS One. 2011;6(3):e17597. Find source
  8. Blank M, Guerim LD, Cordeiro RF, Vianna MR. A one-trial inhibitory avoidance task to zebrafish: rapid acquisition of an NMDA-dependent long-term memory. Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2009;92(4):529-534. Find source
  9. Sison M, Gerlai R. Associative learning in zebrafish (Danio rerio) in the plus maze. Behav Brain Res. 2010;207(1):99-104. Find source
  10. Parker MO, Brock AJ, Walton RT, Brennan CH. The role of zebrafish (Danio rerio) in dissecting the genetics and neural circuits of executive function. Front Neural Circuits. 2013;7:63. Find source
Zebrafish Y Maze
Zebrafish Y Maze
$1,090.00
Added to quoteView Quote