x
[quotes_form]
Request a Quote
Request a Quote

Ion-exchange Chromatography Protocol

Introduction

Ion Exchange Chromatography (IEC) is a powerful liquid chromatographic technique used for bioseparation. The separation is done by a reversible interaction between charged molecules of the sample with charged ligands attached to a column. The method offers a sizeable sample-handling capacity, powerful resolving ability, broad applicability, moderate cost, and ease of handling. These characteristics have made ion-exchange chromatography one of the most versatile and widely used liquid chromatography techniques. Ion exchange chromatography is frequently used for the separation and purification of polypeptides, proteins, enzymes, antibodies, nucleic acids, polynucleotides, and other charged biomolecules.

There are two types of ion-exchange chromatography: anion-exchange and cation-exchange. Cation-exchange chromatography is used for the positively charged molecules. In this type of chromatography, the stationary phase is negatively charged, which attracts the positively charged molecules of interest. Whereas, in anion-exchange chromatography, the stationary phase is positively charged which attracts the negatively charged molecules. It is prominently used in protein purification, water analysis, and quality control. The bound molecules are eluted and collected using an eluant containing anions and cations by running a higher concentration of ions through the column or changing the pH of the column.

Principle

Ion-exchange chromatography separates the molecules based on their respective charged groups. The ion-exchange chromatography consists of both mobile and stationary phases, the former is usually an aqueous buffer system into which the sample of interest is introduced, and the latter is an inert organic matrix chemically derived with ionizable functional groups carrying an oppositely charged counterion. The molecules undergo electrostatic interactions with opposite charges present on the stationary phase matrix. For electroneutrality, these inert charges interact with exchangeable counterions in the solution. Ionizable molecules that are to be resolved to compete with these counterions for binding to the displaceable charges on the stationary phase. These molecules are retained or eluted according to their respective charges.

Apparatus & Equipment

The ion-exchange chromatography consists of a series of mobile phase reservoirs containing a range of different mobile phases. The reservoirs are made of glass or plastic because the mobile phases can have extreme pH values. The components of the ion-chromatography system include pumps, conduits, valves, sampling devices, columns, and detector cells. The solvent reservoirs are attached with a solvent selection valve and a solvent programmer. The solvent then passes from the selector to a high-pressure pump. The mobile phase passes to the sampling device from the pump and relays onto the column. The exit flow from the column passes the solvent to the detector. The detector could be an electrical conductivity detector or the UV detector. The output from the detector sensor is electronically modified and presents the ion concentration on the computer.

Protocol
  1. Prepare the protein mixture by adding 0.2ml [amazon link=”B014V89HD2″ link_icon=”amazon” /]to the protein extract vial. Vortex the mixture until completely dissolved.
  2. Centrifuge the tube for 2 minutes in a microcentrifuge at maximum speed to remove the foam.
  3. Clamp the chromatography column on the stand in an upright position.
  4. Open the caps of the column (top cap first).
  5. Drain the buffer through the column, under gravity, in a waste container.
  6. Ensure that the column resin settles down in the column.
  7. Add 1ml equilibration buffer, allow it to drain out, and then drain the second 1 ml.
  8. Carefully load the protein extract from step 2 to the column.
  9. Wash the column with equilibration buffer four times to remove the unbound protein. Collect 2ml wash fractions as the buffer drains into labeled 2ml collection tubes.
  10. Elute the sample with a salt gradient: equilibration buffer, elution buffer, and a high salt buffer.
  11. Apply 1ml of the gradient elution buffer to the column.
  12. Collect 1ml fractions as the buffer drains into the collection tubes. Collect all elutions in separate 2ml tubes.
  13. Note the color changes of the fractions.
  14. Determine the protein concentration of the fractions.

 

Calculating the protein concentration
  1. Label the tubes and transfer 50μl elute from each fraction to 10 tubes.
  2. Gently mix the RED660 reagent by inverting the bottle several times.
  3. Add 1ml RED660 reagent to the tube and vortex.
  4. Incubate the tubes for 5 minutes at room temperature.
  5. Turn ON the spectrophotometer and adjust the wavelength.
  6. Add 1ml distilled water or the 660 reagents to a cuvette to make the absorbance zero. Record the absorbance value for each tube.

 

Procedure (Sheehan. & FitzGerald., 1996)

Sample preparation

  1. Perform desalting of the protein sample.

Resin equilibration

  1. Wash the 100-200 g resin with water and remove the fines by stirring and aspirating the supernatant.
  2. Wash the defined resin with 500 mL [amazon link=”B07328TQW5″ link_icon=”amazon” /] (200 mM) to achieve equilibration. Gently stir the resin into a slurry, and transfer it to a sintered glass column containing a small volume of water. Pass 10 mM Tris-HCl through the column until it is completely equilibrated.

Chromatography

  1. Apply the sample to the equilibrated resin, and collect the effluent.
  2. Apply a gradient (2 x 500 mL) of 0-100 mM [amazon link=”B00J5YHGEA” link_icon=”amazon” /] in 10 mM [amazon link=”B07328TQW5″ link_icon=”amazon” /] to elute the bound protein.
  3. Collect the fractions in a fraction collector, and record the protein concentration, and conductivity.

 

Purification of serine peptidase from bovine whole brain tissue (Cummins., Rochfort., & Connor., 2017)

Preparation of bovine cytosolic extract

  1. Thoroughly homogenize 50 g whole brain slice in 200 mL of ice-cold Buffer A (100 mM [amazon link=”B00WSDILWQ” link_icon=”amazon” /] pH 7.4, 5 mM DTT ([amazon link=”B076MLXQPP” link_icon=”amazon” /]) and 0.5 mM [amazon link=”B00I31P7WY” link_icon=”amazon” /]).
  2. Centrifuge the homogenate for 45 minutes at 36,000 × g to get a supernatant (S1) and pellet (P1).
  3. Resuspend the pellet in 100 mL of ice-cold distilled water and recentrifuge to get second supernatant (S2) and pellet (P2). Discard this pellet.
  4. Combine S1 and S2 fractions and ultracentrifuge for 45 minutes at 100,000 × g to get a whole brain supernatant (S3) for storage as 40 mL aliquots at -20 °C/-80 °C. Discard the P3 pellet.

Ammonium sulfate precipitation

  1. Add [amazon link=”B000OV85BQ” link_icon=”amazon” /] to 40 mL of S3 and stir it constantly to give 45 % (w/v) saturation and adjust the pH to 7.4 by adding 1 M [amazon link=”B00ILIDWU8″ link_icon=”amazon” /].
  2. Remove the precipitated contaminants by centrifugation (refrigerated) for 45 minutes at 36,000 × g. Retain the supernatant (S4) and discard the pellet (P4).
  3. Add solid ammonium sulfate to S4 and stir to give 75 % saturation (9.39 g at 4 °C) and adjust the pH to 7.4 by adding 1 M NaOH.
  4. Repeat step 2 and retain the pellet (P5). Resuspend it in 5 mL of Buffer B: 50 mM [amazon link=”B07328TQW5″ link_icon=”amazon” /] pH 8.0, 5 mM [amazon link=”B076MLXQPP” link_icon=”amazon” /] and 0.5 mM [amazon link=”B00I31P7WY” link_icon=”amazon” /] to get a “post-ammonium sulfate extract.”
  5. Dialyze the post-ammonium sulfate extract for 12 hours against Buffer B.

Partial purification of Prolyl Oligopeptidase

  1. Equilibrate a 20 mL DEAE-Sepharose column with 100 mL of Buffer B.
  2. Apply the dialyzed post-ammonium sulfate extract to the column and wash the unbound contaminants using 100 mL of Buffer B.
  3. Elute bound propyl oligopeptidase using a 100 mL linear NaCl gradient prepared in Buffer B.
  4. Regenerate the DEAE column with 60 mL of 350 mM NaCl in Buffer B, followed by 100 mL of NaCl-free Buffer B.
  5. Assay eluted fractions for total protein and POP activity.

Post-DEAE fractions assay

  1. Make the substrate stock (10 mM Z -Gly-Pro-MCA) in 100 % [amazon link=”B001L538IY” link_icon=”amazon” /]. Add 600 mL DMSO in 200 mL of substrate stock, followed by Buffer A to make a final volume of 10 mL.
  2. Add 400 mL of 200 mM substrate to 100 mL of post-DEAE fraction and incubate it at 37 °C for 30 minutes.
  3. Terminate the assay reactions after 30 minutes by adding 1 mL of 1.5 M [amazon link=”B078C959XB” link_icon=”amazon” /].
  4. Prepare a negative control by adding 1 mL of 1.5 M acetic acid to a 100 mL aliquot of Fraction 1 “prior” to the addition of substrate.
  5. Monitor liberated MCA by fluorescence spectrophotometry at excitation and emission wavelengths of 370 and 440 nm, respectively.

 

Applications

 

Analysis of the components of a Clostridium difficile vaccine (Rustandi. et al., 2016)

The ion-exchange chromatography was used to characterize the charged variant heterogeneities and to monitor the stability of antigenic components of the Clostridium difficile vaccine. In the study, a novel tetravalent C. difficile vaccine containing all four toxins was developed from an insect cell expression system. Clostridium difficile is the leading pathogen causing nosocomial diarrhea. The main virulence factors are two large glucosyltransferase proteins, toxin A (TcdA) and toxin B (TcdB). These factors are considered to be the primary factors responsible for the symptoms of the infection. The ion-exchange chromatography is a powerful separation technique for the characterization and analysis of protein antigenic components.

Determination of the protein concentration (Hugli. & Moore., 1972)

The ion-exchange chromatography was used for quantitative recoveries of tryptophan on an automatic analyzer. The proteins were hydrolyzed at 110o or 135o in NaOH containing 25 mg of starch. In the study, n-tryptophan was chromatographed on PA-35 resin and yielded values for carbon, hydrogen, and nitrogen within 1.0% of the calculated values. Integral values were obtained for the tryptophan residues in tryptophyl-leucine, porcine pepsin, human serum albumin, sperm whale apomyoglobin, trypsin, bovine a-chymotrypsin, deoxyribonuclease, and serum albumin. The method is advantageous for the measurement of tryptophan in the same hydrolysate used for the determination of the other amino acids. The ion-exchange chromatography could be efficiently used for the determination of amino acid content in hydrolysates.

Characterization of biopharmaceuticals (Fekete., Beck., Veuthey., & Guillarme., 2015)

Ion-exchange chromatography is widely used for the detailed characterization of therapeutic compounds and their derivatives. It can be considered for the qualitative and quantitative assessment of charge heterogeneity of the pharmaceutical agents. The technique has been used for the evaluation of monoclonal antibodies (Mabs), antibody drug conjugates (ADCs), polypeptides, proteins, nucleotides, and nucleic acid conjugates. The ion-exchange chromatography has been employed to separate a wide array of therapeutic agents including C-terminal lysine variants/truncation, deamidated forms, glycoforms, and sialic acid variants. In addition, it also isolates the products of the PEGylation reaction based on the degree of conjugation and the isomeric forms of PEGylated proteins. The method is a promising separation and characterization tool for the analysis of biotherapeutics.

 

Precautions
  • Carefully handle the samples to eliminate contamination for high sensitivity analysis.
  • The column used to separate ions has a packing material modified with ion-exchange groups as a stationary phase. Therefore, it has higher hydrophilicity, which can accumulate hydrophobic components from the sample, which can lead to undesirable effects.
  • Carefully handle the column as hitting the column or exposure to sudden pressure changes or high pressures could lead to deterioration.
  • Avoid precipitation in the column.
  • Tris-buffers are temperature sensitive, so they should be adjusted to pH 7.8 at room temperature.
  • Keep the sample cold while adding ammonium sulfate.

 

Strengths and Limitations
  • The ion-exchange chromatography is a valuable separation technique for the characterization and detailed analysis of amino acids and proteins.
  • The technique can be successfully applied for the evaluation of potential drug candidates and antibody conjugates.
  • The method offers a large sample-handling capacity, moderate cost, powerful resolving ability, broad applicability, and ease of handling.
  • The ion-exchange chromatography is environment-friendly, can provide a high flow rate, and has a low maintenance cost.
  • The method provides high selectivity but relatively poor kinetic performance in bioseparations.
  • The presence of a high concentration of non-volatile salts prevents the precise identification of charge variants.
References
  1. D Sheehan., & FitzGerald., R. (1996). Ion-exchange chromatography. Methods Mol Biol, 59, 145-150.
  2. T. Hugli., & Moore., S. (1972). Determination of the tryptophan content of proteins by ion exchange chromatography of alkaline hydrolysates. J Biol Chem, 247(9), 2828-34.
  3. P. Cummins., D. K. Rochfort., & Connor., O. (2017). Ion-Exchange Chromatography: Basic Principles and Application. Methods Mol Biol, 1485, 209-223.
  4. R. Rustandi., F. Wang., C. Lancaster., A. Kristopeit., S. D. Thiriot., & Heinrichs., H. J. (2016). Ion-Exchange Chromatography to Analyze Components of a Clostridium difficile Vaccine. Methods Mol Biol, 1476, 269-277.
  5. Fekete., A. Beck., L. J. Veuthey., & Guillarme., D. (2015). Ion-exchange chromatography for the characterization of biopharmaceuticals. J Pharm Biomed Anal, 113, 43-55.

Learn More about our Services and how can we help you with your research!

Click here

Introduction

In behavioral neuroscience, the Open Field Test (OFT) remains one of the most widely used assays to evaluate rodent models of affect, cognition, and motivation. It provides a non-invasive framework for examining how animals respond to novelty, stress, and pharmacological or environmental manipulations. Among the test’s core metrics, the percentage of time spent in the center zone offers a uniquely normalized and sensitive measure of an animal’s emotional reactivity and willingness to engage with a potentially risky environment.

This metric is calculated as the proportion of time spent in the central area of the arena—typically the inner 25%—relative to the entire session duration. By normalizing this value, researchers gain a behaviorally informative variable that is resilient to fluctuations in session length or overall movement levels. This makes it especially valuable in comparative analyses, longitudinal monitoring, and cross-model validation.

Unlike raw center duration, which can be affected by trial design inconsistencies, the percentage-based measure enables clearer comparisons across animals, treatments, and conditions. It plays a key role in identifying trait anxiety, avoidance behavior, risk-taking tendencies, and environmental adaptation, making it indispensable in both basic and translational research contexts.

Whereas simple center duration provides absolute time, the percentage-based metric introduces greater interpretability and reproducibility, especially when comparing different animal models, treatment conditions, or experimental setups. It is particularly effective for quantifying avoidance behaviors, risk assessment strategies, and trait anxiety profiles in both acute and longitudinal designs.

What Does Percentage of Time in the Centre Measure?

This metric reflects the relative amount of time an animal chooses to spend in the open, exposed portion of the arena—typically defined as the inner 25% of a square or circular enclosure. Because rodents innately prefer the periphery (thigmotaxis), time in the center is inversely associated with anxiety-like behavior. As such, this percentage is considered a sensitive, normalized index of:

  • Exploratory drive vs. risk aversion: High center time reflects an animal’s willingness to engage with uncertain or exposed environments, often indicative of lower anxiety and a stronger intrinsic drive to explore. These animals are more likely to exhibit flexible, information-gathering behaviors. On the other hand, animals that spend little time in the center display a strong bias toward the safety of the perimeter, indicative of a defensive behavioral state or trait-level risk aversion. This dichotomy helps distinguish adaptive exploration from fear-driven avoidance.

  • Emotional reactivity: Fluctuations in center time percentage serve as a sensitive behavioral proxy for changes in emotional state. In stress-prone or trauma-exposed animals, decreased center engagement may reflect hypervigilance or fear generalization, while a sudden increase might indicate emotional blunting or impaired threat appraisal. The metric is also responsive to acute stressors, environmental perturbations, or pharmacological interventions that impact affective regulation.

  • Behavioral confidence and adaptation: Repeated exposure to the same environment typically leads to reduced novelty-induced anxiety and increased behavioral flexibility. A rising trend in center time percentage across trials suggests successful habituation, reduced threat perception, and greater confidence in navigating open spaces. Conversely, a stable or declining trend may indicate behavioral rigidity or chronic stress effects.

  • Pharmacological or genetic modulation: The percentage of time in the center is widely used to evaluate the effects of pharmacological treatments and genetic modifications that influence anxiety-related circuits. Anxiolytic agents—including benzodiazepines, SSRIs, and cannabinoid agonists—reliably increase center occupancy, providing a robust behavioral endpoint in preclinical drug trials. Similarly, genetic models targeting serotonin receptors, GABAergic tone, or HPA axis function often show distinct patterns of center preference, offering translational insights into psychiatric vulnerability and resilience.

Critically, because this metric is normalized by session duration, it accommodates variability in activity levels or testing conditions. This makes it especially suitable for comparing across individuals, treatment groups, or timepoints in longitudinal studies.

A high percentage of center time indicates reduced anxiety, increased novelty-seeking, or pharmacological modulation (e.g., anxiolysis). Conversely, a low percentage suggests emotional inhibition, behavioral avoidance, or contextual hypervigilance. reduced anxiety, increased novelty-seeking, or pharmacological modulation (e.g., anxiolysis). Conversely, a low percentage suggests emotional inhibition, behavioral avoidance, or contextual hypervigilance.

Behavioral Significance and Neuroscientific Context

1. Emotional State and Trait Anxiety

The percentage of center time is one of the most direct, unconditioned readouts of anxiety-like behavior in rodents. It is frequently reduced in models of PTSD, chronic stress, or early-life adversity, where animals exhibit persistent avoidance of the center due to heightened emotional reactivity. This metric can also distinguish between acute anxiety responses and enduring trait anxiety, especially in longitudinal or developmental studies. Its normalized nature makes it ideal for comparing across cohorts with variable locomotor profiles, helping researchers detect true affective changes rather than activity-based confounds.

2. Exploration Strategies and Cognitive Engagement

Rodents that spend more time in the center zone typically exhibit broader and more flexible exploration strategies. This behavior reflects not only reduced anxiety but also cognitive engagement and environmental curiosity. High center percentage is associated with robust spatial learning, attentional scanning, and memory encoding functions, supported by coordinated activation in the prefrontal cortex, hippocampus, and basal forebrain. In contrast, reduced center engagement may signal spatial rigidity, attentional narrowing, or cognitive withdrawal, particularly in models of neurodegeneration or aging.

3. Pharmacological Responsiveness

The open field test remains one of the most widely accepted platforms for testing anxiolytic and psychotropic drugs. The percentage of center time reliably increases following administration of anxiolytic agents such as benzodiazepines, SSRIs, and GABA-A receptor agonists. This metric serves as a sensitive and reproducible endpoint in preclinical dose-finding studies, mechanistic pharmacology, and compound screening pipelines. It also aids in differentiating true anxiolytic effects from sedation or motor suppression by integrating with other behavioral parameters like distance traveled and entry count (Prut & Belzung, 2003).

4. Sex Differences and Hormonal Modulation

Sex-based differences in emotional regulation often manifest in open field behavior, with female rodents generally exhibiting higher variability in center zone metrics due to hormonal cycling. For example, estrogen has been shown to facilitate exploratory behavior and increase center occupancy, while progesterone and stress-induced corticosterone often reduce it. Studies involving gonadectomy, hormone replacement, or sex-specific genetic knockouts use this metric to quantify the impact of endocrine factors on anxiety and exploratory behavior. As such, it remains a vital tool for dissecting sex-dependent neurobehavioral dynamics.
 The percentage of center time is one of the most direct, unconditioned readouts of anxiety-like behavior in rodents. It is frequently reduced in models of PTSD, chronic stress, or early-life adversity. Because it is normalized, this metric is especially helpful for distinguishing between genuine avoidance and low general activity.

Methodological Considerations

  • Zone Definition: Accurately defining the center zone is critical for reliable and reproducible data. In most open field arenas, the center zone constitutes approximately 25% of the total area, centrally located and evenly distanced from the walls. Software-based segmentation tools enhance precision and ensure consistency across trials and experiments. Deviations in zone parameters—whether due to arena geometry or tracking inconsistencies—can result in skewed data, especially when calculating percentages.

     

  • Trial Duration: Trials typically last between 5 to 10 minutes. The percentage of time in the center must be normalized to total trial duration to maintain comparability across animals and experimental groups. Longer trials may lead to fatigue, boredom, or habituation effects that artificially reduce exploratory behavior, while overly short trials may not capture full behavioral repertoires or response to novel stimuli.

     

  • Handling and Habituation: Variability in pre-test handling can introduce confounds, particularly through stress-induced hypoactivity or hyperactivity. Standardized handling routines—including gentle, consistent human interaction in the days leading up to testing—reduce variability. Habituation to the testing room and apparatus prior to data collection helps animals engage in more representative exploratory behavior, minimizing novelty-induced freezing or erratic movement.

     

  • Tracking Accuracy: High-resolution tracking systems should be validated for accurate, real-time detection of full-body center entries and sustained occupancy. The system should distinguish between full zone occupancy and transient overlaps or partial body entries that do not reflect true exploratory behavior. Poor tracking fidelity or lag can produce significant measurement error in percentage calculations.

     

  • Environmental Control: Uniformity in environmental conditions is essential. Lighting should be evenly diffused to avoid shadow bias, and noise should be minimized to prevent stress-induced variability. The arena must be cleaned between trials using odor-neutral solutions to eliminate scent trails or pheromone cues that may affect zone preference. Any variation in these conditions can introduce systematic bias in center zone behavior. Use consistent definitions of the center zone (commonly 25% of total area) to allow valid comparisons. Software-based segmentation enhances spatial precision.

Interpretation with Complementary Metrics

Temporal Dynamics of Center Occupancy

Evaluating how center time evolves across the duration of a session—divided into early, middle, and late thirds—provides insight into behavioral transitions and adaptive responses. Animals may begin by avoiding the center, only to gradually increase center time as they habituate to the environment. Conversely, persistently low center time across the session can signal prolonged anxiety, fear generalization, or a trait-like avoidance phenotype.

Cross-Paradigm Correlation

To validate the significance of center time percentage, it should be examined alongside results from other anxiety-related tests such as the Elevated Plus Maze, Light-Dark Box, or Novelty Suppressed Feeding. Concordance across paradigms supports the reliability of center time as a trait marker, while discordance may indicate task-specific reactivity or behavioral dissociation.

Behavioral Microstructure Analysis

When paired with high-resolution scoring of behavioral events such as rearing, grooming, defecation, or immobility, center time offers a richer view of the animal’s internal state. For example, an animal that spends substantial time in the center while grooming may be coping with mild stress, while another that remains immobile in the periphery may be experiencing more severe anxiety. Microstructure analysis aids in decoding the complexity behind spatial behavior.

Inter-individual Variability and Subgroup Classification

Animals naturally vary in their exploratory style. By analyzing percentage of center time across subjects, researchers can identify behavioral subgroups—such as consistently bold individuals who frequently explore the center versus cautious animals that remain along the periphery. These classifications can be used to examine predictors of drug response, resilience to stress, or vulnerability to neuropsychiatric disorders.

Machine Learning-Based Behavioral Clustering

In studies with large cohorts or multiple behavioral variables, machine learning techniques such as hierarchical clustering or principal component analysis can incorporate center time percentage to discover novel phenotypic groupings. These data-driven approaches help uncover latent dimensions of behavior that may not be visible through univariate analyses alone.

Total Distance Traveled

Total locomotion helps contextualize center time. Low percentage values in animals with minimal movement may reflect sedation or fatigue, while similar values in high-mobility subjects suggest deliberate avoidance. This metric helps distinguish emotional versus motor causes of low center engagement.

Number of Center Entries

This measure indicates how often the animal initiates exploration of the center zone. When combined with percentage of time, it differentiates between frequent but brief visits (indicative of anxiety or impulsivity) versus fewer but sustained center engagements (suggesting comfort and behavioral confidence).

Latency to First Center Entry

The delay before the first center entry reflects initial threat appraisal. Longer latencies may be associated with heightened fear or low motivation, while shorter latencies are typically linked to exploratory drive or low anxiety.

Thigmotaxis Time

Time spent hugging the walls offers a spatial counterbalance to center metrics. High thigmotaxis and low center time jointly support an interpretation of strong avoidance behavior. This inverse relationship helps triangulate affective and motivational states.

Applications in Translational Research

  • Drug Discovery: The percentage of center time is a key behavioral endpoint in the development and screening of anxiolytic, antidepressant, and antipsychotic medications. Its sensitivity to pharmacological modulation makes it particularly valuable in dose-response assessments and in distinguishing therapeutic effects from sedative or locomotor confounds. Repeated trials can also help assess drug tolerance and chronic efficacy over time.
  • Genetic and Neurodevelopmental Modeling: In transgenic and knockout models, altered center percentage provides a behavioral signature of neurodevelopmental abnormalities. This is particularly relevant in the study of autism spectrum disorders, ADHD, fragile X syndrome, and schizophrenia, where subjects often exhibit heightened anxiety, reduced flexibility, or altered environmental engagement.
  • Hormonal and Sex-Based Research: The metric is highly responsive to hormonal fluctuations, including estrous cycle phases, gonadectomy, and hormone replacement therapies. It supports investigations into sex differences in stress reactivity and the behavioral consequences of endocrine disorders or interventions.
  • Environmental Enrichment and Deprivation: Housing conditions significantly influence anxiety-like behavior and exploratory motivation. Animals raised in enriched environments typically show increased center time, indicative of reduced stress and greater behavioral plasticity. Conversely, socially isolated or stimulus-deprived animals often show strong center avoidance.
  • Behavioral Biomarker Development: As a robust and reproducible readout, center time percentage can serve as a behavioral biomarker in longitudinal and interventional studies. It is increasingly used to identify early signs of affective dysregulation or to track the efficacy of neuromodulatory treatments such as optogenetics, chemogenetics, or deep brain stimulation.
  • Personalized Preclinical Models: This measure supports behavioral stratification, allowing researchers to identify high-anxiety or low-anxiety phenotypes before treatment. This enables within-group comparisons and enhances statistical power by accounting for pre-existing behavioral variation. Used to screen anxiolytic agents and distinguish between compounds with sedative vs. anxiolytic profiles.

Enhancing Research Outcomes with Percentage-Based Analysis

By expressing center zone activity as a proportion of total trial time, researchers gain a metric that is resistant to session variability and more readily comparable across time, treatment, and model conditions. This normalized measure enhances reproducibility and statistical power, particularly in multi-cohort or cross-laboratory designs.

For experimental designs aimed at assessing anxiety, exploratory strategy, or affective state, the percentage of time spent in the center offers one of the most robust and interpretable measures available in the Open Field Test.

Explore high-resolution tracking solutions and open field platforms at
https://conductscience.com/open-field/
Go to

References

  • Prut, L., & Belzung, C. (2003). The open field as a paradigm to measure the effects of drugs on anxiety-like behaviors: a review. European Journal of Pharmacology, 463(1–3), 3–33.
  • Seibenhener, M. L., & Wooten, M. C. (2015). Use of the open field maze to measure locomotor and anxiety-like behavior in mice. Journal of Visualized Experiments, (96), e52434.
  • Crawley, J. N. (2007). What’s Wrong With My Mouse? Behavioral Phenotyping of Transgenic and Knockout Mice. Wiley-Liss.
  • Carola, V., D’Olimpio, F., Brunamonti, E., Mangia, F., & Renzi, P. (2002). Evaluation of the elevated plus-maze and open-field tests for the assessment of anxiety-related behavior in inbred mice. Behavioral Brain Research, 134(1–2), 49–57.

Written by researchers, for researchers — powered by Conduct Science.

See more of Our Posts

Behavioral Neuroscience

All Resources

GO TO

Never miss our posts!

Facebook-f Twitter Instagram Linkedin-in
Facebook Twitter Youtube Instagram Reddit-alien

Our Location

Monday – Friday
9 AM – 5 PM EST

Conduct Science

Resources

Support

Customer service

DISCLAIMER: ConductScience and affiliate products are NOT designed for human consumption, testing, or clinical utilization. They are designed for pre-clinical utilization only. Customers purchasing apparatus for the purposes of scientific research or veterinary care affirm adherence to applicable regulatory bodies for the country in which their research or care is conducted.

© Conduct Science 2024