x
[quotes_form]
Mastering the Microtome

The Cryostat-Microtome

Need Microtomes for your studies?

A Glimpse into the History of a Cryostat

A Cryostat is a versatile and high-quality machine that generates low temperatures for tissue sectioning. The word “Cryostat” originates from two separate Greek words “Kryos”, meaning cold, and “stat”, meaning stable. Sir James Dewar, a Scottish Physicist, and Chemist are credited for the use of the very first cryostats in the 19th century.[1]

These earlier cryostats – named “Dewar” after the inventor, were just a glimpse into the potential benefits of a cryostat. By the 20th century, the cryostat evolved into more specialized and useful pieces of equipment which had many applications in Science and Engineering.

In the healthcare industry, cryostats are used in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), tissue sectioning, and other pathological applications. There are numerous types of cryostats with varied applications. This article concentrates on the medical applications of a microtome-equipped Cryostat, which have become game-changers in the medical field.

 

Cryostat-Microtomes in Immunohistochemistry Laboratories

Major 20th-century advances in the field of fluorescently-labeled antibody staining techniques gave rise to the need for cutting fine tissue sections (~5 microns thick). This field of biology is known as Immunohistochemistry (IHC), a technique that uses antibodies to selectively identify antigens (proteins) in tissue sections.

A classic example of its application is the biopsy of tissue samples to identify markers of cancer. The only way to achieve fine sections, required in immunohistochemistry applications, is to use a freezing temperature chamber (while sectioning the tissue sample).

In the absence of this kind of chamber, the tissue samples are too soft to cut into thin sections. This cold chamber prevents the sample from thawing when the sectioning is in progress and also reduces the destruction of the tissue sample from microorganisms.

This cryo-section is absolutely essential when results are expected quickly and the antigenicity of sensitive molecules is to be preserved.

When we consider tissue biopsies for identifying and treating diseases, it is critical (for example) to provide doctors with the quick and correct information for the downstream treatment of patients. The patient samples are sent to the IHC lab for analysis.

In an IHC lab, these samples are processed in a cryostat which holds a microtome. Briefly, a microtome is an apparatus that cuts thin tissue sections for analysis. The thin slices created by the cryostat are known as cryo-sections which are then analyzed under the microscope.

These ultra-thin sections enable scientists to reach a better conclusion regarding the nature of a disease in a time-efficient manner.

 

Essential Components of the Cryostat-Microtome

The design of the cryostat depends on its application, in other words, it has to be designed in such a way that the device fitted into the cryostat is fully insulated as well as functional.

Although all Cryostat-microtomes follow the same scientific principle, the information provided below uses one of the Cryostat-microtomes from Leica (Leica CM1950) as an example.

 

Components of the Cryostat-Microtome, their Uses, and Care Instructions

 

1.    Waste container

This holds the water generated by the continuous frost-defrost cycles inside the cryostat. This water can be a source of sample contamination; thus, it is important to dispose of it in the waste container.

 

2.    Freezing chamber

As the name suggests, it is the chamber that houses the microtome and keeps it at a low temperature while sectioning.

 

3.    Specimen disc

This holds the tissue specimen in place while it is being sectioned with the knife.

 

4.    Microtome blade and blade holder

In order to observe tissue under microscopes, it needs to be sliced to an appropriate width (in order of a few microns in width). This requires precision cutting with very sharp blades. The blades are held in position by the blade holder.

 

5.    Glass slide door

This is basically a cover for the cryostat.

 

6.    Anti-roll plate

The anti-roll plate prevents curling of the tissue sections after they have been sliced by the blade.

 

7.    U.V source

The ultraviolet light is an efficient sterilizer of surfaces and is, thus, used to sterilize the cryostat chamber. Usually, 35-minute U.V irradiation is sufficient for sterilization.

 

8.    Source of freezing temperature

Low temperatures are maintained inside a cryostat with various modes of refrigeration. Liquid nitrogen or low temperatures by condensers. Helium is also used in cryostats, especially for cooling cryogenic detectors. The liquid cryogens are held in Dewar’s, which are built to match safety standards. It is essential to carry out regular checks to ensure that there is no physical damage to the Dewar.

 

9.    Peltier stage

This is a thermo-electric device that gets rid of the heat from the cryostat chamber by increasing diffusion towards a cold stage.

 

10.   Control panel

The control panel, as the name suggests is the hardware interface for the user to operate the Cryostat. It displays the following options:

  • Lamp On/Off switch: to illuminate the Cryostat.
  • V On/Off switch: to put on the U.V when sterilization is needed.
  • Manual defrosting button: used to control manual defrosting. The cryostat defrosts once the experiment ends.
  • Control panel lock: prevents accidental modifications in the Cryostat’s protocol set.
  • Timer: the cryostat can be programmed to run for a specified length of time. It also manages the defrost timing.
  • Temperature control: as the name suggests, it controls the temperature.
  • Controller: for movement of sample towards the knife.
 
11.    Specimen chuck and chuck holder

Chuck is the adapter on which the tissue sample is mounted. It has a crossing grid pattern which provides better gripping. These chucks are made of stainless steel, which makes them more durable.

Chucks are available in different sizes depending on the size of the sample to be processed. When in use, the chucks are kept at low temperatures in the cryostat.

 

The Science Behind Cooling the Cryostat

The selling point of any cryostat is its ability to maintain a low temperature. An underlying theory of a cryostat is the application of the concepts of heat exchange and gas laws. At its core, a cryostat has a couple of tubes.

The first tube (tube 1) has liquid nitrogen while the second tube (tube 2) contains nitrogen gas, which is maintained slightly above the atmospheric pressure. Tube 1 is placed inside tube 2. The liquid nitrogen is vented out via a small opening in a stopper known as Flange.[3]

Due to this leak, the heat from tube 2 is conducted to tube 1 and is absorbed by the liquid nitrogen. The vaporization of liquid nitrogen removes heat from the system, thus, cooling the cryostat. The rate of heat transfer depends on the material of the tubes.

Usually, silver or copper tubes are best for tube 1, but Aluminum is used in most cases to cut cost. Tube 2 is generally made of stainless steel.

 

How the Cryostat-Microtome Works

Note: How various parts of the Cryostat-microtome works are briefly described in the section below. 

 

1.   Preparing and mounting the samples in the cryostat-microtome:

The tissue samples are flash-frozen in liquid nitrogen at a temperature of -196-degree C.  This method of freezing ensures that there is no build-up of ice crystals in the sample. These frozen samples are mounted on metal blocks with an initial chemical fixation step. The fixative is usually FAE (Formalin, Acetic acid, Ethanol, and water).

The tissue sample is embedded with an embedding medium (also called OCT, which stands for Optimal Cutting Temperature agent).  Essentially, this OCT compound acts as a glue, which sticks the sample to the tissue sample holder (chuck). The chuck is cooled to the temperature of the cryostat (this is also referred to as CT or Cryostat temperature).

The chuck is then mounted on the chuck holder and the position of the sample is kept perpendicular to the blade. The blade is clamped in the blade holder. The low temperature of the cryostat leads to the preservation or fixation of the ultrastructure of the specimen. This mounted specimen is then cryo-sectioned at -20 to -30-degree C, the temperature of the microtome.

 

2.   Adjusting the sample and optimizing the parameters for sectioning:

The mounting block of tissue samples is mechanically moved forward towards the blade for sectioning. The thickness of the slices is chosen according to the desired micron for the particular application.

There is a wheel mechanism in the cryostat, which mechanically controls the movement of the chuck apparatus. This wheel is kept locked when not in use and has to be unlocked and rotated for getting the right distance from the blades and eventually cutting the ultra-fine slices to get the thickness of the desired micron.

The wheel is designed in such a way that with every single rotation of the wheel, it can be programmed to advance the specimen holder by a specified micron. The section thickness is adjusted to usually 5-10 microns once the knife starts peeling the tissue.[4,5]

 

3.   Adjusting the anti-roll plate or brush; is a critical step:

Another important feature of the cryostat microtome is an anti-roll plate. This plate is brought down and adjusted on the blade in such a way that the slices fall underneath it and over the blade cover. In case there is no anti-roll plate provided with the instrument, one can use a brush to hold the edge of the sectioned tissue sample and place it flat on the blade cover.

4.   The golden rule:

According to Abraham Lincoln, “Give me six hours to chop down a tree and I will spend the first four sharpening the ax”. This golden rule must be followed.

The blade of the knife needs to be very sharp to get thin sections. It is advisable that the blade is constantly monitored for bluntness and replaced when needed. Since the blade is not fixed, it can be moved horizontally to replace the blunt portions with sharp ends.

The blade also needs to be cleaned with ethanol before sectioning to remove any dirt or adherent tissue debris. The blade is very sharp and great care needs to be taken while inserting and removing it from the blade holder.

Often, the end of a brush is used to nudge it out of the holder rather than attempting to do the same with fingers.

The speed of slicing by the blade must be optimized by first keeping a steady speed and then cutting the tissue at a faster speed. This ensures that the tissue sectioning generates a clean cut every time.

 

5.   Final piece of advice: Don’t lose your sample!

Many tissue sections are cut so that at least one of these sections provides any worthwhile information when viewed under the microscope. The sample is never left in the cryostat overnight since the machine is usually programmed to defrost and this is going to damage the sample. Usually, if the sample is required to be reused, it is kept back in a low-temperature freezer.[6,7]

 

Conclusion

The contribution of Cryostat to the healthcare industry is quite significant. Analysis of a small tissue section from the patient is often used to determine the next course of treatment.

In the case of diseases such as cancer, the treatment of a patient cannot resume unless the results of tissue biopsy are back from the immunocytochemistry lab. Thus, it becomes important that diagnosis is concluded early using techniques that involve the Cryostat-microtome.

Furthermore, the cryostat is very important for tissue section preparation for Fourier Transform Infra-Red (FTIR) spectroscopy, where even a small temperature difference between the blade and the sample holder can have huge quality issues in the sectioned samples.[8]

 

References
  1. Parma, V. (2013) Cryostat Design. CERN Technology Department, Magnets, Superconductors, and Cryostats Group
  2. II, J. G. W. (2016) Principles of Cryostat Design, Springer
  3. Joiner, B. B. (1968)Design and construction of a liquid nitrogen cryostat for use in a swimming pool-type reactor, Missouri University of Science and Technology
  4. Hyam, P. (2010) Understanding and Maintaining the Cryostat, Springer
  5. Gschwendtner, A., and Mairinger, T. (1995) How thick is your section? The influence of section thickness on DNA-cytometry on histological sections. Anal Cell Pathol9, 29-37
  6. Dey, P. (2018) Frozen Section: Principle and Procedure, Springer
  7. Son, A. I., Sokolowski, K., and Zhou, R. (2013) Cryosectioning. Methods Mol Biol 1018, 301-311
  8. Liyanage, S., Dassanayake, R. S., Bouyanfif, A., Rajakaruna, E., Ramalingam, L., Moustaid-Moussa, N., and Abidi, N. (2017) Optimization and validation of cryostat temperature conditions for trans-reflectance mode FTIR microspectroscopic imaging of biological tissues. MethodsX4, 118-127

Learn More about our Services and how can we help you with your research!

Introduction

In behavioral neuroscience, the Open Field Test (OFT) remains one of the most widely used assays to evaluate rodent models of affect, cognition, and motivation. It provides a non-invasive framework for examining how animals respond to novelty, stress, and pharmacological or environmental manipulations. Among the test’s core metrics, the percentage of time spent in the center zone offers a uniquely normalized and sensitive measure of an animal’s emotional reactivity and willingness to engage with a potentially risky environment.

This metric is calculated as the proportion of time spent in the central area of the arena—typically the inner 25%—relative to the entire session duration. By normalizing this value, researchers gain a behaviorally informative variable that is resilient to fluctuations in session length or overall movement levels. This makes it especially valuable in comparative analyses, longitudinal monitoring, and cross-model validation.

Unlike raw center duration, which can be affected by trial design inconsistencies, the percentage-based measure enables clearer comparisons across animals, treatments, and conditions. It plays a key role in identifying trait anxiety, avoidance behavior, risk-taking tendencies, and environmental adaptation, making it indispensable in both basic and translational research contexts.

Whereas simple center duration provides absolute time, the percentage-based metric introduces greater interpretability and reproducibility, especially when comparing different animal models, treatment conditions, or experimental setups. It is particularly effective for quantifying avoidance behaviors, risk assessment strategies, and trait anxiety profiles in both acute and longitudinal designs.

What Does Percentage of Time in the Centre Measure?

This metric reflects the relative amount of time an animal chooses to spend in the open, exposed portion of the arena—typically defined as the inner 25% of a square or circular enclosure. Because rodents innately prefer the periphery (thigmotaxis), time in the center is inversely associated with anxiety-like behavior. As such, this percentage is considered a sensitive, normalized index of:

  • Exploratory drive vs. risk aversion: High center time reflects an animal’s willingness to engage with uncertain or exposed environments, often indicative of lower anxiety and a stronger intrinsic drive to explore. These animals are more likely to exhibit flexible, information-gathering behaviors. On the other hand, animals that spend little time in the center display a strong bias toward the safety of the perimeter, indicative of a defensive behavioral state or trait-level risk aversion. This dichotomy helps distinguish adaptive exploration from fear-driven avoidance.

  • Emotional reactivity: Fluctuations in center time percentage serve as a sensitive behavioral proxy for changes in emotional state. In stress-prone or trauma-exposed animals, decreased center engagement may reflect hypervigilance or fear generalization, while a sudden increase might indicate emotional blunting or impaired threat appraisal. The metric is also responsive to acute stressors, environmental perturbations, or pharmacological interventions that impact affective regulation.

  • Behavioral confidence and adaptation: Repeated exposure to the same environment typically leads to reduced novelty-induced anxiety and increased behavioral flexibility. A rising trend in center time percentage across trials suggests successful habituation, reduced threat perception, and greater confidence in navigating open spaces. Conversely, a stable or declining trend may indicate behavioral rigidity or chronic stress effects.

  • Pharmacological or genetic modulation: The percentage of time in the center is widely used to evaluate the effects of pharmacological treatments and genetic modifications that influence anxiety-related circuits. Anxiolytic agents—including benzodiazepines, SSRIs, and cannabinoid agonists—reliably increase center occupancy, providing a robust behavioral endpoint in preclinical drug trials. Similarly, genetic models targeting serotonin receptors, GABAergic tone, or HPA axis function often show distinct patterns of center preference, offering translational insights into psychiatric vulnerability and resilience.

Critically, because this metric is normalized by session duration, it accommodates variability in activity levels or testing conditions. This makes it especially suitable for comparing across individuals, treatment groups, or timepoints in longitudinal studies.

A high percentage of center time indicates reduced anxiety, increased novelty-seeking, or pharmacological modulation (e.g., anxiolysis). Conversely, a low percentage suggests emotional inhibition, behavioral avoidance, or contextual hypervigilance. reduced anxiety, increased novelty-seeking, or pharmacological modulation (e.g., anxiolysis). Conversely, a low percentage suggests emotional inhibition, behavioral avoidance, or contextual hypervigilance.

Behavioral Significance and Neuroscientific Context

1. Emotional State and Trait Anxiety

The percentage of center time is one of the most direct, unconditioned readouts of anxiety-like behavior in rodents. It is frequently reduced in models of PTSD, chronic stress, or early-life adversity, where animals exhibit persistent avoidance of the center due to heightened emotional reactivity. This metric can also distinguish between acute anxiety responses and enduring trait anxiety, especially in longitudinal or developmental studies. Its normalized nature makes it ideal for comparing across cohorts with variable locomotor profiles, helping researchers detect true affective changes rather than activity-based confounds.

2. Exploration Strategies and Cognitive Engagement

Rodents that spend more time in the center zone typically exhibit broader and more flexible exploration strategies. This behavior reflects not only reduced anxiety but also cognitive engagement and environmental curiosity. High center percentage is associated with robust spatial learning, attentional scanning, and memory encoding functions, supported by coordinated activation in the prefrontal cortex, hippocampus, and basal forebrain. In contrast, reduced center engagement may signal spatial rigidity, attentional narrowing, or cognitive withdrawal, particularly in models of neurodegeneration or aging.

3. Pharmacological Responsiveness

The open field test remains one of the most widely accepted platforms for testing anxiolytic and psychotropic drugs. The percentage of center time reliably increases following administration of anxiolytic agents such as benzodiazepines, SSRIs, and GABA-A receptor agonists. This metric serves as a sensitive and reproducible endpoint in preclinical dose-finding studies, mechanistic pharmacology, and compound screening pipelines. It also aids in differentiating true anxiolytic effects from sedation or motor suppression by integrating with other behavioral parameters like distance traveled and entry count (Prut & Belzung, 2003).

4. Sex Differences and Hormonal Modulation

Sex-based differences in emotional regulation often manifest in open field behavior, with female rodents generally exhibiting higher variability in center zone metrics due to hormonal cycling. For example, estrogen has been shown to facilitate exploratory behavior and increase center occupancy, while progesterone and stress-induced corticosterone often reduce it. Studies involving gonadectomy, hormone replacement, or sex-specific genetic knockouts use this metric to quantify the impact of endocrine factors on anxiety and exploratory behavior. As such, it remains a vital tool for dissecting sex-dependent neurobehavioral dynamics.
The percentage of center time is one of the most direct, unconditioned readouts of anxiety-like behavior in rodents. It is frequently reduced in models of PTSD, chronic stress, or early-life adversity. Because it is normalized, this metric is especially helpful for distinguishing between genuine avoidance and low general activity.

Methodological Considerations

  • Zone Definition: Accurately defining the center zone is critical for reliable and reproducible data. In most open field arenas, the center zone constitutes approximately 25% of the total area, centrally located and evenly distanced from the walls. Software-based segmentation tools enhance precision and ensure consistency across trials and experiments. Deviations in zone parameters—whether due to arena geometry or tracking inconsistencies—can result in skewed data, especially when calculating percentages.

     

  • Trial Duration: Trials typically last between 5 to 10 minutes. The percentage of time in the center must be normalized to total trial duration to maintain comparability across animals and experimental groups. Longer trials may lead to fatigue, boredom, or habituation effects that artificially reduce exploratory behavior, while overly short trials may not capture full behavioral repertoires or response to novel stimuli.

     

  • Handling and Habituation: Variability in pre-test handling can introduce confounds, particularly through stress-induced hypoactivity or hyperactivity. Standardized handling routines—including gentle, consistent human interaction in the days leading up to testing—reduce variability. Habituation to the testing room and apparatus prior to data collection helps animals engage in more representative exploratory behavior, minimizing novelty-induced freezing or erratic movement.

     

  • Tracking Accuracy: High-resolution tracking systems should be validated for accurate, real-time detection of full-body center entries and sustained occupancy. The system should distinguish between full zone occupancy and transient overlaps or partial body entries that do not reflect true exploratory behavior. Poor tracking fidelity or lag can produce significant measurement error in percentage calculations.

     

  • Environmental Control: Uniformity in environmental conditions is essential. Lighting should be evenly diffused to avoid shadow bias, and noise should be minimized to prevent stress-induced variability. The arena must be cleaned between trials using odor-neutral solutions to eliminate scent trails or pheromone cues that may affect zone preference. Any variation in these conditions can introduce systematic bias in center zone behavior. Use consistent definitions of the center zone (commonly 25% of total area) to allow valid comparisons. Software-based segmentation enhances spatial precision.

Interpretation with Complementary Metrics

Temporal Dynamics of Center Occupancy

Evaluating how center time evolves across the duration of a session—divided into early, middle, and late thirds—provides insight into behavioral transitions and adaptive responses. Animals may begin by avoiding the center, only to gradually increase center time as they habituate to the environment. Conversely, persistently low center time across the session can signal prolonged anxiety, fear generalization, or a trait-like avoidance phenotype.

Cross-Paradigm Correlation

To validate the significance of center time percentage, it should be examined alongside results from other anxiety-related tests such as the Elevated Plus Maze, Light-Dark Box, or Novelty Suppressed Feeding. Concordance across paradigms supports the reliability of center time as a trait marker, while discordance may indicate task-specific reactivity or behavioral dissociation.

Behavioral Microstructure Analysis

When paired with high-resolution scoring of behavioral events such as rearing, grooming, defecation, or immobility, center time offers a richer view of the animal’s internal state. For example, an animal that spends substantial time in the center while grooming may be coping with mild stress, while another that remains immobile in the periphery may be experiencing more severe anxiety. Microstructure analysis aids in decoding the complexity behind spatial behavior.

Inter-individual Variability and Subgroup Classification

Animals naturally vary in their exploratory style. By analyzing percentage of center time across subjects, researchers can identify behavioral subgroups—such as consistently bold individuals who frequently explore the center versus cautious animals that remain along the periphery. These classifications can be used to examine predictors of drug response, resilience to stress, or vulnerability to neuropsychiatric disorders.

Machine Learning-Based Behavioral Clustering

In studies with large cohorts or multiple behavioral variables, machine learning techniques such as hierarchical clustering or principal component analysis can incorporate center time percentage to discover novel phenotypic groupings. These data-driven approaches help uncover latent dimensions of behavior that may not be visible through univariate analyses alone.

Total Distance Traveled

Total locomotion helps contextualize center time. Low percentage values in animals with minimal movement may reflect sedation or fatigue, while similar values in high-mobility subjects suggest deliberate avoidance. This metric helps distinguish emotional versus motor causes of low center engagement.

Number of Center Entries

This measure indicates how often the animal initiates exploration of the center zone. When combined with percentage of time, it differentiates between frequent but brief visits (indicative of anxiety or impulsivity) versus fewer but sustained center engagements (suggesting comfort and behavioral confidence).

Latency to First Center Entry

The delay before the first center entry reflects initial threat appraisal. Longer latencies may be associated with heightened fear or low motivation, while shorter latencies are typically linked to exploratory drive or low anxiety.

Thigmotaxis Time

Time spent hugging the walls offers a spatial counterbalance to center metrics. High thigmotaxis and low center time jointly support an interpretation of strong avoidance behavior. This inverse relationship helps triangulate affective and motivational states.

Applications in Translational Research

  • Drug Discovery: The percentage of center time is a key behavioral endpoint in the development and screening of anxiolytic, antidepressant, and antipsychotic medications. Its sensitivity to pharmacological modulation makes it particularly valuable in dose-response assessments and in distinguishing therapeutic effects from sedative or locomotor confounds. Repeated trials can also help assess drug tolerance and chronic efficacy over time.
  • Genetic and Neurodevelopmental Modeling: In transgenic and knockout models, altered center percentage provides a behavioral signature of neurodevelopmental abnormalities. This is particularly relevant in the study of autism spectrum disorders, ADHD, fragile X syndrome, and schizophrenia, where subjects often exhibit heightened anxiety, reduced flexibility, or altered environmental engagement.
  • Hormonal and Sex-Based Research: The metric is highly responsive to hormonal fluctuations, including estrous cycle phases, gonadectomy, and hormone replacement therapies. It supports investigations into sex differences in stress reactivity and the behavioral consequences of endocrine disorders or interventions.
  • Environmental Enrichment and Deprivation: Housing conditions significantly influence anxiety-like behavior and exploratory motivation. Animals raised in enriched environments typically show increased center time, indicative of reduced stress and greater behavioral plasticity. Conversely, socially isolated or stimulus-deprived animals often show strong center avoidance.
  • Behavioral Biomarker Development: As a robust and reproducible readout, center time percentage can serve as a behavioral biomarker in longitudinal and interventional studies. It is increasingly used to identify early signs of affective dysregulation or to track the efficacy of neuromodulatory treatments such as optogenetics, chemogenetics, or deep brain stimulation.
  • Personalized Preclinical Models: This measure supports behavioral stratification, allowing researchers to identify high-anxiety or low-anxiety phenotypes before treatment. This enables within-group comparisons and enhances statistical power by accounting for pre-existing behavioral variation. Used to screen anxiolytic agents and distinguish between compounds with sedative vs. anxiolytic profiles.

Enhancing Research Outcomes with Percentage-Based Analysis

By expressing center zone activity as a proportion of total trial time, researchers gain a metric that is resistant to session variability and more readily comparable across time, treatment, and model conditions. This normalized measure enhances reproducibility and statistical power, particularly in multi-cohort or cross-laboratory designs.

For experimental designs aimed at assessing anxiety, exploratory strategy, or affective state, the percentage of time spent in the center offers one of the most robust and interpretable measures available in the Open Field Test.

Explore high-resolution tracking solutions and open field platforms at

References

  • Prut, L., & Belzung, C. (2003). The open field as a paradigm to measure the effects of drugs on anxiety-like behaviors: a review. European Journal of Pharmacology, 463(1–3), 3–33.
  • Seibenhener, M. L., & Wooten, M. C. (2015). Use of the open field maze to measure locomotor and anxiety-like behavior in mice. Journal of Visualized Experiments, (96), e52434.
  • Crawley, J. N. (2007). What’s Wrong With My Mouse? Behavioral Phenotyping of Transgenic and Knockout Mice. Wiley-Liss.
  • Carola, V., D’Olimpio, F., Brunamonti, E., Mangia, F., & Renzi, P. (2002). Evaluation of the elevated plus-maze and open-field tests for the assessment of anxiety-related behavior in inbred mice. Behavioral Brain Research, 134(1–2), 49–57.

Written by researchers, for researchers — powered by Conduct Science.