Measuring Innate Conflict in Rodent Models
The Light/Dark Box Test is a widely used behavioral assay for evaluating anxiety-like behavior in rodents. Based on the natural conflict between a rodent’s innate aversion to brightly lit open spaces and its exploratory drive, the test offers a simple yet powerful measure of anxiety modulation. Among its primary metrics, Time Spent in the Light Side (TSLS) is perhaps the most direct and sensitive readout of exploratory anxiety.
At Conduct Science, we emphasize TSLS as a quantifiable, reproducible, and pharmacologically validated parameter in both basic neuroscience and preclinical drug development studies.
What Is Time Spent in the Light Side?
TSLS is the cumulative amount of time (typically measured in seconds) a rodent remains in the illuminated compartment of the Light/Dark Box during a testing session. A standard session lasts 5–10 minutes, during which the subject is free to move between the two compartments—one brightly lit and the other dark and enclosed.
Rodents generally prefer the dark side due to its perceived safety, but exploratory tendencies may drive them into the light side intermittently. The longer an animal spends in the light side, the lower its anxiety level is presumed to be.
Why Is This Metric Important?
1. Direct Readout of Anxiolytic or Anxiogenic States
TSLS is a well-established index for pharmacological testing. Anxiolytic compounds (e.g., benzodiazepines, SSRIs) reliably increase TSLS, while anxiogenic treatments (e.g., yohimbine, caffeine) decrease it (Bourin & Hascoët, 2003). This makes it a critical endpoint in drug screening pipelines.
2. Innate Behavior With High Face Validity
Because the Light/Dark conflict is based on ethologically conserved behavior, TSLS requires no prior training and is highly reproducible across labs and strains. This simplicity is a major advantage in early-stage behavioral phenotyping or transgenic mouse characterization.
3. Differentiates Between Exploratory Drive and Anxiety Suppression
While other anxiety tests (e.g., elevated plus maze) rely on similar avoidance behaviors, TSLS offers a more stable and less height-related metric, reducing confounds like balance or motor deficits.
4. Sensitive to Developmental and Environmental Factors
Environmental enrichment, early life stress, and maternal separation paradigms all modulate TSLS, making it a useful tool for studying the long-term behavioral effects of life history (Crawley & Goodwin, 1980).
Conduct Science’s Light/Dark Box System: Enhancing Sensitivity and Standardization
Our Light/Dark Box system is engineered for maximum behavioral contrast and data accuracy:
- Customizable illumination intensity to match study design
- Opaque dividers and non-reflective flooring for clear zone distinction
- IR-compatible walls for optimal tracking in both compartments
- Automated video tracking integration (e.g., ANY-maze, EthoVision XT)
- Standardized entry gates and zone transition thresholds for precise movement detection
By pairing with advanced video analysis software, researchers can:
- Automatically calculate TSLS and number of transitions
- Generate heatmaps and movement traces
- Analyze zone preference dynamics over time
- Normalize TSLS against baseline or control cohorts
Application Areas and Model Systems
Drug Discovery and Preclinical Screening
TSLS serves as a robust behavioral endpoint for assessing anxiolytic efficacy. For instance, diazepam-treated rodents typically show significantly longer light-side durations, validating the test’s predictive validity (Bourin & Hascoët, 2003).
Genetic and Transgenic Models
Rodents with genetic modifications in serotonin, dopamine, or GABAergic signaling pathways often display altered TSLS. Increased light-side time may reflect reduced anxiety-like behavior or altered risk assessment.
Stress Models and Behavioral Neuroscience
Chronic mild stress, social defeat, or maternal separation models often result in reduced TSLS, mimicking anxiety-like behavior relevant to human psychopathologies. The Light/Dark Box is frequently used in conjunction with elevated plus maze or open field tests to build a behavioral anxiety profile.
Developmental and Aging Studies
TSLS can reveal age-related differences in anxiety expression, with younger rodents typically displaying higher exploratory drive and longer light-side times than older cohorts.
Interpretation Considerations
- Baseline locomotor activity should be monitored to rule out hypo- or hyperactivity effects
- Zone transition frequency can complement TSLS to provide insight into exploration versus avoidance
- Repeated exposure may habituate animals; use counterbalancing or randomized order if running multi-day protocols
Conclusion: Simplicity Meets Sensitivity
Time Spent in the Light Side is an essential, low-variance measure of anxiety-like behavior in rodent models. Its clarity, reproducibility, and pharmacological responsiveness make it an ideal endpoint for behavioral neuroscience.
With Conduct Science’s Light/Dark Box system and integrated tracking tools, researchers can obtain reliable TSLS data with high throughput and minimal variability. Whether you’re screening new compounds or dissecting behavioral phenotypes, TSLS provides a direct line into the core of rodent emotional behavior.
Ready to enhance your anxiety research toolkit? Learn more about the Conduct Science Light/Dark Box:
References
Crawley, J., & Goodwin, F. K. (1980). Preliminary report of a simple animal behavior model for the anxiolytic effects of benzodiazepines. Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior, 13(2), 167–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/0091-3057(80)90067-2
Bourin, M., & Hascoët, M. (2003). The mouse light/dark box test. European Journal of Pharmacology, 463(1–3), 55–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0014-2999(03)01274-3
See more of Our Posts
Behavioral Neuroscience

Time Immobile in the Dark Side: A Fine-Tuned Lens on Anxiety Behavior in the Light/Dark Box Test

Time Immobile in the Light Side: A Subtle but Powerful Window into Anxiety-Like Behavior



Dark Side Time Percentage: A Standardized Measure of Anxiety in the Light/Dark Box Test

Top 6 Alternatives to DeepLabCut: AI Tracking Without the Complexity (2025 Edition)

Top 5 Alternatives to Zebrabox for Microplate Behavioral Tracking (2025 Edition)

Top 5 Alternatives to SMART 3.0 for Behavioral Tracking (2025 Edition)

Top 5 Alternatives to EthoVision XT for Multi-Species Tracking (2025 Edition)

Top 5 Alternatives to ANY-maze for Behavioral Tracking (2025 Edition)
All Resources
Never miss our posts!
Author:

Louise Corscadden, PhD
Dr Louise Corscadden acts as Conduct Science’s Director of Science and Development and Academic Technology Transfer. Her background is in genetics, microbiology, neuroscience, and climate chemistry.