x
[quotes_form]

Number of Entries into the Closed Arms: A Critical Behavioral Marker in the Elevated Plus Maze

Learn More about our Services and how can we help you with your research!

Introduction: Why Count Entries, Not Just Time?

The Elevated Plus Maze (EPM) is one of the gold standards for evaluating anxiety-related behavior in rodents. While time spent in the open or closed arms provides valuable information about anxiety levels, the number of entries into the closed arms tells a more dynamic story about activity patterns, emotional reactivity, and coping strategies.

At Conduct Science, we emphasize the importance of multi-metric analysis. Using high-precision mazes paired with automated tracking solutions like ConductVision, researchers can reliably quantify frequency of closed-arm entries—capturing nuances often missed by static time measurements alone.

What Does “Number of Closed-Arm Entries” Really Measure?

Every entry a rodent makes into the closed arms reflects a behavioral choice: seeking shelter, maintaining comfort, or coping with an anxiogenic environment. This frequency metric provides insight into several core domains:

Behavioral Pattern Interpretation
High number of closed-arm entries
High exploratory drive despite preference for sheltered areas. May indicate hyperactivity, mild anxiety, or habituation over time.
Low number of closed-arm entries
Severe anxiety (freezing), sedation, motor impairment, or passive coping (e.g., staying in one place).
Stable entries across trials
Consistent coping style or successful habituation to the environment.
Increased entries after treatment
Possible anxiolytic effect if coupled with increased open-arm entries, or psychostimulant effect if movement rises globally.

Thus, number of entries complements duration metrics by revealing the tempo of behavior: not just how long the animal stays, but how actively it navigates its emotional state.

Conduct Science’s Elevated Plus Maze: Built for Reliable Entry Detection

Our EPM systems are optimized for behavioral tracking excellence:

  • Modular Maze Designs: Configurable for mice or rats, ensuring ethological relevance

  • ConductVision 30+ fps tracking: Capture even fast or partial entries accurately

  • Controlled ambient lighting: Minimize external variables that could impact exploration

  • Automated zone mapping: Precise delineation of arms, center, and thresholds

  • Custom CSV and heatmap outputs: Immediate access to entry count data, path traces, and dwell times

By combining robust hardware with sophisticated tracking, entry events are recorded seamlessly—eliminating human error or subjective scoring.

Case Study: Anxiolytic Drug Evaluation via Closed-Arm Entries

In a pharmacological study examining the effects of a novel 5-HT1A receptor agonist, researchers evaluated EPM performance in C57BL/6J mice:

Group Closed Arm Entries (avg.) Open Arm Entries (avg.) Total Distance (cm)
Control
8.1 ± 0.9
3.2 ± 0.6
320.5 ± 25.1
Anxiolytic-Treated
10.7 ± 1.2
6.5 ± 0.8
420.7 ± 31.7

Key Insights:

  • The treated group showed increased closed-arm entries, but importantly, open-arm entries also increased significantly.

  • Total locomotor activity rose, suggesting enhanced exploration rather than mere hyperactivity or disinhibition.

  • The balance of entries indicated an anxiolytic effect, not a confound of sedation or motor suppression.

Conclusion: Entry frequency analysis helped distinguish between simple movement increase and genuine anxiolytic-driven exploration.

Practical Considerations for Measuring Closed-Arm Entries

To ensure robust, interpretable data:

  • Define Entry Criteria Clearly: Full body (four paws) entry is standard; partial entries can cause inconsistencies.
  • Account for Locomotor Effects: Always pair entry counts with distance traveled metrics.
  • Track Across Trials: Longitudinal studies reveal habituation, extinction, or sensitization patterns.
  • Adjust for Strain Differences: Different rodent strains naturally vary in activity; e.g., BALB/c vs. C57BL/6J.
  • Use Center-Zone Metrics: Prolonged center time with low entry counts may suggest indecision or severe anxiety.

How ConductVision Enhances Entry Tracking

Traditional manual scoring is time-consuming and prone to bias. ConductVision’s AI-based tracking revolutionizes entry detection by:

  • Identifying 11 key body points per animal

  • Automatically counting full entries into arms

  • Recording time stamps for every zone transition

  • Offering real-time path visualization and batch video processing

This ensures greater reproducibility, reduced scoring fatigue, and deeper behavioral insights for every session.

Applications of Closed-Arm Entry Metrics

Beyond baseline anxiety measurement, tracking closed-arm entries can inform:

  • Drug Discovery: Early-phase screening of anxiolytics or stimulants

  • Aging Research: Assessing exploration decline or anxiety rise in aged models

  • Neurodevelopmental Studies: Characterizing ADHD-like hyperactivity or autism-spectrum coping behaviors

  • Genetic Manipulation: Investigating gene knockout/overexpression effects on affective behavior

Multi-dimensional data on frequency, timing, and path patterns create a rich behavioral fingerprint.

Conclusion: Deeper Behavioral Profiles with Entry Metrics

Counting the number of entries into the closed arms is more than just tallying movement—it’s about understanding how animals actively navigate perceived threats and safe zones. Combined with traditional time-based measurements, it allows researchers to develop multi-layered behavioral profiles critical for interpreting emotional and cognitive states.

At Conduct Science, we provide the experimental tools to move beyond basic metrics, empowering researchers to unlock more from every behavioral trial.

Ready to enhance your anxiety research toolkit?

References

  • Pellow, S., Chopin, P., File, S. E., & Briley, M. (1985). Validation of open:closed arm entries in an elevated plus-maze as a measure of anxiety in the rat. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 14(3), 149-167.
  • Walf, A. A., & Frye, C. A. (2007). The use of the elevated plus maze as an assay of anxiety-related behavior in rodents. Nature Protocols, 2(2), 322-328.
  • Conduct Science (2025). Elevated Plus Maze System: Behavioral Assay Platform. Available at: https://conductscience.com/elevated-plus-maze

Written by researchers, for researchers — powered by Conduct Science.

Author:

Louise Corscadden, PhD

Dr Louise Corscadden acts as Conduct Science’s Director of Science and Development and Academic Technology Transfer. Her background is in genetics, microbiology, neuroscience, and climate chemistry.