Behavioral Mazes

Drosophila Olfactory Operant Conditioning

SKU ME-8501
In Stock — ships now
$4,900.00
Unit: Each

A fruit fly T-maze for olfactory shock conditioning, sold together with its shock grid and vacuum pump; you supply the flies and odors.

Unit: Each

Shipping costs at most $495. Order at this price, and we email the exact cost within one business day, before you pay.

Scientist guidance
Louise Corscadden, PhD, Director of Science

Louise Corscadden, PhD

Director of Science · ConductScience

Ask Louise about Drosophila Olfactory Operant Conditioning fit, setup, configuration, or quote prep.

Used in a 2026 paper in the journal Biology Open

“No evidence for aversive associative olfactory memory through metamorphosis in Drosophila”

From the methods
After eclosion, adult flies (5-7 days old) were transferred into the T-maze part of a designed T maze (MazeEngineers™) and allowed to habituate for 60 s.

Maze Engineers, the maker named in the paper, is part of ConductScience.

See all 2 papers citing this product

Last counted

Key Specifications

Full details →
Model fit
Drosophila
SKU family
ME-8501
Shipping box
43.18 × 43.18 × 27.94 cm
Ordering
Online checkout and quote request available
Category
Behavioral Mazes
Build notes
copper
Category: Behavioral Mazes

Train groups of fruit flies to avoid an odor paired with electric shock, then test what they learned, and how long they remember it, at the T-maze choice point. Labs use the test to study the genes and brain circuits behind memory.

How It Works

Training happens in a tube lined with a copper grid. A vacuum pump draws the first odor from its odor cup through the tube. At the same time, the shock controller, run from a PC, shocks the flies through the grid. A second odor follows without shock.

An elevator in the T-maze then moves the flies to the choice point, where both odors arrive and the flies pick a side. You count the flies in each choice tube. You set the airflow with the pump's knob and read it on the flow meter.

Add-ons and modifications

Add-onPriceDetails
Complete system$4,900T-maze choice area, copper-grid training tube, shock controller and software, vacuum pump with airflow knob and flow meter, odor cups, tubing and clamp
T maze Choice Area only$1,499T-maze choice area, odor cups, vacuum and tubing, clamp
Light Dark T maze Choice$1,599T-maze choice area with a manual light switch for one chamber, odor cups, vacuum and tubing, clamp

Add any of these to your quote request.

Score this test with ConductVision

ConductVision is our video-tracking software. Record your sessions on video, and it reports the measures listed below.

What it measures

Add ConductVision to your quote

A 5-year license is $3,990 in total.

The ConductVision license for Drosophila tests. It also scores the visual and olfactory apparatus, the open field, the maze array and the heat maze.

Ask a question

Have a question? Just ask.

Send it over and we'll email you a personalized answer, with no call or scheduling.

Personalized email reply
Usually within one business day
Helpful answers published here

Prefer to talk it through?

Ask your question

Type it below and we'll email you a personalized answer, with no meeting required.

We'll only use your email to send your answer; broadly useful answers may be published anonymously.

Frequently Bought Together

Total: $11,989.99

Configuration considerations

Common Drosophila Olfactory Conditioning setup decisions

Use these notes to scope species, cohort, tracking, and automation needs. Only verified product or support routes are linked from this section.

This productComplete system

Complete system

Training tube, shock controller and software, T-maze, vacuum pump and odor cups

For full sessions, from odor-shock training to the choice test.

Request a quote
BuyableChoice area

T-maze choice area only

Choice area, odor cups, vacuum and tubing, clamp

Leaves out the copper-grid training tube, shock controller and software.

Request a quote
SpecialtyLight and dark

Light-dark T-maze choice area

Choice area with a manual light switch for one chamber

Also comes with odor cups, vacuum and tubing, and a clamp.

Request a quote

§ 1

Introduction

Quinn, Harris and Benzer showed in 1974 that fruit flies learn to avoid an odor paired with electric shock, and that the memory lasts 24 h 1. Labs have used odor conditioning since then to study the genetics of memory 4.

Tully and Quinn turned the test into a classical (Pavlovian) design in 1985. Flies received twelve shock pulses during the first odor and none during the second, then chose between the two odors at a T-maze choice point. In their experiments, 95% of trained flies typically avoided the shock-paired odor 2.

Flies with mutations in amnesiac, rutabaga or dunce show appreciable learning, but their memory fades quickly over the first 30 min 2. In mushroom body neurons, one particular adenylyl cyclase combines the odor and shock signals 5.

§ 2

Methods

2.1 Procedure

Steps and timings from Malik and Hodge (2014).

Pre-test setup

  1. 1.Collect flies: Collect flies 1 to 2 days before the test and sort them into groups of about 25 under mild CO₂.
  2. 2.Dilute the odors: Dilute 4-methylcyclohexanol 1:67 and 3-octanol 1:100 in mineral oil. Ethyl acetate and isoamyl acetate are other common odors.
  3. 3.Fill the odor cups: Pipette 30 µl of each diluted odor into its own odor cup.

Trial sequence

  1. 1.Adapt: Load a group into the training tube and let the flies adapt to the tube and airflow for 90 s.3
  2. 2.First odor with shock: Present the first odor with 60 V shock, given as twelve 1.25 s pulses with 3.75 s between pulses, for 60 s in total.3
  3. 3.Second odor: Rest for 30 s with no odor or shock, then present the second odor for 60 s without shock.3
  4. 4.Choice test: Move the flies to the T-maze choice point and give them 120 s to choose between the two odors.3
  5. 5.Count and reverse: Count the flies in each choice tube. Then train a reciprocal group, with the shock paired to the other odor.3

Critical methodological constraints

  • Reciprocal groups. With one group alone, a preference for one odor cannot be told apart from learning. Averaging reciprocal groups, one with each odor shock-paired, cancels that preference.34
  • Red light only. Flies cannot see dim red light, so they choose by smell. Run training and testing under a red LED.3
  • Balanced odors. Set the dilutions so untrained flies split about evenly between the two odors, and check this each day. A clear preference before training weakens the score after training.34

2.2 Measurement & Analysis

Score memory with the performance index, and run two controls that rule out a smell or shock problem.

Performance index

Learning or memory score

Flies that avoided the shock-paired odor, minus flies that chose it, divided by the flies in both choice tubes. The two reciprocal groups are averaged into one index.3

Retention

Score after a delay

The performance index measured after a delay. The discussion below lists the memory phase each delay measures.3

Odor acuity

Sensory control

Untrained flies choose between one odor and air for 2 min. Avoiding the odor shows they can smell it.3

Shock reactivity

Sensory control

Flies choose between a tube with 60 V shock and one without for 2 min. Escaping the shock shows they can feel it.3

+ Record for each group: genotype, age, odor dilutions, shock voltage and the delay between training and test.

2.3 Percent avoiding the shock-paired odor

Enter the counts from one group. The note below turns the same counts into a performance index.

Inline calculator

Type the values your tracker recorded.

Avoided

80.0%

With 80 flies avoiding and 20 choosing the shock-paired odor, the performance index is (80 − 20) / (80 + 20) = 0.6 3. Average it with the reciprocal group's index to score the experiment.

§ 3

Results

3.1 Sample apparatus output

Tube counts from one experiment: two groups, each trained with a different shock-paired odor.

Table 1 · Per-animal Drosophila Olfactory Conditioning scoring output

GroupShock-paired odorAvoidedChosePerformance index
Group 14-methylcyclohexanol80200.6
Group 23-octanol75250.5

Illustrative counts that Malik and Hodge (2014) use to show the calculation. The experiment's performance index is the mean of the two groups: (0.6 + 0.5) / 2 = 0.55.

§ 4

Discussion

Limitations of the paradigm, methodological caveats, and current directions.

4.1 Common confounds

Variables that can shift Drosophila Olfactory Conditioning results apart from the effect under study.

Smell and shock sensing

A line that cannot smell the odors or feel the shock scores low even if its memory works, so run the odor acuity and shock reactivity controls alongside memory tests.3

Genetic background

Malik and Hodge outcross mutant and transgenic lines to a wild-type strain for at least six generations to control for genetic background.3

Room humidity

Okray et al. call humidity crucial for shock training: keep the room at or above 55%, with about 70% optimal.4

Shock and odor strength

Avoidance rises with shock intensity and odor concentration. Hold both constant across the groups you compare.2

4.2 Construct validity caveats

Each test delay reads a different memory phase. Testing right after training measures learning; 30 min or 1 h gives short-term memory, and 3 h gives mid-term memory 3. Spaced training builds long-term memory that needs CREB-dependent transcription and can last a week, while massed training builds anesthesia-resistant memory 3. After one training session, wild-type memory declines over about seven hours but is still present at 24 h 2.

4.3 Special considerations

How many flies go in one training group?

It varies by lab: about 25 flies in Malik and Hodge 3, about 100 in Okray et al. 4 and about 150 in the original Tully and Quinn design 2. Okray et al. add that most published olfactory memory data use at least 8 performance indices for each genotype or condition, each from 200 flies 4.

How is long-term memory tested?

Give 5 training cycles 15 min apart (spaced). Massed training, the same 5 cycles back to back, builds anesthesia-resistant memory instead. Keep the flies at 18 °C and 70% humidity in the dark, move them to 25 °C at least 1 h before testing, and test 24 h after training 3.

What does a performance index of 0 mean?

The flies split evenly between the two odors and showed no memory 4. By the Malik and Hodge formula, 1 means every fly avoided the shock-paired odor 3. Okray et al. subtract the other way, so their perfect score is −1 4.

4.4 Current directions

Quarterly editorial review of emerging Drosophila Olfactory Conditioning methodology. Q4 2026

Emerging

From genes to circuits

Okray et al. (2025) note that memory studies have moved from single genes to the neural circuits behind memory, while the T-maze test has changed little.

Emerging

Color and odor together

A recent protocol pairs color cues with odors to study multisensory learning (Okray et al. 2025).

§ 5

Background references

5 selected methods and validation studies of the Drosophila Olfactory Conditioning, from any lab.

  1. Quinn WG, Harris WA, Benzer S. Conditioned behavior in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1974;71(3):708-712. PMID:4207071
  2. Tully T, Quinn WG. Classical conditioning and retention in normal and mutant Drosophila melanogaster. J Comp Physiol A. 1985;157(2):263-277. doi:10.1007/BF01350033
  3. Malik BR, Hodge JJL. Drosophila adult olfactory shock learning. J Vis Exp. 2014;(90):e50107. doi:10.3791/50107
  4. Okray Z, Jacob PF, Moszynski JP, Talbot CB, Waddell S. Classical conditioning of adult Drosophila. Cold Spring Harb Protoc. 2025;2025(8):pdb.prot108566. doi:10.1101/pdb.prot108566
  5. Busto GU, Cervantes-Sandoval I, Davis RL. Olfactory learning in Drosophila. Physiology (Bethesda). 2010;25(6):338-346. doi:10.1152/physiol.00026.2010
Drosophila Olfactory Operant Conditioning
Drosophila Olfactory Operant Conditioning
$4,900.00
Added to quoteView Quote