Updated for 2026

ANY-maze Alternatives
Best Behavioral Tracking Software 2026

An objective, feature-by-feature comparison to help you choose the right behavioral tracking platform for your lab.

ConductVision

Conduct Science
100

Feature Score

  • 30+ fps tracking
  • 11 body points
  • 13+ species
  • 12 study modules
  • 15+ maze paradigms
VS

ANY-maze

Stoelting Co.
28

Feature Score

  • 6–8 fps tracking
  • Custom body points
  • 2 species
  • 3 study modules
  • 9 maze paradigms

Behavioral Research Needs Are Evolving

In 2026, behavioral neuroscience demands more than simple centroid tracking. Modern experiments require higher frame rates, markerless pose estimation, multi-animal tracking, and AI-driven precision — capabilities that legacy platforms were never designed to deliver.

ANY-maze by Stoelting Co. has served the research community since 2000, but researchers increasingly report limitations in speed, flexibility, and analytical depth. Here's how the current landscape compares.

Feature-by-Feature Comparison

FeatureConductVisionRecommendedANY-maze
Tracking
Tracking MethodAI Markerless (Pose Estimation)Contour-based (center of mass)
Frame Rate30+ fps6–8 fps
Body Points Tracked11None
Pose Estimation✓✗
Real-time Tracking✓✓
3D Tracking✓✗
Analysis
Multi-animal TrackingUnlimited1
Social Interaction✓✗
Zone Analysis✓✓
Batch Processing✓✗
Cloud Processing✓✗
Usability
Coding Required✓✓
Species Supported13+2
Study Type Modules123
Maze Compatibility15+9
Trial Available✓✓
#1

ConductVision (by Conduct Science)

The Most Advanced AI-Powered Behavioral Tracking Platform

  • AI-powered markerless tracking with 11-point pose estimation
  • 30+ fps frame rate for high-speed behavioral capture
  • Multi-species support across 13+ species out of the box
  • 12+ study type modules covering social, maze, locomotor, and more
  • Batch video processing for high-throughput experiments
  • No coding or machine learning expertise required
  • Compatible with 15+ standard behavioral paradigms
  • IR and visible light camera support
  • Real-time tracking with live visualization
  • Cloud processing for resource-intensive analyses
Species: Mouse, Rat, Zebrafish, Drosophila, C. elegans, Non-human Primates, Birds, Dogs, Cats, Cattle, Pigs, Insects, Aquatic Invertebrates
Study Types: Social Interaction, Maze Navigation, Locomotor Activity, Multi-species, Anxiety & Fear, Memory & Learning, Grooming & Stereotypy, Gait Analysis, Sleep/Wake, Feeding & Drinking, Pain Assessment, Seizure Detection
Maze Paradigms: Open Field, Elevated Plus Maze, Morris Water Maze, Barnes Maze, T-Maze, Y-Maze, Radial Arm Maze, Fear Conditioning, Forced Swim, Tail Suspension, Light/Dark Box, Social Interaction Chamber, Novel Object Recognition, Rotarod, Beam Walk
Output Formats: CSV, Excel, JSON, PDF Reports, Video Overlay
Camera Support: IR (Infrared), Visible Light, USB, GigE, Depth Cameras
Pricing: Competitive — Per-seat, annual or perpetual
Support: 24/7 email + live chat + dedicated onboarding

Best for: Any lab seeking AI-powered, scalable behavioral tracking without coding requirements — from single-animal maze studies to multi-species social interaction research.

Explore ConductVision
#2

ANY-maze (by Stoelting Co.)

Reliable but Becoming Outpaced

Strengths

  • Easy initial setup for single-animal experiments
  • Zone-based tracking with intuitive interface
  • Widely adopted in academic labs
  • Good maze protocol library

Limitations

  • Low frame rate (6–8 fps) misses fast behaviors
  • Contour-based tracking cannot detect posture or body parts
  • Limited to single-animal tracking in most configurations
  • No batch processing — experiments must be analyzed one at a time
  • Basic output formats with limited export options
  • No AI or deep learning capabilities
  • Struggles with low-contrast animals or complex backgrounds
Species: Mouse, Rat
Study Types: Maze Navigation, Locomotor Activity, Anxiety & Fear
Pricing: Mid-range (~$3,000–$6,000)
Support: Email + documentation

Best for: Small labs running simple single-animal locomotor studies on a moderate budget

Other Behavioral Tracking Alternatives

#3

EthoVision XT

Noldus Information Technology

Powerful but High Complexity and Cost

25–30 fps3 body ptsPremium ($10,000–$25,000+)
Full Comparison →
#4

DeepLabCut

Mathis Lab (Open Source)

Powerful Pose Estimation with High Barriers to Entry

15–120 (GPU dependent) fpsCustom (user-defined) body ptsFree (but requires GPU hardware + engineering time)
Full Comparison →
#5

ToxTrac

Open Source

Free Lightweight Tool for Simple Locomotion

15–30 fpsCustom body ptsFree
Full Comparison →
#6

SMART 3.0

Panlab / Harvard Bioscience

Legacy Platform with Limited Modern Capabilities

25 fps1 body ptsMid-range (~$4,000–$8,000)
Full Comparison →
#7

Bonsai

NeuroGEARS (Open Source)

Flexible Visual Programming but Steep Integration Curve

Hardware dependent fpsCustom body ptsFree
Full Comparison →

ConductVision — A True Step Forward in 2026

With 11-point AI pose estimation, 30++ fps tracking, 13+ species support, and 12 analysis modules, ConductVision delivers the precision, versatility, and simplicity that modern behavioral research demands — no coding required.

Learn More About ConductVisionRequest a Demo

References

  1. ConductVision — conductscience.com/conductvision
  2. ANY-maze — anymaze.co.uk
  3. Mathis, A., et al. (2018). DeepLabCut: markerless pose estimation. Nature Neuroscience, 21, 1281–1289.
  4. Rodriguez, A., et al. (2018). ToxTrac: A fast and robust software for tracking organisms. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 9(3), 460–464.

Built for scientists. Trusted by researchers. Powered by Conduct Science.